History of psychology as a science: the contribution of M.S. Rogovin
«THE HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT» (Special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-10-24Keywords:
history of psychology, methodology of the history of psychology, unity of methodology and history, M.S. Rogovin, structural-level approach to history, evolution of the subject of psychologyAbstract
The article is devoted to a discussion of important methodological problems of the modern history of psychology. It is argued that the history of psychology in Russia was formed as a separate area of scientific and psychological knowledge, its methodological foundations were developed in research works of several generations of scientists. Despite the advances of the modern Russian history of psychology, there remain unresolved methodological problems, resulting in the lack of a full-fledged universal history of psychology that would satisfactorily explain the development of psychological science and characterize its prospects. The article discusses in detail the ideas on the development of the history of psychology proposed by Russian scientist M.S. Rogovin in the 1960s. The historical and psychological concept of M.S. Rogovin remains underestimated, and sometimes it is interpreted incorrectly. Historical and psychological knowledge is considered by M.S. Rogovin as a unity of subject and methodological knowledge, and psychology itself includes three different but interrelated contents: pre-scientific, philosophical, and scientific, which interact throughout the history of psychology. Rogovin distinguishes the external and internal history of psychology, considering it as the dynamics of psychological concepts and the conditions that guide it. Rogovin is the founder of conceptual analysis in the Russian history of psychology. The dynamics of concepts are considered at three levels (facts as indicators of the movement of psychological concepts; internal relationships between psychological concepts, their self-movement associated with the functioning of certain psychological mechanisms; dynamics of concepts within the theoretical systems of modern psychology). This article is the first to distinguish the stages in M.S. Rogovin’s work. At the third stage (from the 1970s), the author develops a structural-level approach to the study of the psyche. The article analyzes some provisions of the theory of M.S. Rogovin that are important for the development of a non-linear (level) history of psychology. It is argued that the ideas expressed by the author are of heuristic importance for the development of the history of psychology in the future. Based on the ideas of M.S. Rogovin, it is possible to proceed to the development of the history of psychology based on the level interpretation of the subject of psychology, the prospects of this approach are assessed in thReferences
Артемьева О.А. Социально-психологическая детерминация развития российской психологии в первой половине ХХ столетия. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2015. 534 с.
Залевский Г.В., Мазилов В.А., Урываев В.А., Соловьев А.В., Урванцев Л.П. Михаил Семенович Роговин — опережая время // Медицинская психология в России. 2013. T. 5, № 5(22). URL: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2013_5_22/nomer/nomer09.php(дата обращения: 15.09.2021).
Кольцова В.А. История психологии. Проблемы методологии. М.: Когито-Центр: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2008. 511 с.
Кольцова В.А. Теоретико-методологические основы истории психологи. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2004. 416 с.
Кольцова В.А., Холондович Е.Н. Воплощение духовности в личности и творчестве Ф.М. Достоевского. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2013. 304 с.
Левченко Е.В. История и теория психологии отношений. СПб.: Алетейя, 2003. 310 с.
Логинова Н.А. Антропологическая психология Бориса Ананьева. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2016. 366 с.
Логинова Н.А. (авт. и сост.). Борис Герасимович Ананьев: Биография. Воспоминания. Материалы. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2006. 376 с.
Логинова Н.А. Опыт человекознания: История комплексного подхода в психологических школах В.М. Бехтерева и Б.Г. Ананьева. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2005. 285 с.
Мазилов В.А. Михаил Семенович Роговин — методолог психологии // Методология и история психологии. 2006. Т. 1, вып. 2. С. 103–112.
Мазилов В.А. Михаил Семенович Роговин — философ психологии (к 100-летию со дня рождения) // Психологический журнал. 2021. Т. 42, № 5. С. 100–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920017080-4
Мазилов В.А. М.С. Роговин как историк психологии: завещание мастера // Ярославский психологический вестник. 2021. Вып. 2(50). С. 42–50.
Мазилов В.А. М.С. Роговин: философ психологии // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2011. № 40. С. 80–88.
Мазилов В.А. Психология и методология психологической науки: нерешенные актуальные проблемы // Методология современной психологии. Вып. 14: сб. / под ред. В.В. Козлова, А.В. Карпова, В.А. Мазилова, В.Ф. Петренко. М; Ярославль: ЯрГУ, НИИСИ РАН, МАПН, 2021. С. 46–63.
