Peer review

Materials submitted to the editorial board undergo an independent ("double-blind") review. No publication fee is charged, no honoraria are paid.     

Rules of scientific articles reviewing

Review form.pdf 

Review Form.docx

                         

                                                                 RULES OF REVIEWING
                                       of scientific articles, sent for publication in the scientific journal
                                             "Vestnik of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology.
                                                                                   Sociology"

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 

1.1 These Rules regulate the procedure of reviewing of author's original articles (materials) and the requirements to the reviews which are received by the editorial board of the scientific journal "Vestnik of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology" (hereinafter referred to as
"editorial board").

1.2 Reviewing (expert evaluation) of manuscripts of scientific articles in the Editorial Board is carried out in order to select the most valuable and relevant (promising) scientific papers, ensuring the maintenance of a high scientific level of the Journal as a whole, as well as by promoting relevant research through the evaluation of manuscripts by highly qualified experts.

1.3 All materials submitted for publication in journals are subject to reviewing.

1.4 The following basic notions are used in these Regulations:

Author - a person or a group of persons (collective of authors) involved in the creation of an article based on the results of scientific research.
Editor-in-Chief - a person who heads the editorial board and makes the final decisions regarding the production and publication of the journal.
Editorial Secretary is a specialist who organizes and supervises intra-editorial work on planning, timely and high-quality preparation of the journal materials for publication.
Plagiarism - is a deliberate appropriation of authorship of someone else's work of science or art, someone else's ideas or inventions. Plagiarism can be a violation of copyright, patent law and as such may entail legal liability.
Editorial Board - an advisory body of a group of authoritative persons who assist the editor-in-chief in the selection, preparation and evaluation of works for publication.
Reviewer - an expert acting on behalf of a scientific journal or publishing house who conducts a scientific review of an author's materials in order to determine the possibility of their publication.
Reviewing - the procedure of consideration and expert evaluation by reviewers of a scientific article proposed for publication in order to determine the appropriateness of its publication, identifying its strengths and weaknesses, which is important for the improvement of the manuscript author and editorial board.
Manuscript - a work submitted by the author for publication in a scientific journal (typed on a computer).

2. RULES OF SUBMISSION OF MATERIALS FOR REVIEWING

2.1 Research articles, prepared in strict accordance with the Rules for submission of research articles, are accepted for reviewing.
2.2 Article materials must be open, which is certified by the author (s) by signing a license agreement. The presence of a restrictive stamp excludes the possibility of publishing the article.
2.3 If the article corresponds to the profile of the journal and if all the requirements to the design are met, the editorial board accepts the manuscript for review. Editor-in-chief sends it for reviewing.

3. ORGANIZATION OF REVIEWING

3.1 Scientists who have a recognized authority and who work in the field of knowledge to which the content of the manuscript refers and who have publications on the subject of the reviewed article within the last three years are involved in reviewing.
Employees of third-party scientific organizations may be involved in reviewing.
A reviewer should have a scientific degree of Doctor or Candidate of Sciences.
3.2 Reviewers must follow the "Regulations on Ethical Standards of the Editorial Policy of Perm State National Research University.
3.3 Authors who are doctoral students, postgraduate students and candidates for the degree of Candidate or Doctor of Sciences, along with the article send to the editorial board a free-form review of it by the supervisor / scientific advisor with a justification of the relevance and compliance of the manuscript with the requirements for scientific articles. Graduate students, in addition, submit a certificate from the educational (scientific) organization, certified with a seal, about training in graduate school.
3.4 The Editorial Board welcomes third-party reviews (as a supplement) provided by candidates and doctors of science from other cities and organizations working in the field of knowledge to which the content of the manuscript refers, and who have during the last three years publications on the subject of the reviewed article. Third-party reviews do not exempt received articles from the review process, which is mandatory for all incoming manuscripts.
3.5 The Editorial Board uses the following

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)