The Figure of City in Contemporary Prose (Olivia Laing’s ‘The Lonely City’ and Albert Spiazzatov’s ‘Losing Our Streets’)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2024-1-116-124Keywords:
urban narrativity; city in literature; Olivia Laing; The Lonely City; Albert Spiazzatov; Eldar Sattarov; Losing Our Streets; figure of city.Abstract
The article explores the boundaries of such a type of narrative as urban narrativity. Based on this approach, not only is a city an object of observation and description, but it also influences the creation of texts, being both the material for the plot and the narrative structure. The expression ‘figure of city’ is formed based on the well-developed concept of the ‘language’ of space (Antsiferov, Toporov, Certeau) and actualizes the rhetorical use of this language by the narrator to communicate with the readers. In this research paper, two contemporary prose works balancing between fiction and autofiction are in the focus of this ‘figure of city’ approach. In the case of Olivia Laing’s The Lonely City (2016), the image of the city performs the function of a synecdoche, and the expression ‘lonely city’ is read as an unspoken ‘lonely me’, ‘lonely us’. In the case of the novel by Albert Spiazzatov (pseudonym of Eldar Sattarov) Losing Our Streets (2010), the city acts as a conceptual metaphor of the hero’s life and as a language for his self-reflection. The two examples demonstrate that thinking about a city is an understanding not only of a specific urban space but also of modern life itself. The figure of city can act both as an ontological metaphor and as a metalanguage of modern life.References
Анциферов Н. П. Радость жизни былой… Проблемы урбанизма в русской художественной литературе. Опыт построения образа города – Петербурга Достоевского – на основе анализа литературных традиций / сост., вступ. ст. Д. С. Московская. Новосибирск: Свиньин и сыновья, 2014. 656 с.
Бахтин М. М. Проблема содержания, материала и формы в словесном художественном творчестве // Эстетика словесного творчества. М.: Искусство, 1975. С. 6–71.
Беньямин В. Бодлер. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2023. 240 с.
Дебор Г.-Э. Психогеография. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2017. 112 с.
Еременко А. А. Городской очерк как текст урбанистической нарративности // Критика и семиотика. 2023. № 1. С. 368–383. doi 10.25205/2307-1753-2023-1-368-383
Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем / пер. с англ., под ред. и с предисл. А. Н. Баранова. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004. 256 с.
Лэнг О. Одинокий город. Упражнения в искусстве одиночества / пер. с англ. Шаши Мартыновой. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс: Музей современного искусства «Гараж», 2021. 352 с.
Пономарев Е. Травелог vs. путевой очерк: постколониализм российского извода // Новое литературное обозрение. 2020. № 166 (6). URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/166_nlo_6_2020/article/22969/ (дата обращения: 01.02.2023).
Серто М. де. Изобретение повседневности. 1. Искусство делать / Мишель де Серто; пер. с фр. Д. Калугина, Н. Мовниной. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2013. 330 с.
Соколов А. А. Вьетнамские отцы, советские сыновья: контекст межнациональной семьи // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития, 2021. № 1 (50). С. 243–261.
Спьяццатов А. Теряя наши улицы. Алматы: TOO «DPS», 2010. 228 с.
Топоров В. Н. Петербургский текст / Отд-ние ист.-филол. наук РАН. М.: Наука, 2009. 820 с.
Херльт Й. «Этот город странен, этот город непрост...»: о литературной истории «города N» // Русская литература и журналистика в движении времени. 2015. № 1. С. 5–28.
Laing O. The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2016. 336 p.
Sittikul P. Reimagining Loneliness: Stigmatisation of Marginalised Artists in Patriarchal Society through Memoir of Olivia Laing’s Lonely City // วารสารมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลรา
ชธานี, 2021. № 12(2). P. 1–27. URL: https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human_ubu/article/view/247423/170884 (дата обращения: 08.02.2023).
Warde-Aldam D. Going It Alone in The Modern City // Apollo, 2016. URL: https://www.apollo-magazine.com/going-alone-modern-city/ (дата обращения: 08.02.2023).
