The Features of Philological Prose in the Novels of A. Bitov and J. Barnes: On the Problem of Paratextuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2025-3-122-132Keywords:
postmodernism; philological novel; fictional biography; J. Barns, A. Bitov; paratextuality.Abstract
The article explores intertextual inclusions in philological prose through the examples of works by modern writers: Pushkin House (1971) by A. Bitov (USSR) and The Noise of Time (2016) by J. Barnes (England). One of the research objectives is to analyze the legitimacy of considering the novel The Noise of Time as that possessing the features of a philological novel. Since this work is considered in the country of origin as a fictional biography, the article examines the accepted markers of a philological novel and their presence in the novel by J. Barnes. The comparison of the two works reveals a common cultural code since the heroes of the novels are both affected by the time of the Great Terror. A. Bitov's novel is an artistic text that creates a literary portrait of the epoch employing the means of a philological novel. J. Barnes creates secondary text using already published biographies of Dmitri Shostakovich, but creatively rethinks biographical materials. A comparative analysis showed that one of the special features of the novels is their structure, characterized by the presence of several types of interaction between texts, including intertextuality and paratextuality. The novels contain quotes and allusions to classical Russian works of Alexander Pushkin, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Leo Tolstoy. The relationship between the texts and their titles, chapters, and epigraphs helps to create subtext, characteristic of a philological novel, the understanding of which requires at least minimal philological knowledge. A philological novel and a fictional biography novel synthesize memoir, biographical, essayistic, and artistic discourses. For the writer, the facts of biography and fiction become equivalent means of creating a literary image. As material the writer can use diaries or essays written by a historical figure, prototypes of the heroes. The personality of the hero, proposed for the reader as a riddle to solve, allows one to see the hidden meaning of the text, to join the intellectual game.References
Андрианова М. Д. «Бедный всадник» в окружении «Медных людей». Рецепция творчества Пушкина и Достоевского в романе А. Битова «Пушкинский дом» // Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. 2011. № 11. С. 136–141.
Барнс Дж. Шум времени / пер. с англ. Е. Петровой. СПб.: Азбука-Аттикус, 2018. 256 с.
Барт Р. Литература и метаязык // Барт Р. Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика / пер. с фр., сост., общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Г. К. Косикова. М.: Прогресс, 1989. C. 131–133.
Битов А. Пушкинский дом. М.: АСТ, 2023. 492 с.
Генис А. Фотография души. В окрестностях филологического романа // Звезда. 2000. № 9. С. 185–200.
Генис А. Частный случай: Филологическая проза. М.: АСТ, 2009. 376 с.
Женетт Ж. Палимпсесты: литература во второй степени. М.: Наука, 1982. 213 с.
Ильин И. Постструктурализм. Деконструктивизм. Постмодернизм. М.: Интрада, 1996. 256 с.
Киричук Е. В., Ерофеева Н. Е. Дж. Барнс о прозе Г. Флобера: филологический роман как способ «глубокого чтения» // Наука о человеке: гуманитарные исследования. 2022. Т. 16, № 1. С. 67–74. doi 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2022.16.1.8.
Киричук Е. В., Федорова А. В. Литературные аллюзии в романе Д. Лоджа «Мир тесен» // Наука о человеке гуманитарные исследования. 2020. Т. 14, № 4. С. 43–48. doi 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.4.5.
Колесниченко Е. В. Этапы становления личности Д. Шостаковича в «диалоге» с властью (на материале романа Дж. Барнса «Шум времени») // Современная англистика и американистика: актуальные проблемы лингвистики и литературоведения: сб. науч. ст. ⅠⅠ межвуз. науч.-практ. конф. студентов, магистрантов и аспирантов, посвящ. 70-летию Ольги Васильевны Афанасьевой. М.: Диона, 2019. С. 82–86.
Кристева Ю. Избранные труды: Разрушение поэтики: пер. с фр. М.: Рос. полит. энцикл., 2004. 656 с.
