Self-regulation and subjectness: the intersection of the systems
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-1-76-85Keywords:
subject, subjectness, self-regulation, systems, structural equation modelingAbstract
The article attempts to correlate the phenomena of subjectness and self-regulation at the empirical level. As theoretical and empirical studies show, these phenomena are closely related. However, there is no unambiguous understanding of their relationship: is self-regulation part of subjectness, is it an independent phenomenon, or is there an intersection of the systems? Subjectness seems to us to be a more fundamental phenomenon; therefore, subjectness was not considered as part of self-regulation. In the empirical study, several alternative models were constructed and tested: 1) a model assuming that subjectness and self-regulation are a single phenomenon (a single-factor model); 2) a model assuming that self-regulation is a component of subjectness; 3) a model assuming that subjectness and self-regulation are two independent phenomena; 4) a model assuming a relationship between subjectness and self-regulation; 5) a model assuming an intersection of the systems, in which case subjectness uses certain properties of self-regulation, while self-regulation uses certain properties of subjectness, with both phenomena being understood as independent. Priority was given to the latter model. The models’ consistency with the empirical data was tested on a sample of 184 people aged 15 to 53 (M = 20.49, SD = 7.34), including 104 women and 80 men. These were mostly students of higher and secondary specialized educational institutions. The methods used were «The Development Level of a Person’s Subjectness» by M.A. Shchukina and the questionnaire «Behavior Self-Regulation Style – SSPM 2020» by V.I. Morosanova. The main statistical method was structural equation modeling. The intersecting systems model turned out to be most consistent with the data.References
Брушлинский А.В. Психология субъекта (лекция, прочитанная студентам, аспирантам и преподавателям факультета психологии Тверского государственного университета 19 октября 2001 г.) // Психологический журнал. 2003. Т. 24, № 2. С. 15–17.
Волкова Е.Н., Суворова О.В., Дунаева Н.И., Бирюкова Л.А. и др. Развитие субъектности в онтогенезе в современном социокультурном пространстве образования и семьи: учеб. пособие. Н. Новгород: Изд-во НГПУ им. К. Минина, 2012. 246 с.
Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Индивидуально-интеллектуальные интеграции человека. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2021. 279 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/mng_21_0438
Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Эмпирическая психология индивидуально-интеллектуальных интеграций. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2024. 290 с.
Конопкин О.А. Осознанная саморегуляция как критерий субъектности // Вестник практической психологии образования. 2012. Т. 9, № 4. С. 97–101. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/bppe/archive/2012_n4/Konopkin (дата обращения: 21.07.2024).
Моросанова В.И. Психология осознанной саморегуляции: от истоков к современным исследованиям // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2022. Т. 15, № 3. С. 57–82.
Моросанова В.И. Саморегуляция и индивидуальность человека / Ин-т психологии РАН; Психологический ин-т РАО. 2-е изд. М.: Наука, 2012. 519 с.
Моросанова В.И., Кондратюк Н.Г. Опросник В.И. Моросановой «Стиль саморегуляции поведения – ССПМ 2020» // Вопросы психологии. 2020. Т. 66, № 4. С. 155–167.
Осницкий А.К. Проблемы исследования субъектной активности // Вопросы психологии. 1996. № 1. С. 5–19.
Осницкий А.К. Регуляторный опыт — основа субъектной активности человека // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2008. Т. 1, № 2. С. 17–34.
Сергиенко Е.А., Виленская Г.А., Ковалева Ю.В. Контроль поведения как субъектная регуляция. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2010. 352 с.
Суворова О.В. К проблеме критериев и структуры субъектности // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2011. Т. 13, № 2(5). С. 1178–1182.
Щукина М.А. Особенности развития субъектности личности в подростковом возрасте: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. СПб., 2004. 19 с.
Щукина М.А. Психология саморазвития личности. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2015. 348 с.
