Evolution of the concept of the self in the European-American tradition

Psychology

Authors

  • Leonid Ya. Dorfman Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-1-74-87%20

Keywords:

European-American tradition, evolution of the self, multiple selves, behavioral self, cognitive self, humanistic-existential self

Abstract

Evolutionary-historical and philosophical turns indicate changes of the concepts of the self in the European-American tradition. The ideas about the self go back to the religious idea of soul. But this idea is unacceptable for scientific purposes. R. Descartes was the first major thinker who used the self as an alternative to the soul. For R. Descartes, the main question was how the «self», being immaterial, fits into the material world, governed by mechanical laws. Although R. Descartes replaced the concept of soul with the concept of «self», unitary ideas about the soul were transferred to «self». The idea of a single (unitary) «self» gradually gave way to the ideas of a differentiated «self» and its integration. The word «self» came into use in the English language regardless of R. Descartes. It is believed to have first appeared as a noun around the year 1300 and had negative connotations, following the religious tradition of viewing man as the source of sins. Fundamental changes of the self occurred in the second half of the 19th century. A multiple view of the self fundamentally contradicted the religious understanding of the soul, the essence of which was supposed to be indivisible. W. James showed that a person has as many selves as there are people who recognize him and carry his image in their minds. American psychology identifies and analyzes three important and influential areas: behavioral, cognitive, and humanistic-existential. Theories of the self arise in different and broad contexts, grounded on various paradigms. The paper considers psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive, social, narrative, humanistic, and existential models of the self. Currently, a common feature of research on the self is fragmentation. It is assumed that integrative (through actual paradigms) theories of the self will be put forward.

Author Biography

Leonid Ya. Dorfman, Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Humanities

References

Аронова Е.А., Моросанова В.И. Типологическая структура самосознания и саморегуляции у старшеклассников // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2008. Т. 1, № 1 С. 37–44. Василевская Е.Ю., Молчанова О.Н. Возможные Я: обзор зарубежных исследований // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2016. Т. 13, № 4. С. 801–815. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.17323/1813-8918-2016-4-801-815

Гершкович В.А., Фаликман М.В. Когнитивная психология в поисках себя // Российский журнал когнитивной науки. 2018. Т. 5, № 4. С. 28–46.

Джеймс У. Принципы психологии. Глава Х. Сознание Я / пер. с англ. В.Г. Николаева // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2018. Т. 20, вып. 1–2. С. 24–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30936/1606-951X2018-20-1/2-24-48

Дорфман Л.Я. Я–концепция: дифференциация и интеграция // Интегральная индивидуальность, Я–концепция, личность / под ред. Л.Я. Дорфмана. М.: Смысл, 2004. С. 96–123.

Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Четырехфакторный опросник Я: его концептуальный и психометрический анализ // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2020. № 75. С. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/75/4

Карпинский К.В. Профессиональное самоотношение личности и методика его психологической диагностики. Гродно: Изд-во Гродн. гос. унта, 2010. 140 с.

Кон И.С. Открытие Я. М.: Политиздат, 1978. 367 с.

Леонтьев Д.А. Очерк психологии личности. 2е изд. М.: Смысл, 1997. 64 с.

Логинов Н.И., Спиридонов В.Ф. Воплощенное познание (embodied cognition): основные направления исследований // Вестник СанктПетербургского университета. Психология. Педагогика. 2017. Т. 7, № 4. С. 343–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.404

Мазилов В.А., Слепко Ю.Н. Зарубежная психология в начале XXI века: Эскиз к портрету. Ярославль: Изд-во ЯГПУ им. К.Д. Ушинского, 2018. 140 с.

Маслоу А.Г. Новые рубежи человеческой природы / пер. с англ. Г.А. Балла, А.П. Попогребского. М: Смысл, 1999. 425 с.

Мерлин В.С. Структура личности. Характер, способности, самосознание: учеб. пособие. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. гос. пед. ин-та, 1990. 109 с.

Миллер Дж., Галантер Е., Прибрам К. Планы и структура поведения / пер. с англ. О.С. Виноградовой, Е.Д. Хомской. М.: Прогресс, 1964. 238 с.

Петровский В.А. «Я» в персонологической перспективе. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2013. 504 с.

Солсо Р.Л. Когнитивная психология / пер. с англ. С. Комарова. 6-е изд. М.: Питер, 2006. 592 с.

Столин В.В. Самосознание личности. М.: Издво Моск. ун-та, 1983. 284 с.