Мазилов В.А. Уроки мастера: человек, который знал все. Несколько штрихов к портрету М.С. Роговина // Ярославский психологический вестник. 2021. Вып. 2(50). С. 12–19.
Мироненко И.А. Российская психология в пространстве мировой науки. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2015. 304 с.
Пирковский С.П., Роговин М.С. Пьер Жане // Журнал невропатологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 1961. Т. 61, вып. 3. С. 449–456.
Роговин М.С. Введение в психологию. М.: Высш. шк., 1969. 382 с.
Роговин М.С. Проблемы теории памяти. М.: Высш. шк., 1977. 181 с.
Роговин М.С. Психологическое исследование: учеб. пособие. Ярославль, ЯрГУ, 1979. 66 с.
Роговин М.С. Пьер Жане // Вестник истории мировой культуры. 1960. № 6. С. 100–110.
Роговин М.С. Развитие структурно-уровневого подхода в психологии // Системные исследования. Ежегодник, 1974. М.: Наука, 1974. С. 187–230.
Роговин М.С. Структурно-уровневые теории в психологии: учеб. пособие. Ярославль: ЯрГУ, 1977. 80 с.
Роговин М.С. Уровневая структура психики в учении Аристотеля // Системные исследования. Ежегодник, 1978. М.: Наука, 1978. С. 152–168.
Роговин М.С. Философские проблемы теории памяти. М.: Высш. шк., 1966. 168 с.
Роговин М.С. Элементы общей и патологической психологии в построении психологической теории: автореф. дис. … д-ра пед. наук. М., 1968. 28 с.
Славская А.Н. Основы психологии С.Л. Рубинштейна. Философское обоснование развития. М.: Когито-Центр: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2015. 344 с.
Слепко Ю.Н., Мазилов В.А. К 100-летию М.С. Роговина — интервью с учеником // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2021. № 5(122). С. 143–158.
Холондович Е.Н. Реконструкция психологических характеристик личности гения на примере изучения жизненного пути и творчества Ф.М. Достоевского: дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2010. 260 с.
Элленбергер Г.Ф. Открытие бессознательного: история и эволюция динамической психиатрии. Т. 2: Психотерапевтические системы конца XIX – первой половины XX века. СПб.: Янус, 2004. 668 с.
Carus F.A. Nachgelassene Werke: Dritter Teil. Geschichte der Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth und Kummer, 1808. 790 S.
References
Asmolov, A.G. (1999). [XXI century: psychology in the age of psychology]. Voprosy Psychologii. No. 1, pp. 3–12.
Asmolov, A.G. (2000). [Psychology of the XXI century: prophecies and forecasts (materials of the «round table»)]. Voprosy Psychologii. No. 1, pp. 21–36.
Batyrshina, A.R. (2016). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 224 p.
Brushlinskiy, A.V. (ed.) (1997). Psikhologicheskaya nauka v Rossii XX stoletiya: problemy teorii i istorii [Psychological science in Russia of the XX century: problems of theory and history]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 576 p.
Chiker, V.A. (2021). [Socio-psychological training: 40 years of the development of M. Forverg’s concept in Russia]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 219–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120314
Dafermos, M. (2014) Soviet psychology. T. Teo (ed.) Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer Publ., pp. 1828–1835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_297
Girenok, F.I. (2014). Metafizika pata (kosnoyazychie ustalogo cheloveka) [Metaphysics of pat (tongue-tied tired person)]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 240 p.
Golovey, L.A. and Grischenko, P.A. (2021). [From the history of the psychological school of Leningrad/St. Petersburg University: Nina Albertovna Grishchenko]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology]. Vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 284–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.306
González Rey, F.L. (2014). Advancing further the history of Soviet psychology: moving forward from dominant representations in Western and Soviet psychology. History of Psychology. Vol. 17(1), pp. 60–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035565
Il’in, G.L. (2022). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: Urait Publ., 389 p.
Interv’yu o buduschem psikhologii [Interview about the future of psychology]. IP RAS. Available at: http://www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/media/on-layn-bibliote/intervu-o-budush.html (accessed 13.02.2020).
