American socio-philosophical utopia: the genesis and problems of representation
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-3-402-410Keywords:
utopia, America, Henry Thoreau, Fredrick Skinner, Robert Nozick, Richard Rorty, Walden, «postmodern bourgeois liberalism», behaviorism, retrotopia, hauntology, conspiracy theoryAbstract
The genesis of the genre of socio-philosophical utopia in American intellectual culture seems an important research topic since it is in this concept that the ontological, epistemological, anthropological, axiological, philosophical and historical meanings of the era and culture come together. The purpose of the work is to discover the semantic unity of the American utopia and understand the reasons for its crisis. The tradition of American utopia is taken for analysis due to the significance that it had for the formation of this culture and civilization as the embodied «city upon a hill», «society of equal opportunities», «beacon of hope». Henry Thoreau, Burres Fredrick Skinner, Robert Nozick, and Richard Rorty are taken as representatives of the American socio-philosophical utopia. Attention is drawn to the distinctive feature of the American utopia — its open nature, the absence of fundamental, predetermined guidelines, and pluralism. The paper provides conclusions about the causes of the crisis of utopian theorizing in American culture, which, in our opinion, is associated with: the feeling of the «end of history» that has become established in the public consciousness of the era of late capitalism, which leads to the rejection of the future in favor of the endless repetition of the same plots and to being doomed to remain in frozen time; retrotopia as a search for an optimal life project in the past, not the future; hauntology as a state of once existing but never realized hope for a progressive movement into the future; conspiracy theories as a way of explaining the world through conspiracy and deception. For the globalized society of late capitalism, all this gives rise to disappointment, depression as the main symptom of the time, longing for other, no longer accessible cultural development scenarios, and a nagging feeling of nostalgia.References
Баталов Э.Я. Социальная утопия и утопическое сознание в США. М.: Наука, 1982. 336 с.
Бауман З. Ретротопия / пер. с англ. В.Л. Силаевой. М.: ВЦИОМ, 2019. 160 с.
Венедиктова Т.В. Разговор по-американски: дискурс торга в литературной традиции США. М.: Новое лит. обозрение, 2003. 328 с.
Нозик Р. Анархия, государство и утопия / пер. с англ. Б.С. Пинскера. М.: ИРИСЭН, 2008. 424 с.
Рорти Р. Обретая нашу страну: политика левых в Америке 20 века / пер. с англ. И.В. Хестановой, Р.З. Хестанова. М.: Дом интеллект. кн., 1998. 128 с.
Рорти Р. Случайность, ирония, солидарность / пер. с англ. И.В. Хестановой, Р.З. Хестанова. М.: Русское феноменол. о-во, 1996. 282 с.
Рорти Р. Троцкий и дикие орхидеи / пер. с англ. А. Эткинд // Неприкосновенный запас. 2001. № 3(17). С. 7–17.
Торо Г.Д. Высшие законы / пер. с англ. З.А. Александровой, Э.Ф. Осиповой, В.В. Сонькина. М.: Республика, 2001. 412 с.
Торо Г.Д. Уолден, или Жизнь в лесу / пер. с англ. З.А. Александровой. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1962. 240 с.
Фишер М. Капиталистический реализм / пер. с англ. Д.Ю. Кралечкина. Екатеринбург: Ультракультура 2.0, 2010. 144 с.
Halafoff A., Weng E., Roginski A., Rocha C. Introduction to the special issue: (Con)spirituality, science and COVID-19 // Journal for the Academic Study of Religion. 2022. Vol. 35, no. 2. P. 133–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jasr.23529
Mancosu М., Vassallo S., Vezzoni C. Believing in conspiracy theories: evidence from an exploratory analysis of Italian survey data // South European Society and Politics. 2017. Vol. 22, iss. 3. P. 327–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1359894
Oliver J.E., Wood Th. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States // JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014. Vol. 174, no. 5. P. 810–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
Rorty R. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 238 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643
Skinner B.F. Walden Two. N.Y.: Macmillan Co., 1948. 266 p.
References
Batalov, E.Ya. (1982). Sotsial’naya utopiya i utopicheskoe soznanie v SShA [Social utopia and social hope in USA]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 336 p.
Bauman, Z. (2019). Retrotopiya [Retrotopia]. Moscow: VTZIOM Publ., 160 p.
Fisher, M. (2010). Kapitalisticheskiy realizm [Capitalist realism]. Moscow: Ultrakultura 2.0 Publ., 144 p.
Halafoff, A., Weng, E., Roginski, A. and Rocha, C. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: (Con)spirituality, science and COVID-19. Journal for the Academic Study of Religion. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 133–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jasr.23529
Mancosu, М., Vassallo, S. and Vezzoni, C. (2017). Believing in conspiracy theories: evidence from an exploratory analysis of Italian survey data. South European Society and Politics. Vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 327–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1359894
Nozick, R. (2008). Anarkhiya, gosudarstvo i utopiya [Anarchy, state and utopia]. Moscow: IRISEN Publ., 424 p.
Oliver, J.E. and Wood, Th. (2014). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine. Vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 810–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
Rorty, R. (1990). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 238 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643
Rorty, R. (1996). Sluchaynost’, ironiya, solidar-nost’ [Contingency, irony, and solidarity]. Moscow: Russkoe Fenomenologicheskoe Obschestvo Publ., 282 p.
Rorty, R. (1998). Obretaya nashu stranu: politika levykh v Amerike 20 veka [Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America]. Moscow: Dom Intellektualnoy Knigi Publ., 128 p.
Rorty, R. (2001). [Trotsky and the wild orchids]. Neprikosnovenny Zapas. No. 3(17), pp. 7–17.
Skinner, B.F. (1948). Walden Two. New York: Macmillan Co Publ., 266 p.
Thoreau, H.D. (1962). Uolden, ili Zhizn’ v lesu [Walden or life in the woods]. Moscow: AN SSSR Publ., 240 p.
Thoreau, H.D. (2001). Vysshie zakony [Higher laws]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 412 p.
Venediktova, T.V. (2003). Razgovor po-amerikanski: diskurs torga v literaturnoy traditsii SShA [American conversation: bargaining discourse in the US literary tradition]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 328 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.