Quasi-classicism as a property of the modern multiversal society
Creative generation of meaning in the multiverse of contemporary culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-4-535-542Keywords:
system, classical system, quasi-classical system, society, progress, creativity, innovation, valuesAbstract
A system is defined as a set of elements that are in relationships and connections with each other forming a certain integrity, unity. A classical system is characterized by the interconnectedness of all its parts, and each of the parts works for the whole. An example of a classical system is a biological organism. Speaking about the system (meaning human society as a whole), Erich Fromm noted the high inertia of systems, their resistance to any change. It is true that a classical system is most often stable (it can also be dynamically stable) and difficult to change because any part of it works to preserve it as a given system. However, the modern information society, with its contradictions and increased creativity, is becoming impossible to comprehend in terms of a classical system. And this is where the concept of quasi-classical systems is used. A quasi-classical system differs in that some of its parts may not work for the whole and may even be destructive in relation to the system they belong to. However, these parts also become useful for the system, ensuring its lability. An example of a quasi-classical system is the modern information society, which is particularly creative precisely due to its non-classicism. Human psyche can also be considered as a quasi-classical system.References
Аршинов В.И. На пути к наблюдателю-конструктору инновационной сложности // Инновационная сложность / отв. ред. Е.Н. Князева. СПб.: Алетейя, 2016. С. 15–37.
Василенко И.А. Система политическая // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. / науч.-ред. совет: В.С. Степин и др. М: Мысль, 2010. Т. 3. С. 555–556. URL: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH0178cc6538a5c6496f161178 (дата обращения: 11.04.2024).
Князева Е.Н. Инновационная сложность: общая методология и способы организации когнитивных, коммуникативных, социальных систем // Инновационная сложность / отв. ред. Е.Н. Князева. СПб.: Алетейя, 2016. С. 38–100.
Матурана У., Варела Ф. Древо познания: Биологические корни человеческого понимания / пер. с англ. Ю.А. Данилова. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. 224 с.
Моркина Ю.С. Ценности как фактор культурного развития // Третьи Степинские чтения. Перспективы философии науки в современную эпоху: материалы Междунар. конф. (Москва, 20–21 июня 2023 г.) / отв. ред В.А. Лекторский, В.Г. Буданов. М.; Курск: Университетская книга, 2023. С. 478–481.
Николис Г., Пригожин И. Самоорганизация в неравновесных системах: от диссипативных структур к упорядоченности через флуктуации / пер. с англ. В.Ф. Пастушенко. М.: Мир, 1979. 512 с.
Пригожин И., Стенгерс И. Порядок из хаоса. Новый диалог человека с природой / пер. с англ. Ю.А. Данилова. М.: Прогресс, 1986. 432 с.
Садовский В.Н. Система // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. / науч.-ред. совет: В.С. Степин и др. М: Мысль, 2010. Т. 3. С. 552–553. URL: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASHd77bbce481b4406a90ced7 (дата обращения: 11.04.2024).
Смирнова Н.М. Концепт коммуникативной сложности в парадигме (пост)неклассической рациональности // Инновационная сложность / отв. ред. Е.Н. Князева. СПб.: Алетейя, 2016. С. 268–295.
Смирнова Н.М. Творчество как процесс созидания новых культурных смыслов // Философия творчества: материалы Всерос. науч. конф. (Москва, Ин-т философии РАН, 8–9 апреля 2015 г.) / под ред. Н.М. Смировой, А.Ю. Алексеева. М.: ИИнтелл, 2015. С. 88–103.
Степин В.С. Цивилизация и культура. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУП, 2011. 408 с.
Фромм Э. Быть человеком // Фромм Э. Быть человеком. Концепция человека у Карла Маркса: сборник / пер. с англ. А. Александровой. М.: АСТ, 2020. С. 6–189.
Luhmann N. The autopoiesis of social systems // Luhmann N. Essays on self-reference. N.Y: Columbia University Press, 1990. P. 1–20.
References
Arshinov, V.I. (2016). [On the way to the observer-designer of innovative complexity]. Innovatsionnaya slozhnost’, otv. red. E.N. Knyazeva [E.N. Knyazeva (ed.) Innovative complexity]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., pp. 15–37.
Fromm, E. (2020). [On being human]. Fromm E. Byt’ chelovekom. Kontseptsiya cheloveka u Karla Marksa: sbornik [Fromm E. On being human. Marx’s concept of man: collection]. Moscow: AST Publ., pp. 6–189.
Knyazeva, E.N. (2016). [Innovative complexity: general methodology and methods of organizing cognitive, communicative, and social systems]. Innovatsionnaya slozhnost’, otv. red. E.N. Knyazeva [E.N. Knyazeva (ed.) Innovative complexity]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., pp. 38–100.
Luhmann, N. (1990) The autopoiesis of social systems. Luhmann N. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–20.
Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.G. (2001). Drevo poznaniya. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya [The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 224 p.
Morkina, Yu.S. (2023). [Values as a factor of cultural development]. Tret’i Stepinskie chteniya. Perspektivy filosofii nauki v sovremennuyu ehpokhu: materialy Mezhdunar. konf. (Moskva, 20–21 iyunya, 2023 g.), otv. red V.A. Lektorskiy, V.G. Budanov [V.A. Lektorskiy, V.G. Budanov (eds.) Third Stepin readings. Prospects of philosophy of science in the modern era: proceedings of the International conference (Moscow, Jun. 20–23, 2023)]. Moscow, Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga Publ., pp. 478–481.
Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. (1979). Samoorganizatsiya v neravnovesnykh sistemakh: ot dissipativnykh struktur k uporyadochennosti cherez fluktuatsii [Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: from dissipative structures to order through fluctuations]. Moscow: Mir Publ., 512 p.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1986). Poryadok iz khaosa. Novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 432 p.
Sadovskii, V.N. (2010). [Sistema Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya: v 4 t., nauch. red. V.S. Stepin i dr. [V.S. Stepin et al. (eds.) The new philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 3, pp. 552–553. Available at: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASHd77bbce481b4406a90ced7 (accessed 11.04.2024).
Smirnova, N.M. (2015).[Creativity as a process of creating new cultural meanings]. Filosofiya tvorchestva: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Moskva, In-t filosofii RAN, 8–9 aprelya 2015 g.), pod red. N.M. Smirovoy, A.Yu. Alekseyeva [N.M. Smirova, A.Yu. Alekseyev (eds.) Philosophy of creativity: proceedings of the All-Russian scientific conference (Moscow, IPh RAS, Apr. 8–9, 2015). Moscow: IIntell Publ., pp. 88–103.
Smirnova, N.M. (2016). [The concept of communicative complexity in the paradigm (post)nonclassical rationality]. Innovatsionnaya slozhnost’, otv. red. E.N. Knyazeva [E.N. Knyazeva (ed.) Innovative complexity]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., pp. 268–295.
Stepin, V.S. (2011). Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilization and culture]. St. Petersburg: SPbUHSS Publ., 408 p.
Vasilenko, I.A. (2010). [The political system]. Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya: v 4 t., nauch. red. V.S. Stepin i dr. [V.S. Stepin et al. (eds.) The new philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 3, pp. 555–556. Available at: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH0178cc6538a5c6496f161178 (accessed 11.04.2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.