THE ZOOMORPHIC CODE IN THE LINGUISTIC IMAGERY OF THE ARTISTIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD IN WORKS BY RUSSIAN AND KAZAKH WRITERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2019-4-45-52Keywords:
language, culture, language picture of the world, zoomorphic code of culture, metaphor¬rical comparison.Abstract
The article presents a linguoculturological analysis of comparative structures in works of fiction by Russian and Kazakh authors written in the first half of the 20th century. The analysis aims to identify lexemes contained in these structures as an agent of comparison and nominating objects of wild fauna such as animals, birds and fish. The research attempts to establish the importance of particular animal universals in cultural life of the ethnos and also to reveal the cognitive strategy of naming in language, i. e. to determine what properties are perceived and reflected in human consciousness when referring to a certain animal. Natural universals are considered as part of ethnic universals connected with the location of a certain ethnos. At the same time, it is noted that the traditional character of a natural universal determines the durability of its inclusion into cultural and language fund of the ethnos and the scope of its associative links. All the areas of the ethnos’s existence are reflected in the language as a system of cultural codes, fundamental ones among which are temporal, spatial, somatic, substantive, biomorphic, etc. The existence of the biomorphic code of culture is recognized by many linguists. It is a set of names of man (anthropomorphic code), florae (phytomorphic code) and faunae (zoomorphic code).The study has revealed that in Russian literature the zoomorphic code is represented by the names of animals that are objects of hunting and fishing. For Russian consciousness, the utilitarian function of a wild animal is important: animals are a source of food and material for making household items. In Kazakh mentality, the importance is attached to the projective function: giving animals human traits. Identification of themselves with animals exists as a result of learning historical cultural experience, whose roots go back to the deep past, where there was a totemic cult of animals.The problem of the language picture of the world is closely connected with the problem of comparison as a way of creating it. Being the reflection of the opposition between man and the world, it reflects both national stereotypes of thinking and a personal worldview, therefore comparison is of special interest not only for linguists but also for psycholinguists and cultural scientists.References
Список источников
Ауэзов М. Племя младое // Избранные произведения. Алма-Ата: Жазушы, 1977. 520 с.
Белая аруана. Казахские рассказы. М.: Худож. лит., 1976. 471 с.
Караван выходит на рассвете: Казахские исторические повести. Алма-Ата: Жазушы, 1989. 432 с.
Паустовский К. Повести и рассказы. Л.: Худож. лит., 1985. 320 с.
Пришвин М. Собрание сочинений: в 6 т. Т. 4: Мои тетрадки. М.: Худож. лит., 1957. 724 с.
Русская проза первой половины XX века: в 2 т. М.: Дрофа, 2003.
Список литературы
Афанасьев А. Н. Поэтические воззрения славян на природу: опыт сравнительного изучения славянских преданий и верований в связи с мифологическими сказаниями других родственных народов. М., 1965. Т. 1. 736 с.
Ахманова О. С., Гюббенет И. В. «Вертикальный контекст» как филологическая проблема // Вопросы языкознания. 1977. № 3. С. 47.
Багаутдинова Г. А. Человек во фразеологии: антропоцентрический и аксиологический аспекты: автореф. дисс. … д-ра филол. наук. Казань, 2007. 45 с.
Васильев Б. А. Медвежий праздник // Совет-ская этнография. 1948. № 4. С. 79–104.
Джусупов Н. М. Тюркский символ в художественном тексте (лингвокогнитивный аспект). Астана: Изд-во «Сарыарка», 2011. 218 с.
Ковшова М. Л. Семантика и прагматика фразеологизмов: лингвокультурологический аспект: автореф. дис. … д-ра филол. наук. М., 2009. 48 с.
Кондыбай С. Мифология предказахов. Кн. 3 / пер. с каз. яз З. Наурзбаевой. Алматы, СаГа, 2008. 436 с.
Красных В. В. Этнопсихолингвистика и лин-гвокультурология: курс лекций. М.: Гнозис, 2002. 284 с.
Мальцева Д. Г. Национально-культурный аспект фразеологии: дисс. … д-ра филол. наук. М., 1990. 520 с.
Орел В. Е. Культура, символы и животный мир. Харьков: Гуманит. центр, 2013. 592 с.
Пименова М. В. Языковая картина мира. М.: ФЛИНТА, 2014. 109 с.
