READING ‘THE NEWCOMES’ IN DIFFERENT WAYS: LITERARY AND CRITICAL ‘DUEL’ OF CHERNYSHEVSKY AND DRUZHININ

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2021-3-101-111

Keywords:

Nikolay Chernyshevsky; Alexander Druzhinin; Russian literary criticism of the 19th century; reception; Victorianism; William Thackeray; The Newcomes; English novel; literary hero.

Abstract

The essay deals with the issues of reception of English literature by Russian literary criticism; it analyzes polemically pointed evaluations of The Newcomes (1853–1855) by two leading Russian critics of the 1850s – 1860s – Nikolay Chernyshevsky and Alexander Druzhinin. To look at their reviews of the novel is worthwhile as it leads to a better understanding of both Russian literary process of the period and Russian reception of English literature in the middle of the 19th century. While examining these reviews, it is necessary to remember that this novel occupies quite an important place in the creative work of Thackeray and has many peculiarities at such levels of its structure as genre, plot, narrative, character-making, irony. The novel belongs to the after Vanity Fair period of Thackeray’s oeuvre with its own aesthetics which just in The Newcomes gets its final look. The novel pictures the life of the English upper classes with the help of chronicle and panoramic methods of plot-making; direct satire, keenest irony and invective do not work here as they work in Vanity Fair. It is precisely this ‘otherness’ of The Newcomes, in comparison with the most famous novel by Thackeray, that becomes the matter of the opposite estimates of this novel by two Russian critics: at one extreme, Chernyshevsky who, though noting some strong plot-making and narrative positions in the novel, criticizes the writer for poor conceptuality of the novel, the petty themes raised, the hero’s unimpressiveness, procrastination and slowness of the narrative; at the other extreme, the benevolent view of Druzhi­nin who reveals some important facets of the novel’s artistic originality. He does not assess the novel from the ideological positions which are, in many respects, the products of the first Russian ‘thaw’ after the period of political reaction of the regime of Nicholas I and which determine the position of Chernyshevsky. Since Druzhinin had been taken by Chernyshevsky as his ideological rival and the founder of ‘art for art’s sake’ conception, his review was a severe polemical answer to Druzhinin’s review published earlier. That is one of the main reasons why such a profound literary critic as Chernyshevsky did not notice or did not want to notice many merits of The Newcomes which are stressed in the essay. It is shown in the essay that, while wri­ting his review of The Newcomes, Chernyshevsky was thinking more about Russian literary situation than Thackeray’s novel itself and the literary process in England in the middle of the 19th century.

Author Biography

Boris M. Proskurnin, Perm State University

Professor, Head of the Department of World Literature and Culture

References

Список литературы

Аникст А. А. Теккерей // Аникст А. А. История английской литературы. М.: Учпедгиз, 1956. С. 312–330.

Бельчиков Н. Ф. Дружинин Александр Васильевич // Литературная энциклопедия: в 11 т. / отв. ред. В. М. Фриче. М.: Изд-во Коммунистической академии, 1939. Т. 3. URL: http://www.azlib.ru/-d/druzhinin_a_w/text_0010.shtml (дата обращения: 17.05.2021).

Борискин В. В. Викторианская Англия в оценках российских либералов и демократов 50–

-х годов XIX века: автореф. дис. … канд. ист. наук. Орел, 2006. 25 с.

Вахрушев В. С. Романы Теккерея начала пятидесятых годов // Творчество Теккерея. Саратов: Изд-во Саратов. ун-та, 1984. С. 83–104.

Гениева Е. Ю. Странная судьба Уильяма Теккерея // У. М. Теккерей: Творчество. Воспоминания. Библиографические изыскания. М.: Худож. лит., 1989. URL: http://philology.ru/literature3/¬genieva-89c.htm (дата обращения: 12.05.2021).

Егоров Б. Ф. Избранное. Эстетические идеи в России XIX века. СПб.: Летний сад, 2009. 663 с.

