Representation of the Comforting Strategy in Modern German and English Fiction Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2024-2-28-38

Keywords:

strategy; tactics; supportive communication; comforting; empathy.

Abstract

The article discusses comforting strategy and the tactics of its implementation as they are represented in modern English and German fiction discourse. The communicative goal of comforting is to alleviate the distress of the interlocutor caused by some traumatic circumstances. It is considered to be an empathic act and an important component of supportive communication. Comforting has been studied in such disciplines as psychology, medicine, and pragmalinguistics. The relevance of the present research is due to the priority of the strategic approach to the study of communication, the universality of the phenomenon of comforting, its significance in the process of human interaction, and also the need for a taxonomy of tactics implementing this strategy to be developed. The aim of the work is to identify tactics that implement comforting strategy and the corresponding language means in German and English. The material for this study was German- and English-language works of fiction of the 21st century related to the genres of everyday prose and romance novel. The paper uses methods of linguistic observation and description, analysis of dictionary definitions, seme, contextual and pragmalinguistic analysis. Four groups of tactics implementing the comforting strategy are described. Object-oriented tactics are aimed directly at the emotions and volitional sphere of the object of comforting and include tactics of soothing, guilt relief, advice, mobilization. Subject-oriented tactics focus on the comforting subject, they are tactics of support and reference to personal experience. Situationally-oriented tactics refer to third parties and various circumstances related to the traumatic situation and include tactics of the opponent’s discreditation, optimism, reference to the past, generalization. Combined tactics do not fall strictly into any of the three beforementioned groups and include tactics of empathy, fatalism, and perspective change.

Author Biographies

Natalya B. Boeva-Omelechko, Southern Federal University

Professor in the Department of Theory and Practice of the English Language

Ekaterina I. Gokova, Southern Federal University

Postgraduate Student at the Department of Theory and Practice of the English Language

References

Бен Шушан А. А. Эмпатийное речевое поведение в условиях анонимности виртуального общения // Доклады Башкирского университета. 2020. Т. 5, № 6. С. 444–448.

Боева-Омелечко Н. Б. Вопрос как средство выражения стратегий вежливости и антивежливости в современном английском языке // Язык. Культура. Перевод. Коммуникация: сб. науч. тр. М.: Тезаурус, 2015. С. 85–88.

Василюк Ф. Е. Сопереживание как центральная категория понимающей психотерапии // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2016. Т. 24, № 5. С. 205–227.

Гринева М. С. Содержательные характеристики речевых действий практического психолога в терапевтическом дискурсе: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Калуга, 2018. 220 с.

Иссерс О. И. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики русской речи. М.: ЛЕНАНД, 2017. 308 с.

Казачкова Ю. В. Выражение сочувствия в русском и английском речевом общении (жанровый аспект): дис. … канд. филол. наук. Саратов, 2006. 177 с.

Карягина Т. Д. Поведенческие проявления эмпатии в раннем возрасте: на материале апробации стандартизованной экспериментальной процедуры «симулированный дистресс взрослого» // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Психология и педагогика. 2022. № 3. С. 573–591. doi 10.22363/ 2313-1683-2022-19-3-573-591

Козлова М. М. Современный любовный роман как жанр массовой культуры // Вестник УлГТУ. 2001. № 1. С. 77–84.

Конджола-Пих К. Реализация интенции утешения при помощи совета // Synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny. 2015. № 14. C. 185–192.

Кузнецова А. А. Иллокутивные типы вербальной эмпатии: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Уфа, 2010. 211 с.

Лекант П. А. Синтаксис простого предложения в современном русском языке. М.: Высш. шк., 2004. 247 с.

Немец H. Г. Утешение как механизм изменения структуры самосознания личности: дис. … канд. психол. наук. Тверь, 2007. 216 с.

Психология экстремальных ситуаций для спасателей и пожарных: учеб. пособие / под общ. ред. Ю. С. Шойгу. М.: Смысл, 2007. 319 с.

Смирнова Е. В. Гендерные и социокультурные особенности коммуникации // Вестник ВГУ. 2005. № 2. С. 141–147.

Сусов И. П. Лингвистическая прагматика. Винница: Нова Кныга, 2009. 272 с.

Федунина Н. Ю. Речевые формулы утешения // Московский психотерапевтический журнал. 2009. № 4. С. 98–123.

Ханский А. О. Коммуникативные стратегии вербального утешения: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Тверь, 2001. 126 с.