Токарева Г.В., Дорфман Л.Я. Имплицитные процессы и их исследование в западной психоло

гии // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Психология. 2014. Т. 7, № 1. С. 17–27.

Тхостов A.Ш. Топология субъекта (опыт феноменологического исследования) // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология. 1994. № 2. С. 3–13.

Allport G.W. The productive paradoxes of William James // Psychological Review. 1943. Vol. 50, iss. 1. P. 95–120. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0057717

Anderson J.R. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 7th ed. N.Y.: Worth Publishers, 2010. 469 p.

Baars B.J. The cognitive revolution in psychology. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1986. 443 p.

Barresi J., Martin R. History as prologue: Western theories of the self // The Oxford Handbook of the Self / ed. by S. Gallagher. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 33–56. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548019.003.0002

Behaviourism: The early years. Vol. 1: Reflex, habit and implicit response: The early elaboration of theoretical and methodological behaviourism 1915– 1928 / ed. by R.H. Wozniak. London: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994. Benjamin L.T. A brief history of modern psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007. 246 p.

Bergson H. Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1910. 280 p.

Bhar S.S., Kyrios M. The self-concept: theory and research // The Self in understanding and treating psychological disorders / ed. by M. Kyrios et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016. P. 8–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9781139941297.003

Boring E.G. History of experimental psychology. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950. 777 p.

Bruner J.S. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986. 222 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019

Bruner J.S., Goodnow J.J., Austin G.A. A study of thinking. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, 1956. 330 p.

Cameron-Smith C. The story of the self: A grounded theory perspective. Doctoral diss. Rand African Yniversity, 2004.

Catania A.C. The operant behaviorism of B.F. Skinner // The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1984. Vol. 7, iss. 4. P. 473–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00026728

Chomsky N. «Verbal behavior» by B.F. Skinner: review // Language. 1959. Vol. 35, no. 1. P. 26–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/411334

Danziger K. Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage, 1997. 224 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815

Danziger K. The historical formation of selves // Self and identity: Fundamental issues / ed. by R.D. Ashmore, L.J. Jussim. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1997. P. 137–159. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oso/9780195098266.003.0006

Existential psychology / ed. by R. May. N.Y.: Random House, 1961. 126 p.

Fuchs A.H. Contributions of American mental philosophers to psychology in the United States // History of Psychology. 2000. Vol. 3, iss. 1. P. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1093-4510.3.1.3

Greenwood J.D. Neobehaviorism, radical behaviorism, and problems of behaviorism // Greenwood J.D. A Conceptual History of Psychology: Exploring the Tangled Web. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015. P. 410–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.012

Harré R. The Second Cognitive Revolution // After Cognitivism: A Reassessment of Cognitive Science and Philosophy / ed. by K. Leidlmair. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 2009. P. 181–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9992-2_11

Hattie J. Self-Concept. N.Y.: Psychology Press, 2014. 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315802183 Hume D. An enquiry concerning human understanding / ed. by T.L. Beauchamp. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999. 304 p.

Husserl E. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. N.Y.: Collier Books, 1962. 466 p.

James W. The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. London: Macmilian, 1890. 716 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000

Kernis M H., Goldman B.M. Stability and variability in self-concept and self-esteem // Handbook of self and identity / ed. by M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2003. P. 106–127.

Leary M.R., Tangney J.P. The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences // Handbook of self and identity / ed. by M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2003. P. 3–14.

Malone J.C., Cruchon N.M. Radical Behaviotism and the rest of psychology: A review precis of Skinner’s About Behaviorism // Behavior and Philosophy. 2001. Vol. 29. P. 31–57.

Markus H.R., Wurf E. The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective // Annual Review of Psychology. 1987. Vol. 38. P. 299–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503

Marschall C. Kant’s metaphysics of the self // Philosophers’ Imprint. 2010. Vol. 10, no. 8. URL: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0010.00 8/--kant-s-metaphysics-of-the-self?view=image (accessed: 22.01.2024).

Maslow A.H. Motivation and personality. N.Y.: Harper & Brothers, 1954. 411 p.

Maslow A.H. Existential psychology: What’s in it for us? // Existential psychology / ed. by R. May. N.Y.: Random House, 1961. P. 49–57.

Maslow A.H. Toward a psychology of being. N.Y.: Van Nostrand, 1962. 214 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10793-000

May R. Intentionality, the heart of human will // The Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 1965. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 202–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002216786500500209

May R. The discovery of being: Writings in existential psychology. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co., 1994. 194 p.

