The Story ‘The Old Teacher’ by V. S. Grossman: an Analysis of the Motivic and Lexical Organization of the Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2024-1-89-97Keywords:
V. S. Grossman; The Old Teacher; antithesis; Rosenthal; Holocaust; lexical repetition.Abstract
The article is devoted to an analysis of the lexical structure and the system of characters in the text of V. S. Grossman’s short story The Old Teacher. The author of the paper looks at this text in the context of works of Russian literature dealing with the Holocaust. The study examines the lexical means used to create the images of the key characters, the main one of which is an old mathematics teacher living in a city besieged by the Nazis. The author comes to a conclusion that the main compositional-and-stylistic principle in the work under study is opposition, the selection of linguistic material is determined by the oppositions light/darkness, youth/old age, life/death; the main character is depicted with the use of antithesis as he is shown in comparison with and in opposition to other characters. There is a motive of fear in the story, realized through active lexical and derivational repetition of words and phrases with a pronounced seme of fear, which allows us to consider the motive conceptually significant. Through an analysis of text dominants, the study identifies important personality traits of key characters, determines realities that are conceptually significant for the writer’s artistic world. The semantic opposition life/death and the opposition light/darkness, associated with the former, determine the choice of means for depicting objects of opposition; the main one of such means is metaphorization. The article discusses the functions that metaphors perform in the text of the story (pictorial, cognitive, prospective). The analysis identified a lexico-semantic group of words with the common component ‘time’ that are repeated during the characterization of the characters as well as at the beginning and at the end of the text, which indicates significance of this concept for the artistic space of the work. The main character conveys the image of a righteous man, so characteristic of the traditions of Russian literature.References
Абдуллаева С. Н. Особенности жанрово-стилевой репрезентации авторской позиции в романе В. Гроссмана «Жизнь и судьба»: дис. … канд. филол. наук. М., 2022. 168 с.
Арутюнова Н. Д. Язык и мир человека. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1999. 896 с.
Басилая Н. А. Семасиологический анализ бинарных метафорических словосочетаний. Тбилиси: Изд-во Тбилис. ун-та, 1971. 78 с.
Бит-Юнан Ю. Г. Публицистика В.С. Гроссмана в литературно-политическом контексте в 1920-х – 1980-х гг.: автореф. … д-ра филол. наук. М., 2021. 53 с.
Бочаров А. Г. Василий Гроссман. Жизнь, творчество, судьба. М.: Сов. писатель, 1990. 402 с.
Виноградов В. В. О языке художественной прозы. М., 1980. 360 c.
Волохова Ю. А. «Старый учитель» В. С. Гроссмана: четыре варианта одного рассказа // Вестник Российского государственного гуманитарного университета. Серия «Литературоведение. Языкознание. Культурология». 2019. № 5. С. 85–112.
Григорьева Т. В. Метафорическая бинарная оппозиция как способ языковой интерпретации действительности // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2014. № 7(336). Филология. Искусствоведение. Вып. 89. С. 155–158.
Гроссман В. С. Жизнь и судьба. М.: СЛОВО, 1999. 700 с.
Гроссман В. С. Старый учитель / Добро вам! М.: Текст, 2018. С. 143–176.
Дегтева В. В. Творчество Василия Гроссмана: современные подходы и концепции // Мир науки, культуры и образования. 2012. № 4(35). С. 62–64.
Карасик О. Б. О Холокосте средствами постмодернизма (романы Дж. С. Фоера «Полная иллюминация» и Н. Краусс «Хроники любви») // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2013. Т. 15, № 2. С. 181–186.
Лотман Ю. М. Риторика // Труды по знаковым системам. Тарту, 1981. Вып. 12. 148 c.
Мокиенко В. М., Никитина Т. Г. Большой словарь русских поговорок. М: Олма Медиа Групп, 2007.
Николина Н. А. Филологический анализ текста: учеб. пособие для студ. высш. пед. учеб. заведений. М.: Академия, 2003. 256 с.
Садыкова М. А. Лингвокультурный анализ мифологизированных концептов «свет/light» и «тьма/darkness» в текстах Священного Писания: автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Ижевск, 2007. 19 с.
Современный толковый словарь русского языка / под ред. Т. Ф. Ефремовой. 2000. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/efremova/253349/Темнота (дата обращения: 14.08.2022).
Успенский Б. А. Семиотика искусства. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1995. 360 с.
Шаваева Ф. Я. Языковая и художественная метафоры. Специфика функционирования метафоры в художественном тексте // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2016. № 5, ч. 1. С. 164–167.
Chandler D. Semiotics the basics. Madison Ave. New York, 2002. 307 p.
