Formal-dynamic characteristics of individuality in relation to the manifestations of the value-semantic sphere of personality
Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-76-91Keywords:
individuality, temperament, temperament traits, personality, value-semantic sphere of personalityAbstract
The article discusses the relationship between the formal-dynamic characteristics of individuality and the properties of the value-semantic sphere of personality. It is suggested that in case of detecting such an interrelationship, it may be the evidence in favor of the subject’s desire to harmonize their own individuality and to make the interaction of its multilevel characteristics consistent. A research sample consisted of 463 people, including 219 girls and 244 young men aged 15 to 24 (M = 18.9; SD = 2.0). Based on a wide range of methods aimed at studying temperament traits, values and meanings, the authors identified generalized formal-dynamic characteristics of individuality. They are emotional stability – emotional instability, extraversion – introversion, psychoticism – superego strength, formal-dynamic features of intelligence, psychomotor endurance. Likewise, generalized indicators of the value-semantic sphere of personality, i.e. value-based orientations and life-purpose orientations, were detected. For this purpose, the following statistical methods were used: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). A close interdependence between the indicators of temperament and the value-semantic sphere of personality was found. To study the level of stability of the detected structure, a gender invariance test was carried out, which showed high consistency of the structure in male and female samples. The main hypothesis of the study was confirmed.References
Алексеева В.Г. Ценностные ориентации как фактор жизнедеятельности и развития личности // Психологический журнал. 1984. Т. 5, № 5. С. 63–70.
Андреева Г.М. Социальная психология. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2001. 378 с.
Анцыферова Л.И. Психология формирования и развития личности // Человек в системе наук / отв. ред. И.Т. Фролов. М.: Наука, 1989. С. 426–434.
Бодалев А.А. Специфика социально-психологического подхода к пониманию личности // Психология личности в трудах отечественных психологов: хрестоматия / сост. Л.В. Куликов. СПб.: Питер, 2000. С. 336–344.
Волочков А.А. Активность субъекта бытия: Интегративный подход / Перм. гос. пед. ун-т. Пермь, 2007. 376 с.
Волочков А.А., Ермоленко Е.Г. Ценностная направленность личности как выражение смыслообразующей активности // Психологический журнал. 2004. Т. 25, № 2. С. 17–27.
Донцов А.И. О ценностных отношениях личности // Советская педагогика. 1974. № 5. С. 67–76.
Калугин А.Ю. Вклад свойств темперамента в обобщенные ценностно-смысловые ориентации личности // Актуальные проблемы исследования массового сознания: матер. V Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. / отв. ред. В.В. Константинов. Пенза: Изд-во ПГУ, 2019. С. 95–98.
Калугин А.Ю. К проблеме связи ценностей, смыслов, ментальных ресурсов и концептов // Мир науки. Педагогика и психология 2018. Т. 6, № 6. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/11PSMN618.pdf (дата обращения: 18.12.2019).
Калугин А.Ю. Обобщенные свойства темперамента и ценностно-смысловой сферы личности // Методология, теория, история психологии личности / отв. ред. А.Л. Журавлев, Е.А. Никитина, Н.Е. Харламенкова. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2019. С. 133–141.
Калугин А.Ю. Соотношение понятий при изучении ценностно-смысловой и мотивационно-потребностной сфер личности // Вестник Пермского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета. Серия № 1. Психологические и педагогические науки. 2014. Вып. 1. С. 17–24.
Калугин А.Ю. Ценностная направленность личности как выражение смыслообразующей активности: структура, динамика и функции в структуре интегральной индивидуальности (на материале студенчества): дис. … канд. психол. наук. Пермь, 2015. 179 с.
Калугин А.Ю., Волочков А.А. Ценностная направленность личности студентов-гуманитариев // Вопросы психологии. 2016. № 4. С. 28–42.
Капцов А.В. Психологическая аксиометрия личности и группы: учеб. пособие. Самара: СамЛюксПринт, 2011. 112 с.
Клайн П. Справочное руководство по конструированию тестов. Киев: ПАН Лтд., 1994. 288 с.
Князев Г.Г., Слободская Е.Р., Сафронова М.В. Краткая форма личностного опросника Грея–Уильсона // Вопросы психологии. 2004. № 4. С. 113–122.
Купер К. Индивидуальные различия. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. 527 с.
Леонтьев Д.А. От социальных ценностей к личностным: социогенез и феноменология ценностной регуляции деятельности // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14. Психология. 1996. № 4. С. 35–44.
Леонтьев Д.А. Психология смысла: природа, строение и динамика смысловой реальности. М.: Смысл, 2019. 584 с.
Леонтьев Д.А. Тест смысложизненных ориентаций (СЖО). М.: Смысл, 2006. 18 с.
Мерлин B.C. Очерк интегрального исследования индивидуальности. М.: Педагогика, 1986. 256 с.
Мерлин В.С. Очерк теории темперамента. Пермь: ПГГПУ, 2018. 462 с.
Митина О.В., Михайловская И.Б. Факторный анализ для психологов. М.: УМК «Психология», 2001. 169 с.
