VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE EGOCENTRIC FIELD OF THE SPEAKER IN THE MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE (Experimental Study)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2037-6681-2018-3-13-27

Keywords:

spatial deixis, personal deixis, egocentrism, demonstratives, personal pronouns, Macedonian language, visualization.

Abstract

The article deals with demonstratives and personal pronouns in the Macedonian language in the experimental aspect. Among others, Macedonian demonstratives include a member morpheme (article). Articles in the Macedonian language have three forms: with roots -v (the proximality indicator), -t (the mediality indicator), -n (the distality indicator). Since the use of articles is rather poor in the Bitola dialect being considered, we included in the experiment the task of using personal pronouns. Demonstratives and personal pronouns create the personal sphere of the speaker or participants in the speech act. It was of interest to us to trace the relationship of spatial and personal indicators in the sphere of personal communication. Thus, the purpose of the experiment was to determine the egocentric sphere of the speaker and the type of the deictic system in the Macedonian language.The material for the experiment included personal-oriented and spatial-oriented contexts by which informants determined the egocentric sphere of the speaker. There were 20 informants participating in the experiment – school children, who are supposed to be “naïve” native speakers.To process the experimental data, the information system “Semograph” was used. Work in the IS “Semograph” was performed in two stages. At the first stage, a project was created in which for each response of the subjects there was a separate context with a description of the relevant data. The next step was to automatically process the data entered.The interconnection of the components of the egocentric field is visually represented on interactive graphs. As the main visual means of display, an interactive graph with customizable means for preprocessing displayed data is used. For structured display of high-connectivity data, a circle graph is used.As a result of the experiment, a model of the egocentric field of the speaker was created, the relationship between personal-oriented and spatially-oriented parameters was shown.

Author Biographies

Наталия Владимировна Боронникова (Natalia V. Boronnikova), Perm State University

Associate Professor in the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics

Александар Талески (Aleksandar Taleski), Institute of the Czech National Corpus

Researcher

Константин Игоревич Белоусов (Konstantin I. Belousov), Perm State University

Professor in the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics

Константин Валентинович Рябинин (Konstantin V. Ryabinin), Perm State University

Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematical Support for Computer Systems

References

Апресян Ю. Д. Дейксис в лексике и грамматике и наивная модель мира // Семиотика и информатика. М., 1997. Вып. 35. С. 272–298.

Арутюнова Н. Д. и др. Человеческий фактор в языке: Коммуникация, модальность, дейксис. М.: Наука, 1992. 281 с.

Бондарев А. Е., Галактионов В. А., Шапиро Л. З. Обработка и визуальный анализ многомерных данных // Научная визуализация. М.: Национальный исследовательский ядерный университет МИФИ, 2017. Кн. 4, Т. 9, № 5. С. 86–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.9.5.08.

Боронникова Н. В., Котельникова Е. Ю. Экспериментальное исследование дейктических показателей македонского языка // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Сер. Гуманитарные науки. 2016. № 12. С. 124–134.

Бюлер К. Теория языка: Репрезентативная функция языка. М.: Прогресс, 1993. 501 c.

Видоески Б. Диjалектите на македонскиот jазик. Скопjе: МАНУ, 1998. Т. 1. 365 с.

Виноградов В. А. Дейксис // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь / гл. ред. В. Н. Ярцева. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1990. С. 128.

Гуреев В. А. Языковой эгоцентризм в новых парадигмах знания // Вопросы языкознания. 2004. № 53, ч. 2. C. 57–67.

Жеребило Т. В. Словарь лингвистических терминов. URL: http://lingvistics_dictionary.academic.ru (дата обращения: 18.06. 2018).

Интерактивный граф дейктических параметров. URL: http://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/deixis (дата обращения: 02.07.2018).

Кибрик А. А. Дейксис // Энциклопедия Кругосвет. URL: http://www.krugosvet.ru/enc/gumanitarnye_nauki/lingvistika/DEKSIS.html?page=0,0 (дата обращения: 15.06.2018).

Конески Б. Граматика на македонскиот литературен jазик. Скопjе: Култура, 1967. Дел I–II. 552 с.

Кравченко A. B. Вопросы теории указательности: Эгоцентричность. Дейктичность. Индексальность. Иркутск: Изд-во Иркут. ун-та, 1992. 210 с.

Лайонз Дж. Введение в теоретическую лингвистику. Благовещенский гуманитарный колледж им. И. А. Бодуэна де Куртенэ, 1999. 543 с.