Крушинский А. А. Субъект, пространство, время: как читать древнекитайский текст // Идеи и идеалы. 2020. Т. 12, № 3, ч. 1. С. 17–35. doi 10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.3.1-17-35.
Ладохина О. Филологический роман: фантом или реальность русской литературы XX века. Томск: Водолей, 2010. 165 с.
Новиков В. Филологический роман. Старый жанр на исходе столетия // Новый мир. 1999. № 10. С. 193–205.
Сидорова О. Г. «Большой террор» в современном британском романе // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки. 2017. Т. 19, № 4(169). С. 161–175. doi 10.15826/izv2.2017.19.4.071.
Степанова И. М. Филологический роман как «промежуточная словесность» в русской прозе конца XX века // Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки (Филология). 2005. № 6(50). С. 75–82.
Трофимова Л. В. Роман Барбары Фришмут «Пора созревания»: специфика филологического романа // Научный диалог. 2019. № 9. С. 219–229. doi 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-219-229.
Хохлова Е. В. Философские аспекты автобиографической прозы Джулиана Барнса // Новый филологический вестник. 2015. № 1 (32). С. 140–146. doi 10.24411/2072-9316-2015-00013.
Чернигова И. В. Коммуникативный потенциал паратекста французских художественных произведений XVI–XVII веков (на материале авторских и издательских предисловий): дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Иркутск, 2006. 208 с.
Barnes J. The Noise of Time. Jonathan Cape, UK, 2016. 192 p.
Faleev A. N., Filatova M. N., Mayer V. V. Postmodernism: theoretical and methodological problems // ASTRA Salvensis. 2020. Supplement № 1. P. 307–319.
References
Andrianova M. D. ʽBednyy vsadnikʼ v okruzhenii ʽMednykh lyudeyʼ. Retseptsiya tvorchestva Pushkina i Dostoevskogo v romane A. Bitova ʽPushkinskiy domʼ. ['Poor horseman' amidst 'Bronze people'. Reception of Pushkin’s and Dostoevsky’s works in Andrei Bitov’s 'Pushkin House']. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2011, issue 11, pp. 136-141. (In Russ.)
Barnes J. Shum vremeni [The Noise of Time]. Transl. from Eng. by E. Petrova. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Atticus Publ., 2018. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Barthes R. Literatura i metayazyk [Literature and metalanguage]. In: Barthes R. Izbrannyye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Transl. from French, comp., ed. and pref. by G. K. Kosikov. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 131-133. (In Russ.)
Bitov A. Pushkinskiy dom [Pushkin House]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2023. 492 p. (In Russ.)
Genis A. Fotografiya dushi. V okrestnostyakh filologicheskogo romana [The photography of the soul. In the vicinity of the philological novel]. Zvezda [Star], 2000, issue 9, pp. 185-200. (In Russ.)
Genis A. Chastnyy sluchay: Filologicheskaya prosa [A Special Case: Philological Prose]. Мoscow, АSТ Publ., 2009. 376 p. (In Russ.)
Genette J. Palimpsesty: literatura vo vtoroy stepeni [Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 213 p. (In Russ.)
Ilyin I. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1996. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Kirichuk E. V., Erofeeva N. E. Dzh. Barns o proze G. Flobera: filologicheskiy roman kak sposob ʽglubokogo chteniyaʼ [J. Barnes’ considerations about G. Flaubert’s prose: philological novel as a means of ʽprofound readingʼ]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities], 2022, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 67-74. doi 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2022.16.8. (In Russ.)
Kirichuk E. V., Fedorova A. V. Literaturnye allyuzii v romane D. Lodzha ʽMir tesenʼ [Literary allusions in the novel ʽSmall Worldʼ by D. Lodge]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities], 2020, vol. 14, issue 4, pp. 43-48. doi 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.4.5. (In Russ.)
