Problematization of the human: an incompletely completed project
Philosophy «Problematization of the human: an ongoing project» (special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-312-317Keywords:
the human, transhumanism, emergent technologies, life, death, soul, body, Faith, love, conscienceAbstract
From the standpoint of the author, the project of the human is complete and at the same time incomplete. It is ‘complete’ in the sense that philosophy and religion, in their millennial quest, gave an answer to the universal question about the origin, essence and purpose the human, about the highest spiritual meaning of his being. The answer provides a stable worldview foundation that allows one to overthrow skepticism and relativism, for which there is no criterion distinguishing between the good and the evil and everything that happens is covered with a mist of relativity and uncertainty. A modern form of skepticism is postmodernism, which answers topical questions concerning digitalization and at the same time separates the human from both the real world and transcendence, plunging him into the space of ‘simulacra’. It is, indeed, an unfinished, extremely open, unstable and unreliable space. But the philosophy of the East and West, in its centuries-old search, has found reliable ways to refute skepticism in all its historical forms and determined the firm, unshakable foundations of the human existence in the world, the ‘ultimately signified’ of his. Having in its repertoire the result obtained by hard work, philosophy can become a reliable support in the interpretation of the concept of transhumanism, inspired by the success of ‘emergent technologies’. At the same time, the project is incomplete in the sense that the human has to overcome the base, animal nature, which encourages vicious desires, thoughts and actions, and to make an ascent to the spiritual, divine Source. This process can be considered unfinished, open, endless. Human physicality will also improve due to the advances of modern technologies, but under the guidance of spiritual and moral principles – Faith, Love, Conscience. These positions are supported in the article by reference to the concepts of Orthodox philosophy (Ivan Ilyin) and Islamic philosophy (Abu Hamid al-Ghazali).References
Адорно Т.В. Эстетическая теория. М.: Республика, 2001. 527 с.
Аль-Газали А.Х. Воскрешение наук о вере / пер. с араб. и коммент. В.В.Наумкина. М.: Наука, 1980. 375с.
Аль-Газали А.Х. Элексир счастья. Ч. 1: Унваны 1–4. Рукн 1. СПб.: Петербургское востоковедение, 2002. 332 с.
Аль-Газали А.Х. Спасающий от заблуждений // Степанянц М.Т. Восточная философия. М.: Вост. лит., РАН, 1997. С. 434–436.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Энциклопедия философских наук. Т. 3: Философия духа. М.: Мысль, 1977. 471 с.
Ильин И.А. Аксиомы религиозного опыта. М.: АСТ, 2004. 588 с.
Ильин И.А. Религиозный смысл философии. М.: АСТ, 2006. 694 с.
Мерло-Понти М. В защиту философии / пер. с фр., примеч. и послесл. И.С. Вдовиной. М.: Изд-во гуманит. лит., 1996. 248 с.
Соловьева Г.Г. О человеке, его вере, любви, справедливости, богатстве, счастье. Ч. 1: Знание, вера, диалог. Алматы, 2016. 307 с.
Стпенянц М.Т. Восточная философия. М.: Вост. лит., РАН, 1997. 503 с.
Тиллих П. Избранное: Теология культуры: пер. с англ. М.: Юрист, 1995. 480 с.
Шелер М. Положение человека в Космосе / пер. А. Филиппова // Проблемы человека в западной философии: Переводы. М.: Прогресс, 1988. С. 31–95.
Хабермас Ю. Политические работы / пер. с нем. Б.М. Скуратова. М.: Праксис, 2005. 368 с.
Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие / сост., пер., вступ. ст. В.В. Бибихина. М.: Республика, 1993. 447с.
References
Adorno, T.V. (2001). Esteticheskaya teoriya [Aesthetic theory]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 527 p.
Al’-Gazali, A.H. (1980). Voskreshenie nauk o vere [Resurrection of the sciences of faith]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 375 p.
Al’-Gazali, A.H. (1997). [Saving from delusions]. Stepanyants M.T. Vostochnaya filosofiya [Stepanyants M.T. Eastern philosophy]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, RAS Publ., pp. 434–436.
Al’-Gazali, A.H. (2002). Eleksir schast’ya. Ch. 1 [Elixir of happiness. Pt. 1]. Saint Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie Publ., 332 p.
Habermas, J. (2005). Politicheskie raboty [Political works]. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 368 p.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3: Filosofiya dukha [Encyclopedia of philosophical sciences. Vol. 3: The philosophy of the spirit]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 471 p.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Vremya i bytie [Time and being]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 447 p.
Il’in, I.A. (2004). Aksiomy religioznogo opyta [Axioms of religious experience]. Moscow: AST Publ., 588 p.
Il’in, I.A. (2006). Religioznyy smysl filosofii [The religious meaning of philosophy]. Moscow: AST Publ., 694 p.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). V zaschitu filosofii [In defense of philosophy]. Moscow: Gumanitarnaya Literatura Publ., 248 p.
Scheler, M. (1998). [The position of man in Space]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii: Perevody [The problem of man in Western philosophy: Translations]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 31–95.
Solov’eva, G.G. (2016). O cheloveke, ego vere, lyubvi, spravedlivosti, bogatstve, schast’e. Ch. 1: Znaniye, vera, dialog [About a person, his faith, love, justice, wealth, happiness. Pt. 1: Knowledge, faith, dialogue]. Almaty, 307 p.
Stpenyants, M.T. (1997). Vostochnaya filosofiya [Eastern philosophy]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, RAS Publ., 503 p.
Tillich, P. (1995). Izbrannoye: Teologiya kul’tury [Selected works: Theology of culture]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 480 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.