Some aspects of the problem of the historical cognition subject in Postmodernism
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-4-555-562Keywords:
subject, historical cognition subject, author, reader, scripter, narrator, hero, text, narrative, PostmodernismAbstract
The article deals with the changing perceptions of the historical cognition subject in Postmodernism. The present changes are connected with the reconsideration of the grounds of historical science,which has led to the transformation in the field of humanities and even non-scientific knowledge. This has also caused the doubt in the existence of historical reality and the appeals for excluding it from scientific circulation. In this situation, the revision of the historical cognition subject has become inevitable.In Postmodernism, text appears to be the only cogitable reality and the subject does not precede the text, but emerges with the text taking the whole of its space. In the field of historical cognition, the subject becomes the creator and the designer of historical reality: «the prisoner of the past» turns into its sovereign. On the one hand, this concept entails the approach and even the confluence of the cognition subject and the history subject. On the other hand, the subject becomes dependent on its time, i.e. on the present and its instances. «New» non-freedom is expressed in the subject’s loss of oneness, separateness, constancy and awareness. The role and the content of the subject are reconsidered, and modernistic concepts of the «author», «reader», «interpreter» are replaced by the more appropriate ones according to the new understanding. The articleconsiders the differences between the subject-scripter and the subject-narrator, «the hero» and «the narrator», «the agent» and «the patient». The author of the article shows another aspect of the problem of historical cognition stating that a historian should combine qualities both of a scientist and of a literary critic.References
Лиотар Ж.-Ф. Состояние постмодерна / пер. с фр. Н.А. Шматко. СПб., 1998. 160 с.
Данто А. Аналитическая философия истории. М.: Идея-Пресс, 2002. 292с.
Барт Р. Смерть автора // Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика. М.: Прогресс, 1989. С. 384–391.
Poster M. The Mode of Information. Post-Structuralism & Social Context. Cambridge, 1996. 136
Ипполитов Г.М. Пленники времени, или как историки, будучи здесь и сейчас, пишут о том, что было там и теперь // Человек в контексте своего времени: опыт историко-психологического осмысления: матер. XX Междунар. науч. конф. Санкт-Петербург, 18–19 декабря 2006 г. / под ред. д-ра ист. наук, проф. С.Н. Полторака. СПб., 2006. Ч. I. С. 56–61.
Ильин А.Н. Субъект в пространстве философии постмодернизма // Знание. Понимание. Умение: Информационный гуманитарный портал. 2010. № 1 – Философия. Политология. URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2010/1/Ilyin_Subject/ (дата обращения: 03.01.2016).
Философский словарь. URL: http://slovariki.org/filosofskij-slovar (дата обращения: 02.03.2017).
Ильин И.П. Постмодернизм — от истоков до конца столетия: эволюция научного мифа. М.: Интрада, 1998. 258 с.
Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности: пер. с фр. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с. URL: http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/istoria.txt_with-big-pictures.html (дата обращения: 23.06.2016).
Делез Ж. Логика смысла М.: Академ. проект, 2011. 472 с.
Уилбер К. Краткая история всего. М.: АСТ: Астрель, 2006. 476 с.
Бланшо М. Литература и право на смерть // Бланшо М. От Кафки к Кафке. М.: Логос, 1998. С. 9–56. URL: http://blansho.narod.ru/blanchot/litera.html (дата обращения: 06.03.2017).
Бланшо М. Последний человек. М.: Терра, 1997. 304 с.
Gresset M. Introduction // Intertextuality in Faulkner / ed. by M. Gresset, N. Polk. N.Y.: University of Mississippi, 1985. P. 3–15.
Miller J.H. Tradition and difference // Diacritics. 1972. Vol. 2, no 2. P. 9–12.
Kayser W. Wer erzahlt den Roman? // Die Vortragsreise: Studien zur Legende. Bern, 1958. S. 82–101.
White H. The Historical Event. URL: http://www.culturahistorica.es/hayden_white/historical_event.pdf (accessed: 01.05.2016).
Мегилл А. Историческая эпистемология: монография. М.: Канон+: Реабилитация, 2007. 480 с.
White H. The Burden of History // History and Theory. 1966. Vol 5, no 2. P. 111–134.
Шмид В. Нарратология. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2003. 312 с. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/shmid-narratology.pdf (дата обращения: 21.02.2017).
