Cartesian paradigm of tne subject crisis as an «epistemic shift»

Philosophy

Authors

  • Ekaterina Sergeevna Pankova Kazan Federal University, 18, Kremlyovskaya str., Kazan, 420008, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-32-38

Keywords:

Cartesian paradigm of the subject, subject, episteme, poststructuralism, Postmodern

Abstract

The paper focuses on the analysis of Cartesian paradigm of the subject and its critical reflection in the Postmodern. The methodology of the research is an integration of the two schools such as classical philosophy of rationalism and structuralism. Moreover, not only the fundamental works of the representatives of these schools would be regarded, but the works of their methodological successors as well. The scientific consideration of human nature and identity and the subject and subjectivity begins right from the classical philosophy of rationalism. Structuralism set out the cornerstones for the studies of mechanisms of functioning of the subject and social that is logically continuedin poststructuralism. Apart from that, at the heart of poststructuralism there is a methodological differentiation of the Premodern, the Modern and the Postmodern that is of great importance for the research. The main provisions of Cartesian subjectivity, which became the basis for the subsequent criticism in the 20th-century philosophy, are designated in the paper. It is concluded that the epistemological transformation of the subject in the poststructuralist methodology leads to the «epistemic shift» and isolation of the three forms of the subject, such as the Renaissance episteme, the classical episteme and the modern episteme that will present the Premodern, the Modern and the Postmodern. The gradual devaluation of the subject, which can be seen in epistemes, leads to a crisis of identity, the alienation of man from himself and to what might be called the death of the subject.

Author Biography

Ekaterina Sergeevna Pankova, Kazan Federal University, 18, Kremlyovskaya str., Kazan, 420008, Russia

Ph.D. Student of Department of Social Philosophy

References

Баткин Л. Итальянское Возрождение в поисках индивидуальности. М.: Наука, 1989. 272 с.

Бодрийяр Ж. Символический обмен и смерть. 4-е изд. М.: Добросвет: Изд-во КДУ, 2011. 392 с.

Гегель Г.В.Ф. Феноменология духа / пер. с нем. Г.Г. Шпета. СПб.: Наука, 1992. 444 с.

Декарт Р. Сочинения: в 2 т.: пер. с лат. и фр. Т. 1 / сост., ред., вступ. ст. В.В. Соколова. М.: Мысль, 1989. 654 c.

Декарт Р. Сочинения: в 2 т.: пер. с лат. и фр. Т. 2 / сост., ред. и примеч. В.В. Соколова. М.: Мысль, 1994. 633 с.

Деррида Ж. О грамматологии / пер. с фр. Н. Автономовой. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 с.

Жижек С. Щекотливый субъект: отсутствующий центр политической онтологии / пер. с англ. С. Щукиной. М.: Изд. дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2014. 528 с.

Кант И. Критика чистого разума. М.: Мысль, 1994. 591 с.

Лакан Ж. «Я» в теории Фрейда и в технике психоанализа (1954/55) / пер. с фр. А. Черноглазова. М.: Гнозис: Логос. 1999. 520 с.

Лосев А. Эстетика Возрождения. М.: Мысль, 1978. 623 с.

Рябушкина Т. Рефлексия как метод самопознания: к вопросу о кризисе оснований картезианской и посткартезианских теорий субъективности // NB: Философские исследования. 2013. № 1. С. 1–59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.1.268.

Соссюр Ф. Курс общей лингвистики / под ред. Ш. Балли, А. Сеше; пер. с фр. А. Сухотина. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 1999. 432 с.

Фромм Э. Иметь или быть? / пер. с нем. Э.М. Телятниковой. М.: АСТ: Астрель, 2010. 314 с.

Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. М.: Прогресс, 1977. 488 с.

References

Batkin L. Italyanskoe Vozrozhdenie v poiskah individualnosti [The Italian Renaissance in search of idividuality]. Moscow, Nauka Publ, 1989, 272 c. (In Russian).

Baudrillard J. Simvolichiskii obmen i smert [Symbolic exchange and death]. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ, KDU Publ, 2011, 392 p. (In Russian).

Hegel G.W.F. Fenomenologiya duha [Phenomenology of spirit]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1992, 444 p. (In Russian).

Descartes R. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 1 [Writings: in 2 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Mysl Publ, 1989, 654 p. (In Russian).

Descartes R. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2 [Writings: in 2 vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Mysl Publ, 1994, 633 p. (In Russian).

Derrida J. O grammatologii [On grammatology]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ, 2000, 512 p. (In Russian).

Zhizhek S. Schekotlivyi subect: otsutstvuyuschii centr politicheskoi ontologii [The ticklish subject: the absent centre of political ontology]. Moscow, Delo Publ., Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Publ., 2014, 528 p. (In Russian).

Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [The critique of pure reason]. Moscow, Mysl Publ, 1994, 591 p. (In Russian).

Lacan J. «Ya» v teorii Freida i v technike psichoanaliza (1954/55) [The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ, Logos Publ, 1999, 520 p. (In Russian).

Losev A. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya [Aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Moscow, Mysl Publ, 1978, 623 p. (In Russian).

Ryabushkina T. [Self-Reflection as a method of selfknowledge: on the question about the crisis of foundations of the Cartesian and Post-Cartesian theories of subjectivity]. NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya [NB: Philosophical thought]. 2013, no 1, pp. 1–59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.1.268.

Saussure F. Kurs obschey lingvistiki [Course of general linguistics]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publ, 1999, 432 p. (In Russian).

Fromm E. Imet ili byt? [To have or to be?]. Moscow, AST: Astrel’ Publ, 2010, 314 p. (In Russian).

Foucault M. Slova i veschi. Arheologiya gumanitarnyh nauk [The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences]. Moscow, Progress Publ, 1977, 488 p. (In Russian)

Published

2016-06-30