Румянцева М. В. К проблеме отображения объективной реальности в языковой образности // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2014. № 7 (336). С. 190–195.
Сабитова З. К. Прошлое в настоящем. Рус-ско-тюркские культурные и языковые контакты. Алматы: Қазақ университеті, 2007. 320 с.
Рыбаков Б. А. Язычество древних славян. М.: Наука, 1980. URL: http://www.litmir.net/br/?b=
(дата обращения: 20.08.2018).
Хроленко А. Т. Этническое своеобразие языка фольклора // Проблемы русистики (лексикология и грамматика): тезисы Межрегион. науч. конф. Белгород, 1995. С. 116–118.
References
Afanas’ev A. N. Poeticheskie vozzreniya slavyan na prirodu: opyt sravnitel’nogo izucheniya slavyanskikh predaniy i verovaniy, v svyazi s mifologicheskimi skazaniyami drugikh rodstvennykh narodov [Poetic views of the Slavs on nature: Experience of a comparative study of Slavic traditions and beliefs in connection with the mythological tales of other kindred peoples]. Moscow, 1965, vol. 1. 736 p. (In Russ.)
Akhmanova O. S., Gyubbenet I. V. ‛Vertikal'nyy kontekst’ kak filologicheskaya problema [‛Vertical сontext’ as a philological problem]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 1977, issue 3, p. 47. (In Russ.)
Bagautdinova G. A. Chelovek vo frazeologii: antropotsentricheskiy i aksiologicheskiy aspekty. Avtoreferat diss. … d-ra filol. nauk [Man in phraseology: Anthropocentric and axiological aspects. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss.]. Kazan, 2007. 45 p. (In Russ.)
Vasil’ev B. A. Medvezhiy prazdnik [Bear holi-day]. Sovetskaya etnografiya [Soviet ethnography], 1948, issue 4, pp. 79–104. (In Russ.)
Dzhusupov N. M. Tyurkskiy simvol v khudozhestvennom tekste (lingvokognitivnyy aspekt) [Turkic symbol in fiction text (linguo-cognitive aspect)]. Astana, Saryarka Publ., 2011. 218 p. (In Russ.)
Kovshova M. L. Semantika i pragmatika frazeologizmov: lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspect. Avtoreferat diss. … d-ra filol. nauk. [Semantics and pragmatics of phraseological units: Linguoculturological aspect. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 48 p. (In Russ.)
Kondybay S. Mifologiya predkazakhov [Mythology of the pre-Kazakh]. Transl. from Kazakh by Z. Naurzbaeva. Almaty, SaGa Publ., 2008, vol. 3. 436 p. (In Kazakh)
Krasnykh V. V. Etnopsikholingvistika i lingvokul’turologiya: Kurs lektsiy [Ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology: Course of lectures]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2002. 284 p. (In Russ.)
Mal’tseva D. G. Natsional’no-kul’turnyy aspekt frazeologii. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [National and cultural aspects of phraseology. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1990. 520 p. (In Russ.)
Orel V. E. Kul’tura, simvoly i zhivotnyy mir [Culture, symbols and wildlife]. Kharkov, Humanitarian Center Publ., 2013. 592 p. (In Russ.)
Pimenova M. V. Yazykovaya kartina mira [The language picture of the world]. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2014. 109 p. (In Russ.)
Rumyantseva M. V. K probleme otobrazheniya ob”ektivnoy real’nosti v yazykovoy obraznosti [To the problem of the objective reality reflection in the linguistic imagery]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [CSU Bulletin], 2014, issue 7 (336), pp. 190–195. (In Russ.)
Sabitova Z. K. Proshloe v nastoyashchem. Russko-tyurkskie kul’turnye i yazykovye kontakty [The past is in the present. Russian-Turkic cultural and language contacts]. Almaty, Kazak Universiteti Press, 2007. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Rybakov B. A. Yazychestvo drevnikh slavyan [Paganism of the ancient Slavs]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. Available at: http://www.litmir.net/br/?b=85956 (accessed 16.05.2019). (In Russ.)
Khrolenko A. T. Etnicheskoe svoeobrazie yazyka fol’klora [Ethnic originality of the folklore language]. Problemy rusistiki (leksikologiya i grammatika). Tezisy Mezhregional’noy nauchnoy konferentsii [Issues of Russian studies (lexicology and grammar). Abstracts of the Interregional sci. conf.]. Belgorod, 1995, pp. 116–118. (In Russ.)