Assessment of the internal consistency and factorial validity of Ch. Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Psychology

Authors

  • Dmitry E. Merzlyakov Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614068, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-4-587-600

Keywords:

anxiety, anxiousness, state anxiety, trait anxiety, construct validity, reliability

Abstract

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a widely used instrument for assessing anxiety both as a state and as a personality trait. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the internal consistency and facto-rial validity of the STAI. The study involved 605 students of Perm State University aged between 17 and 32 (M = 22.3; SD = 4.96). The adapted version of the questionnaire developed by Yu.L. Khanin in 1976 was used. Data analysis included testing for normality (Anderson–Darling test), assessment of internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha and McDonald’s Omega coefficients), Pearson correlation analysis, ex-ploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. High internal consistency was observed for both scales, this confirming the reliability of measuring the respective constructs. However, confirmatory factor analysis indicated a lack of fit between the empirical data and the proposed one-factor model, while exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure for each scale, based on the semantic orientation of the items: direct statements reflected anxiety symptoms, whereas reverse items characterized the opposite emotional phenomenon. These findings suggest that the STAI simultaneously captures anxiety symptoms and an oppositely directed emotional state, which raises questions about the construct homogeneity of the scales. The findings highlight the importance of further discussion and, possibly, revision of individual elements of the STAI framework to improve the precision of the instrument.

Author Biography

Dmitry E. Merzlyakov, Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614068, Russia

Senior Lecturer of the Department of General and Clinical Psychology

References

Азабина Е.С., Ильинский С.В. Взаимосвязь тревожности личности и репрезентации ее успешности // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия: Психология. 2019. № 1(25). С. 3–15.

Белова А.Н. Шкалы, тесты и опросники в неврологии и нейрохирургии. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Практическая медицина, 2018. 696 с.

Вергунов Е.Г., Николаева Е.И., Боброва Ю.В. К вопросу о психометрической надежности некоторых психологических методик // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2019. Т. 12, № 1. С. 61–68.

Коптева Н.В., Калугин А.Ю., Дорфман Л.Я. Невоплощенность в Интернете. Сообщение 2. Психометрическая проверка инструментария // Клиническая и специальная психология. 2021. Т. 10, № 4. С. 205–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2021100410

Наследов А.Д. Структурное моделирование каузальных гипотез: исследование педагогических стереотипов оценивания младших школьников // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 12. Психология. Социология. Педагогика. 2011. Вып. 1. С. 305–313.

Шишлянникова Л.М. Применение корреляционного анализа в психологии // Психологическая наука и образование. 2009. Т. 14, № 1. С. 98–107.

Шмелев А.Г. Психометрические параметры методики Спилбергера–Ханина (ситуативная и личностная тревожность) / Форум HT-Line. 2022. 25 июл. URL: https://forum.ht-line.ru/

threads/psixometricheskie-parametry-metodiki-spilbergera-xanina-situativnaja-i-lichnostnaja-trevozhnost.3363/ (дата обращения: 03.05.2025).

Щербатых Ю.В. Методики диагностики тревоги и тревожности — сравнительная оценка // Вестник по педагогике и психологии Южной Сибири. 2021. № 2. С. 85–104.

Balsamo M., Romanelli R., Innamorati M., Ciccarese G., Carlucci L., Saggino A. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Shadows and lights on its construct validity // Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2013. Vol. 35, iss. 4. P. 475–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9354-5

Behrouzian F., Sadrizadeh N., Nematpour S., Seyedian S.S., Nassiryan M., Zadeh A.J.F. The effect of psychological preparation on the level of anxiety before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy // Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017. Vol. 11, iss. 7. URL: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10270/24876_ce[ra]_f(sh)_pf1(ru_vt_ne)_pfa(pne).pdf (accessed: 03.05.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/24876.10270

Bieling P.J., Antony M.M., Swinson R.P. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, trait version: structure and content re-examined // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1998. Vol. 36, iss. 7–8. P. 777–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00023-0

Caci H., Baylé F.J., Dossios Ch., Robert Ph., Boyer P. The Spielberger trait anxiety inventory measures more than anxiety // European Psychiatry. 2003. Vol. 18, iss. 8. P. 394–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.05.003

Cattell R.B., Scheier I.H. The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. N.Y.: The Ronald Press Company, 1961. 535 p.

