The significance of negative philosophical anthropology and its human types in modern times
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2026-3-442-455Keywords:
negative anthropology, fatigue, a nervous person, an old-fashioned person, melancholic person, homo lassus, homo defessusAbstract
The article highlights the significance of negative anthropology for the social and human sciences. It explores the reasons behind its emergence and develops a definition of the concept as a set of ideas focusing on those human characteristics that are considered negative in the classical and essential sense. It is emphasized that negative anthropology is not identical to apophatic anthropology, which focuses on the fundamental unknowability of the human essence. On the contrary, negative anthropology has an empirical dimension and captures real, historically and culturally determined human states that have traditionally fallen outside the purview of positive anthropology. The article demonstrates the importance of its typologies, which are linked to the human lifeworld, particularly in recent decades. The study constructs a chronology of types: from the nervous, melancholic, and outdated person to homo lassus (defessus). This typology, however, is not limited to a description of alienation, but encompasses a wide range of negative modes of existence, each with its own historical prerequisites and foundations, as demonstrated by the author’s insights, analysis, and reflection on the works of J. Radkau, G. Anders, K. Johannisson, J. Vigarello, Byung-Chul Han, V. V. Varava, G. Agamben, and others. In addition to self-disappointment, a dangerous tendency is revealed, defined as taedium vitae, which threatens to develop into a fatigue of being human, potentially resulting in self-overcoming (so-called transhumanist tendencies). Furthermore, the author notes an urgent need for the emergence of a culture of leisure, idleness, peace, and so-called not-potency. The question arises: “Is it necessary to flee fatigue?” Such escapism is an escape from one of our aspects, which should not be excluded from the life of a human being. By isolating fatigue as a separate domain, we seem to fragment our existence, which should not degenerate into a taedium vitae, but should instead be connected to a favorite activity, leisure, and become a signal for proper rest. The human types identified by negative anthropology are the result of an understanding of human existence over recent decades in a transforming world, with an eye toward the future. The task of other social and human sciences is to work with particular manifestations of these specific phenomena, with modern language (especially psychological categorizations) being an example of that as it has developed terms that describe the situation of homo lassus.
References
Агамбен Дж. О том, чего мы можем не делать // Нагота. М.: Издательство Грюндриссе, 2014. 204 с.
Бодрийяр Ж. Общество потребления: его мифы и структуры. М.: Республика; Культурная революция, 2006. 269 с.
Валуев О.С. Экзистенциальная усталость как психологическая проблема силы и слабости бытия-в-мире // Проблемы психологического благополучия: материалы Международной научно-практической онлайн-конференции, Екатеринбург; Фергана, 07 апреля 2023 года. Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2023. С. 24–32. EDN: GKRHQC
Варава В.В. Усталость быть человеком (этические основания нечеловеческой антропологии) // Человек.RU. 2020. № 15. С. 180–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32691/2410-0935-2020-15-180-186 EDN: POKBWY
Вигарелло Ж. История усталости от Средневековья до наших дней. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2024. 552 с.
Гуревич П.С. Что такое негативная антропология? // Философия и культура. 2013. № 3. С. 275–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2013.03.1 EDN: PXUKAV
Делёз Ж. L'Épuisé («Истощенный») / пер. с фр. А. Тарасова // Academia.edu. 2014. URL: https://www.academia.edu/9492239/Жиль_Делёз_Истощённый_2_4_ (дата обращения: 09.03.2026).
Дорожкин Е. Мишель Фуко об «антропологическом круге» // Философская антропология. 2023. Т. 9, № 2. С. 122–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2023-9-2-122-129 EDN: KMVWAS
Иванов Д.И., Варава В.В. Триумф нечеловеческого, или Taedium vitae «конца истории» // Вопросы философии. 2025. № 1. С. 34–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-1-34-50 EDN: IELRHU
Костомаров А.С. Проект негативной антропологии в философии Дж. Агамбена // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2025. № 2(83). С. 178–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54398/1818-510X.2025.83.2.018 EDN: EOESZK
Неаполитанский М. Мыслить общество выгорания: усталость как философский концепт // Нож. 2024. 29 окт. URL: https://knife.media/tired (дата обращения: 09.03.2026).
Радкау Й. Эпоха нервозности. Германия от Бисмарка до Гитлера. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2017. 552 с.
Спирова Э.М. «Негативная антропология» Гюнтера Андерса, или кризис прометеевского проекта // Вестник КалмГУ. 2020. № 4(48). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/negativnaya-antropologiya-gyuntera-andersa-ili-krizis-prometeevskogo-proekta (дата обращения: 09.03.2026). EDN: ZWROQL
Фуко М. Слова и вещи: археология гуманитарных наук. СПб.: A-cad, 1994. 405 с.
Хан Б.-Ч. Общество усталости: негативный опыт в эпоху чрезмерного позитива = Müdigkeitsgesellschaft. М.: АСТ, 2023. 160 с. URL: https://www.rulit.me/books/obshchestvo-ustalosti-negativnyj-opyt-v-epohu-chrezmernogo-pozitiva-read-800179-7.html (дата обращения: 09.03.2026).
