Artistic Functions of Landscape in Alexander Grin’s Early Prose (‘Reno Island’)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2021-4-123-128Keywords:
Alexander Grin; landscape; nature; psychological; story; self-awareness; light; synesthesia; color.Abstract
This article explores the images of nature in Alexander Grin’s early works. The purpose of the study is to identify the semantic meanings and visual possibilities of the landscape in the prose written by Grin in the period from the late 1900s to the early 1910s. The material for analysis is Reno Island (1909), which is one of Grin’s representative prose works. Depiction of a landscape is one of the main means used by the writer to explore the themes permanently present in his reflections – those concerning ontological and social freedom of a person, and the boundaries of individual will; besides, through the depiction of landscapes Grin shows the character’s mentality. In our research we applied the hermeneutic approach to the text. First of all, this article attempts to explore the active role that landscape depiction plays in the plot development and structural composition. Secondly, it discusses the symbolic and autological content of nature depiction as a determinant that helps to shape the character’s romantic streak and to depict the characters’ psychological space, formed on the basis of his senses, confronting emotions, cognitive features, oneiric states, and ethical reactions. In particular, Grin employed the principle of polysensory composition in plots that describe psychological states of the hero when being in nature. Thirdly, the paper discusses how Turgenev’s tradition of describing nature developed in Grin's prose. Fourthly, our attention is focused on artistic techniques employed by Grin to verbally reproduce the existential states of nature and man: the poetics of color and light, metaphor, comparison, hyperbole, etc. It is concluded that images of nature are highly mythogenic and they are of great importance when a writer wants to show the significance of self-knowledge and to depict feelings of a hero when being close to nature.References
Абрагам К. Сон и миф. Очерк народной психологии. М.: Современные проблемы, 1912. 120 с.
Бердяев Н. Самопознание (опыт философской автобиографии) / вступ. ст. Ю. П. Сенокосова. М.: Международные отношения, 1990. 336 с.
Боева Н. Б. Особенности синтаксической организации пейзажных контекстов в современных английских и американских рассказах // Научная мысль Кавказа. 2004. № 12. С. 190–194.
Грин А. С. Собрание сочинений: в 5 т. Т. 1. Рассказы 1906–1912 гг. / сост., вступ. ст. В. Ковского; прим. А. Ревякиной. М.: Худож. лит., 1991. 703 с.
Дмитриевская Л. Н. Пейзаж и портрет: проблема определения и литературного анализа (пейзаж и портрет в творчестве З. Н. Гиппиус). М.: (Ярославль) ООО «Литера», 2005. 135 с.
Кобзев Н. А. Ранняя проза А. С. Грина. Симферополь: Крымский архив, 1995. 71 с.
Козлова Е. А. Принципы художественного обобщения в прозе А. Грина: развитие символической образности: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Псков, 2004. 204 с.
Ляпина Л. Сенсорная поэтика в русской литературе XIX века. Опыты изучения. СПб.: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2014. 169 с.
Прокофьева В. Ю. Категория пространство в художественном преломлении: локусы и топосы // Вестник ОГУ. 2005. № 11. С. 87–94.
Староверова В. В. Художественное мышление И. С. Тургенева и Л. Н. Толстого в изображении пейзажей. Саратов: СГПИ, 1980. 80 с.
Уржа А. В. Понятие модусного плана произведения и изучение переводов текста // Слово и текст в культурном сознании эпохи: сб. науч. тр. / отв. ред. Г. В. Судаков. Вологда: Легия, 2010. Ч. 5. С. 253–258.
Хализев В. Е. Теория литературы М.: Высшая школа, 2004. 405 с.
Хьелл Л., Зиглер Д. Теории личности (Основные положения, исследования и применение). СПб.: Питер-пресс, 1997. 608 с.
References
Abragam K. Son i mif. Ocherk narodnoy psikhologii [Dream and Myth. Essay on Folk Psychology]. Moscow, Sovremennye problemy Publ., 1912. 120 p. (In Russ.)
Berdyaev N. Samopoznanie (opyt filosofskoy avtobiografii) [Self-knowledge: An Essay in Autobiography]. Pref. by Yu. P. Senokosova. Moscow, International Relations Publisher, 1990. 336 p. (In Russ.)
Boeva N. B. Osobennosti sintaksicheskoy organizatsii peyzazhnykh kontekstov v sovremennykh angliyskikh i amerikanskikh rasskazakh [Features of the syntactic organization of landscape contexts in modern English and American stories]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza [Scientific Thought of Caucasus], 2004, issue 12, pp. 190–194. (In Russ.)
Grin A. S. Sobranie sochineniy: v 5 t. [Collected works: In 5 vols.]. Comp., pref. by V. Kovskiy; notes by A. Revyakina. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1991, vol. 1. Rasskazy 1906–1912 gg. [Stories 1906–1912]. 703 p. (In Russ.)
Dmitrievskaya L. N. Peyzazh i portret: problema opredeleniya i literaturnogo analiza: (peyzazh i portret v tvorchestve Z. N. Gippius) [Landscape and Portrait: The Issue of Definition and Literary Analysis: (landscape and portrait in the oeuvre of Z. N. Gippius)]. Moscow (Yaroslavl), Litera Publ., 2005. 135 p. (In Russ.)
Kobzev N. A. Rannyaya proza A. S. Grina [Early Prose by A. S. Green]. Simferopol, Krymskiy arkhiv Publ., 1995. 71 p. (In Russ.)
Kozlova E. A. Printsipy khudozhestvennogo obobshcheniya v proze A. Grina: razvitie simvolicheskoy obraznosti. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Principles of artistic generalization in A. Green’s prose: The development of symbolic imagery. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Pskov, 2004. 204 p. (In Russ.)
Lyapina L. Sensornaya poetika v russkoy literature XIX veka. Opyty izucheniya. [Sensory poetics In Russian literature of the 19th century. Experience of studying]. St. Petersburg, Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2014. 169 p. (In Russ.)
Prokofieva V. Yu. Kategoriya prostranstvo v khudozhestvennom prelomlenii: lokusy i toposy [Category of space in the artistic refraction: Locus and topos]. Vestnik OGU [Vestnik of Orenburg State University], 2005, issue 11, pp. 87–94. (In Russ.)
Staroverova V. V. Khudozhestvennoe myshlenie I. S. Turgeneva i L. N. Tolstogo v izobrazhenii peyzazhey [The Artistic Thinking of I. S. Turgenev and L. N. Tolstoy in the Depiction of Landscapes]. Saratov, Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute Press, 1980. 80 p. (In Russ.)
Urzha A. V. Ponyatie modusnogo plana proizvedeniya i izuchenie perevodov teksta [The concept of the modus plan of a literary work and the study of text translations]. Slovo i tekst v kul’turnom soznanii epokhi: Sb. nauchnykh trudov. Ch. 5. [Word and Text in the Cultural Consciousness of the Era: Collection of scientific papers. Pt. 5.]. Ed. by G. V. Sudakov. Vologda, Legiya Publ., 2010, pp. 253–258. (In Russ.)
Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury [Literary Theory]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2004. 405 p. (In Russ.)
Hjelle L., Ziegler D. Teorii lichnosti (Osnovnye polozheniya, issledovaniya i primenenie) [Personality Theories (Basic assumptions, Research and Applications)]. St. Petersburg, Piter-press, 1997. 608 p. (In Russ.)
