Virtual resourses of Orthodox Church in the process of struggle for belief (on the Perm city materials)

Sociology

Authors

  • Sergey Gabdulsamatovich Dyukin Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Culturology and Philosophy
  • Irina Valer’evna Samoilova Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-3-172-179

Keywords:

The Orhodox Church, Internet, Virtual space, communication, function, ritual, presentation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the forms of presentations of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Internet. The object ofresearch is Internet media of the Orthodox Church of Russian province. We research Internet media of Perm regionas one of tipical terretories of country. The research task is identifying functions of Internet-resoerces of church andsearch of specific featers of Internet-discource in the Orthodox religion forms. The main instruments we use arestructure-functional analyses and discource-analyses. The metodological base of article is founded on texts of modern reseachers of virtual media. They are H. Campbell, P. Cheong, Ch. Helland, N. Boiz, S. Rajagopolan, M. Gorham. We find out that Internet resourses are dysfunctional, focused to repetition of ritual. These media exist out oftheir auditory. On Internet media the church demonstrate failure from translation of religious content. There isn`t religious narrative, elements of sermon on sites, in social nets. These communicative units give place social-politicdiscource, to which Orthodox Church come. Other important feature of Orthodox Internet media is absent of feedback with users. Reasons of such situation is unwillingness of local religious community to use new forms of communication, conservative spirit of clergy and parishioners.

Author Biographies

Sergey Gabdulsamatovich Dyukin , Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Culturology and Philosophy

Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent, Associate Professorof the Department of Culturology and Philosophy

Irina Valer’evna Samoilova, Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professorof the Department of Russian Language and Stylistics

References

Бизюкова М.С. Проблема киберсоциализации личности в коммуникативной реальности социальных сетей // Вопросы культурологии. 2013. № 9. С. 45–48.

Больц Н. Азбука медиа. М.: Европа, 2011. 136 с.

Брезгина О.В. Лингвистическая культурологическая специфика Интернет-коммуникации как средство формирования языковой личности // Вопросы культурологии. 2013. № 5. С. 17–20.

Горошко О., Жигалина Е. Политические коммуникации в блогосфере Рунета // Digital Icons. 2009. № 1. С. 81–100. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/

issue01/goroshko_and_zgigalina.php?lng=Russian6 (дата обращения: 21.10.2015).

Драгунский Д.В. Особенности национального проектирования // Русский журнал. 1998. № 1. URL: http://www.russ.ru/journal/odna_8/98-01-09/dragun.htm (дата обращения: 21.10.2015).

Кордонский С. Сословная структура постсоветской России. М.: Ин-т Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2008. 216 с.

Митрохин Н. Церковь после кризиса // Неприкосновенный запас. 2006. № 6(50). С. 250–270.

Панченко Е. Интеграция Интернет-СМИ в социальных сетях в Рунете: Новая публичная сфера или пространство контроля? // Digital Icons. 2011. № 5. С. 87–118. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/issue05/ru/egor-panchenko/ (дата обращения: 18.10.2015).

Хренов Н.А. Медиа в начале второго десятилетия XXI века: от ренессанса к кризису // Вопросы культурологии. 2013. № 12. С. 34–41.

Campbell H. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. N.Y.: Routledge, 2013. 288 p.

Campbell H. Who`s Got The Power? The Question of Religious Authority and The Internet // The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. DOI:

Cheong P., Ficser-Nielson P., Gelfgren S. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practice and Futures.

Gorham M. Virtual Rusophonia: Language Policy as «Soft Power» in the New Media Age // Digital Icons. 2011. № 5. P. 23–48. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/

issue05/ru/michael-gorham/ (accessed: 11.10.2015).

Helland Ch. Online Religion as Lived Religion. Methological Issues in the Study of Religious Participation on the Internet // Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religious on the Internet. 2005. Vol. 01.1: Special Isssue on Theory and Methology. URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/5823/1/Helland3a.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2015).

Rajagopalan S. Is There Room for the Fan? // Digital Icons. 2013. № 10. P. 1–16. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/issue10/sudha-rajagopalan/ (accessed: 16.10.2015).

REFERENCES

Bizyukova M.S. [The problem of cybersocialization of personality in communicative reality of social nets]. Voprosy kulturologii [Issues of culturology]. 2013, no. 9, pp. 45–48. (In Russian).

Bolz N. Azbuka media [Alphabet of the media]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2011, 136 p. (In Russian).

Brezgina O.V. [Linguistic culturology specify of Internet-Communication as instrument of forming of language personality]. Voprosy kulturologii [Issues of culturology]. 2013, no. 5, pp. 17–20. (In Russian).

Goroshko O., Zhigalina E. Politicheskije kommunikacii v blogosfere Runeta [Political communications in the blogsphere of Runet]. [Digital Icons]. 2009, no. 1, pp. 81–100. Available at: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/issue01/

goroshko_and_zgigalina.php?lng=Russian6 (accessed 21.10.2015). (In Russian).

Dragunskiy D.V. [Peculiaretias of national design]. Russkiy zhurnal [Russian journal]. 1998, no. 1. Available at: http://www.russ.ru/journal/odna_8/98-01-09/dragun.htm (accessed 21.10.2015). (In Russian).

Kordonskiy S. Soslovnaja struktura postsovetskoy Rossii {The bar structure of postsoviet Russia}. Moscow, Institut fonda «Obshestvennoje mnenije» Publ., 2008, 216 p. (In Russian).

Mitrohin N. [The Church after crisis]. Neprikosnovenniy zapas [Reserve stock]. 2006, no. 6(50), pp. 250–270. (In Russian).

Panchenko E. Integracija Internet-SMI v socialnyh setjah v runete: novaja publichnaya sfera ili prostranstvo kontrolya? [Integration of Internet-media in the social nets in the Runet: new public sfera or space of control]. [Digital Icons]. 2011,pp. 87–118.Available at htpp://www.digitalicons.org/

issue05/ru/egor-panchenko/ (accessed 18.10.2015) (In Russian).

Hrenov N.A. [Media in the beginning of the second decade of XXI century: from renaissanse to crisis]. Voprosy kulturologii [Issues of culturology]. 2013. no. 12, pp. 34–41. (In Russian).

Campbell H. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. New York: Routledge, 2013. 288 p.(In English).

Campbell H. Who`s Got The Power? The Question of Religious Authority and The Internet. The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 1043–1062. DOI: .(In English).

Cheong P., Ficser-Nielson P., Gelfgren S. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practice and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Internetional, 2012, 326 p.(In English).

Gorham M. Virtual Rusophonia: Language Policy as «Soft Power» in the New Media Age. Digital Icons. 2011, no 5, pp. 23–48. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/issue05/ru/michael-gorham/ (accessed: 11.10.

Helland Ch. Online Religion as Lived Religion. Methological Issues in the Study of Religious Participation on the Internet. Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religious on the Internet. 2005, vol. 01.1: Special Isssue on Theory and Methology. URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/5823/

/Helland3a.pdf (accessed: 11.10.2015).(In English).

Rajagopalan S. Is There Room for the Fan? Digital Icons. 2013, no. 10, pp. 1–16. URL: htpp://www.digitalicons.org/issue10/sudha-rajagopalan/ (accessed: 16.10.2015).(In

Published

2016-09-30

Issue

Вестник 2016 Выпуск 3 (27)

Section

Статьи

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.