Холмогорова А. Б., Московская М. С., Шерягина Е. В. Алекситимия и способность к оказанию разных видов социальной поддержки // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2014. Т. 22, № 4. С. 115–129.

Шерягина Е. В. Проективная методика исследований стратегии утешения // Московский психотерапевтический журнал. 2009. № 4. С. 212–224.

Bodie G. The Role of Thinking in the Comforting Process: An Empirical Test of a Dual-process Framework // Communication Research. 2013. № 40(4). P. 533–558.

Burleson B. R. Emotional Support Skill // Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. P. 551–595.

Fischer R. S., Lundman B., Norberg A. Feeling Whole: The Meaning of Being Consoled Narrated by Very Old People // The Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling. 2010. № 6. P. 1–12.

Hawley M. P. Nurse Comforting Strategies. Perceptions of Emergency Department Patients // Clinical Nursing Research. 2000. № 4. P. 98–107.

Jesson S. Consolation and the Sharing of Attention // Simone Weil and Continental Philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. 25 p.

Kim H. S. Culture and Social Support Provision: Who Gives What and Why / J. M. Chen, H. S. Kim, T. Mojaverian, B. Morling // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012. № 38(1). P. 3–13.

Klass D. Culture, Consolation, and Continuing Bonds in Bereavement: The Selected Works of Dennis Klass. New York: Routledge, 2021. 302 p.

Norberg A., Bergsten M., Lundman B. A Model of Consolation // Nursing Ethics. 2001. № 8(6). P. 544–553.

Suzuki T. A Corpus-linguistic Approach to the Verbal Realization of “Comforting” // The Cultural Review. 2010. № 4(36). P. 81–103.

Tornøe K. A. The challenge of consolation: Nurses’ Experiences with Spiritual and Existential Care for the Dying-a Phenomenological Hermeneutical Study / K. A. Tornøe, Danbolt L. J., K. Kvigne, V. Sorlie // BMC Nursing. 2015. Vol. 14, issue 62. 12 p.

References

Ben Shushan A. A. Empatiynoe rechevoe povedenie v usloviyakh anonimnosti virtual’nogo obshcheniya [Empathic speech behavior in virtual anonymous communication]. Doklady Bashkirskogo universiteta [Reports of Bashkir University], 2020, vol. 5, issue 6, pp. 444–448. (In Russ.)

Boeva-Omelechko N. B. Vopros kak sredstvo vyrazheniya strategiy vezhlivosti i antivezhlivosti v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Question as a means of realization of polite and impolite strategies in modern English]. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Perevod. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Culture. Translation. Communication]: a collection of scientific articles. Moscow, Tezaurus Publ., 2015, pp. 85–88. (In Russ.)

Vasilyuk F. E. Soperezhivanie kak tsentral’naya kategoriya ponimayushchey psikhoterapii [Сo-experiencing as a key category of co-experiencing psychotherapy]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016, vol. 24, issue 5, pp. 205–227. (In Russ.)

Grineva M. S. Soderzhatel’nye kharakteristiki rechevykh deystviy prakticheskogo psikhologa v terapevticheskom diskurse. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Features of a counseling psychologist’s speech acts in therapeutic discourse. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Kaluga, 2018. 220 p. (In Russ.)

Issers O. I. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative Strategies and Tactics in the Russian Speech]: a monograph. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2017. 308 p. (In Russ.)

Kazachkova Yu. V. Vyrazhenie sochuvstviya v russkom i angliyskom rechevom obshchenii (zhanrovyy aspekt). Diss. kand. filol. nauk [The expression of sympathy In Russian and English speech communication (genre aspect). Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2006. 177 p. (In Russ.)

Karyagina T. D. Povedencheskie proyavleniya empatii v rannem vozraste: na materiale aprobatsii standartizovannoy eksperimental’noy protsedury «simulirovannyy distress vzroslogo». [Behavioral manifestations of empathy at an early age: based on the testing of a standardized experimental procedure ‘Simulated Adult Distress’]. Vestnik RUDN. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics], 2022, issue 3, pp. 573–591. doi 10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-573-591. (In Russ.)

Kozlova M. M. Sovremennyy lyubovnyy roman kak zhanr massovoy kul’tury [Modern romantic novel as a mass culture genre]. Vestnik UlGTU [Bulletin of the Ulyanovsk State Technical University], 2001, issue 1, pp. 77–84. (In Russ.)

