Game as a foundation of the classical and non-classical aesthetic experience
Philosophy
Keywords:
aesthetic experience, a game, philosophy of art, culture, realism, romanticism, rationalism, irrationalismAbstract
The article is devoted to aesthetics as a philosophical discipline, including the study of theories of origin and vocation of art where one of the key concepts is the game. The author executes a short historical and philosophical analysis of the changes and the accumulation of meanings of given concept and gives a comparative description of its sound in the frame of classical and non-classical understanding of the aesthetic experience. Special attention is paid to the modern aesthetic situation of coexistence of mentioned approaches. In this context, the game — support understanding of culture, culture itself becomes a free game character, the game is treated as an important characteristic of human existence, and is a characteristic of elite culture. Aesthetic experience is seen as an expression of individual moral principles that allow to distinguish between game and non-game.References
(1). Белл Д. Культурные противоречия капитализма // Этическая мысль / отв. ред. А.А. Гусейнов. М., 1990. С. 243–258.
(2). Бердяев Н.А. О русских классиках. Миросозерцание Достоевского. М.: Высшая школа, 1993. 368 с.
(3). Гегель Г.В.Ф. Работы разных лет: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1970–1971. Т. 1. 668 с. (Философское наследие).
(4). Кант И. Критика способности суждения. М.: Мысль, 1966. 564 с. (Философское наследие).
(5). Хейзинга Й. Homo Ludens. В тени завтрашнего дня. М., 2004. 342 с.
(6). Шиллер Ф. О грации и достоинстве // Шиллер Ф. Собр. соч.: в 7 т. Т. 6: Статьи по эстетике. М., 1957. С. 115–170.
(7). Шлегель Ф. Идеи // Литературные манифесты западноевропейских романтиков. М.: Изд-во. МГУ, 1980. С. 60–61.
References
(1). Bell D. [The cultural contradictions of capitalism]. D. Bell. Jeticheskaya mysl’ [Ethical thought]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 243–258. (In Russian).
(2). Berdyaev N.A. O russkih klassikah. Mirosozertsaniye Dostoevskogo [Concerning Russian classics. Dostoevsky’s world view]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1993, 368 p. (In Russian).
(3). Hegel G.W.F. Raboty raznyh let: v 2 tomah. Tom 1 [Works of several years: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1970–1971, 668 p. (In Russian).
(4). Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [The Critique of Judgment]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1966, 564 p. (In Russian).
(5). Huizinga J. Homoludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya [Homo Ludens. In the shadow of tomorrow]. Moscow, 2004, 342 p. (In Russian).
(6). Schiller F. [On grace and dignity]. Schiller F. Sobranie sochinnij: v 7 tomah. Tom 6. Stat’I po jestetike [Oeuvre. In 7 vol., vol. 6. Articles on aesthetics]. Moscow, 1957, pp. 115–170. (In Russian).
(7). Schlegel K.W.F. Idei. Literaturnye manifesty zapadnoevropejskih romantikov [Ideas. Literary manifesto of West-European romanticists]. Moscow, Moscow st. Univ. Publ., 1980, pp. 60–61. (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
