Human in the digital world: «distributed» and integral
Philosophy «Problematization of the human: an ongoing project» (special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-370-375Keywords:
human, digital technologies, integrity, respect, digital environmentAbstract
Today digital technologies are the most important force that transforms both social relations and the human. At its early development stages, digital environment was seen as an opportunity for a human to be in the new world that exists independently of the physical world. Nowadays, online and offline worlds intertwine and form a «hybrid» environment where human exists in both worlds simultaneously. The main challenge of the digital environment is the challenge to the human integrity, which is seen as a fundamental human trait that allows human to be an independent and responsible actor who can acknowledge and respect another human being. In the present digital environment, human is «distributed», i.e. represented «fragmentarily» in different communications, various digital files, «distributed» between the online and offline worlds. Interaction between people used to be based on face-to-face communication, which gave the possibility to perceive another human integrally. The development of telecommunications creates a distorted, fragmented perception of the Other, who is thus seen as a digital being that has no real essence and hence does not deserve respect. It is shown in the paper that unconditional respect for the other human being is one of the most important evolutionary acquisitions, ensuring the existence of human communities. For this value to be preserved, it is important today to develop an ability to see the Other as an integral person in the new situation of the «hybrid» world.References
Войскунский А.Е. Интернет как пространство познания: психологические аспекты применения гипертекстовых структур // Современная зарубежная психология. 2017. Т. 6, № 4. С. 7–20. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/jmfp/2017/n4/Voiskounsky.shtml (дата обращения: 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060401
Гибсон Дж.Дж. Экологический подход к зрительному восприятию. М.: Прогресс, 1988. 464c.
Лекторский В.А. Трансформации индивидуальной и коллективной памяти в контексте глобальной цифровизации // Электронный научно-образовательный журнал «История». 2020. Т.11, № 9(95). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840012305-4-1/ (дата обращения: 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840012305-4
Пронькина А.Н. Трансформация памяти в условиях информационного перенасыщения // Философия науки и техники. 2020. Т.25, №1. С.110–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2020-25-1-110-124
Труфанова Е.О. Информационное перенасыщение: ключевые проблемы // Философские проблемы информационных технологий и киберпространства. 2019. №1(16). С.4–21. URL: http://cyberspace.pglu.ru/issues/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=320213 (дата обращения: 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philit.2019.1.16.1
Труфанова Е.О. Приватное и публичное в цифровом пространстве: размывание границ // Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2021. Т.3, № 1. С.14–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i1.130
Труфанова Е.О. Я как реальность и как конструкция // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 8. С.100–112.
Фролов А.В. Экзистенция и мир в цифровую эпоху // Вестник Московского университета. Серия7: Философия. 2018. №3. С.18–30.
Фромм Э. Анатомия человеческой деструктивности. М.: АСТ, 2017. 736 с.
Carr N. The amorality of Web 2.0. 2005. Oct. 3. URL: http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php (accessed: 21.07.2021).
Clark A., Chalmers D.J. The extended mind // Analysis. 1998. Vol. 58, iss. 1. P. 7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Kohler P., Pannasch S., Velichkovsky B.M. Enhancing mutual awareness, productivity and feeling: Cognitive science approach to design of groupware systems // Future Interaction Design II. London, UK: Springer, 2009. P. 31–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_2
Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Part 1 // On the Horizon. 2001. Vol. 9, iss. 5. URL: https://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (accessed: 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Sparrow B., Liu J., Wenger D.M. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips // Science. 2011. Vol.333, iss.6043. P.776−778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
References
Carr, N. (2005). The amorality of Web 2.0. Oct. 3. Available at: http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php (accessed 21.07.2021).
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D.J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis. Vol. 58, iss. 1, pp. 7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Frolov, A.V. (2018). [Human existence and his world in digital epoch]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya [Russian Studies in Philosophy. Series 7. Philosophy]. No. 3, pp. 18–30.
Fromm, E. (2017). Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti [The anatomy of human destructiveness]. Moscow: AST Publ., 736 p.
Gibson, J.J. (1998). Ekologicheskiy podkhod k zritel’nomu vospriyatiyu [The ecological approach to visual perception]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 464 p.
Kohler, P., Pannasch, S. and Velichkovsky, B.M. (2009). Enhancing mutual awareness, productivity and feeling: Cognitive science approach to design of groupware systems. Future interaction design 2. London: Springer Publ., pp. 31–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_2
Lektorskiy, V.A. (2020). [Transformation of individual and collective memory in the context of digitalization. Electronic scientific and educational journal «History». Vol. 11, no. 9(95). Available at: https://history.jes.su/s207987840012305-4-1/ (accesssed 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840012305-4
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon. Vol. 9, iss. 5. Available at: https://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (accessed 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Pron’kina, A.N. (2020). [Memory transformation in an information oversaturation environment]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of Science and Technology]. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 110–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2020-25-1-110-124
Sparrow, B., Liu, J. and Wenger, D.M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science. Vol. 333, iss. 6043, pp. 776−778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Trufanova, E.O. (2019). [Information oversaturation: key problems]. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologii i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical Problems of IT and Cyberspace]. No. 1(16), pp. 4–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philit.2019.1.16.1
Trufanova, E.O. (2021). [Private and public in the digital space: blurring of the lines]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i1.130
Trufanova, E.O. (2017). [The Self as reality and as construction], Voprosy filosofii. No. 8, pp. 100–112.
Voyskunskiy, A.E. (2017). [The Internet as a space of knowledge: psychological aspects of hypertext structures]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7–20. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/jmfp/2017/n4/Voiskounsky.shtml (accessed 21.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060401
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
