Visual phenomenology of M. Merleau-Ponty

Philosophy

Authors

  • Anton Sergeevich Reutov Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, 1, Ulyanov str., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-4-520-527

Keywords:

production of presence, visual studies, meaning, perception, hermeneutics, phenomenology

Abstract

This article represents the review of the main ideas and concepts of Merleau-Ponty, which refer to the analysis of the visual essence. In the beginning of this article the constitutive role of physicality will be shown. Due to the presence of the body, man is able to understand oneself and the world one is located. The body and the world are indissoluble, have the same nature, this is due to the possibility of perception.In the second part of the article the author shows how Merleau-Ponty understands the process of vision. For the philosopher ability to see itself is important, to see before thinking, to see, that is already a type of thinking. This type of seeing can be understood only in certain circumstances. Firstly, in a situation when one sees not a specific thing, but the entire visible horizon, the whole «scene». Secondly, it should be noted that «the seer»and «the seen» are always at a certain distance, vision is subjective and depends on «the seer». Further, in the third part of the article the reconstruction of the analysis of the painting which was held by Merleau-Ponty in his works is presented. The author gives special attention to the role of the artist. Painter has a special kind of view, he sees the world differently and in diffrent categories. Through the perception of the artist, one can understand how the world can fully capture «the seer».Through analysis of the painting, we open special measures of the visible world. The depth shows the arrangement of things relative to one another. Its anchor is a seeing eye. Color opens the materiality, palpability of surfaces, color is always paired with the quality of things, that it covers. The line or circuit on the painting make explicit the hidden sense of the non-existent border between things, which occurs only in the human eye.These and other categories of analysis of a work of art open to the philosopher the main sense of vision of the real world, on the other hand.The author of the article aims to show how understanding of the seeing in the works of Merleau-Ponty is revealed, and that it is a characteristic of the world and is the result of a specific juxtaposition of «the seer» and «the seen», «the man» and «the world». 

Author Biography

Anton Sergeevich Reutov , Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, 1, Ulyanov str., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia

Ph.D. Student of the Department of Philosophyand Social Sciences

References

Баль М. Визуальный эссенциализм и объект визуальных исследований // Логос. 2012. № 1(85). С. 212–249.

Инишев И.Н. Феноменология как теория образа // Логос. 2010. № 5(78). С. 196–204.

Мерло-ПонтиМ. Феноменология восприятия. СПб.: Наука, 1999. 312 с.

ПетровскаяЕ. Теория образа. М.: Рос. гос. гуманит. ун-т, 2010. 283 с.

Мерло-Понти М. Видимое и невидимое. Минск, 2005. 400 с.

Moxey K. Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn // Journal of Visual Culture. 2008. Vol. 7, iss.2. P. 131–146. DOI: 10.1177/1470412908091934.

Гумбрехт Х.-У. Производство присутствия: Чего не может передать значение. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2006. 184 с.

Мерло-Понти М. Кино и новая психология восприятия. URL: http://www.psychology.ru/library/00038.shtml (дата обращения: 09.12.2016).

Мерло-ПонтиМ. Око и дух. М.: Искусство, 1992. 63 с.

Мерло-ПонтиМ. Сомнение Сезанна. URL: http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/7647-cezanne (дата обращения: 09.12.2016).

Mitchell W.J.T. Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture // Journal of Visual Culture. Vol.1, iss. 2. P. 165–181. DOI: 10.1177/147041290200100202.

Маклюэн Г.M. Понимание Медиа: Внешние расширения человека. М.: Жуковский, 2003. 464 с.

References

Bal’ M. Vizual’niy essentsializm i ob’ekt vizual’nyh issledovaniy [Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture]. Logos [Logos]. 2012, no. 1(85), pp. 212–249. (In Russian).

Inishev I.N. Fenomenologiya kak teoriya obraza [Phenomenology as a Theory of Image]. Logos [Logos]. 2010, no. 5(78), pp. 196–204. (In Russian).

Merleau-Ponty M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1999, 312 p. (In Russian).

Petrovskaya E. Teoriya obraza [Theory of Image]. Moscow, RSUH Publ., 2010, 283 p. (In Russian).

Merleau-Ponty M. Vidimoe i nevidimoe [The Visible and the Invisible]. Minsk, 2005, 400 p. (In Russian).

Moxey K. Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn. Journal of Visual Culture. 2008, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 131–146. DOI: 10.1177/1470412908091934. (In English).

Gumbreht H.-U. Proizvodstvo prisutstviya: Chego ne mozhet peredat’ znachenie [Production of Presence: what meaning cannot convey]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2006, 184 p. (In Russian).

Merleau-Ponty M. Kino i novaya psikhologiya vospriyatiya [Cinema and the New Psychology]. Available at: http://www.psychology.ru/library/ 00038.shtml (accessed 09.12.2016). (In Russian).

Merleau-Ponty M. Oko i dukh [Eye and Mind]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1992, 63 p. (In Russian).

Merleau-Ponty M. Somnenie Sezanna [Cézanne’s Doubt]. Available at: http://theoryandpractice.ru/ posts/7647-cezanne (accessed: 09.12.2016). (In Russian).

Mitchell W.J.T. Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture. 2002, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 165–181. DOI: 10.1177/147041290200100202. (In English).

Maklyuen G.M. Ponimanie Media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Moscow, Zhukovskiy Publ., 2003, 464 p. (In Russian).

Published

2017-12-30

Issue

Section

Статьи