Explciit and implicit attitudes toward Muslims among Russian undergraduates identifying themselves with Orthodox Church

Psychology

Authors

  • Sergei A. Shchebetenko Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia
  • Yevgeny Yu. Artamonov Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Keywords:

implicit attitudes, confessions, Muslims, social attitudes, right-wing authoritarianism

Abstract

Implicit and explicit attitudes toward Muslims among Orthodox undergraduates at Perm State University have been investigated. Implicit attitudes were measured by Implicit Association Test, whereas explicit attitudes were measured using the “evaluation” subscale of semantic differential. Implicit and explicit attitudes did not correlate between each other. While explicit attitudes did not differ significantly from neutral, implicit attitudes were negative regarding Muslims. At the behavioral level, contrary to explicit attitudes, implicit ones predicted recommended budget cuts for Muslims and Orthodox Church in directions concordant with hypotheses. Finally, implicit attitudes were inverted-U-related with right-wing authoritarianism: implicit attitudes toward Muslims were positive when right-wing authoritarianism was either high or low, whereas middle degree authoritarians demonstrated negative implicit attitudes toward Muslims. The results are discussed and compared with those studies published earlier.

Author Biographies

Sergei A. Shchebetenko , Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of General and Clinical Psychology

Yevgeny Yu. Artamonov, Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Graduate of «Psychology» program of the Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology

References

(1). «Верим ли мы в Бога?» // Пресс-выпуск ВЦИОМ № 1461 от 30.03.2010. URL: http://www.wciom.ru/index.php?id=268&uid=13365 (дата обращения: 15.02.2012).

(2). Ли Тоан Тханг. Пространственная модель мига: когниция, культура, этнопсихология (на материале вьетнамского и русского языков): автореф. на соиск… докт. филол. наук. М., 1993. 66 с.

(3). Мкртчян Н.В, Карачурина Л.Б. Миграция в Пермском крае: опыт анализа на региональном и муниципальном уровнях // Научные труды Института народнохозяйственного прогнозирования РАН / гл. ред. А.Г. Коровкин. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2009. С. 688–712.

(4). Петренко В.Ф. Психосемантика сознания. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1988.

(5). Разин А.С. Специфика этноконфессионального фактора и формирование этноконфессиональных отношений // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 7: Философия. Социология и социальные технологии. 2010. Т. 2. № 7–12. С. 63–69.

(6). Склярова Д.В. Характеристики когнитивного компонента этноидентичноти кабардинцев, балкарцев и русских // Известия Южного федерального университета. Технические науки. 2008. Т. 78, № 1. С. 128–129.

(7). Федеральная служба государственной статистики Российской Федерации: национальный состав населения по субъектам Российской Федерации. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/per-itog/tab7.xls (дата обращения: 15.02.2012).

(8). Федоров В.Ф. Конфессиональная проблематика в психологии этно-религиозных конфликтов // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 12: Психология. Социология. Педагогика. 2010. № 1. С. 280–286.

(9). Шляхтин Г.С., Давыдов С.В. Соотношение имплицитных и эксплицитных этнических стереотипов у русских и немцев // Вестник Нежегородского государственного университета. Серия Социальные науки. 2006. Т. 1, № 5. С. 125–138.

(10). Щебетенко С.А., Вайнштейн С.В. Об измерении черт личности посредством времени реакции (Часть II: результаты исследования) // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2010. № 4. С. 52–72.

(11). Якунина Ю.Е. Специфика этнической идентичности коренных малочисленных народов Магаданской области в контексте межэтнических отношений // Вестник Северо-Восточного государственного университета. 2008. Т. 10, № 10. С. 94–98.

(12). Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

(13). Altemeyer, R.A. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wingauthoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

(14). Altemeyer, R.A. (2006). The authoritarians. Winnipeg: B. Altemeyer. University of Manitoba URL: http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/ (date of access 15.02.2012).

(15). Back, M.D., Schmuckle, S.C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, pp. 533–548.

(16). Bargh, J.A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

(17). Blair, I.V. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

(18). Burris, C.T., & Rempel, J.K. (2004). "It's the end of the world as we know it": Threat and the spatial-symbolic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, pp. 19–42.

(19). Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, pp. 997–1003.

(20). Cohrs, J.C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, pp. 263–276.

(21). Cunningham, W.A., Nezlek, J.B., & Banaji, M.R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, pp. 1332–1346.

(22). Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing and believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, pp. 642–658.

(23). De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, pp. 347–368.

(24). Duckitt, J. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47, pp. 1182–1193.

(25). Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, pp. 463–482.

(26). Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 229–238.

(27). Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, pp. 4–27.

(28). Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, pp. 1464–1480.

(29). Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, pp. 85–93.

(30). Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, pp. 197–216.

(31). Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., & Banaji, M.R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, pp. 17–41.

(32). Johnson, S. (1992). Anti-Arabic prejudice in “middletown”. Psychological Reports, 70, pp. 811–818.

(33). Lane, K.A., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A., & Greenwald, A.G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) (pp. 59–102). In B. Wittenbrink & N.S. Schwarz (Eds.). Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies. New York: Guilford Press.

(34). Osgood, C.E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

(35). Park, J., Felix, K., & Lee, G. (2007). Implicit attitudes toward Arab-Muslims and the moderating effects of social information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, pp. 35–45.

(36). Rogers, J.L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, pp. 1–12.

(37). Rowatt, W.C., Franklin, L.M., & Cotton, M. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, pp. 29–43.

(38). Rowatt, W.C., Tsang, J.-A., Kelly, J., LaMartina, B., McCullers, M., & McKinley, A. (2006). Associations between religious personality dimensions and implicit homosexual prejudice. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, pp. 397–406.

(39). Rudman, L.A., & Ashmore, R.D. (2007). Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, pp. 359–372.

(40). Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, pp. 207–232.

(41). Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M, & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, pp. 815–827.

Published

2012-03-30

Issue

Section

Psychology

Categories