Дружинин А. В. «Ньюкомы», роман Теккерея. URL: http://druzhinin.lit-info.ru/druzhinin/kritika-druzhinin/nyukomy-tekkereya.htm (дата обращения: 12.05.2021).

Завьялова О. О. Активизация модернизационного потенциала российской общественности в годы Крымской войны (1853–1856 гг.) // Псковский военно-исторический вестник. 2019. Вып. 5. С. 39–44.

Ивашева В. В. За щитом скептицизма // Английский реалистический роман в его современном звучании. М.: Худож. лит., 1974. С. 193–263.

Кузнецов О. В. Крымская война как «момент истины» для России // Военная история России: проблемы, поиски, решения. Волгоград: Волгоград. гос. ун-т, 2016. С. 154–166.

Ломакин С. В. Уильям Теккерей и русская литература 40–60-х гг. XIX века: оценки в критике и типологические связи: автореф. канд. дис. … филол. наук. М., 2012. 26 с.

Матвеенко И. А. Полемика А. В. Дружинина и Н. Г. Чернышевского о творчестве Э. Бульвер-Литтона как отражение литературной ситуации 1850–1860 гг. // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2013. № 3(21), ч. II. С. 130–133.

Поспелов Г. Н. История русской литературы XIX века (1840–1860 гг.). М.: Высшая школа, 1972. 470 с.

Проскурнин Б. М. Эстетическое своеобразие западноевропейского реализма после 1848 года // Проскурнин Б. М., Яшенькина Р. Ф. История зарубежной литературы XIX века: западноевропейская реалистическая проза. М.: Флинта: Наука, 1998. С. 225–235.

Проскурнин Б. М. Человек и власть в романе Чарльза Диккенса «Крошка Доррит» // Филолог. 2011. URL: http://philolog.pspu.ru/module/magazi-ne/do/mpub_17_343 (дата обращения: 12.05.2021).

Проскурнин Б. М. Может ли историк доверять романисту: об историческом романе У. М. Тек¬керея «История Генри Эсмонда, эсквайра» // Вестник Пермского университета. Сер. «История». 2012. Вып. 2(19). С. 44–53.

Ратников К. В. Отражение событий Крымской войны 1853–1856 гг. в восприятии русского общества той эпохи // Известия вузов. Уральский регион. 2018. № 2. С. 49–65.

Скатов Н. Н. А. В. Дружинин – литературный критик. URL: http://druzhinin.lit-info.ru/druzhinin/¬kritika/skatov-druzhinin.htm (дата обращения: 12.05.2021)

Теккерей У. М. Ньюкомы. Жизнеописание одной весьма почтенной семьи, составленное Артуром Пенденнисом, эсквайром / пер. с англ. Р. Померанцевой // Собрание сочинений: в 12 т. М.: Худож. лит., 1978. Т. 8. 494 c. Т. 9. 479 с.

Тихомиров В. В. Развитие литературно-крити¬ческого метода Н. Г. Чернышевского // Вестник Костромского государственного университета им. Н. А. Некрасова. 2009. № 3. С. 157–167.

Уздеева Т. М. Критические взгляды Н. Г. Чер-нышевского и А. В. Дружинина // Вестник Чеченского государственного университета. 2015. № 2(18). С. 124–127.

Чернышевский Н. Г. Очерки гоголевского периода русской литературы. Статьи и рецензии 1856 г. // Полное собрание сочинений: в 15 т. М.: Гослитиздат, 1947. Т. III. С. 5–309.

Чернышевский Н. Г. Роман Теккерея. Две части. СПб., 1856. URL: http://chernyshevskiy.lit-info.ru/chernyshevskiy/kritika/nyukomy-istoria.htm (дата обращения: 12.05.2021).

Шевцова Л. И. Жанрово-композиционное и стилистическое своеобразие критических выступлений А. В. Дружинина // Текст: структура, семантика, стилистика: сб. ст. М.: Моск. гос. гуманит. ун-т им. М. А. Шолохова, 2015. С. 163–173.