Kondzhola-Pikh K. Realizatsiya intentsii utesheniya pri pomoshchi soveta [Realization of comforting intention through advice]. Synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny [Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects in Polish Studies], 2015, issue 14, pp. 185–192. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsova A. A. Illokutivnye tipy verbal’noy empatii. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Illocutionary types of verbal empathy. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Ufa, 2010. 211 p. (In Russ.)

Lekant P. A. Sintaksis prostogo predlozheniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Syntax of the simple sentence in the modern Russian language]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2004. 247 p. (In Russ.)

Nemets N. G. Uteshenie kak mekhanizm izmeneniya struktury samosoznaniya lichnosti. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Comforting as a mechanism of changing an individual’s consciousness. Cand. psychol. sci. diss.]. Tver, 2007. 216 p. (In Russ.)

Psikhologiya ekstremal’nykh situatsiy dlya spasateley i pozharnykh [Psychology of Extreme Situations for Rescuers and Firemen]: a textbook. Ed. by Yu. S. Shoygu. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 319 p. (In Russ.)

Smirnova E. V. Gendernye i sotsiokul’turnye osobennosti kommunikatsii [Gender, social and cultural peculiarities of communication]. Vestnik VGU [Proceedings of Voronezh State University], 2005, issue 2, pp. 141–147. (In Russ.)

Susov I. P. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika [Linguapragmatics]. Vinnitsa, Nova Knyga Publ., 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.)

Fedunina N. Yu. Rechevye formuly utesheniya [Comforting speech formulae]. Moskovskiy psikhoterapevticheskiy zhurnal [Moscow Psychotherapy Journal], 2009, issue 4, pp. 98–123. (In Russ.).

Khanskiy A. O. Kommunikativnye strategii verbal’nogo utesheniya. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Communicative strategies of verbal comforting. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Tver, 2001. 126 p. (In Russ.).

Kholmogorova A. B., Moskovskaya M. S., Sheryagina E. V. Aleksitimiya i sposobnost’ k okazaniyu raznykh vidov sotsial’noy podderzhki [Alexithymia and the ability to provide different types of social support]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2014, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 115–129. (In Russ.).

Sheryagina E. V. Proektivnaya metodika issledovaniy strategii utesheniya [Projective methodology of research on the consolation strategy]. Moskovskiy psikhoterapevticheskiy zhurnal [Moscow Psychotherapy Journal], 2009, issue 4, pp. 212–224. (In Russ.).

Bodie G. The role of thinking in the comforting process: An empirical test of a dual-process framework. Communication Research, 2013, vol. 40, issue 4, pp. 533–558. (In Eng.)

Burleson B. R. Emotional support skill. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003, pp. 551–595. (In Eng.)

Fischer R. S., Lundman B., Norberg A. Feeling whole: The meaning of being consoled narrated by very old people. The Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 2010, issue 6, pp. 1–12. (In Eng.)

Hawley M. P. Nurse comforting strategies. Perceptions of emergency department patients. Clinical Nursing Research, 2000, issue 4, pp. 98–107. (In Eng.)

Jesson S. Consolation and the sharing of attention. Simone Weil and Continental Philosophy. London, Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. 25 p. (In Eng.)

Kim H. S. Culture and social support provision: Who gives what and why. Ed. by J. M. Chen, H. S. Kim, T. Mojaverian, B. Morling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2012, vol. 38, issue 1, pp. 3–13. (In Eng.)

Klass D. Culture, Consolation, and Continuing Bonds in Bereavement: The Selected Works of Dennis Klass. New York, Routledge, 2022. 302 p. (In Eng.)

Norberg A., Bergsten M., Lundman B. A model of consolation. Nursing Ethics, 2001, vol. 8, issue 6, pp. 544–553. (In Eng.)

Suzuki T. A Corpus-linguistic approach to the verbal realization of ‘comforting’. The Cultural Review, 2010, vol. 4, issue 36, pp. 81–103. (In Eng.)

Tornøe K. A. The challenge of consolation: Nurses’ experiences with spiritual and existential care for the dying-a phenomenological hermeneutical study. Ed. by K. A. Tornøe, L. J. Danbolt, K. Kvigne, V. Sorlie. BMC Nursing, 2015, vol. 14, issue 62. 12 p. (In Eng.)

Published

2024-07-09

How to Cite

Boeva-Omelechko Н. Б. ., & Gokova Е. И. . (2024). Representation of the Comforting Strategy in Modern German and English Fiction Discourse. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2024-2-28-38

Issue

Section

LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND SOCIETY