Literary Cyclization in Epic Prose (on the Problem of Comparative Analysis of the Cycle and the Novel as Genre Forms)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2023-4-127-136Keywords:
cycle; genre; cyclization; novel; polyphony.Abstract
The article studies the relationship between the prose cycle and the novel. Looking at the development of the novel as a genre from a diachronic perspective, it is possible to see that between novels (Greek and antique, medieval and Rabelaisian, the Bildungsroman and the novel of formation, classical and modernist and postmodern novel) there is always a kind of intermediate ‘zone’ in which the process of preparing a new type of novel takes place. In literary studies, this ‘pre-novel’ genre form is called a prose cycle. However, in the studies of prose cyclization, there is still neither a theoretically developed approach to such literary phenomena nor unanimous opinion about their ontological connection with the novel genre. In our opinion, the theory of novel developed by M. M. Bakhtin, which deals with the fundamental features of the novel (folk culture of laughter, the incomplete present novel tense, marginal connection with reality, polyphony, multilingualism), may serve as the theoretical basis for the consideration of prose cycles. The relation between the cycle and the novel in this case is considered from the causal perspective as the relation of aprototext to the text or of a presupposition to the illocution. The paper considers contemporary literary studies on cyclization (by M. N. Darvin, V. I. Tyupa, A. S. Yanushkevich, and other researchers) in the context of the Bakhtin’s theory of novel on the basis of the assumption that there is an ontological connection between these two ‘illegal’ genre forms. In the process of analyzing these works, examined through the prism of Bakhtin's theory, one can see a gradual transformation of the cycle into the novel: from the cycles of the 1820s-30s, through Belkin's Tales, to the Russian classical novel. This opens the way to the interpretation of prose cycles taking into account the presence of the novel features in them.References
Афонина Е. Ю. Поэтика авторского прозаического цикла: дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Тверь, 2005. 166 с.
Бахтин М. М. Собрание сочинений в 7 томах. Т. 3: Теория романа (1930–1961 гг.). М.: Языки славянских культур, 2012. 880 с.
Бахтин М. М. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. М.: Библиотека всемирной литературы, 2017а. 640 c.
Бахтин М. М. Из записей 1970–1971 годов // Автор и герой в эстетическом событии. Т. 1. М.; СПб: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2017б. C. 339–391.
Белинский В. Г. Герой нашего времени. Сочинение М. Лермонтова: [Рецензия]. СПб., 1840. Ч. 1–2 // Белинский В. Г. М. Ю. Лермонтов: Статьи и рецензии. Л.: ОГИЗ: Гос. изд-во. худ. лит., 1941. C. 23–24.
Беляева И. А. Сюжет спасения в русском классическом романе // Филологические науки. Научные доклады высшей школы. М.: Алмавест, 2016. C. 44–52.
Дарвин М. Н. Мужское и женское: смыслопорождающая модель цикла («Повести покойного Ивана Петровича Белкина, изданные А. П.») // Поэтический мир лирического цикла. М.: РГГУ, 2018. C. 201–214.
Дарвин М. Н. Европейские традиции в становлении понятия цикл // Европейский лирический цикл: материалы междунар. науч. конф., 15–17 ноября 2001 г. М.: РГГУ, 2003. 278 с.
Дарвин М. Н. Русский лирический цикл. Красноярск, 1988. 144 с.
Лихачев Д. С. Избранные работы в трех томах. Л.: Худ. лит., 1987. Т. 3. 520 c.
Нестерова С. В. Техническое текстопостроение в малой эпической прозе: дис. ... канд. филол. наук. Тверь, 2012. 190 с.
Одиноков В. Г. Проблемы типологии русского романа XIX века. Новосибирск: Наука, 1971. 192 с.
Пушкин А. С. Библиотека русской классики. Т. 8. М.: Слово, 2014. 680 c.
Смирнов И. П. Олитературенное время. (Гипо)теория литературных жанров. СПб.: Изд-во Рус. христ. гуманит. акад., 2008. 263 с.
Тюпа В. И. Анализ сложносоставного целого («Повести покойного Ивана Петровича Белкина, изданные А. П.») // Анализ художественного текста. М.: Aкадемия, 2009. 336 c.
Шкловский В. Б. О теории прозы. М.: Сов. писатель, 1983. 384 с.
Эйхенбаум Б. М. «Герой нашего времени» // Эйхенбаум Б.М. Статьи о Лермонтове. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1961. C. 221–265.
Яницкий Л. С. Циклизация как коммуникативная стратегия в современной культуре // Критика и семиотика. Вып. 1–2. Кемерово: КГУ. 2000. C. 170–174.
Янушкевич А. С. Русский прозаический цикл 1820–1830-х годов как форма времени // Исторические пути и формы художественной циклизации в поэзии и прозе. Кемерово: КГУ, 1992. C. 18–35.
References
Afonina E. Yu. Poetika avtorskogo prozaicheskogo tsikla. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [The poetics of the author’s prose cycle. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Tver, 2005. 166 р. (In Russ.)
Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]: in 7 vols. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2012, vol. 3. Teoriya romana (1930–1961 gg.)
[Theory of the novel (1930–1961)]. 880 p. (In Russ.)
Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, Biblioteka Vsemirnoy Literatury Publ., 2017a. 640 p. (In Russ.)
Bakhtin M. M. Iz zapisey 1970-1971 godov [From notes of 1970-1971]. Avtor i geroy v esteticheskom sobytii [Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Center for Humanities Initiatives, 2017b, vol. 1, pp. 339–391. (In Russ.)
Belinsky V. G. Geroy nashego vremeni. Sochinenie M. Lermontova [A Hero of Our Time. A work by M. Lermontov: a Review. St. Petersburg, 1840. Pts. 1–2]. In: Belinsky V. G. M. Yu. Lermontov: Stat’i i retsenzii [M. Yu. Lermontov: Articles and Reviews]. Leningrad, OGIZ, 1941, pp. 23–24. (In Russ.)
Belyaeva I. A. Syuzhet spaseniya v russkom klassicheskom romane [Salvation as a plotline in the Russian classical novel]. Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshey shkoly [Philological Sciences. Scientific Reports of the Higher School]. Moscow, Almavest Publ., 2016, pp. 44–52. (In Russ.)
Darvin M. N. Muzhskoe i zhenskoe: smysloporozhdayushhaya model’ tsikla (‘Povesti pokoynogo Ivana Petrovicha Belkina, izdannye A. P.ʼ) [The male and female: The sense-generating model of the cycle (‘The Tales of the Late Ivan Petrovich Belkin, published by Alexander Pushkinʼ)]. Poeticheskiy mir liricheskogo tsikla [The Poetic World of the Lyrical Cycle]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Press, 2018, pp. 201–214. (In Russ.)
Darvin M. N. Evropeyskie traditsii v stanovlenii ponyatiya tsikl [European traditions in the formation of the concept of the cycle]. Evropeyskiy liricheskiy tsikl. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, 15–17 noyabrya 2001 g. [The European Lyrical Cycle. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, November 15–17, 2001]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities, 2003. 278 p. (In Russ.)
Darvin M. N. Russkiy liricheskiy tsikl [The Russian Lyrical Cycle]. Krasnoyarsk, 1988. 144 p. (In Russ.)
Likhachev D. S. Izbrannye raboty [Selected Works]: in 3 vols. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1987, vol. 3. 520 p. (In Russ.)
Nesterova S. V. Tsiklicheskoe tekstopostroenie v maloy epicheskoy proze. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [The cyclic text-building in small epic prose. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Tver, 2012. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Odinokov V. G. Problemy tipologii russkogo romana XIX veka [The Problems of Typology of the Russian 19th-Century Novel]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1971. 192 p. (In Russ.)
Pushkin A. S. Biblioteka russkoy klassiki [The Library of Russian Classics]. Moscow, Slovo Publ., 2014, vol. 8. 680 p. (In Russ.)
Smirnov I. P. Oliteraturennoe vremya. (Gipo)teoriya literaturnykh zhanrov [Literated Time. (Hypo)theory of Literary Genres]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities Press, 2008. 263 р. (In Russ.)
Tyupa V. I. Analiz slozhnosostavnogo tselogo (ʽPovesti pokoynogo Ivana Petrovicha Belkina, izdannye A. P.ʼ) [An analysis of the complex whole (ʽThe Tales of the Late Ivan Petrovich Belkin, published by Alexander Pushkinʼ)]. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta [Analysis of Literary Text]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009. 336 p. (In Russ.)
Shklovskiy V. B. O teorii prozy [On the Theory of Prose]. Moscow, Sovetskiy Pisatel’ Publ., 1983. 384 p. (In Russ.)
Eikhenbaum B. M. ‘Geroy nashego vremeni’ [‘A Hero of Our Time’]. In: Eikhenbaum B. M. Stat’i o Lermontove [Articles on Lermontov]. Moscow, Leningrad, Academy of Sciences of the Soviet
Union Publ., 1961, pp. 221–265. (In Russ.)
Yanitskiy L. S. Tsiklizatsiya kak kommunikativnaya strategiya v sovremennoy kul’ture [Cyclization as a communicative strategy in modern culture]. Kritika i semiotika [Criticism and Semiotics]. Kemerovo, Kemerovo State University Press, 2000, issues 1–2, pp. 170–174. (In Russ.)
Yanushkevich A. S. Russkiy prozaicheskiy tsikl 1820–1830-kh godov kak forma vremeni [The Russian prose cycle of the 1820–1830s as a form of time]. Istoricheskie puti i formy khudozhestvennoy tsiklizatsii v poezii i proze [Historical Ways and Forms of Artistic Cyclization in Poetry and Prose]. Kemerovo, Kemerovo State University Press, 1992, pp. 18–35. (In Russ.)