Mead G.H. A behavioristic account of the significant symbol // Journal of Philosophy. 1922. Vol. 19, iss. 6. P. 157–163. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2939827

Mead G.H. Mind, self, and society / ed. by C.W. Morris. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1934. 440 p. Mill J. Analysis of the phenomena of the human mind: in 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1869. 454 p., 403 p.

Miller G.A. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003. Vol. 7, iss. 3. P. 141–144. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00029-9

Miller G.A., Galanter E., Pribram K.H. Plans and the structure of behavior. N.Y.: Holt, 1960. 236 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10039-000

Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. N.Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967. 351 p.

Oxford English Dictionary / ed. by J. Simpson, E. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1989. Vol. 14. 1016 p.

Rogers C.R. Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1951. 560 p.

Rogers C.R. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the clientcentered framework // Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the Person and the Social Context / ed. by S. Koch. N.Y.: McGraw Hill, 1959. P. 184–256.

Rogers C.R. On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1961. 420 p.

Rogers C.R. The emerging person: A new revolution // Carl Rogers: The man and his ideas / ed. by R.I. Evans. N.Y.: E.P. Dutton & Co, 1975. P. 147–175.

Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. et al. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986. 567 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001

Schultz D.P., Schultz S.E. A history of modern psychology. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. 432 p.

Self and identity: Fundamental issues / ed. by R.D. Ashmore, L.J. Jussim. N.Y: Oxford University Press, 1997. 256 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780195098266.001.0001

Shlein J.M. The Self concept in relation to behavior: Theoretical and empirical research //·Dynamic Social Psychology / ed. by D.G. Dean. N.Y.: Random House, 1969. P. 9–31.

Shotter J. Toward a third revolution in psychology: From inner mental representations to dialogical social practices // Jerome Bruner: Language, Culture, Self / ed. by. D. Bakhurst, S.G. Shanker. London: Sage, 2001. P. 167–183. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4135/9781446217634.n11

Siegel J. The idea of the Self: thought and experience in Western Europe since the seventeenth century. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 734 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818141

Skinner B.F. About behaviorism. N.Y.: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974. 256 p. Skinner B.F. Science and human behavior. N.Y.: Macmillan, 1953. 461 p.

Spencer H. The principles of psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1855. 620 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14065-000

Staats A.W. A Psychological behaviorism theory of personality // Handbook of psychology. Vol. 5: Personality and Social Psychology / ed. by T. Millon, M.J. Lerner, I.B. Weiner. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003. P. 135–158. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/0471264385.wei0506

Todes D. Pavlov’s physiology factory: Experiment, interpretation, laboratory enterprise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. 512 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801866906

Tolman E.Ch. Behavior and psychological man. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1951. 286 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520344822

Watson J.B. Behaviorism. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co, 1930. 304 p.

Watson J.B. Psychology as the behaviorist views it // Psychological Review. 1913. Vol. 20, iss. 2. P. 158–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428

Wong P.T.P. Existential and humanistic theories // Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology / ed. by J.Ch. Thomas, D.L. Segal. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. P. 192–211. Woodward W.R. Lotze, the self, and American psychology // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006. Vol. 291, iss. 1. P. 168–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb53068.x

Yalom I.D. Existential psychotherapy. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1980. 544 p.

References

Allport, G.W. (1943). The productive paradoxes of William James. Psychological Review. Vol. 50, iss. 1, pp. 95–120. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0057717

Anderson, J.R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 7th ed. New York: Worth Publishers, 469 p. Aronova, E.A. and Morosanova, V.I. (eds.) (2008). [The typological structure of self-awareness and self-regulation in high school students]. Teoreticheskaya i experimental’naya psykhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology]. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–44.

Ashmore, R.D. and Jussim, L.J. (1997). Self and identity: Fundamental issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 256 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780195098266.001.0001

Baars, B.J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 443 p. Barresi, J. and Martin, R. (2011). History as prologue: Western theories of the self. S. Gallagher (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Self. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–56. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548019.003.0002

Benjamin, L.T. (2007). A brief history of modern psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ., 246 p.

Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Publ., 280 p.

Bhar, S.S. and Kyrios, M. (2016). The selfconcept: theory and research. M. Kyrios et al. (eds.) The Self in understanding and treating psychological disorders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9781139941297.003

Boring, E.G. (1950). History of experimental psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts Publ., 777 p.