Мухина В.С. Механизмы формирования ценностных ориентации и социальной активности личности. М.: МГПИ, 1985. 140 с.
Осин Е.Н. Чувство связности как показатель психологического здоровья и его диагностика // Психологическая диагностика. 2007. № 3. С. 22–40.
Основы психологии: практикум / ред.-сост. Л.Д. Столяренко. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2002. 704 с.
Парыгин Б.Д. Основы социально-психологической теории. М.: Мысль, 1971. 351 с.
Платонов К.К. Структура и развитие личности. М.: Наука, 1986. 256 с.
Рослякова Е.Ю. Взаимосвязь видов активности субъекта жизнедеятельности в ранней юности: дис. … канд. психол. наук. Ярославль, 2009. 184 с.
Русалов В.М. Темперамент в структуре индивидуальности человека: дифференциально-психофизиологические и психологические исследования. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2012. 528 с.
Стреляу Я., Митина О., Завадский Б., Бабаева Ю., Менчук Т. Методика диагностики темперамента (формально-динамических характеристик поведения). М.: Смысл, 2009. 104 с.
Chen F.F. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2007. Vol. 14, iss. 3. P. 464–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Horsburgh V.A., Schermer J.A., Veselka L., Vernon P.A. A behavioural genetic study of mental toughness and personality // Personality and individual differences. 2009. Vol. 46, iss. 2. P. 100–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.009
Marsh H.W., Morin A.J., Parker P.D., Kaur G. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis // Annual review of clinical psychology. 2014. Vol. 10. P. 85–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
McCrae R.R., Costa P.T.Jr. The five-factor theory of personality // Handbook of personality: Theory and research / ed. by O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2008. P. 159–181.
Norman G.R., Streiner D.L. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. Hamilton, CA; L., UK: Decker, 2000. 324 p.
Shchebetenko S., Kalugin A.Y., Mishkevich A.M., Soto C.J., John O.P. Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory – 2: Evidence From the Russian Version // Assessment. 2019. (Advance Online Publication). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Soto C.J., John O.P. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI–2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2017. Vol. 113, iss. 1. P. 117–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Tabachnick B.G., Fidel L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, 2013. 983 p.
Vernon P.A., Villani V.C., Vickers L.C., Harris J.A. A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5 // Personality and Individual Differences. 2008. Vol. 44, iss. 2. P. 445–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
References
Alekseeva, V.G. (1984). Tsennostnye orientatsii kak faktor zhiznedeyatel’nosti i razvitiya lichnosti [Value orientations as a factor of life and personal development]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 63–70.
Andreeva, G.M. (2001). Sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Social psychology]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., 378 p.
Antsyferova, L.I. (1989). Psikhologiya formirovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti [Psychology of personality formation and development]. Chelovek v sisteme nauk [The man in the science system]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 426–434.
Bodalev, A.A. (2000). Spetsifika sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo podkhoda k ponimaniyu lichnosti [Specifics of the socio-psychological approach to understanding the personality]. Psikhologiya lichnosti v trudakh otechestvennykh psikhologov [Psychology of personality in the works of domestic psychologists]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Publ., pp. 336–344.
Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 464–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cooper, C. (2000). Individual’nye razlichiya [Individual differences]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., 527 p.
Dontsov, A.I. (1974). O tsennostnykh otnosheniyakh lichnosti [About value relationships of the person]. Sovetskaya pedagogika [Soviet Pedagogy]. No. 5, pp. 67–76.
Horsburgh, V.A., Schermer, J.A., Veselka, L. and Vernon, P.A. (2009). A behavioural genetic study of mental toughness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 46, iss. 2, pp. 100–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.009
Kalugin, A.Yu. (2018). K probleme svyazi tsennostey, smyslov, mental’nykh resursov i kontseptov [To the problem of the relationship between values, meanings, mental resources and concepts]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya [World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology]. Vol. 6, no. 6. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/11PSMN618.pdf (accessed 18.12.2019).
Kalugin, A.Yu. (2019). Obobschennye svoystva temperamenta i tsennostno-smyslovoy sfery lichnosti [Generalized properties of temperament and value-semantic sphere of personality]. Metodologiya, teoriya, istoriya psikhologii lichnosti [Methodology, theory, history of personality psychology]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., pp. 133–141.
Kalugin, A.Yu. (2014). Sootnoshenie ponyatiy pri izuchenii tsennostno-smyslovoy i motivatsionno-potrebnostnoy sfer lichnosti [Relations between the concepts in the study of value-semantic and motivation-need spheres of personality]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya № 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Vestnik PSHPU. Series 1. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences]. Iss. 1, pp. 17–24.
Kalugin, A.Yu. (2015). Tsennostnaya napravlennost’ lichnosti kak vyrazhenie smysloobrazuyuschey aktivnosti: struktura, dinamika i funktsii v strukture integral’noy individual’nosti (na materiale studenchestva): dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Value orientation of the personality as an expression of meaning-making activity: structure, dynamics and functions in the structure of integral individuality (based on students): dissertation]. Perm, 179 p.