Падучева Е. В. Эгоцентрические единицы языка и режимы интерпретации // Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: тр. Междунар. конф. «Диалог 2013». М., 2013. URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2013/materials/pdf/PaduchevaEV.pdf (дата обращения: 21.06.2018).

Плунгян В. А. Введение в грамматическую семантику: грамматические значения и грамматические системы языков мира: учеб. пособие. М.: РГГУ, 2011. 672 с.

Рассел Б. Человеческое познание: его сфера и границы / пер. с англ. М.: Терра-Книжный клуб: Республика, 2000. 464 c.

Ростовцев-Попель А. А. Типология демонстративов: средние дейктики // Вопросы языкознания. 2009. № 2. С. 22–34.

Тополињска З. Граматика на именската фраза во македонскиот литературен jазик. Род, броj, посоченост. Скопjе: МАНУ, 1974. 156 с.

Успенский Б. А. Дейксис и вторичный семиозис в языке // Вопросы языкознания. 2011. № 2. С. 3–30.

Ageev A. A. Triangle-free Circle Graph with Chromatic Number 5 // Discrete Mathematics. 1996. Vol. 152. P. 295–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00349-2.

Anderson S. R., Keenan Е. Deixis // T. Shopen [ed.] Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Vol. III. Р. 259–308.

Belousov K., Erofeeva E., Leshchenko Y., Baranov D. “Semograph” Information System as a Framework for Network-Based Science and Education // Smart Education and e-Learning 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 75. P. 263–272.

Diessel H. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999. 205 p.

Fillmore Ch. Deictic Categories in the Semantics of “Come” // Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy. N. Y., 1966. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 219–232.

Fillmore Ch. J. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington; Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club, 1975. 87 p.

Fillmore Ch. Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis // Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Rеlated Topics / ed. by R. J. Jarvella, W. Klein. Chichester, NY, Bris-bane, Toronto, Singapore, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1982. P. 31–59.

Jungbluth K. Deictics in the Conversation Dyad: Findings in Spanish and Some Cross-linguistic Outlines // Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person / Friedrich Lenz (ed.). Amsterdam, 2003. P. 13–40.

Lyons J. Semantics. L. etc.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977. Vol. 1, 2.

References

Apresyan Yu. D. Deyksis v leksike i grammatike i naivnaya model’ mira [Deixis in the lexicon and grammar and the folk model of the world]. Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and Informatics]. Moscow, 1997, issue 35, pp. 272–298. (In Russ.)

Arutyunova N. D. et al. Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke: Kommunikatsiya, modal’nost’, deyksis [The human factor in language: Communication, modality, deixis]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992. 281 p. (In Russ.)

Bondarev A. E., Galaktionov V. A., Shapiro L. Z. Obrabotka i vizual’nyy analiz mnogomernykh dannykh [Processing and visual analysis of multidimensional data]. Nauchnaya vizualizatsiya [Scientific Visualization]. Moscow, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Press, 2017, quarter 4, vol. 9, issue, pp. 86–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26583/

sv.9.5.08. (In Russ.)

Boronnikova N. V., Kotelnikova E. Yu. Eksperimental’noe issledovanie deykticheskikh pokazateley makedonskogo yazyka [Experimental study of the deictic exponents in the Macedonian language]. Sovremennaya nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya gumanitarnyye nauki [Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series of Humanities], 2016, issue 12, pp. 124–134. (In Russ.)

Bühler K. Teoriya yazyka: Reprezentativnaya funktsiya yazyka [Theory of Language: The repre-sentational function of language]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993. 588 p. (In Russ.)

Vidoeski B. Dijalektite na makedonskiot jazik [Dialects of the Macedonian language]. Skopje, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Press, 1998, vol. 1, 365 p. (In Maced.)

Vinogradov V. A. Deyksis [Deixis]. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Linguistics]. Ed. by V. N. Yartseva. Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya Publ., 1990. 128 p. (In Russ.)

Gureev V. A. Yаzykovoy egotsentrizm v novykh paradigmakh znaniya [Language egocentrism in new paradigms of knowledge]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 2004, issue 53, pt. 2, pp. 57–67. (In Russ.)

Zherebilo T. V. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [The Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Available at: http://lingvistics_dictionary.academic.ru (accessed 18.06. 2018). (In Russ.)

