The role of organizational trust in the regulation of work attitudes and labor behavior of industrial employees
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2023-1-131-140Keywords:
organizational trust, organizational commitment, corporate solidarity, work attitudes, labor behaviorAbstract
The discussion about the social base of modernization processes in Russia raises topical issues concerning the adequacy of sociocultural characteristics of modern industrial personnel in the context of the country’s orientation toward a new technological paradigm. It is also important to study the conditions that stimulate the development in employees of qualities that are in demand by an innovative economy. The results obtained by foreign authors show that trust stimulates the formation of organizational commitment interested and responsible attitude to work, initiative in the workplace. Russian sociologists also note the positive role of organizational trust, but its role in the development of pro-organizational attitudes and labor behavior has not been sufficiently investigated so far. The paper presents the results of a sociological study conducted at two Perm industrial enterprises (n=2,186 respondents). The study shows that trusting relationships between management and employees play an important role for the formation of organizational commitment, corporate solidarity, pro-organizational behavior, productivity, innovative activity, etc. These results allow us to conclude that the creation of conditions conducive to the development of trust can contribute to the development of personnel’s qualities necessary for the introduction of new equipment and technologies and, thereby, stimulate the development of the social base of modernization processes in the economy as a whole.References
Балабанова Е.С., Эфендиев А.Г., Гоголева А.С., Сорокин П.С. Инновационное поведение сотрудников российских и иностранных компаний // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. 2019. Т. 12, вып. 3. С. 215–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.301
Бессокирная Г.П., Татарова Г.Г. Идентификация с предприятием: индексы для типологического анализа работников // Официальный сайт ИC РАН. 2014. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3125 (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).
Бессокирная Г.П., Татарова Г.Г. Идентификация с предприятием: концептуальная модель и инструментарий исследования // Официальный сайт ИС РАН. 2013. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=2768 (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).
Бочаров В.Ю., Тукумцев Б.Г. Новые требования к работнику промышленного производства в условиях современной модернизации (социологический анализ) // Телескоп: журнал социологических и маркетинговых исследований. 2015. № 3(111). С. 45-49.
Козырева П.М. Доверие и его ресурсы в современной России. М.: Ин-т социологии РАН, 2011. 172 с.
Купрейченко А.Б. Психология доверия и недоверия. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2008. 570 с.
Леонов Н.И., Леонова И.Ю. Влияние доверия в организации на стратегии поведения сотрудников в конфликтной ситуации // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2016. Т. 26, вып. 1. С. 53–70.
Солидаризация в рабочей среде: социальное и индивидуальное: сб. ст. / отв. ред. В.А. Ядов. М.: Ин-т социологии РАН, 1998. 231 с.
Темницкий А.Л. Проблема доверия в отношениях руководства – подчинения как предмет социологического анализа и элемент концепции согласия в российском обществе // Социология и современная Россия / под ред. А.Б. Гофмана. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2003. С. 167–186.
Темницкий А.Л. Социокультурная модель наемного работника рыночного типа // XI Международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества: в 3 кн. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2011. Кн. 2. С. 376–385.
Тукумцев Б.Г. Включенность в организацию // Социология труда. Теоретико-прикладной толковый словарь / отв. ред. В.А. Ядов. СПб.: Наука, 2006. С. 31–32.
Шо Р.Б. Ключи к доверию в организации: результативность, порядочность, проявление заботы. М.: Дело, 2000. 272 с.
Яхонтова Е.С. Доверие в управлении персоналом. Зарубежные подходы и отечественный опыт оценки // Социологические исследования. 2004. № 9. C. 117–122.
Chughtai A.A., Buckley F. Work engagement and its relationship with state and trait trust: a conceptual analysis // Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. 2008. Vol. 10, iss. 1. P. 47–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.17170
Cook J., Wall T. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment // Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1980. Vol. 53, iss. 1. P. 39–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x
Creed W.E.D., Miles R.E. Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research / ed. by R. Kramer, T. Tyler. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1996. P. 16–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n2
Dirks K.T., Ferrin D.L. The role of trust in organizational settings // Organization Science. 2001. Vol. 12, no. 4. P. 450–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
Madsen S.R., Miller D., John C.R. Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference? // Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 16, iss. 2. P. 213–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1134
Miles R.E., Creed W.E.D. Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review // Research in Organizational Behavior: an Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews / ed. by B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1995. Vol. 17. P. 333–372.