Watkins T. From Foragers to Complex Societies in Southwest Asia // The Human Past: World Prehistory & the Development of Human Societies. London: Thames & Hudson. 2005. P. 201–234.
References
Antsiferov N. P. Radost’ zhizni byloy… Problemy urbanizma v russkoy khudozhestvennoy literature. Opyt postroeniya obraza goroda – Peterburga Dostoevskogo – na osnove analiza literaturnykh traditsiy [The Joy of Old Life... Urbanism Issues in Russian Fiction. An Experience of Constructing the Image of the City – Dostoevsky’s St. Petersburg – on the Basis of an Analysis of Literary Traditions]. Novosibirsk, Svin’in i Synov’ya Publ., 2014. 656 p. (In Russ.)
Bakhtin M. M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [The problem of content, material, and form in verbal art]. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1975, pp. 6–71. (In Russ.)
Benjamin W. Bodler [Baudelaire], Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2023. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Debord G.-E. Psikhogeografiya [Psychogeography], Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2017. 112 p. (In Russ.)
Eremenko A. A. Gorodskoy ocherk kak tekst urbanisticheskoy narrativnosti [Urban literary sketch as a text of urban narrativity]. Kritika i semiotika [Critique & Semiotics], 2023, issue 1, pp. 368–383. doi 10.25205/2307-1753-2023-1-368-383. (In Russ.)
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Transl. from English, ed. and pref. by A. N. Baranov. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Laing O. Odinokiy gorod. Uprazhneniya v iskusstve odinochestva [The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press: Museum of Contemporary Art ‘Garage’ Publ., 2021. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Ponomarev E. Travelog vs. putevoy ocherk: postkolonializm rossiyskogo izvoda [Travelogue vs. Travel Article: the Russian Version of Postcolonialism]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 2020, issue 166(6). Available at: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/166_nlo_6_2020/article/22969/ (accessed 1 Feb 2023). (In Russ.)
Certeau M. de Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat’ [The Practice of Everyday Life. 1. The Art of Doing]. Transl. from French by D. Kalugin, N. Movnina. St. Petersburg, European University at St. Petersburg Press, 2023. 330 p. (In Russ.)
Sokolov A. A. V’etnamskie ottsy, sovetskie
synov’ya: kontekst mezhnatsional’noy sem’i [Vietnamese fathers, Soviet sons: the context of an interethnic family]. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nye problemy razvitiya [South East Asia: Actual Problems of Development], 2021, issue 1(50), pp. 243–261. (In Russ.)
Spiazzatov A. Teryaya nashi ulitsy [Losing Our Streets], Almaty, LLP ‘DPSʼ Publ., 2010. 228 p. (In Russ.)
Toporov V. N. Peterburgskiy tekst [Petersburg Text]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009. 820 p. (In Russ.).
Herlt J. ‘Etot gorod stranen, etot gorod neprost...’: o literaturnoy istorii ‘goroda N’ [‘This town is strange, this city is not simple...’: about the literary history of ‘town N’]. Russkaya literatura i zhurnalistika v dvizhenii vremeni [Russian Literature and Journalism in the Movement of Time], 2015, issue 1, pp. 5–28. (In Russ.).
Laing O. The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone, Edinburgh Canongate Books, 2016. 336 p. (In Eng.)
Sittikul P. Reimagining loneliness: Stigmati-sation of marginalised artists in patriarchal society through reading Olivia Laing’s Lonely City. วารสาร
มนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี [Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ubon Ratchathani University], 2021, issue 12(2). Available at: https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human_
ubu/article/view/247423/170884 (accessed 8 Feb 2023). (In Eng.)
Warde-Aldam D. Going it alone in the modern city. Apollo, 2016. Available at: https://www.apollo-magazine.com/going-alone-modern-city/ (accessed 8 Feb 2023). (In Eng.)
Watkins T. From foragers to complex societies in Southwest Asia. The Human Past: World Prehistory & the Development of Human Societies, London, 2005, pp. 201–234. (In Eng.)