Evans R.J. The future of history // Prospect Magazine. 1997. Oct. Iss. 23. URL: http://www.stoa.org.uk/topics/postmodernism/the-future-of-history.pdf (accessed: 07.05.2016).
Рикер П. Время и рассказ. Т. СПб.: Университетская книга, 2000. 313 с.
References
Liotard J.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna [The postmodern condition]. Saint Petersburg. Publ., 1998, 160 p. (In Russian).
Danto A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya istorii [Analytical philosophy of history]. Moscow, Idea-Press Publ., 2002, 292 p. (In Russian).
Barthes R. Smert’ avtora [The death of the author]. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 384–391. (In Russian).
Poster M. The Mode of Information. PostStructuralism & Social Context. Cambridge, 1996, 136 p. (In English).
Ippolitov G.M. Plenniki vremeni, ili kak istoriki, buduchi zdes’ i seychas, pishut o tom, chto bylo tam i teper’ [Prisoners of time, or as historians, being here and writing about what was there and now]. Chelovek v kontekste svoego vremeni: opyt istorikopsikhologicheskogo osmysleniya [Man in the context of his time: the experience of historicalpsychological understanding]. Saint Petersburg, 2006, part I, pp. 56–61. (In Russian).
Il’in A.N. Sub’ekt v prostranstve filosofii postmodernizma [The subject in the space of the philosophy of postmodernism]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie: Informatsionniy gumanitarniy portal. 2010. № 1 – Filosofiya. Politologiya [Knowledge. Understanding. Ability: Information humanitarian portal. 2010. № 1 – Philosophy. Political science]. Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2010/1/ Ilyin_Subject/ (accessed 03. 01. 2016). (In Russian).
Filosofskiy slovar’ [Philosophical dictionary]. Available at: http://slovariki.org/filosofskij-slovar (accessed: 02.03.2017). (In Russian).
Il’in A.N. Postmodernizm — ot istokov do konca stoletiya: evolyutsiya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from the beginning to the end of the century: the evolution of the scientific myth]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1998, 258 p. (In Russian).
Foucault M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti [The will to truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality]. Moscow, Kastal’ Publ., 1996. 448 p. Available at: http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/ istoria.txt_with-big-pictures.html (accessed 23.06.2016). (In Russian).
Deleuze G. Logika smysla [The logic of sense]. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., 2011. 472 p. (In Russian).
Wilber K. Kratkaya istoriya vsego [A brief history of everything]. Moscow, AST, Astrel Publ., 2006, 476 p. (In Russian).
Blanchot M. Literatura i pravo na smert’ [Literature and right to death]. Blanchot M. Ot Kafki k Kafke [From Kafka to Kafka]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 1998, pp. 9–56. Available at: http://blansho.narod.ru/ blanchot/litera.html (accessed 06.03.2017). (In Russian).
Blanchot M. Posledniy chelovek [The last man]. Moscow, Terra Publ., 1997, 304 p. (In Russian).
Gresset M. Introduction. Intertextuality in Faulkner. New York, University of Mississippi, 1985, pp. 3– 15. (In English).
Miller J.H. Tradition and difference. Diacritics. 1972, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 9–12. (In English).
Kayser W. Wer erzahlt den Roman? [Who tells the novel?]. Die Vortragsreise: Studien zur Legende [The lecture tour: Studies on the legend]. Bern, 1958, pp. 82–101. (In German).
White H. The Historical Event. Available at: http://www.culturahistorica.es/hayden_white/historic al_event.pdf (accessed 01.05.2016). (In English).
Magill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya: monografiya [Historical epistemology: monograph] Moscow, Canon+: ROOI «Rehabilitation» Publ., 2007, 480 p. (In Russian).
White H. The Burden of History. History and Theory. 1966, vol 5, no 2, pp. 111–134. (In English).
Schmid V. Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2003, 312 p. Available at: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/cultur/shmidnarratology.pdf (accessed 21.02.2017). (In Russian).
Evans R.J. The future of history. Prospect Magazine. 1997, Oct, iss. 23. Available at: http://www.stoa.org.uk/topics/postmodernism/thefuture-of-history.pdf (accessed: 07.05.2016). (In English).
Ricoeur P. Vremya i rasskaz [Time and narrative]. Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya knigaPubl., 2000, vol. 1, 313 p. (In Russian).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
