Cognitivism in ethics. The subjectivist approach
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-4-44-49Keywords:
morality, ethics, substantiation, cognitivism, non-cognitivism, subjectivism, objectivism, sociological diagnosis, justice as fairness, commutative principle, distributive principleAbstract
The article provides an overview of morality substantiation problems in philosophy, considering a subjectivist approach to solving them. The main representatives of this approach and the fundamental principles have been studied. The article stresses the importance of morality substantiation through considering the role of morality in the social and philosophical context.The strengths of subjectivist approach are considered, the analysis and evaluation of subjective methodology are given.The basic concepts used in modern subjective ethics discourse are described. We consider both the theoretical and practical meanings of these concepts in relation to the realities of modern society. Using the illustrative examples we show the current value of the input definitions and terms.Comparing various rational behavior strategies we establish the criteria for achieving a fair organization of the social order. Basing on the concept of the classical authors we establish the connection with the fresh theoretical approaches in the sphere of social ethics and political philosophy.Besides, we dwell upon the scale of subjectivist approach problems. The critical assessment shows the applicability of the ethical paradigm under consideration. We also assess the risks of subjectivity as the only and non-alternative instrument of ethical substantiation. We warn about the possible negative consequences of rational egoism abuse. The danger of morality instrumentalization and ethical discourse reduction to moral conformism is identified.References
Аристотель. Никомахова этика / пер. Нины Брагинской // Философы Греции. М.: ЭКСМО-Пресс, 1997. 100 с.
Максимов Л.В. Очерк современной метаэтики // Вопросы философии. 1998. № 10. С. 39–54.
Ролз Дж. Теория справедливости. Новосибирск: Изд-во НГУ, 1995. 532 с.
Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки. М.: Канон+: РООИ «Реабилитация», 2009. 1248 с.
Mack E. «Ethischer Egoismus»: Lebensphilosophie oder Ethik? // EWE. 2004. Vol. 15(4). S. 547–550.
References
Aristotle. [Nicomachean ethics]. Filosofy Gretsii [Philosophers of Greece]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 1997, 100 p. (In Russian).
Maksimov L.V. [Sketch on modern metaethics]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. 1998, no 10, pp. 39–54. (In Russian).
Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of fairness]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University Publ., 1995, 532 p. (In Russian).
Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 2009, 1248 p. (In Russian).
Mack E. «Ethischer Egoismus»: Lebensphilosophie oder Ethik? EWE. 2004, vol. 15(4), S. 547–550. (In German).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.