Davey G.C.L., Hampton J., Farrell J., Davidson S. Some characteristics of worrying: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs // Personality and Individual Differences. 1992. Vol. 13, iss. 2. P. 133–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90036-o

Dhanabhakyam M., Sarath M. Psychological wellbeing: a systematic literature review // International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. 2023. Vol. 3, iss. 1. P. 603–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-8345

Grupe D.W., Nitschke J.B. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 14, iss. 7. P. 488–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524

Hernandez R., Bassett S.M., Boughton S.W., Schuette S.A., Shiu E.W., Moskowitz J.T. Psychological well-being and physical health: associations, mechanisms, and future directions // Emotion Review. 2018. Vol. 10, iss. 1. P. 18–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917697824

Jouvent R., Bungener C., Morand P., Millet V., Lancrenon S., Ferreri M. Distinction trait/état et anxiété en médecine générale: Étude descriptive // L’Encéphale. 1999. Vol. 25, no. 1. P. 44–49.

Kaupuzs A., Vazne Z., Usca S. Evaluation of psychometric properties of the state and trait anxiety inventory scale in a student sample // Society. Integration. Education: proceedings of the International scientific conference (Rēzekne, May 22–23, 2015). Rēzekne, LV: Rēzeknes Augstskola, 2015. Vol. 1. P. 198–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.317

Kvaal K., Laake K., Engedal K. Psychometric properties of the state part of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in geriatric patients // International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2001. Vol. 16, iss. 10. P. 980–986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.458

McDowell I. Anxiety // McDowell I. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 273–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.003.0006

Ryff C.D. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia // Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2014. Vol. 83, iss. 1. P. 10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Shin H., Jung Yo., Jeong Ch., Heo J.-H. Assessment of modified Anderson–Darling test statistics for the generalized extreme value and generalized logistic distributions // Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 2012. Vol. 26, iss. 1. P. 105–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0463-y

Spielberger Ch.D., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene R., Vagg P.R., Jacobs G.A. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Self-evaluation questionnaire STAI form Y–1 and form Y–2. 1977. URL: https://pdfcoffee.com/

stai-spielberger-state-trait-anxiety-inventory-pdf-free.html (аccessed: 20.09.2022).

Wiedemann K. Anxiety and anxiety disorders // International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences / ed. by J.D. Wright. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 1. P. 804–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.27006-2

Zinbarg R.E., Revelle W., Yovel I., Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability // Psychometrika. 2005. Vol. 70, iss. 1. P. 123–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7

Zsido A.N., Teleki S.A., Csokasi K., Rozsa S., Bandi S.A. Development of the short version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory // Psychiatry Research. 2020. Vol. 291. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178120300834/pdfft?md5=9e5ccfa8b2ef8a03b565349df24b31aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0165178120300834-mainext.pdf (accessed: 03.05.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113223

References

Azabina, E.S. and Ilinsky, S.V. (2019). [The relationship of anxiety personality and represtntation of its success]. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya [Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. A Series of Psychology]. No. 1(25), pp. 3–15.

Balsamo, M., Romanelli, R., Innamorati, M., Ciccarese, G., Carlucci, L. and Saggino, A. (2013). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Shadows and lights on its construct validity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. Vol. 35, iss. 4, pp. 475–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9354-5

Behrouzian, F., Sadrizadeh, N., Nematpour, S., Seyedian, S.S., Nassiryan, M. and Zadeh, A.J.F. (2017). The effect of psychological preparation on the level of anxiety before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Vol. 11, iss. 7. Available at: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10270/24876_ce[ra]_f(sh)_pf1(ru_vt_ne)_pfa(pne).pdf (accessed 03.05.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/24876.10270

Belova, A.N. (2018). Shkaly, testy i oprosniki v nevrologii i neirokhirurgii [Scales, tests and questionnaires in neurology and neurosurgery]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina Publ., 696 p.

Bieling, P.J., Antony, M.M. and Swinson, R.P. (1998). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, trait version: structure and content re-examined. Behaviour Research and Therapy. Vol. 36, iss. 7–8, pp. 777–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00023-0

Caci, H., Baylé, F.J., Dossios, Ch., Robert, Ph. and Boyer, P. (2003). The Spielberger trait anxiety inventory measures more than anxiety. European Psychiatry. Vol. 18, iss. 8, pp. 394–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.05.003

Cattell, R.B. and Scheier, I.H. (1961). The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 535 p.