Kalugin, A.Yu. (2019). Vklad svoystv temperamenta v obobschennye tsennostno-smyslovye orientatsii lichnosti [Contribution of temperament properties to generalized value-semantic orientations of personality]. Aktual’nye problemy issledovaniya massovogo soznaniya [Actual problems of the study of mass consciousness]. Penza: PSU Publ., pp. 95–98.
Kalugin, A.Yu. and Volochkov, A.A. (2016). Tsennostnaya napravlennost’ lichnosti studentov-gumanitariev [Value orientation of the personality of humanitarian students]. Voprosy psikhologii. No. 4, pp. 28–42.
Kaptsov, A.V. (2011). Psikhologicheskaya aksiometriya lichnosti i gruppy [Psychological axiometry of personality and group]. Samara: SamLyuksPrint Publ., 112 p.
Kline, P. (1994). Spravochnoe rukovodstvo po konstruirovaniyu testov [The handbook of psychological testing]. Kiev: PAN Publ., 288 p.
Knyazev, G.G., Slobodskaya, E.R. and Safronova, M.V. (2004). Kratkaya forma lichnostnogo oprosnika Greya–Uilsona [Brief form of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire]. Voprosy psikhologii. No. 4, pp. 113–122.
Leont’ev, D.A. (1996). Ot sotsial’nykh tsennostey k lichnostnym: sotsiogenez i fenomenologiya tsennostnoy regulyatsii deyatel’nosti [From social to personal values: sociogenesis and phenomenology of value regulation of activity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya [Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 14. Psychology]. No. 4, pp. 35–44.
Leont’ev, D.A. (2019). Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy real’nosti [Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 584 p.
Leont’ev, D.A. (2006). Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsiy (SZhO) [Meaningful orientation test]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 18 p.
Marsh, H.W., Morin, A.J., Parker, P.D. and Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual review of clinical psychology. Vol. 10, pp. 85–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T.Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, ed. by O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 159–181.
Merlin, V.S. (1986). Ocherk integral’nogo issledovaniya individual’nosti [Essay on the integral study of individuality]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 256 p.
Merlin, V.S. (2018). Ocherk teorii temperamenta [Essay on the theory of temperament]. Perm: PSHPU Publ., 462 p.
Mitina, O.V. and Mikhaylovskaya, I.B. (2001). Faktornyy analiz dlya psikhologov [Factor analysis for psychologists]. Moscow: Educational and Methodical Collector «Psychology», 169 p.
Mukhina, V.S. (1985). Mekhanizmy formirovaniya tsennostnykh orientatsiy i sotsial’noy aktivnosti lichnosti [Mechanisms of formation of value orientation and social activity of the personality]. Moscow: MSPI Publ., 140 p.
Norman, G.R. and Streiner, D.L. (2000). Biostatistics: the bare essentials. Hamilton, CA, London, UK: Decker Publ., 324 p.
Osin, E.N. (2007). Chuvstvo svyaznosti kak pokazatel’ psikhologicheskogo zdorov’ya i ego diagnostika [Sense of coherence as an indicator of psychological health and its diagnosis]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological Diagnostics]. No 3, pp. 22–40.
Parygin, B.D. (1971). Osnovy sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoy teorii [Basics of socio-psychological theory]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 351 p.
Platonov, K.K. (1986). Struktura i razvitie lichnosti [The structure and development of personality]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 256 p.
Roslyakova, E.Yu. (2009). Vzaimosvyaz’ vidov aktivnosti sub’ekta zhiznedeyatel’nosti v ranney yunosti: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [The relationship of the types of activity of the subject of life in early adolescence: dissertation]. Yaroslavl, 184 p.
Rusalov, V.M. (2012). Temperament v strukture individual’nosti cheloveka: Differentsial’no-psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Temperament in the structure of human individuality: Differential psychophysiological and psychological studies]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 528 p.
Schebetenko, S., Kalugin, A.Yu., Mishkevich, A.M. et al. (2019). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory – 2: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment. (Advance Online Publication). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI–2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 113, iss. 1, pp. 117–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Stolyarenko, L.D. (ed.) (2002). Osnovy psikhologii: Praktikum [Fundamentals of psychology: Practical training]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks Publ., 704 p.
Strelyau, Ya., Mitina, O., Zavadskiy, B. et al. (2009). Metodika diagnostiki temperamenta (formal’no-dinamicheskikh kharakteristik povedeniya) [Methods of diagnostics of temperament (formal-dynamic characteristics of behavior)]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 104 p.
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidel, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Publ., 983 p.
Vernon, P.A., Villani, V.C., Vickers, L.C. and Harris, J.A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 44, iss. 2, pp. 445–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
Volochkov, A.A. (2007). Aktivnost’ sub’ekta bytiya: Integrativnyy podkhod [The activity of the subject of being: An integrative approach]. Perm: PSPU Publ., 376 p.
Volochkov, A.A. and Ermolenko, E.G. (2004). Tsennostnaya napravlennost’ lichnosti kak vyrazhenie smysloobrazuyuschey aktivnosti [Value orientation of personality as an expression of meaning-making activity]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 17–27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