Jeshmaridian, S. (2012). Post-Soviet psychology. R.W. Rieber (ed.) Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories. New York: Springer Publ., .pp. 802–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_300
Kandybovich, S.L., Lysakov, N.D. and Lysakova, E.N. (2021). [Space psychology in Russia: history of formation and development features]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 97–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920015231-0
Klempe, S.H. and Smith, R. (eds.) (2016). Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology. Cham, CH: Springer Publ. 266 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7
Klotter, C. (2021). [History of Psychology — History of psychology?]. Die Psychologie als Verteidigerin der Moderne [Psychology as a defender of modernity]. Wiesbaden, DE: Springer Publ., pp. 39–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33365-2_7
Koltsova, V.А., Oleinik, Yu.N., Gilgen, A.R., and Gilgen, C.К. (eds.) (1996). Post-soviet perspectives on Russian psychology. Westport, CT, London, UK: Greenwood Press, 334 p.
Konstantinov, V.V. (2019). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 432 p.
Kovaleva, Yu.V. (2021). [History of developing the concept of «large social groups». Part 3. The begginings of modern stage in the development of social psychology (the 1990s – 2000s of XX century]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences Social and Economic Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 1(21), pp. 93–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2021.21.1.004
Kovaleva, Yu.V. (2021). [History of formation of the concept of «large social groups». Part 4. Modern stage of social psychology development (2000-present)]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences Social and Economic Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 3(23), pp. 6–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_23_3_01
Kudryavtsev, V.T. (2021). [F.T. Mikhailov: appeal as a cultural and psychological phenomenon]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170102
Levchenko, E.V. (2020). [On the problem of objectivity of modern historical and psychological research]. Anan’evskie chteniya – 2020. Psikhologiya sluzhebnoy deyatel’nosti: dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya (v chest’ 75-letiya Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941–1945 gg.) [Ananyev Readings – 2020. Psychology of Service Activity: Achievements and Prospects of Development (in honor of the 75th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945)]. St. Petersburg: Skifiya-Print Publ., pp. 155–156.
Martsinkovskaya, T.D. and Yurevich, A.V. (2011). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., Triksta Publ., 528 p.
Mazilov, V.A. (2017). [Psychology: a look into the future]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 97–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/s0205959217050087
Mescheryakov, B.G. (2021). [V.P. Zinchenko through the lens of his relations (based on V.P. Zinochenko’s autobiographical materials)]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 162–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170321
Mironenko, I.A. (2017). [From forecast to foresight of the future of Russian psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal[Psychological Journal]. Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 119–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/s0205959217030102
Mos, L.P. (ed.) (2009). History of psychology in autobiography. New York: Springer Publ., 256 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88499-8
Mülberger, A. (2016). Commentary 1: Functions and trends in the history of psychology. S.H. Klempe, R. Smith (eds.) Centrality of history for theory construction in Psychology. Cham, CH: Springer Publ., pp. 229–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_12
Nalchajian, A., Jeshmaridian, S.S. and Takooshian, H. (1997). Post-Soviet psychology: What is ahead? Eye on Psi Chi. Vol. 1, iss. 3, pp. 22–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24839/0033-2569.eye1.3.22
Nemirovskaya, N.G. (2017). Rekonstruktsiya zhiznennogo puti i tvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti V.N. Druzhinina: avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Reconstruction of the life path and creative activity of V.N. Druzhinin: Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation]. Moscow, 26 p.
Noskova, O.G. (2018). [The future of psychological science and practice from the perspective of the history of psychology and the study of science]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 122–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920000077-0
Pavlov, A.V. (2011). [History as a splash. To the article of V.N. Sagatovsky]. Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and Power]. No. 2(30), pp. 108–114.
Pavlov, A.V. (2017). Filosofiya sovremennosti i mezhvremen’ya [Philosophy of modernity and inter-time]. Tyumen: Titul Publ., 280 p.
Rafikova, V.A. and Mironenko, I.A. (2021). [Actual tendencies of the methodology of the history of psychology in light of the philosophic and methodological problems of historiography]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology]. Vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 312–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2021.402
Ryzhov, B.N. (2004). Istoriya psikhologicheskoy mysli. Puti i zakonomernosti [The history of psychological thought. Ways and patterns]. Moscow: Voenizdat Publ., 240 p.
Safonov, A.A. and Safonova, M.A. (2022). Sovremennaya istoriya [Modern history]. Moscow: Urait Publ., 245 p.