Davey, G.C.L., Hampton, J., Farrell, J. and Davidson, S. (1992). Some characteristics of worrying: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 133–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90036-o

Dhanabhakyam, M. and Sarath, M. (2023). Psychological wellbeing: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. Vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 603–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-8345

Grupe, D.W. and Nitschke, J.B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Vol. 14, iss. 7, pp. 488–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524

Hernandez, R., Bassett, S.M., Boughton, S.W., Schuette, S.A., Shiu, E.W. and Moskowitz, J.T. (2018). Psychological well-being and physical health: associations, mechanisms, and future directions. Emotion Review. Vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 18–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917697824

Jouvent, R., Bungener, C., Morand, P., Millet, V., Lancrenon, S. and Ferreri, M. (1999). [Distinction between anxiety state/trait in general practice: A descriptive study]. L’Encéphale [The Brain]. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–49.

Kaupuzs, A., Vazne, Z. and Usca, S. (2015). Evaluation of psychometric properties of the state and trait anxiety inventory scale in a student sample. Society, Integration, Education: proceedings of the International scientific conference (Rēzekne, May 22–23, 2015). Rezekne, LV: Rezekne University of Applied Sciences Publ., vol. 1, pp. 198–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.317

Kopteva, N.V., Kalugin, A.Yu. and Dorfman, L.Ya. (2021). [Unembodiment in the Internet. Part 2. Psychometric Verification of the Questionnaire]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education]. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 205–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2021100410

Kvaal, K., Laake, K. and Engedal, K. (2001). Psychometric properties of the state part of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in geriatric patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Vol. 16, iss. 10, pp. 980–986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.458

McDowell, I. (2006). Anxiety. McDowell I. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 273–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.003.0006

Nasledov, A.D. (2011). [Structural modeling of causal hypotheses: reserch of pedagogical assessment stereotypes of younger schoolboy]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy]. Iss. 1, pp. 305–313.

Ryff, C.D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. Vol. 83, iss. 1, pp. 10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Shcherbatykh, Yu.V. (2021). [Comparative assessment of methods for diagnosing anxiety]. Vestnik po pedagogike i psikhologii Yuzhnoy Sibiri [Bulletin on Pedagogics and Psychology of Southern Siberia]. No. 2, pp. 85–104.

Shin, H., Jung, Yo., Jeong, Ch. and Heo, J.-H. (2012). Assessment of modified Anderson-Darling test statistics for the generalized extreme value and generalized logistic distributions. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. Vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 105–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0463-y

Shishlyannikova, L.M. (2009). [Application of correlation analysis in psychology]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye [Psychological Science and Education]. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 98–107.

Shmelev, A.G. (2022). Psikhometricheskie parametry metodiki Spilbergera–Khanina (situativnaya i lichnostnaya trevozhnost) [Psychometric parameters of the Spielberger–Khanin method (state and trait anxiety)]. Forum HT-Line, Jul. 25. Available at: https://forum.ht-line.ru/threads/psixometricheskie-parametry-metodiki-spilbergera-xanina-situativnaja-i-lichnostnaja-trevozhnost.3363/ (accessed 03.05.2025).

Spielberger, Ch.D., Gorsuch, R.L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P.R. and Jacobs, G.A. (1977). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Self-evaluation questionnaire STAI form Y–1 and form Y–2. Available at: https://pdfcoffee.com/stai-spielberger-state-trait-anxiety-inventory-pdf-free.html (аccessed 20.09.2022).

Vergunov, E.G., Nikolaeva, E.I. and Bobrova Yu.V. (2019). [On the issue of psychometric reliability of some psychological methods]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology]. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61–68.

Wiedemann, K. (2015). Anxiety and anxiety disorders. J.D. Wright (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Publ., vol. 1, pp. 804–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.27006-2

Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. and Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. Vol. 70, iss. 1, pp. 123–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7

Zsido, A.N., Teleki, S.A., Csokasi, K., Rozsa, S. and Bandi, S.A. (2020). Development of the short version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Psychiatry Research. Vol. 291. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178120300834/pdfft?md5=9e5ccfa8b2ef8a03b565349df24b31aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0165178120300834-mainext.pdf (accessed 03.05.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113223

Published

2025-12-24

Issue

Section

Статьи