Kolesnichenko E. V. Etapy stanovleniya lichnosti D. Shostakovicha v ʽdialogeʼ s vlast'yu (na materiale romana Dzh. Barnsa ʽShum vremeniʼ) [The stages of the development of D. Shostakovich’s personality in ʽdialogueʼ with power (based on the novel ʽThe Noise of Timeʼ by J. Barnes)]. Sovremennaya anglistika i amerikanistika: aktual'nye problemy lingvistiki i literaturovedeniya: sb. nauch. st. ⅠⅠ mezhvuzovskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov, posvyashchennoy 70-letiyu Ol'gi Vasil'evny Afanas'evoy [Modern English and American Studies: Current Issues of Linguistics and Literary Criticism: a collection of scientific articles of the ⅠⅠ Interuniversity Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Undergraduates and Graduate Students dedicated to the 70th anniversary of birth of Olga Vasil’evna Afanas’eva]. Moscow, Diona Publ., 2019, pp. 82-86. (In Russ.)
Kristeva Yu. Izbrannyye trudy: razrushenie poetiki [Selected Works: Deconstructing Poetics]. Transl. from French. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2004. 656 p. (In Russ.)
Krushinskiy A. A. Subˮekt, prostranstvo, vremya: kak chitat’ drevnekitayskiy text [Subject, space, time: how to read ancient Chinese text]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals], 2020, vol. 12, issue 3, pt. 1, pp. 17-32. doi 10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.3.1-17-35. (In Russ.)
Ladokhina O. Filologicheskiy roman: fantom ili real'nost' russkoy literatury XX veka [The Philological Novel: Phantom or Reality of Russian Literature of the 20th Century]. Tomsk, Vodoley Publ., 2010. 165 p. (In Russ.)
Novikov V. Filologicheskiy roman. Staryy zhanr na iskhode stoletiya [The philological novel. An old genre at the turn of the century]. Novyy mir [New World], 1999, issue 10, pp. 193-205. (In Russ.)
Sidorova O. G. ʽBol’shoy terrorʼ v sovremennom britanskom romane [ʽThe great terrorʼ in the con-
temporary British novel]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 2. Gumanitarnye nauki [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2: Humanities and Arts], 2017, vol. 19, issue 4 (169), pp. 161-175. (In Russ.)
Stepanova I. M. Filologicheskiy roman kak ʽPromezhutochnaya slovesnostˮ v russkoy proze kontsa XX veka [The philological novel as an ʽIntermediate literatureʼ in the Russian prose of the end of 20th century]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki (Filologiya) [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2005, issue 6 (50), pp. 75-82. (In Russ.)
Trofimova L. V. Roman Barbary Frishmut ʽPora sozrevaniyaʼ: spetsifika filologicheskogo romana [Barbara Frishmuth’s novel ʽTime of Ripeningʼ: Specificity of a philological novel]. Nauchnyy dialog [Scientific Dialogue], 2019, issue 9, pp. 219-229. doi 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-219-229. (In Russ.)
Khokhlova E. V. Filosofskie aspekty avtobiograficheskoy prozy Dzhuliana Barnsa [Philosophical aspects of autobiographical prose by Julian Barnes]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik [The New Philological Bulletin], 2015, issue 1 (32), pp. 140-146. doi 10.24411/2072-9316-2015-00013. (In Russ.)
Chernigova I. V. Kommunikativnyy potentsial parateksta frantsuzskikh khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy XVI-XVII vekov (na materiale avtorskikh i izdatel’skikh predisloviy). Diss. kand. filol. nauk [The communicative potential of the paratext of French fiction works of the 16th-17th centuries (based on the material of the authors’ and publishers’ prefaces). Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Irkutsk, 2006. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Barnes J. The Noise of Time. United Kingdom, Jonathan Cape Publ., 2016. 192 p. (In Eng.)
Faleev A. N., Filatova M. N., Mayer V. V. Postmodernism: Theoretical and Methodological Problems. ASTRA Salvensis, 2020, supplement issue 1, pp. 307-319. (In Eng.)