Salvatore, S. (2016). Commentary 2: The past and the history of psychology. S.H. Klempe, R. Smith (eds.) Centrality of history for theory construction in Psychology. Cham, CH: Springer Publ., pp. 235–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_13
Sarychev, S.V. and Logvinov, I.N. (2022). Istoriya psikhologii: v 2 ch. Chast’ 2 [The history of psychology: in 2 parts]. Moscow: Urait Publ., pt. 2, 211 p.
Scalambrino, F. (2018). Conclusion: post-modern turning away from method. Philosophical principles of the history and systems of psychology. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., pp. 195–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74733-0_6
Schukina, M.A. (2018). [B.G. Ananyev’s forecasts and modern psychology trends]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education]. Vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 258–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.304
Semenov, I.N. (2018). [Russian psychology hundred-year development, sociocultural reflection: to the centenary of soviet psychology (1918–2018)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin]. No. 4, pp. 4–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2018.04.04
Semenov, I.N. (2018). [Scientific reflection on the age-of development of Russian psychological science (to the 100th anniversary of Soviet psychology)]. Mir psikhologii [The World of Psychology]. No. 4(96), pp. 279–300.
Semenov, I.N. (2019). [The pioneering role of E.A. Budilova in the implementation of S.L. Rubinstein’s research programs and methodological problems of periodization of Russian (pre-revolutionary/Soviet/post-Soviet) psychology]. Istoricheskaya preemstvennost’ v otechestvennoy psikhologii, pod red. A.L. Zhuravleva, E.V. Kharitonova, E.N. Kholondovich [A.L. Zhuravlev, E.V. Kharitonov, E.N. Kholondovich (eds.) Historical continuity in Russian psychology]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 47–67.
Shmelev, A.G. (2015). [25 years of laboratory «humanitarian technologies» (chronological memories)]. PEM: Psychology. Educology. Medicine. No. 3–4, pp. 219–239.
Shvatskiy, A.Yu. (2019). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 322 p.
Sokolov, A.B. (2022). Istoriya istoricheskoy nauki. Istoriografiya Novoy i Noveyshey istorii [History of historical science. Historiography of Modern and Contemporary History]. Moscow: Urait Publ., 309 p.
Stepin, V.S., Gorokhov, V.G. and Rozov, M.A. (1996). Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology]. Moscow: Gardariki Publ., 400 p.
Sternberg, R.J. and Grigorenko, E.L. (1999). Psst: There’s more to Soviet and post-Soviet psychology than Pavlov and Vygotsky. The American Journal of Psychology. Vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 147–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1423628
Vassilieva, J. (2010). Russian psychology at the turn of the 21st century and post-Soviet reforms in the humanities disciplines. History of Psychology. Vol. 13(2), pp. 138–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019270
Vekilova, S.A. and Bezgodova, S.A. (2022). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: Urait Publ., 324 p.
Velichkovskiy, B.M. and Solov’ev, V.D. (2021). [Evolution in the status of cognitive research over 40 years: from the initial ban to new nomenclatury of sciences]. Voprosy Psychologii. No. 4, pp. 50–54.
Volovikova, M.I. (2021). [Laboratory of personality psychology IP RAS in the 1990s and the fate of academic science]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 2(22), pp. 227–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_22_2_09
Yakunin, V.A. (2001). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Moscow: V.A. Mikhailov Publ., 378 p.
Zhdan, A.N. (2007). Istoriya psikhologii: Ot Antichnosti do nashikh dney [History of psychology: From Antiquity to the present day]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 576 p.
Zhdan, A.N. (2012). [On the results of the development of Russian psychology in the XX century]. Razvitie psikhologii v sisteme kompleksnogo chelovekoznaniya. Ch. 1, pod red. A.L. Zhuravleva, V.A. Kol’tsovoy [A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsova (eds.) The development of psychology in the system of complex human knowledge. Pt. 1]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 175–185.
Zhuravlev, A.L. and Belopol’skiy, V.I. (eds.) (2014). Vydayuschiesya uchenye Instituta psikhologii RAN: Biograficheskie ocherki [Outstanding scientists of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Biographical essays]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 419 p.
Zhuravlev, A.L. and Mironenko, I.A. (2020). [Post-soviet period in scientific creativity of B.D. Parygin (the 90th anniversary)]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences Social and Economic Psychology]. Vol. 5, no. 2(18), pp. 443–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.016
Zhuravlev, A.L., Nestik, T.A. and Yurevich, A.V. (2016). [Forecast of psychological science and practice development by 2030]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 45–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
