About the rationality of the human thinking

Psychology

Authors

  • Ekaterina V. Uskova Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-1-57-62

Keywords:

rationality, irrationality, realism, relativism, categorizing, consciousness, psychological states

Abstract

Author considers rationality as a special human phenomenon, features and descriptions of which are studied by social anthropology, through the concepts of form and content. Article also describes connection between rationality, realism and relativism. Irrationality may be understood as «self-alien» of rationality and as inalienable part of the human thinking in general. There is shown a differ between theoretical and practical rationality. Also author considers categorizing as cogitative procedure. The classics of philosophy and psychology characterize human actions as rational if they have aim, plan of action, and if they were reflexed. Modern psychologists and philosophers consider that human rationality has limits and even doubt that rationality correlates with consciousness (our ideas, desires, actions). Consciousness may be understood as separate function, which appears in addition to our mental conditions. These reasons cause a question about rationality of human behavior and thinking. Are all our actions, intentions, thoughts a result of preliminary consciousness and reflection or maybe many mental processes occur automatically and recognized by us in hindsight? Because of it we have a question about connection between rationality and conciousness: what is rationality? is it a priori attribute of our thinking or it appears after the realization of the object of which we are thinking about?

Author Biography

Ekaterina V. Uskova , Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia

Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Human Resources Management and Psychology

References

(1). Ускова Е.В. Рациональность в контексте проблемы реализм/релятивизм: автореф. дис. … канд. филос. наук. Екатеринбург, 2005. 24 с.

(2). Вебер М. Основные социологические понятия // Вебер М. Избранные произведения. М.: Прогресс, 1990. 808 c.

(3). Леви-Брюль Л. Сверхъестественное в первобытном мышлении. М.: Педагогика-пресс, 1994. 602 с.

(4). Лакофф Дж. Женщины, огонь и опасные вещи. Что категории мышления говорят нам о мышлении. М.: Гносиз, 2011. 512 с.

(5). Клейн М.С. Археологическая периодизация: подходы и критерии // STRATUM plus. 2000. № 1. С. 485–515.

(6). Сёрль Дж. Рациональность в действии / пер. с англ. А. Колодия, Е. Румянцевой. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2004. 336 с.

(7). Rosental D.M. Consciousness and its function // Neuropsyhologia. 2008. Vol. 46. P. 829–840.

References

(1). Uskova E.V. Ratsional’nost’ v kontekste problem realizm/reliativizm: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Rationality in the context of problem realism/relativism: author’s abstract on procuring the degree of candidate of philosophy]. Ekaterinburg, 2005, 24 p. (In Russian).

(2). Weber M. [Basic concepts in sociology]. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, 808 p. (In Russian).

(3). Lévy-Bruhl L. Sverhestestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii [Primitives and the Supernatural]. Moscow, Pedagogika-press Publ., 1994, 602 p. (In Russian).

(4). Lakoff G. Zhenschiny, ogon’ i opasnye veschi. Chto kategorii myshleniya govoryat nam o myshlenii [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2011, 512 p. (In Russian).

(5). Kleyn L.S. [Archaeological Periodisation: Approaches and Criteria]. [STRATUM Plus]. 2000, № 1, pp. 485–515. (In Russian).

(6). Searle G.R. Ratsional’nost’ v deistvii [Rationality in action]. Moscow, Progress-tradition Publ., 2001, 336 p. (In Russian).

(7). Rosental D.M. Consciousness and its function. Neuropsyhologia. 2008, vol. 46, pp 829–840. (In English).

Published

2017-03-30

Issue

Section

Psychology

Categories