The concept of the death of the author and the problem of post-creativity in the digital age

Philosophy of creativity in the becoming of the culture’s language

Authors

  • Sergey M. Malkov Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya st., Moscow, 109240, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-2-205-213

Keywords:

Roland Barthes, death of the author, personality, depersonalization, language, generative technologies, digital society, post-creation

Abstract

The paper analyzes Roland Barthes’ concept described in the article The Death of the Author (1968). It is shown that two different interpretations of the concept can be distinguished in this text: 1) the author dies with the appearance of the reader; 2) the author dies with the demise of the bourgeois era. The paper attempts to combine them into a single concept basing on the analysis of the notion «depersonalization», which appears to be among the fundamental ones for Barthes. It is concluded that by the impersonal subject of writing, the French intellectual most likely understood not an individual, but human in general or humanity as a whole. The process of depersonalization is carried out through language. The language, according to Barthes, is a set of ready-made words, phrases that the writer draws for his needs, taking them out of the storerooms as from a huge box. As a result, the author turns from the creator of ideas, what he appeared to be since Modern times, into a simple scriptwriter. The language performs the same depersonalization procedure with the reader. In the digital society, the problem of depersonalization of the author is revived in a new guise, as a result of which the concept proposed by Barthes acquires second life. With the use of modern generative technologies, the work of live artists is imitated, sometimes without their consent. A special case is the situation with deceased artists whose digital images can be artificially recreated by modern technologies and used in new works. Examples cited in the paper include cases from modern musical art, the GPT neural network as well as Russian cinema. 

Author Biography

Sergey M. Malkov , Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya st., Moscow, 109240, Russia

Junior Researcher

References

Барт Р. Смерть автора / пер. с фр. С.Н. Зенкина // Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика: Поэтика / сост., общ. ред. Г.К. Косикова. М.: Прогресс, 1989. С. 384–391.

Береснева Н.И., Кокарева Е.А. Эволюция идеи «Смерть автора» // Филологические заметки. 2012. Т. 10, № 1. С. 3–10.

Брайдотти Р. Постчеловек / пер. с англ. Д. Хамис. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2021. 408 с.

Ковалевская Т.В. О человеке, его личности и тайне и о ее разгадках // Достоевский и мировая культура. Филологический журнал. 2023. № 3(23). С. 247–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/26190311-2023-3-247-255

Колесников С.А. Автор в жизни и в радости // Человек. 2018. № 5. С. 140–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s023620070000730-0

Колесников С.А. Взгляни на дом свой, автор! // Человек. 2017. № 4. С. 159–172.

Колесников С.А. Так похоронен ли автор? // Человек. 2016. № 4. С. 132–145.

Лекторский В.А. Умер ли человек? // Человек. 2004. № 4. С. 10–16.

Малков С.М. Автор как культурноисторический субъект // Человек. 2011. № 4. С. 146–157.

Спешилова Е.И. Бессмертие автора // Человек.RU. 2016. № 11. С. 118–125.

Усов О.О. Федоров В.А., Федорова Н.А., Головешкина Н.В. «Смерть автора» в контексте современной журналистики // Вестник Шадринского государственного педагогического университета. 2020. № 4(48). С. 197–201.

Фуко М. Что такое автор? // Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет / пер. с фр. С.В. Табачниковой. М.: Касталь, 1996. С. 7–46.

Харауэй Д. Манифест киборгов: наука, технология и социалистический феминизм 1980-х / пер. с англ. А.В. Гараджа. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2017. 128 с.

Шошина С. Скарлетт Йоханссон раскритиковала OpenAI из-за голоса чат-бота // РБК. 2024. 21 мая. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/664c29689a794743d712fb65 (дата обращения: 28.04.2024).

Gibbs A. 200 musical artists sign an open letter against unethical AI in music, what to know // The Tennessean. 2024. Apr. 2. URL: https://www.tennessean.com/story/entertainment/music/2024/04/02/200-musical-artists-sign-an-openletter-against-harmful-ai-in-music/73179130007/ (accessed: 28.04.2024).

Robison K. ChatGPT will be able to talk to you like Scarlett Johansson in Her // The Verge. 2024. May 13. URL: https://www.theverge.com/2024/ 5/13/24155652/chatgpt-voice-mode-gpt4o-upgrades (accessed: 28.04.2024).

References

Bart, R. (1989). Smert’ avtora [Death of the author]. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Bart R. Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 384–391.

Beresneva, N.I. and Kokareva E.A. (2012). [Evolution of the idea of «Death of the author»]. Filologicheskie zametki [Philological Studies]. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–10.

Braidotti, R. (2021). Postchelovek [Posthuman]. Moscow: Institut Gaidara Publ., 408 p.

Foucault, M. (1996). [What is an author?]. Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti. Raboty raznykh let [The will to truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years]. Moscow: Kastal’ Publ., pp. 7–46.

Gibbs, A. (2024). 200 musical artists sign an open letter against unethical AI in music, what to know. The Tennessean. Apr. 2. Available at: https://www.tennessean.com/story/entertainment/music/2024/04/02/200-musical-artists-sign-an-openletter-against-harmful-ai-in-music/73179130007/ (accessed 28.04.2024).

Haraway, D. (2017). Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskiy feminizm 1980-kh [The cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 128 p.

Kolesnikov, S.A. (2016). [So is the author buried?]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 4, pp. 132–145.

Kolesnikov, S.A. (2017). [Look homeward, the author!]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 4, pp. 159–172.

Kolesnikov, S.A. (2018). [The author in life and in joy]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 5, pp. 140– 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s023620070000730-0

Kovalevskaya, T.V. (2023). [On the human being, personality and mystery, and its solutions]. Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura. Filologicheskiy zhurnal [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological Journal]. No. 3(23), pp. 247–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-3-247-255

Lektorsky, V.A. (2004). [Is a person dead?]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 4, pp. 10–16.

Malkov, S.M. (2011). [The author as a cultural and historical subject]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 4, pp. 146–157.

Robison, K. (2024). ChatGPT will be able to talk to you like Scarlett Johansson in Her. The Verge. May 13. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/13/24155652/chatgpt-voice-mode-gpt4oupgrades (accessed 28.04.2024).

Shoshina, S. (2024). [Scarlett Johansson criticized OpenAI because of the voice of the chatbot]. RBK. May 21. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/664c29689a794743d712fb65 (accessed 28.04.2024).

Speshilova, E.I. (2016). [The immortality of the author]. Chelovek.RU. No. 11, pp. 118–125.

Usov, O.O., Fedorov, V.A., Fedorova, N.A. and Goloveshkina, N.V. (2020). [«The death of the author» in the context of contemporary journalism]. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Journal of Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University]. No. 4(48), pp. 197–201.

Published

2024-08-07

Issue

Section

Special issue

Categories