Шепарнева А. И. Крымская война в оценке русского общественного мнения, 1853–1856: дис. ... канд. истор. наук. Орел, 1995. 242 с.

Ямпольский И. Г. Заметки о Чернышевском (К полемике Н. Г. Чернышевского с А. В. Дружини-ным) // Н. Г. Чернышевский. Статьи, исследования, материалы: межвуз. науч. сб. / под ред. профессора Е. И. Покусаева. Саратов: Изд-во Саратов. ун-та, 1978. Т. 8. С. 230–237.

Cecil D. William Makepeace Thackeray // Early Victorian Novelists. Essays in Revaluation. L.: The Fontana Library 1964. P. 58–88.

Houghton W. E. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1985. 467 p.

Purchase S. Key Concepts in Victorian Culture. London: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2006. 282 p.

Ray G. The Newcomes // Thackeray. A Collection of Critical Essays / Ed. by A. Welsh. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,1968. P. 147–160.

Taylor D. J. Introduction // Thackeray W. M. The Newcomes. L.: Everyman, 1994. P. xviii–xxix.

Thackeray W. M. The Newcomes. Memoirs of a Most Respectable Family / Ed. by A. Pendennis Esq. L.: Everyman, 1994. 801 p.

The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel / Ed. by Deidre David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 267 p.

References

Anikst A. A. Tekkerey [Thackeray]. Istoriya angliyskoy literatury [History of English literature]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1956, pp. 312–330. (In Russ.)

Bel’chikov N. F. Druzhinin Aleksandr Vasil’e-vich [Druzhinin Alexander Vasilyevich]. Litera-turnaya entsiklopediya [Literary encyclopedia: in 11 vols.]. Ed. by V. M. Friche. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Kommunisticheskoy Akademii Publ., 1939, vol. 3. Available at: http://www.azlib.ru/d/druzhinin_a_-w/text_0010.shtml (accessed 17.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Boriskin V. V. Viktorianskaya Angliya v otsen¬kakh rossiyskikh liberalov i demokratov 50–60-kh go¬dov XIX veka. Avtoref. diss. … kand. istor. nauk. [Victorian England in the assessment of Russian liberals and democrats of the 50s–60s of the 19th century. Abstract of Cand. hist. sci. diss.]. Oryol, 2006. 25 p. (In Russ.)

Vakhrushev V. S. Romany Tekkereya nachala pyatidesyatykh godov [Thackeray’s novels of the early 1850s]. Tvorchestvo Tekkereya [Thackeray’s oeuvre]. Saratov, Saratov State University Press, 1984, pp. 83–104. (In Russ.)

Genieva E. Yu. Strannaya sud’ba Uil’yama Tekkereya [The strange fate of William Thackeray]. U. M. Tekkerey: Tvorchestvo. Vospominaniya. Bibliograficheskie izyskaniya [W. M. Thackeray: Oeuvre. Recollections. Bibliographical studies]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1989. Available at: http://philology.ru/literature3/genieva-89c.htm (accessed 12.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Egorov B. F. Izbrannoe. Esteticheskie idei v Rossii XIX veka [Selected works. Aesthetical ideas In Russia of the 19th century]. St. Petersburg, Letniy sad Publ., 2009. 663 p. (In Russ.)

Druzhinin A. V. ʽNyukomy’, roman Tekkereya [The Newcomes, the novel of Thackeray]. Avai-lable at: http://druzhinin.lit-info.ru/druzhinin/kri-tika-druzhinin/nyukomy-tekkereya.htm (accessed 12.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Zav’yalova O. O. Aktivizatsiya modernizatsionnogo potentsiala rossiyskoy obshchestvennosti v gody Krymskoy voyny (1853–1856) [Activization of the modernization potential of the Russian society in the years of the Crimean War (1853–1856). Pskovskiy voenno-istoricheskiy vestnik [Pskov Bulletin of Military History], 2019, issue 5, pp. 39–44. (In Russ.)