Neves P., Caetano A. Commitment to change: Contributions to trust in the supervisor and work outcomes // Group and Organization Management. 2009. Vol. 34, iss. 6. P. 623–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109350980
Robinson S.L. Trust and breach of the psychological contract // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 41, no. 4. P. 574–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393868
Sitkin S.B., Roth N.L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic «remedies» for trust/distrust // Organizational Science. 1993. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. 345–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.4.3.367
Thau S., Crossley C., Bennett R.J., Sczesny S. The relationship between trust, attachment and antisocial work behaviors // Human Relations. 2007. Vol. 60, iss. 8. P. 1155–1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0018726707081658
Yong L.M.S. Managing creative people // Journal of Creative Behavior. 1994. Vol. 28, iss. 1. P. 16–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.21626057.1994.tb00716.x
References
Balabanova, E.S., Efendiev, A.G., Gogoleva, A.S. and Sorokin, P.S. (2019). [Innovative employee behavior: Evidence from domestic and foreign-owned companies operating in Russia]. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology]. Vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 215–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.301
Bessokirnaya, G.P. and Tatarova, G.G. (2013). [Identification with the enterprise: conceptual model and research tools]. IS RAS. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3125 (accessed 01.12.2022).
Bessokirnaya, G.P. and Tatarova, G.G. (2014). Identifikatsiya s predpriyatiem: indeksy dlya tipologicheskogo analiza rabotnikov [Identification with the enterprise: indexes for the typological analysis of workers]. IS RAS. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=2768 (accessed 01.12.2022).
Bocharov, V.Yu. and Tukumtsev, B.G. (2015). [New requirements for an industrial worker in the context of modern modernization (sociological analysis)]. Teleskop [Telescope]. No. 3(111), pp. 45–49.
Chughtai, A.A. and Buckley, F. (2008). Work engagement and its relationship with state and trait trust: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. Vol 10, iss. 1, pp. 47–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.17170
Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology. Vol. 53, iss. 1, pp. 39–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x
Creed, W.E.D. and Miles, R.E. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. R. Kramer, T. Tyler (eds.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publ., pp. 16– 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n2
Dirks, K.T. and Ferrin, D.L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science. Vol. 12, no, 4, pp. 450–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
Kozyreva, P.M. (2011). Doverie i ego resursy v sovremennoy Rossii [Trust and its resources in modern Russia]. Moscow: IS RAS Publ., 172 p.
Kupreychenko, A.B. (2008). Psikhologiya doveriya i nedoveriya [Psychology of trust and mistrust]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 570 p.
Leonov, N.I. and Leonova, I.Yu. (2016). [The influence of trust in an organization on the strategy of employees behavior in a conflict situation]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy]. Vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 53–70.
Madsen, S.R., Miller, D. and John, C.R. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference? Human Resource Development Quarterly. Vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 213–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1134
Miles, R.E. and Creed, W.E.D. (1995). Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (eds.) Research in organizational behavior: an annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, vol. 17, pp. 333–372.
Neves, P. and Caetano, A. (2009). Commitment to change: Contributions to trust in the supervisor and work outcomes. Group and Organization Management. Vol. 34, iss. 6, pp. 623–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109350980
Robinson, S.L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 574–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393868
Shaw, R.B. (2000). Klyuchi k doveriyu v organizatsii: rezul’tativnost’, poryadochnost’, proyavleniye zaboty [Trust in the balance: Building successful organizations on results, integrity, and concern]. Moscow: Delo Publ., Publ., 272 p.
Sitkin, S.B. and Roth, N.L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic «remedies» for trust/distrust. Organizational Science. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 345–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.4.3.367
Temnitskiy, A.L. (2003). [The problem of trust in the relationship of leadership - subordination as a subject of sociological analysis and an element of the concept of consent in Russian society]. Sotsiologiya i sovremennaya Rossiya, pod red. A.B. Goffmana [A.B. Goffman (ed.) Sociology and modern Russia]. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 167–186.
Temnitskiy, A.L. (2011). [Sociocultural model of a market-type employee]. XI Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obschchestva: v 3 kn. [11th International Scientific Conference on the Problems of Economic and Social Development: in 3 books]. Moscow: HSE Publ., book 2, pp. 376–385.
Thau, S., Crossley, C., Bennett, R.J. and Sczesny, S. (2007). The relationship between trust, attachment and antisocial work behaviors. Human Relations. Vol. 60, iss. 8, pp. 1155–1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707081658
Tukumtsev, B.G. (2006). [Involvementin the organization] Sotsiologiya truda. Teoretiko-prikladnoy tolkovyy slovar’, pod red. V.A. Yadova [V.A. Yadov (ed.) Sociology of labor. Theoretical and applied explanatory dictionary]. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 31–32.
Yadov, V.A. (ed.) (1998). Solidarizatsiya v rabochey srede: sotsial’noe i individual’noe [Solidarization in the work environment: social and individual]. Moscow: IS RAS Publ., 231 p.
Yakhontova, E.S. (2004). [Trust in personnel management. Foreign approaches and domestic experience in assessment]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9, pp. 117–122.
Yong, L.M.S. (1994). Managing creative people. Journal of Creative Behavior. Vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 16– 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.21626057.1994.tb00716.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
