Intermediality in Donna Tartt’s Novel ‘The Goldfinch’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2025-3-90-97Keywords:
intermediality; polysemantics; pictorial code; poetics; pictoriality of literature.Abstract
The article is dedicated to the study of intermedial elements in Donna Tartt's novel The Goldfinch. The analysis of the literary text is preceded by a consideration of approaches to the phenomenon of intermediality and the problem of synthesis of arts as viewed by specialists who belong to the diverse fields of the humanities. The researchers mentioned in the paper have noted examples of the mutual influence of different artistic codes throughout history, despite the traditional view of the ‘monocode’ nature of individual art forms. This aspect is significant in the theory of intermediality. Within the framework of the proposed analysis of Donna Tartt's novel, the greatest attention was paid to the verbal representation of the pictorial code, whereas previously the cinematic features of the text in the process of its film adaptation were emphasized in studies. The paper explores the images of paintings included in the text regarding them as intermedial elements. In addition, the author's own picturesque style is noted, which uses elements of color and light as well as the symbolism of the paintings to deepen the semantic level of the work. This creative method serves to enhance the aesthetic and psychological effects. A particular focus is on the significance of the painting by Carel Fabritius The Goldfinch, which is connected with different levels of the novel. By virtue of this canvas, such motifs as fate, destiny, and the importance of art are brought to the fore. In addition, in connection with the painting, links between characters are organized, and the plot of the work develops and thickens. The facts offered above allow us to talk about the plot-forming and meaning-forming significance of intermedial elements in the text. The analysis leads to a conclusion that intermediality determines the poetics and is found at different levels of Donna Tartt's novel The Goldfinch.References
Алпатов М. В. Проблема синтеза в искусстве Ренессанса. 1936 // TEHNE. URL: https://tehne.com/event/arhivsyachina/m-v-alpatov-problema-sinteza-v-iskusstve-renessansa-1936 (дата обращения: 18.03.2025).
Белаш А. Н. Музей как «другое пространство» культуры // Музей. Памятник. Наследие. 2018. Вып. 1(3). С. 12–22.
Веселовский А. Н. Историческая поэтика. М.: Высш. шк., 1989. 405 с.
Владимирова Н. Г. Интертекстуальность. Интермедиальность. Интердискурсивность. Великий Новгород: НовГУ им. Ярослава Мудрого, 2016. 170 с.
Генерозова Е. Бабочка // Arzamas. 2017. URL: https://arzamas.academy/micro/animal/1 (дата обращения: 24.03.2025).
Ищенко Е. Н., Попова М. К. Экфрасис как структурообразующий элемент художественного мира и маркер современного отношения общества к искусству в романе Д. Тартт «Щегол» // Вестник Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта. Серия: Филология, педагогика, психология. 2016. № 2. С. 66–73.
Кириенко И. В., Перич О. В. Синтез искусств в художественной картине мира эпохи барокко // Университетский научный журнал. 2021. № 61. С. 184–193.
Лотман Ю. М. Текст и полиглотизм культуры // Лотман Ю. М. Избранные статьи: в 3 т. Т. 1. Статьи по семиотике и типологии культуры. Таллинн: Александра, 1992. С. 142–148.
Набиуллина А. Н. Интермедиальность как составляюшая транзитивной картины мира в современной русскоязычной прозе // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2023. Т. 16, вып. 2. С. 488–452.
Никифорова А. С. Идея синтеза искусств в культуре немецкого романтизма (от И. Г. Гердера до Р. Вагнера) // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7. Философия. 2015. № 3. С. 68–82.
Прохорова В. О. Интермедиальность как стратегия создания художественного мира в романе Донны Тартт «Щегол» // Американистика на Дальнем Востоке. 2020. Вып. 6. С. 166–171.