References
Abdullaeva S. N. Osobennosti zhanrovo-stilevoy reprezentatsii avtorskoy pozitsii v romane V. Grossmana ‘Zhizn’ i sud’baʼ. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Specific features of genre-style representation of the author’s position in V. Grossman’s novel ‘Life and Fate’. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2022. 168 p. (In Russ.)
Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the Human World]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1999. 896 p. (In Russ.)
Basilaya N. A. Semasiologicheskiy analiz binarynykh metaforicheskikh slovosochetaniy [Semasiological Analysis of Binary Metaphorical Phrases]. Tbilisi, Tbilisi State University Press, 1971. 78 p. (In Russ.)
Bit-Yunan Yu. G. Publitsistika V. S. Grossmana v literaturno-politicheskom kontekste v 1920-kh – 1980-kh gg. Avtoref. diss. d-ra filol. nauk [V. S. Grossman’s writings in the literary and political context in the 1920s-1980s. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2021. 53 p. (In Russ.)
Bocharov A. G. Vasiliy Grossman. Zhizn’, tvorchestvo, sud’ba [Vasily Grossman. Life, Creative Work, Destiny]. Moscow, Sovetskiy Pisatel’ Publ., 1990. 402 p. (In Russ.)
Vinogradov V. V. O yazyke khudozhestvennoy prozy [On the Language of Literary Fiction]. Moscow, 1980. 360 p. (In Russ.)
Volokhova Yu. A. ‘Staryy uchitel’’ V. S. Grossmana: chetyre varianta odnogo rasskaza [‘The Old Schoolmaster’ by V. S. Grossman: Four versions of the novel]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya ‘Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul’turologiyaʼ [Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: ‘Literary Criticism. Linguistics. Culturology’], 2019, issue 5, pp. 85–112. (In Russ.)
Grigor’eva T. V. Metaforicheskaya binarnaya oppozitsiya kak sposob yazykovoy interpretatsii deystvitel’nosti [Metaphorical binary opposition as a way of linguistic interpretation of reality]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 89 [CSU Bulletin. Series: Philology. Art Criticism. Issue 89], 2014, issue 7(336), pp. 155–158. (In Russ.)
Grossman V. S. Zhizn’ i sud’ba [Life and Fate]. Moscow, SLOVO Publ., 1999. 700 p. (In Russ.)
Grossman V. S. Staryy uchitel’. Dobro vam! [Old Teacher. Welcome to You!]. Moscow, Text Publ., 2018, pp. 143–176. (In Russ.)
Degteva V. V. Tvorchestvo Vasiliya Grossmana: sovremennye podkhody i kontseptsii [Works by Vasily Grossman: modern approaches and conceptions]. Mir nauki, kul’tury i obrazovaniya [World of Science, Culture and Education], 2012, issue 4(35), pp. 62–64. (In Russ.)
Karasik O. B. O Kholokoste sredstvami postmodernizma (romany Dzh. S. Foera ‘Polnaya illyuminatsiya’ i N. Krauss ‘Khroniki lyubvi’) [On the Holocaust by means of postmodernism (novels by J. S. Foer ‘Everything is Illuminated’ and N. Krauss ‘The History of Love’)]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2013, vol. 15, issue 2, pp. 181–186. (In Russ.)
Lotman Yu. M. Ritorika [Rhetoric]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works on Sign Systems]. Tartu, 1981, issue 12. 148 p. (In Russ.)
Mokienko V. M., Nikitina T. G. Bol’shoy slovar’ russkikh pogovorok [A Large Dictionary of Russian Sayings]. Moscow, Olma Media Group Publ., 2007. (In Russ.)
Nikolina N. A. Filologicheskiy analiz teksta [Philological Analysis of Text]: a textbook for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2003. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Sadykova M. A. Lingvokul’turnyy analiz mifologizirovannykh kontseptov ‘svet/lightʼ i ‘t’ma/darknessʼ v tekstakh Svyashchennogo pisaniya. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic and cultural analysis of the mythologized concepts ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ in the texts of Holy Scripture. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Izhevsk, 2007. 19 p. (In Russ.)
Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Modern Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Ed. by T. F. Efremova. 2000. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/efremova/253349/
Темнота (accessed 14 Aug 2022). (In Russ.)
Uspenskij B. A. Semiotika iskusstva [The Semiotics of Art]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1995. 360 p. (In Russ.)
Shavaeva F. Ya. Yazykovaya i khudozhestvennaya metafory. Spetsifika funktsionirovaniya metafory v khudozhestvennom tekste [Language and literary metaphors. Specificity of metaphor functioning in literary text]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2016, issue 5, pt. 1, pp. 164–167. (In Russ.)
Chandler D. Semiotics: The Basics. Madison Ave, New York, 2002. 307 p. (In Eng.)