Ivasheva V. V. Za shchitom skeptitsizma [Behind the shield of skepticism]. Angliyskiy realisticheskiy roman XIX veka v ego sovremennom zvuchanii [The English novel of the 19th century in the contemporary context]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1974, pp. 193–263. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsov O. V. Krymskaya voyna kak ‘moment istiny’ dlya Rossii [The Crimean War as the moment of truth for Russia]. Voennaya istoria Rossii: proble¬my, poiski, resheniya [The Military history of Russia: Issues, searches, solutions]. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Press, 2016, pp. 154–166. (In Russ.)

Lomakin S. V. Uil’yam Tekkerey i russkaya literatura 40–60-kh gg. XIX veka: otsenki v kritike i tipologicheskie svyazi. Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. [William Thackeray and Russian literature of the 40s–60s of the 19th century: Assessments in criticism and typological connections. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, Moscow State University Press, 2012. 26 p. (In Russ.)

Matveenko I. A. Polemika A. V. Druzhinina i N. G. Chernyshevskogo o tvorchestve E. Bul’ver-Littona kak otrazhenie literaturnoy situatsii 1850–1860 gg. [Polemics of A. V. Druzhinin and N. G. Chernyshevsky on E. Bulwer-Lytton’s works as the reflection of the literary situation of the 1850s–1860s]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory and Practice], 2013, issue 3(21), pt. 2, pp. 130–133. (In Russ.)

Pospelov G. N. Istoriya russkoy literatury XIX ve¬ka (1840–1860 gg.) [The history of Russian literature (1840s–1860s)]. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 1972. 470 p. (In Russ.)

Proskurnin B. M. Esteticheskoe svoeobrazie zapadnoevropeyskogo realizma posle 1848 goda [The aesthetical peculiarities of the Western European realism after 1848]. Proskurnin B. M., Yashen’ki¬na R. F. Istoriya zarubezhnoy literatury XIX veka: zapadnoevropeyskaya realisticheskaya proza [The history of foreign literature of the 19th century: Western European realistic prose]. Moscow, Flinta-Nauka Publ., 1998, pp. 225–235. (In Russ.)

Proskurnin B. M. Chelovek i vlast’ v romane Dikkensa ‘Kroshka Dorrit’ [A man and the power in Charles Dickens’s Little Dorrit]. Filolog [Philologist], 2011. 9 p. Available at: http://philolog.pspu.-ru/module/magazine/do/mpub_17_343. (In Russ.)

Proskurnin B. M. Mozhet li istorik doveryat’ romanistu: ob istoricheskom romane U. M. Tekkereya ‘Istoriya Genri Esmonda, eskvaira [Can a historian trust a novelist: On The History of Henry Esmond, Esq. by W. M. Thackeray]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seriya ‘Istoria’ [Perm University Herald. History], 2012, issue 2(19), pp. 44–53. (In Russ.)

Ratnikov K. V. Otrazhenie sobytiy Krymskoy voyny 1853–1856 gg. v vospriyatii russkogo obschestva toy epohi [Reflection of the events of the Crimean War of 1853 – 1856 in the perception of the Russian society of that epoch]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Ural’skiy region [Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. Ural Region], 2018, issue 2, pp. 49–65. (In Russ.)

Skatov N. N. A. V. Druzhinin – literaturnyy kritik [A. V. Druzhinin as a literary critic]. Available at: http://druzhinin.lit-info.ru/druzhinin/kritika/skatov-druzhinin.htm (accessed 13.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Thackeray W. M. Nyukomy. Zhizneopisanie odnoy ves’ma pochtennoy sem’i, sostavlennoe Arturom Pendennisom. Eskvayrom [The Newcomes. Memoirs of a most respectable family, edited by Arthur Pendennis, Esq]. Transl. from English by R. Pomerantseva. Sobranie sochineniy: v 12 t. [Collection of works in 12 vols.]. Moscow, Khudo¬zhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1978, vol. 8. 494 p.; vol. 9. 479 p. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirov V. V. Razvitie literaturno-kritiches¬kogo metoda N. G. Chernyshevskogo [The deve¬lopment of Chernyshevsky’s method of literary cri¬ticism]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova [Vestnik of Kostroma State University], 2009, issue 3, pp. 157–167. (In Russ.)