Столбова Н. В., Железняк В. Н. Опыт искусства в романе Д. Тартт «Щегол» // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехничсеского университета. Культура. История. Философия. Право. 2017. № 4. С. 74–81. doi 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.4.09
Суханова И. А. О парциальной и миметической интермедиальности // Вестник КГУ им. Н. А. Некрасова. 2015. № 2. С. 119–123.
Тресиддер Дж. Щегол // Словарь символов. URL: https://www.booksite.ru/localtxt/tre/sid/der/tresidder_d/slovar_sim/22.htm (дата обращения: 22.07.2025).
Хаминова А. А., Зильберман Н. Н. Теория интермедиальности в контексте современной гуманитарной науки // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2014. № 389. С. 38–45.
Чуканцова В. О. Интермедиальный анализ в системе исследования художественных текстов: преимущества и недостатки // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена. 2009. № 108. C. 140–145.
Шафранская Э. Ф., Гарипова Г. Т., Кешфидинов Ш. Р. «Мир – это гранат»: межкультурная символика райского плода // Журнал фронтирных исследований. Т. 9, № 2(34). 2024. С. 188–201. doi 10.46539/jfs.v9i2.568
Hanks P., Hardcastle K., Hodges F. A Dictionary of First Names. 2019. URL: https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780198610601.001.0001/acref-9780198610601-e-2631 (дата обращения: 24.04.2025).
Louvel L. The Pictorial Third: An Essay into Intermedial Criticism. Routledge, 2018. 243 p.
Petersson S. et al. The Power of the In-Between: Intermediality as a Tool for Aesthetic Analysis and Critical Reflection / S. Petersson, C. Johansson, M. Holdar, S. Callahan. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, 2018. 427 p.
Rajewsky I. O. Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality // Intermédialités / Intermediality. 2005. № 6. P. 43–64.
Tartt D. The Goldfinch. Little, Brown and Company, 2013. 4934 p.
References
Alpatov M. V. Problema sinteza v iskusstve Renessansa. 1936 [The Problem of Synthesis in Renaissance Art. 1936]. TEHNE. Available at: https://tehne.com/event/arhivsyachina/m-v-alpatov-problema-sinteza-v-iskusstve-renessansa-1936 (accessed 18 Mar 2025). (In Russ.)
Belash A. N. Muzey kak ʽdrugoe prostranstvoʼ kul'tury [Museum as an ʽother spaceʼ of culture]. Muzey-pamyatnik-nasledie [Museum-Monument-Heritage], 2018, issue 1 (3), pp. 12-22. (In Russ.)
Veselovskiy A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical Poetics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 405 p. (In Russ.)
Vladimirova N. G. Intertekstual'nost'. Intermedial'nost'. Interdiskursivnost' [Intertextuality. Intermediality. Interdiscursivity]. Veliky Novgorod, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University Press, 2016. 170 p. (In Russ.)
Generozova E. Babochka [Butterfly]. Arzamas, 2017. Available at: https://arzamas.academy/micro/animal/1 (accessed 24 Mar 2025). (In Russ.)
Ishchenko E. N., Popova M. K. Ekfrasis kak strukturoobrazuyushchiy element khudozhestvennogo mira i marker sovremennogo otnosheniya obshchestva k iskusstvu v romane D. Tartt ʽShchegolʼ [Ekphrasis as a structural element of the world of art and a marker of modern society's attitude to it in the novel by D. Tartt ʽThe Goldfinchʼ]. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya [IKBFU's Vestnik. Series: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology], 2016, issue 2, pp.66-73. (In Russ.)
Kirienko I. V., Perich O. V. Sintez iskusstv v khudozhestvennoy kartine mira epokhi barokko [The Synthesis of Arts in the Artistic Worldview Within the Baroque Period]. Universitetskiy nauchnyy zhurnal [Humanities and Science University Journal], 2021, issue 61, pp. 184-193. (In Russ.)
