Digital reality: meaning and significance
The philosopher and philosophy in the modern world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2026-2-199-210Keywords:
objective reality, digital reality, information, meaning, significance, digital time, digital spaceAbstract
The article analyzes approaches to the study of digital reality and identifies the features of the concept of “digital reality.” The naturalistic, disciplinary, functional, structural, and communicative-procedural approaches to the study of digital reality are outlined. In contrast to these approaches, the article shows the possibility of studying digital reality based on identifying the dynamics of meanings and significance that emerge in subjects (individuals) who demonstrate varying degrees of immersion in digital reality through active, cognitive, and communicative interaction with it. Employing the procedural approach to the analysis of digital reality, the article identifies its ontological characteristics based on the “bonding” of natural, social, and technical levels of reality by information processes occurring within them. Therefore, the genetic aspect, the aspect of actual existence, and the semantic aspect of digital reality are examined. Within this framework, such attributive features of digital reality as “digital time,” “digital space,” and the “digital context of human existence” have been identified. The meaning of time in the digital realm is transformed in such a way that, on the one hand, it represents a set of processes of human interaction with technical devices and with the virtual reality formed in this interaction, and, on the other hand, this sequence of mathematical operations in technical devices contains the emergent quality of existence (“to be”) outside natural, social, and existential time. “Digital space” is a semantic object of informational meanings that exists within the conventions of a subject’s interaction with technical devices. For a person who, through a cognitive and practical relationship with the objectively existing world, forms the meaning and significance of reality, digital reality reveals a spectrum of the same meanings of reality, but in absolutely invariant forms that are open to infinite combinatorics. Therefore, the “digital mode of human existence” signifies the priority of all meanings reproduced by digital reality in the consciousness of a subject who perceives it in a value-based, cognitive, and practical relation to everything that exists as a whole.References
Гринфилд А. Радикальные технологии: устройство повседневной жизни. М.: Дело; РАНХиГС, 2018. 424 с. EDN: FBNKJE
Гримов О.А. Цифровая реальность: социальная онтология и методология эмпирического изучения // Сложность. Разум. Постнеклассика. 2019. № 3. С. 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5dbaa8bf81fe27.51109106 EDN: LEOOUR
Желнин А.И. Интеллект и «тайна» логико-вычислительного фетишизма // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2025. Вып. 3. С. 376–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-3-376-387 EDN: NFFSTP
Косенков А.Ю. Концепция цифровой реальности и ее эвристический потенциал в экспликации угроз цифровизации // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 2023. № 2. С. 14–19. EDN: FSXYIM
Лазинина Е.В. Цифровая реальность в контексте процессов коммуникации и экзистенции человека // Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2019. Т. 11, № 2. С. 80–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2019-2-78-90 EDN: DHTJQX
Доэрти П., Уилсон Д. Человек + машина. Новые принципы работы в эпоху искусственного интеллекта. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2019. 304 c.
Макаров В.А. Влияние цифровой реальности на концепцию бытия // Международный журнал «Вестник науки». Научный электронный журнал. 2024. Т. 2, № 12(81). С. 1261–1265. EDN: JIPXEQ
Моррис Ч.У. Основания теории знаков // Семиотика: Антология / сост. Ю.С. Степанов. М.: Академический проект; Екатеринбург: Деловая книга, 2001. 702 с.
Оливейра А. Цифровой разум: как наука меняет человечество. М.: Дело; РАНХиГС, 2022. 448 с.
Орлов В.В. Проблема будущего человеческой цивилизации (товарное производство, капитализм, социализм) // Новые идеи в философии. 1999. Вып. 8. С. 4–23. EDN: TWFEOZ
Подопригора А.В. Числа и цифры: пифогорейская традиция и метафизика цифровой реальности // Научный ежегодник Института философии и права Уральского отделения РАН. 2018. Т. 18, вып. 3. С. 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17506/ryipl.2016.18.3.726 EDN: YAJQGL
Пржиленский В.И. «Реальность»: социально-эистемологическое исследование // Вопросы философии. 2013. № 9. С. 91–106. EDN: REFRZL
Пржиленский В.И. Понятие цифровой реальности: значение и смысл // Философия науки и техники. 2021. Т. 26, № 2. С. 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-2-68-80 EDN: QWTYPK
Саден Э. Среди призраков: Рассуждение об эпохе метавселенной и генеративного искусственного интеллекта. СПб.: Издательство Ивана Лимбаха, 2025. 272 с.