Awang Z. Structural equation modeling using Amos Graphic. Shah Alam, MY: University Technology MARA Press, 2012. 167 p.
Bentler P.M., Satorra A. Testing model nesting and equivalence // Psychological Methods. 2010. Vol. 15, iss. 2. P. 111–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019625
Brosseau-Liard P.E., Savalei V. Adjusting incremental fit indices for nonnormality // Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2014. Vol. 49, iss. 5. P. 460–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.933697
Brosseau-Liard P.E., Savalei V., Li L. An investigation of the sample performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA // Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2012. Vol. 47, iss. 6. P. 904–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
Brown T.A. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2015. 462 p.
Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999. Vol. 6, iss. 1. P. 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
References
Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using Amos Graphic. Shah Alam, MY: University Technology MARA Press, 167 p.
Bentler, P.M. and Satorra, A. (2010). Testing model nesting and equivalence. Psychological Methods. Vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 111–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019625
Brosseau-Liard, P.E. and Savalei, V. (2014). Adjusting incremental fit indices for nonnormality. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 49, iss. 5, pp. 460–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.933697
Brosseau-Liard, P.E., Savalei, V. and Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 47, iss. 6, pp. 904–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
Brown, T.A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press, 462 p.
Brushlinskiy, A.V. (2003). [Psychology of the Subject (a lecture given to students, postgraduates and teachers of the Faculty of Psychology of Tver State University on October 19, 2001]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 15–17.
Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2021). Individual’no-intellektual’nye integratsii cheloveka [Individual-intellectual integration of a person]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 279 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/mng_21_0438
Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2024). Empiricheskaya psikhologiya individual’no-intellektual’nykh integratsiy [Empirical psychology of individual-intellectual integrations]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 290 р.
Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Konopkin, O.A. (2012). [Conscious self-regulation as a criterion of subjectness]. Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya [Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education]. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 97–101. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/bppe/archive/2012_n4/Konopkin (accessed 21.07.2024).
Morosanova, V.I. (2012). Samoregulyatsiya i individual’nost’ cheloveka [Self-regulation and human individuality]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 519 p.
Morosanova, V.I. (2022). [Psychology of conscious self-regulation: from origins to modern research]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychol-ogy]. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 57–82.
Morosanova, V.I. and Kondratyuk, N.G. (2020). [Questionnaire by V.I. Morosanova «Style of self-regulation of behavior – SSBM 2020»]. Voprosy psikhologii. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 155–167.
Osnitskiy, A.K. (1996). [Problems of studying subject activity]. Voprosy psikhologii. No. 1, pp. 5–19.
Osnitskiy, A.K. (2008). [Regulatory experience is the basis of human subjective activity]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psilhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology]. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 17–34.
Schukina, M.A. (2004). Osobennosti razvitiya sub’ektnosti lichnosti v podrostkovom vozraste: avtoref: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Features of development of personality subjectness in adolescence: Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation]. St. Petersburg, 19 p.
Schukina, M.A. (2015). Psikhologiya samorazvitiya lichnosti [Psychology of self-development of personality]. St. Petersburg: SPbSU Publ., 348 р.
Sergienko, E.A., Vilenskaya, G.A. and Kovaleva Yu.V. (2010). Kontrol’ povedeniya kak sub’ektnaya regulyatsiya [Behavior control as subject regulation]. M: IP RAS Publ., 352 р.
Suvorova, O.V. (2011). [To the problem of criteria and structure of subjectiveness]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 13, no. 2(5), pp. 1178–1182.
Volkova, E.N., Suvorova, O.V., Dunaeva, N.I., Biryukova, L.A. et al. (2012). Razvitie sub’ektnosti v ontogeneze v sovremennom sotsiokul’turnom prostranstve obrazovaniya i sem’i [Development of subjectness in ontogenesis in the modern socio-cultural space of education and family]. Nizhny Novgorod: NGPU Publ., 246 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
