Human and posthuman: qualities, boundaries, and relationships from the perspective of technological posthumanism
Light and shadows of digital reality: the artificial and the natural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-3-340-350Keywords:
human, posthuman, posthumanism, technological singularity, integrated information theory, artificial intelligence, NBIC technologies, R. Kurzweil, R. BraidottiAbstract
This article explores the problem of defining and distinguishing between the concepts of human and posthuman, analyzes the attributes and aspects ascribed to them from the perspective of technological posthumanism. The author connects the relevance of this study with the active development of NBIC technologies, with the expectation that humanity will soon reach the point of technological singularity, and with the implications of the theory of integrated information developed by J. Tononi. The study refers to the integrated information theory, which develops the concept of the completeness of phenomenal experience and ways of its empirical fixation both in humans and in other entities, as well as to the theories of R. Kurzweil and R. Braidotti. As a result of research conducted, the paper provides the following definitions of human and posthuman subjects based on the functional approach to the definition of a human being by R. Kurzweil: a human subject is a biological or non-biological entity of natural or artificial origin, possessing consciousness or the potential for its actualization, and capable of performing the function of a subject associated with civilization; a posthuman subject is a man-made, active, intellectual agent that is benevolent to life, possesses the form of reflection of reality that is superior to consciousness, and has motives for activity that lie in the material world. The author suggests that the criterion for the diversification of such subjects is the parameter of the completeness of phenomenal experience. The existence of human subjects is associated with a certain degree of manifestation of internal and external causality, as well as with various risks for the existence of life in general; the existence of posthuman subjects is associated with the overcoming of such limitations and of existential risks for life in the universe. The results obtained are proposed for use in social philosophy and social theory.References
Бородай С.Ю. Современное понимание проблемы лингвистической относительности: работы по пространственной концептуализации // Вопросы языкознания. 2013. № 4. С. 17–54.
Заньковский А.В. Время твердых медуз: Метамодерн, который мы заслужили // Metamodern. 2021. 29 мар. URL: https://metamodernizm.ru/metamodern-which-we-deserve/ (дата обращения: 13.11.2023).
Лем С. Сумма технологии / пер. с пол. А.Г. Громовой и др.; ред. и послесл. Б.В. Бирюкова, Ф.В. Широкова. М.: Мир, 1968. 608 с.
Нейрат О. Протокольные предложения / пер. с нем. А.Л. Никифорова // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2005. Т. 6, № 4. С. 226–234.
Никитина Е.Б. По направлению к транс-мета-постгуманизму // Academia. 2018. URL: http://www.academia.edu/36494476 (дата обращения: 25.11.2023).
Павленко А.Н. Рациофундаментализм // Вопросы философии. 2008. № 1. С. 29–44.
Bostrom N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014. 352 p.
Braidotti R. Posthuman Humanities // European Educational Research Journal. 2013. Vol. 12(1). P. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
Davis E. TechGnosis: myth, magic & mysticism in the age of information. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 2015. 456 p.
Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 296 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350059511
Fleming S.M., Frith Ch.D., Goodale M., Lau H. et al. The Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness as Pseudoscience / PsyArXiv. 2023. URL: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zsr78 (accessed: 02.01.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zsr78
Harari Y.N. AI and the future of humanity: Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum / YouTube. 2023. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWiM-LuRe6w&t=0s&ab_channel=YuvalNoahHarari (accessed: 26.06.2024).
Harrison K.D. When Languages Die: The Extinction Of The World’s Languages And The Erosion Of Human Knowledge. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2007. 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181920.001.0001
Kurzweil R. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. N.Y.: Viking, 2005. 672 p.
Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? // The Philosophical Review. 1974. Vol. 83, no. 4. P. 435–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
Raczynski J. Possible End of Humanity from AI? Geoffrey Hinton at MIT Technology Review’s EmTech Digital / YouTube. 2023. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sitHS6UDMJc&t=0s&ab_channel=JosephRaczynski (accessed: 26.06.2024).
Ray T.S. An approach to the synthesis of life // Artificial Life II: proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Life (Santa Fe, NM, February 1990) / ed. by Ch.G. Langton et al.; SFI Studies in the Sci-ences of Complexity. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1992. Vol. X. P. 371–408.
Tononi G., Koch C. Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015. Vol. 370, iss. 1668. URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167 (accessed: 02.01.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167
Zimmerman M.E. Religious Motifs in Technological Posthumanism // Western Humanities Review. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 67–83.
References
Borodai, S.Yu. (2013). [Modern understanding of the problem of linguistic relativity: works on spatial conceptualization]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. No. 4, pp. 17–54.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 352 p.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal. Vol. 12(1), pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
Davis, E. (2015). TechGnosis: myth, magic & mysticism in the age of information. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books Publ., 456 p.
Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publ., 296 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350059511
Fleming, S.M., Frith, Ch.D., Goodale, M., Lau, H. et al. (2023). The integrated information theory of consciousness as pseudoscience. PsyArXiv. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zsr78 (accessed 02.01.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zsr78
Harari, Y.N. (2023). AI and the future of humanity: Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWiM-LuRe6w&t=0s&ab_channel=YuvalNoahHarari (accessed 26.06.2024).
Harrison, K.D. (2007). When languages die: the extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181920.001.0001
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Publ., 672 p.
Lem, S. (1968). Summa tekhnologii [Summa technologiae]. Moscow: Mir Publ., 608 p.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review. Vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 435–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
Neurath, O. (2005). [Protocol statements]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 226–234.
Nikitina, E.B. (2018). Po napravleniyu k trans-meta-postgumanizmu [Toward trans-meta-posthumanism]. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/36494476 (accessed 25.11.2023).
Pavlenko, A.N. (2008). [Ratiofundamentalism]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 1, pp. 29–44.
Raczynski, J. (2023). Possible end of humanity from AI? Geoffrey Hinton at MIT Technology Review’s EmTech Digital. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sitHS6UDMJc&t=0s&ab_channel=JosephRaczynski (accessed 26.06.2024).
Ray, T.S. (1991). An approach to the synthesis of life. Artificial Life II: proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Life (Santa Fe, NM, February 1990). SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley Publ., Vol. 10, pp. 371–408.
Tononi, G. and Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 370, iss. 1668. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167 (accessed 25.11.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167
Zan’kovskiy, A.V. (2021). Vremya tverdykh meduz: Metamodern, kotoryy my zasluzhili [The time of solid jellyfish: The metamodern we deserve]. March 29. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/metamodern-which-we-deserve/ (accessed 13.11.2023).
Zimmerman, M.E. (2009). Religious motifs in technological posthumanism. Western Humanities Review. Vol. 3, pp. 67–83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