Саден Э. Тирания Я: конец общего мира. СПб.: Издательство Ивана Лимбаха, 2023. 336 с.
Сотой дю М. Нейросеть разумная. Как искусственный интеллект осваивает человеческие навыки, творит, думает и учиться. М.: Колибри; Азбука-Аттикус, 2024. 384 с.
Vnutskikh A., Komarov S. Lebenswelt, Digital Phenomenology and Modification of Human Intelligence // Technology and Language: Chat GPT and the Voice of Reason. 2024. Vol. 5(2). P. 67–79.
Vnutskikh A., Komarov S. Technogenic Subjectivity and its Social Prjjections // Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century – Innovations and Technologies in Interdisciplinary Applications, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. May 26, 2023. P. 653–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28086-3_61 EDN: QJSPHK.
References
Daugherty, P. and Wilson, J. (2019). Chelovek+mashina. Novye printsipy raboty v epokhu iskusstvennogo intellekta [Human + machine: Reimagining work in the age of AI]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 304 p.
Greenfield, A. (2018). Radikal’nye tekhnologii: ustroystvo povsednevnoy zhizni [Radical technologies. The design of everyday life]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 424 p.
Grimov, O.A. (2019). [Digital reality: social ontology and empirical study methodology]. Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika [Complexity. Mind. Postnonclassics]. No. 3, pp. 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5dbaa8bf81fe27.51109106
Kosenkov, A.Yu. (2023). [The concept of digital reality and its heuristic potential in the explication of threats of digitalisation]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya [Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology]. No. 2, pp. 14–19.
Lazinina, E.V. (2019). [The digital reality from the perspective of communication processes and existence of human]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem [Russian Journal of Humanities]. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 80–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2019-2-78-90
Makarov, V.A. (2024). [Influence of digital reality on concept of being]. Vestnik nauki [Bulletin of Science]. No. 12 (81), vol. 2, pp. 1261–1265.
Morris, Ch.W. (2001). [Foundations of the theory of signs]. Semiotika: Antologiya, sost. Yu.S. Stepanov [Stepanov Yu.S. (ed.) Semiotics: Anthology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ.; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga Publ., 702 p.
Oliveira, A. (2022). Tsifrovoy razum: kak nauka menyaet chelovechestvo [The digital mind: how science is redefining humanity]. Moscow: Delo RANEPA Publ., 448 p.
Orlov, V.V. (1999). [The problem of the future of human civilization (commodity production, capitalism, socialism)]. Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy]. Iss. 8, pp. 4–23.
Podoprigora, A.V. (2018). [Number and figure: Pythagorean tradition and metaphysics of digital reality]. Nauchniy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya RAN [Research Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the RAS]. No. 18, iss. 3, pp. 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17506/ryipl.2016.18.3.726
Przhilenskiy, V.I. (2013). ["Reality": a socio-epistemological study]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 9, pp. 91–106.
Przhilenskiy, V.I. (2021). [The concept of digital reality: meaning and significance]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of Science and Technology]. Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-2-68-80
Saden, E. (2025). Sredi prizrakov: Rassuzhdenie ob epokhe metavselennoy i generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta [Among the ghosts: a discourse on the era of the metaverse and generative artificial intelligence]. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publ., 272 p.
Saden, E. (2023). Tiraniya Ya: konets obschego mira [The tyranny of the Ego: the end of the common world]. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publ., 336 p.
Sautoy, M. Du. (2024). Neyroset’ razumnaya. Kak iskusstvennyy intellekt osvaivaet chelovecheskie navyki, tvorit, dumaet i uchitsya [Neural network intelligent: How artificial intelligence learns human skills, creates, thinks, and learns]. Moscow: Kolibri Publ., Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 384 p.
Vnutskikh, A. and Komarov, S. (2024). Lebenswelt, digital phenomenology and modification of human intelligence. Technology and Language: Chat GPT and the Voice of Reason. No. 5(2), pp. 67–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2024.02.06
Vnutskikh, A. and Komarov, S. (2023). Technogenic subjectivity and its social prjjections. Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century – Innovations and Technologies in Interdisciplinary Applications, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. New York: Springer Publ., pp. 653–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28086-3_61
Zhelnin, A.I. (2025). [Intelligence and the «mystery» of logico-computational fetishism]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology]. Iss. 3, pp. 376–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-3-376-387
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
