CONCEPT OF IMMATERIAL LABOUR IN POST-OPERAIST PHILOSOPHY AND ITS CRITIQUE

Philosophy

Authors

  • Yana Viktorovna Grigorova Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 29, Komsomolsky av., Perm, 614990, Russia
  • Viktoria Sergeevna Gritsenko Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 29, Komsomolskiy av., Perm, 614990, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-39-44

Keywords:

Post-Operaism, immaterial labour, modern type of labour, working time, free time, exploitation, symbolic labour, affective labour

Abstract

In the article the main features of the concept of immaterial labour in Post-Operaist philosophy are unveiled. The authors consider the history of Post-Operaism, allocating its key moment as communication of Post-Operaist theorists with the new left and show that in their philosophical works much attention is paid to the changes of socialstructure of society. Formation of the so-called information society has essentially affected Post-Operaism perspective: its theorists possess the main merit in an introduction to a scientific turn and further development of concept of the immaterial labour, which has become today a platitude for the description of modern society. The main categories describing new society are immaterial labour, creative activity, symbolical work, affective work, economy of knowledge. It is all about increasing role of competence, communication, an affective component of new type of labour and new features in exploitation of this component in the conditions of capitalism. The authors show that in modern society the border between free and working hours is washed away that leads both to continuous development of individuality of the worker, and to a basic opportunity to exploit all the time of his life. Analyzing M. Lazzarato and P. Virno’s ideas of immaterial labour, and also criticism of this representation by S. Sayers andV.V. Orlov, the authors come to a conclusion that though modern theorists call «immaterial», nevertheless they doesn’t make a sharp opposition of material and immaterial labour. The abstraction of immaterial labour, according to authors, helps to see certain specifics of modern type of work, to distinguish it from the previous work types in theconditions of capitalism. This concept can work only along with a competent understanding of the essence of labour and the man and therefore it should not be treated in literal sense.

Author Biographies

Yana Viktorovna Grigorova , Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 29, Komsomolsky av., Perm, 614990, Russia

Assistant of Department of Philosophy and Law

Viktoria Sergeevna Gritsenko , Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 29, Komsomolskiy av., Perm, 614990, Russia

Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professorof Department of Philosophy and Law

References

Вирно П. Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной жизни. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013. 170 с.

Лаззарато М. Нематериальный труд // Художественный журнал. 2008. № 69. URL: http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/69/nmtrln-trd/ (дата обращения: 08.03.2016).

ЛенинВ.И. Материализм и эмпириокритицизм // Полн. собр. соч. М.: Политиздат, 1968. Т. 18. 525 с.

Маркс К. Экономические рукописи 1857–1859 гг. // МарксК., ЭнгельсФ. Соч. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1969. Т. 46, ч. 2. 618 с.

Маркс К. Экономическо-философские рукописи 1844 г. // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1974. Т. 42. С. 41–174.

Орлов В.В. Философия экономики / Перм. гос. ун-т. 3-е изд., испр. и доп. Пермь, 2013. 268 c.

Полани М. Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии. Благовещенск: БГК им. И.А. Бодуэна де Куртенэ, 1998. 344 с.

Хардт М., НегриА. Множество: война и демократия в эпоху империи. М.: Культурная революция, 2006. 599с.

Reich R. The Work of Nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st-century Capitalism. London: Simon & Schuster, 1991. 339

Sayers S.The Concept of Labour: Marx and His Critics // Scienceand71, no 4. P. 431–454.

References

Virno P. Grammatika mnozhestva: k analizu form sovremennoj zhizni [A grammar of the multitude: on an analysis of contemporary forms of life]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2013, 170 p. (In Russian).

Lazzarato M. [Immaterial labour]. Hudozhestvennyj zhurnal [Journal of art]. 2008, no 69. Available at: http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/69/nmtrln-trd/ (accessed 08.03.2016). (In Russian)

Lenin V.I. Materializm i jempiriokriticizm [Materialism and empirio-criticism]. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij [Complete set of works]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1968, vol. 18, 525 p. (In Russian).

Marx K. Jekonomicheskie rukopisi, 1857–1859. [Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Marx K., Engels F. Works], Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1969, vol. 46, part 2, 618 p. (In Russian).

Marx K. Jekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi, 1844. [Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Marx K., Engels F. Works]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1974, vol. 42, pp. 41–174. (In Russian).

Orlov V.V. Filosofija jekonomiki [Philosophy of economics]. Perm, 2013, 268 p. (In Russian).

Polany M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoj filosofii [Personal knowledge: towards a postcritical philosophy]. Blagoveshchensk, BGK Publ., 1998, 344 p. (In Russian).

Hardt M., Negri A. Mnozhestvo: vojna i demokratija v jepohu imperii [Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire]. Moscow, Culture Revolution Publ., 2006, 599 p. (In Russian).

Reich R. The Work of Nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st-century Capitalism. London, Simon & Schuster, 1991, 339 p. (In English).

Sayers S. The Concept of Labour: Marx and His Critics. Science and Society. 2007, vol. 71, no 4, pp. 431– 454. (In English).

Published

2016-06-30