Interaktivnyy graf deykticheskikh parametrov [Interactive graph of deictic parameters]. Available at: http://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/deixis (accessed 02.07.2018). (In Russ.)

Kibrik A. A. Deyksis [Deixis]. Entsiklopediya Krugosvet [Encyclopedia]. Available at: http://www.krugosvet.ru/enc/gumanitarnye_nauki/lingvistika/DEKSIS.html?page=0,0 (accessed 15.06.2018). (In Russ.)

Koneski B. Gramatika na makedonskiot litera-ture jazik [Grammar of the Macedonian Literary Language]. Skopje, Kultura Publ., 1967, pts. 1–2. 552 p. (In Maced.)

Kravchenko A. V. Voprosy teorii ukazatel’nosti: Egotsentrichnost’. Deyktichnost’. Indeksalnost’ [Issues of the Theory of Indication: Egocentricity. Deixis. Indexicality]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University Press, 1992. 210 p. (In Russ.)

Lyons J. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu lingvistiku [Introduction to theoretical linguistics]. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchensk College of Humanities named after I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay Press, 1999. 543 p. (In Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. Egotsentricheskie edinitsy yazyka i rezhimy interpretatsii [Egocentricals and their registers of interpretation]. Kompyuternaya lingvistika i intellektualnyye tekhnologii. Trudy Mezhdunar. konf. «Dialog» 2013 [Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2013”]. Moscow, 2013. Available at: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2013/materials/pdf/PaduchevaEV.pdf (accessed 21.06.2018). (In Russ.)

Plungyan V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskiye sistemy yazykov mira: ucheb. posobie [Introduction to grammatical semantics: grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of world languages: textbook]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Press, 2011. 672 p. (In Russ.)

Russell B. Chelovecheskoe poznaniye: ego sfera i granitsy [Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits]. Moscow, Terra Book Club: Republic Publ., 2000. 464 p. (In Russ.)

Rostovtsev-Popel A. A. Tipologiya demonstrativov: srednie deyktiki [Typology of Demonstratives: average deictics]. Voprosy yazaykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 2009, issue 2, pp. 22–34. (In Russ.)

Topolinjska Z. Gramatika na imenskata fraza vo makedonskiot literature jazik. Rod, broj, posočenost [The Grammar of the Noun Phrase in the Macedonian Literary Language. Gender, number, identification]. Skopje, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Press, 1974, 156 p. (In Maced.)

Uspensky B. A. Deyksis i vtorichnyy semiozis v yazyke [Dexis and secondary semiosis in language]. Voprosy yazaykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 2011, issue 2, pp. 3–30. (In Russ.)

Ageev A. A Triangle-free Circle Graph with Chromatic Number 5. Discrete Mathematics. 1996, vol. 152, pp. 295–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00349-2. (In Eng.)

Anderson S. R., Keenan Е. Deixis. Ed. by T. Shopen. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, vol. 3, pp. 259–308. (In Eng.)

Belousov K., Erofeeva E., Leshchenko Y., Baranov D. “Semograph” Information System as a Framework for Network-Based Science and Education. Smart Education and e-Learning 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 75, pp. 263–272. (In Eng.)

Diessel H. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1999. 205 p. (In Eng.)

Fillmore Ch. Deictic Categories in the Semantics of “Come”. Ed. by Ch. Fillmore. Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy. NY, 1966, vol. 2, issue 3, pp. 219–232. (In Eng.)

Fillmore Ch. J. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Ed. by Ch. Fillmore. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1975. 87 p. (In Eng.)

Fillmore Ch. J. Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis. Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. Ed. by R. J. Jarvella, W. Klein. Chichester, NY, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1982, pp. 31–59. (In Eng.)

Jungbluth K. Deictics in the conversation dyad: Findings in Spanish and some cross-linguistic outlines. Deictic conceptualization of Space, Time and Person. Ed. by Friedrich Lenz. Amsterdam, 2003, pp. 13–40. (In Eng.)

Lyons J. Semantics. London etc., Cambridge University Press, 1977, vols. 1–2. (In Eng.)

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Боронникова (Natalia V. Boronnikova) Н. В., Талески (Aleksandar Taleski) А., Белоусов (Konstantin I. Belousov) К. И., & Рябинин (Konstantin V. Ryabinin) К. В. (2018). VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE EGOCENTRIC FIELD OF THE SPEAKER IN THE MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE (Experimental Study). Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2037-6681-2018-3-13-27

Issue

Section

LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND SOCIETY