Uzdeeva T. M. Kriticheskie vzglyady N. G. Cher¬nyshevskogo i A. V. Druzhinina [Literary critical views of N. G. Chernyshevsky and A. V. Druzhi¬nin]. Vestnik Chechenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chechen State University], 2015, issue 2(18), pp. 124–127. (In Russ.)

Chernyshevsky N. G. Ocherki gogolevskogo perioda russkoy literatury. Stat’i i retsenzii 1856 g. [Essays on the Gogol period of Russian literature. Essays and reviews of 1856]. Chernyshevsky N. G. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 15 t. [A complete collection of works: in 15 vols]. Moscow, Goslitizdat Publ., 1947, vol. 3, pp. 5–309. (In Russ.)

Chernyshevsky N. G. Roman Tekkereya. Dve chasti [The Novel of Thackeray. Two parts]. St. Petersburg, 1856. Available at: http://chernyshevskiy.¬lit-info.ru/chernyshevsliy/kritika/nyukomy-istiria.htm (accessed 12.05.2021). (In Russ.)

Shevtsova L. I. Zhanrovo-kompozitsionnoe i sti¬listicheskoe svoeobrazie kriticheskikh vystupleniy A. V. Druzhinia [Peculiarities of the genre, composition and style of A. V. Druzhinin’s literary criticism]. Tekst: struktura, semantika, stilistika. Sbornik statey [Text: Structure, semantics, style. Collection of articles]. Moscow, Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities Press, 2015, pp. 163–173. (In Russ.)

Sheparneva A. I. Krymskaya voyna v otsenke russkogo obshchestvennogo mneniya, 1853–1856: diss. ... kand. istor. nauk [The Crimean War as Represented in Russian Public Opinion, 1853–1856. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Orel, 1985. 242 p.

Yampol’skiy I. G. Zametki o Chernyshevskom (K polemike N. G. Chernyshevskogo s A. V. Dru¬zhininym [Notes on Chernyshevsky (on polemics of N. G. Chernyshevsky and A. V. Druzhinin)]. N. G. Chernyshevsky. Stat’i, issledovaniya, mate¬rialy [N. G. Chernyshevsky. Essays, studies, materials]. Saratov, Saratov State University Press, 1978, vol. 8, pp. 230–237. (In Russ.)

Cecil D. William Makepeace Thackeray. Cecil D. Early Victorian Novelists. Essays in Revaluation. London, Fontana Library, 1964, pp. 58–88. (In Eng.)

Houghton W. E. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1985. 467 p. (In Eng.)

Purchase S. Key Concepts in Victorian Culture. London, Palgrave, Macmillan, 2006. 282 p. (In Eng.)

Ray G. The Newcomes. Thackeray. A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. by A. Welsh. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1968, pp. 147–160. (In Eng.)

Taylor D. J. Introduction. Thackeray W. M. The Newcomes. London, Everyman, 1994, pp. xviii–xxix. (In Eng.)

Thackeray W. M. The Newcomes. Memoirs of a most respectable family, edited by Arthur Pendennis, Esq. London, Everyman, 1994. 801 p. (In Eng.)

The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel. Ed. by Deidre David. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. 267 p. (In Eng.)

Published

2021-10-23

How to Cite

Proskurnin Б. М. . (2021). READING ‘THE NEWCOMES’ IN DIFFERENT WAYS: LITERARY AND CRITICAL ‘DUEL’ OF CHERNYSHEVSKY AND DRUZHININ. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2021-3-101-111

Issue

Section

LITERATURE IN THE CONTEXT OF CULTURE