Bruner, J.S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 222 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019

Bruner, J.S., Goodnow, J.J. and Austin, G.A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons Publ., 330 p.

Cameron-Smith, C. (2004). The story of the self: A grounded theory perspective. Doctoral diss. Johannesburg, Rand African Yniversity.

Catania, A.C. (1984). The operant behaviorism of B.F. Skinner. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 473–475. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/s0140525x00026728

Chomsky, N. (1959). «Verbal behavior» by B.F. Skinner: review. Language. Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 26–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/411334

Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage Publ., 224 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815

Danziger, K. (1997). The historical formation of selves. R.D. Ashmore, L.J. Jussim (eds.) Self and identity: Fundamental issues. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780195098266.003.0006

Dorfman, L.Ya. (2004). [Self–concept: differentiation and integration]. Integtral’naya individualnost’, Ya–kontseptsiya, lichnost’, pod red. L.Ya. Dorfmana [L.Ya. Dorfman (ed.) Integral individuality, selfconcept, personality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., pp. 96–123.

Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2020). [The four-factor self questionnaire: Theoretical and psychometric analysis]. Sibirskyy psykhologicheskyy zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Psychology]. No. 75, pp. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/ 17267080/75/4

Fuchs, A.H. (2000). Contributions of American mental philosophers to psychology in the United States. History of Psychology. Vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1093-4510.3.1.3

Gershkovich, V.A. and Falikman, M.V. (2018). [Cognitive psychology in search of itself]. Rossiiskyy zhurnal kognitivnoy nauki [The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science]. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 28–46.

Greenwood, J.D. (2015). Neobehaviorism, radical behaviorism, and problems of behaviorism. Greenwood J.D. A conceptual history of psychology: Exploring the tangled web. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 410–453. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781107414914.012

Harré, R. (2009). The second cognitive revolution. K. Leidlmair (ed.) After cognitivism: A Reassessment of Cognitive Science and Philosophy. Dor drecht, NL: Springer Publ., pp. 181–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9992-2_11

Hattie, J. (2014). Self-concept. New York: Psychology Press, 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315802183

Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 304 p. Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York: Collier Books Publ., 466 p. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. London: Macmilian Publ., 716 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000 James, W. (2018). [The principles of psychology. Chapter 10. The consciousness of the Self]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obschestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 20, iss. 1–2, pp. 24–48. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.30936/1606-951X-2018-20-1/2-24-48

Karpinskiy, K.V. (2010). Professional’noe samootnoshenie lichnosti i metodika ego psykhologicheskoy diagnostiki [Professional self-attitude of a personality and the methodology of its psychological diagnosis]. Grodno: GrSU Publ., 140 p.

Kernis, M.H. and Goldman, B.M. (2003). Stability and variability in self-concept and self-esteem. M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (eds.) Handbook of self and identity. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 106–127.

Kon, I.S. (1978). Otkrytie Ya [Opening I]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 367 p.

Leary, M.R. and Tangney, J.P. (2003). The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (eds.) Handbook of self and identity. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 3–14. Leont’ev, D.A. (1997). Ocherk psykhologii lichnosti [An essay on personality psychology]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 64 p.

Loginov, N.I. and Spiridonov, V.F. (2017). [Key areas of research in the embodied cognition approach]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psykhologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education]. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 343–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/ 11701/spbu16.2017.404 Malone, J.C. and Cruchon, N.M. (2001). Radical Behaviotism and the rest of psychology: A review precis of Skinner’s About Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy. Vol. 29, pp. 31–57.

Markus, H.R. and Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 38, pp. 299–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.ps.38.020187.001503

Marschall, C. (2010). Kant’s metaphysics of the self. Philosothers’ Imprint. Vol. 10, no. 8. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/ 3521354.0010.008/--kant-s-metaphysics-of-theself?view=image (accessed 22.01.2024).

Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers Publ., 411 p.

Maslow, A.H. (1961). Existential psychology: What’s in it for us? R. May (ed.) Existential psychology. New York: Random House Publ., pp. 49–57.

Maslow, A.H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Publ., 214 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10793-000

Maslow, A.H. (1999). Novye rubezhy chelovecheskoy prirody [New frontiers of human nature]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 425 p.

May, R. (ed.) (1961). Existential psychology. New York: Random House Publ., 126 p.

May, R. (1965). Intentionality, the heart of human will. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 202–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002216786500500209

May, R. (1994). The discovery of being: Writings in existential psychology. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Publ., 194 p.