Хандке П. Три эссе: Об усталости; О джукбоксе; Об удачном дне. СПб.; М.: Jaromír Hladík press; libra, 2022. 176 с.
Эренберг А. Быть собой — смертельная ловушка современной цивилизации // Un-sci.com. URL: https://un-sci.com/ru/2024/12/09/byt-soboj-smertelnaya-lovushka-sovremennoj-czivilizaczii-alen-erenberg (дата обращения: 10.03.2026).
Юханнисон К. История меланхолии: о страхе, скуке и печали в прежние времена и теперь. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2011. 320 с.
Pieper J. Leisure, The Basis of Culture. South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press, 1998. 160 p.
References
Agamben, D. (2014). [On what we can not do]. Nagota [Nudity]. Moscow: Gryundrisse Publ., 204 p.
Baudrillard, J. (2006) Obschestvo potrebleniya: ego mify i struktury [The consumer society: myths and structures]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 269 p.
Deleuze, G. (2014). L'Épuisé («Istoschennyy») [L'Épuisé (The exhausted)]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/9492239/Жиль_Делёз_Истощённый_2_4_ (accessed: 10.07.2026).
Dorozhkin, E. (2023). [Michel Foucault on the "anthropological circle"]. Filosofskaya antropologiya [Philosophical Anthropology]. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 122–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2023-9-2-122-129
Ehrenberg, A. (2024). [Being oneself is a deadly trap of modern civilization]. Un-sci.com. Available at: https://un-sci.com/ru/2024/12/09/byt-soboj-smertelnaya-lovushka-sovremennoj-czivilizaczii-alen-erenberg (accessed: 10.03.2026).
Foucault, M. (1994). Slova i veschi: arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk [The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences]. Saint Petersburg: A-cad Publ., 405 p.
Gurevich, P.S. (2013). [What is negative anthropology?]. Filosofiya i kul'tura [Philosophy and Culture]. No. 3, pp. 275–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2013.03.1
Han, B.-Ch. (2023). Obschestvo ustalosti: negativnyy opyt v epokhu chrezmernogo pozitiva = Müdigkeitsgesellschaft [The burnout society]. Moscow: AST Publ., 160 p. Available at: https://www.rulit.me/books/obshchestvo-ustalosti-negativnyj-opyt-v-epohu-chrezmernogo-pozitiva-read-800179-7.html (accessed: 09.03.2026).
Handke, P. (2022). Tri esse: Ob ustalosti; O dzhukbokse; Ob udachnom dne [Three essays: On fatigue; On the jukebox; On the successful day]. Saint Petersburg; Moscow, Jaromír Hladík Press; Libra Publ., 176 p.
Ivanov, D.I. and Varava, V.V. (2025). [The triumph of the inhuman, or Taedium vitae of the "end of history"]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 1, pp. 34–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-1-34-50
Johannisson, K. (2011) Istoriya melankholii: o strakhe, skuke i pechali v prezhnie vremena i teper’ [History of melancholy: on fear, boredom and sadness in former times and now]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 320 p.
Kostomarov, A.S. (2025). [The project of negative anthropology in the philosophy of G. Agamben]. Kaspiyskiy region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura [The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture]. No. 2 (83), pp. 178–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54398/1818-510X.2025.83.2.018
Neapolitanskiy, M. (2024). [Thinking the burnout society: fatigue as a philosophical concept]. Nozh [Knife]. 29 October. Available at: https://knife.media/tired (Accessed: 09.03.2026).
Pieper, J. (1988). Leisure, the basis of culture. South Bend: St. Augustine's Press, 160 p.
Radkau, J. (2017). Epokha nervoznosti. Germaniya ot Bismarka do Gitlera [The age of nervousness. Germany from Bismarck to Hitler]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 552 p.
Spirova, E.M. (2020). [Günther Anders' "negative anthropology", or the crisis of the Promethean project]. Vestnik KalmGU [Bulletin of Kalmyk University]. No. 4 (48). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/negativnaya-antropologiya-gyuntera-andersa-ili-krizis-prometeevskogo-proekta (accessed: 09.03.2026).
Valuev, O.S. (2023). [Existential fatigue as a psychological problem of the strength and weakness of being-in-the-world]. Problemy psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy onlayn-konferentsii [Problems of Psychological Well-Being: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Online Conference]. Ekaterinburg: UrGPU Publ.; Fergana Publ., pp. 24–33.
Varava, V.V. (2020). [Fatigue of being human (ethical foundations of non-human anthropology)]. Chelovek.RU. No. 15, pp. 180–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32691/2410-0935-2020-15-180-186
Vigarello, G. (2024). Istoriya ustalosti ot Srednevekov’ya do nashikh dney [History of fatigue from the Middle Ages to the present day]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 552 p.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.