Lotman Yu. M. Tekst i poliglotizm kul'tury [Text and Cultural Polyglotism]. In: Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat'i [Selected Articles]: in 3 vols. Tallinn, Aleksandra Publ., 1992, vol. 1. Stat'i po semiotike i tipologii kul'tury [Articles on semiotics and typology of culture], pp. 142-148. (In Russ.)
Nabiullina A. N. Intermedial'nost' kak sostavlyayushaya tranzitivnoy kartiny mira v sovremennoy russkoyazychnoy proze [Intermediality as a component of the transitive worldview in contemporary Russian-language prose]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2023, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 488-452. (In Russ.)
Nikiforova A. S. Ideya sinteza iskusstv v kul'ture
nemetskogo romantizma (ot I. G. Gerdera do R. Vagnera) [The idea of synthesis of the arts in the culture of German romanticism (from J. G. Herder to R. Wagner)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy], 2015, issue 3, pp. 68-82. (In Russ.)
Prokhorova V. O. Intermedial'nost' kak strategiya sozdaniya khudozhestvennogo mira v romane Donny Tartt ʽShchegolʼ [Intermediality as a strategy for creating an artistic world in Donna Tartt's novel ‘The Goldfinch’]. Amerikanistika na Dal'nem Vostoke [American Studies in the Far East]: Yearly Bulletin, 2020, issue 6, pp. 166-171. (In Russ.)
Stolbova N. V., Zheleznyak V. N. Opyt iskusstva v romane D. Tartt ʽShchegolʼ [The experience of art in the D. Tartt's novel ʽGoldfinchʼ]. Vestnik PNIPU. Kul'tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo. [Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law], 2017, issue 4, pp. 74-81. doi 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.4.09. (In Russ.)
Sukhanova I. A. O partsial'noy i mimeticheskoy intermedial'nosti [On partial and mimetic intermediality]. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova [Vestnik of Nekrasov Kostroma State University], 2015, issue 2, pp. 119-123. (In Russ.)
Tresidder J. Shchegol [Goldfinch]. Slovar' simvolov [The Complete Dictionary of Symbols]. Available at: https://www.booksite.ru/localtxt/tre/sid/der/tresidder_d/slovar_sim/22.htm (accessed 22 July 2025).
Khaminova A. A., Zil'berman N. N. Teoriya intermedial'nosti v kontekste sovremennoy gumanitarnoy nauki [The theory of intermediality in the context of modern humanities]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State Unversity Journal], 2014, issue 389, pp. 38-45. (In Russ.)
Chukantsova V. O. Intermedial'nyy analiz v sisteme issledovaniya khudozhestvennykh tekstov: preimushhestva i nedostatki [Intermediality in the system of approaches to the study of literary texts: advantages and disadvantages]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences], 2009, pp. 140-145. (In Russ.)
Shafranskaya E. F., Garipova G. T., Keshfidinov Sh. R. ʽMir – eto granatʼ: mezhkul'turnaya simvolika rayskogo ploda [ʽThe world as a pomegranateʼ: Intercultural symbolism of the fruit of paradise]. Zhurnal frontirnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Frontier Studies], 2024, vol. 9, issue 2 (34), pp. 188-201. doi: 10.46539/jfs.v9i2.568. (In Russ.)
Hanks P., Hardcastle K., Hodges F. A Dictionary of First Names, 2019. Available at: https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780198610601.001.0001/acref-9780198610601-e-2631 (accessed 24 Apr 2025). (In Eng.)
Louvel L. The Pictorial Third: An Essay into Intermedial Criticism. Routledge, 2018. 243 p. (In Eng.)
Petersson S., Johansson C., Holdar M., and Callahan S. The Power of the In-Between: Intermediality as a Tool for Aesthetic Analysis and Critical Reflection. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, 2018. 427 p. (In Eng.)
Rajewsky I. O. Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality. Intermédialités / Intermediality, 2005, issue 6, pp. 43-64. (In Eng.)
Tartt D. The Goldfinch. Little, Brown and Company, 2013. 4934 p. (In Eng.)