Mazilov, V.A. and Slepko, Yu.N. (2018). Zarubezhnaya psykhologiya v nachale XXI veka: Eskiz k portretu [Foreign psychology at the beginning of the 21th century: A outline for a portrait]. Yaroslavl: YSPU Publ., 140 p.

Mead, G.H. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 19, iss. 6, pp. 157–163. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2939827

Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 440 p.

Merlin, V.S. (1990). Struktura lichnosty: Kharakter, sposobnosty, samosoznanie [Personality structure. Character, abilities, self-awareness]. Perm: PSPU Publ., 109 p.

Mill, J. (1869). Analysis of the phenomena of the human mind: in 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer Publ., 454 p., 403 p.

Miller, G.A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 141–144. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00029-9

Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt Publ., 236 p. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1037/10039-000

Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K.H. (1964). Plany i struktura povedeniya [Plans and the structure of behavior]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 238 p.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Publ., 351 p.

Petrovskiy, V.A. (2013). «Ya» v personalogicheskoy perspective [«Self» in a personological perspective]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 504 p.

Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Publ., 560 p.

Rogers, C.R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client–centered framework. S. Koch (ed.) Psychology: a study of a science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context. New York: McGraw Hill Publ., pp. 184–256.

Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Publ., 420 p.

Rogers, C.R. (1975). The emerging person: A new revolution. R.I. Evans (ed.) Carl Rogers: The man and his ideas. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co Publ., pp. 147–175.

Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. et al. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 567 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001

Schultz, D.P. and Schultz, S.E. (2011). A history of modern psychology. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage, Learning Publ., 432 p.

Shlein, J.M. (1969). The Self concept in relation to behavior: Theoretical and empirical research. D.G. Dean (ed.) Dynamic Social Psychology. New York: Random House Publ., pp. 9–31.

Shotter, J. (2001). Toward a third revolution in psychology: From inner mental representations to dialogical social practices. D. Bakhurst, S. Shanker (eds.) Jerome Bruner: Language, Culture, Self. London: Sage Publ., pp. 167–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217634.n11

Siegel, J. (2005). The idea of the Self: thought and experience in Western Europe since the seventeenth century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 734 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9780511818141 Simpson, J. and Weiner, E. (eds.) (1989). Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,. vol. 14, 1016 p.

Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan Publ., 461 p.

Skinner, B.F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Publ., 256 p.

Solso, R.L. (2006). Kognitivnaya psykhologiya [Cognitive psychology]. Moscow: Piter Publ., 592 p.

Stolin, V.V. (1983). Samosoznanie lichnosty [Self-awareness of personality]. Moscow: MSU Publ., 284 p. Tkhostov, A.Sh. (1994). [Topology of the subject (experience of phenomenological research)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya [Lomonov Psychology Journal]. No. 2, pp. 3–13.

Tokareva, G.V. and Dorfman, L.Ya. (2014). [Investigations of implicit processes in Western psychology]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psykhologiya [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology]. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–27.

Spencer, H. (1855). The principles of psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans Publ., 620 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14065-000

Staats, A.W.(2003). A psychological behaviorism theory of personality.

Millon T., Lerner M.J., Weiner I.B. (eds.) Handbook of psychology. Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Publ., pp. 135–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0506

Todes, D. (2001). Pavlov’s physiology factory: Experiment, interpretation, laboratory enterprise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 512 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801866906

Tolman, E.Ch. (1951). Behavior and psychological man. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 286 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ 9780520344822

Vasilevskaya, E.Yu. and Molchanova, O.N. (2016). [Possible selves: Review of international studies]. Psykhologiya. Zhurnal Vyshey shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 801–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2016-4-801-815

Watson, J.B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review. Vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 158–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428

Watson, J.B. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W.W. Norton & Co Publ., 304 p.

Wong, P.T.P. (2005). Existential and humanistic theories. J.Ch. Thomas, D.L. Segal (eds.) Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Publ., pp. 192–211. Woodward, W.R. (2006). Lotze, the self, and American psychology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 291, iss. 1, pp. 168–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb53068.x

Wozniak, R.H. (ed.) (1994). Behaviourism: The early years. Vol. 1: Reflex, habit and implicit tesponse: The early elaboration of theoretical and methodological behaviourism 1915–1928. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Publ. Yalom, I.D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books Publ., 544 p.

Published

2024-05-13

Issue

Section

Статьи