The concept of «human nature» as an axiological principle
Philosophy «Problematization of the human: an ongoing project» (special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-413-422Keywords:
human nature, human essence, axiology, philosophical anthropology, biological, social, corporeality, «first nature», «second nature», EnlightenmentAbstract
In the philosophy of the 20th century, the idea of the absence of nature in man was established, due to which the concept of «human nature» became a rudiment in anthropological knowledge, and man himself began to be comprehended as «unsupported». In the era of the «biotechnological revolution», this concept turns out to be inconvenient for the transgressive game of man with his own limits. However, the problematization of a person in modern anthropological discourse can occur in many respects precisely through questioning the human nature. In the era of developed biotechnologies, for the purposes of human ecology, modern anthropology should not so much deny as assert the nature of man, since the concept of «human nature» indicates an ontological framework that preserves the authenticity of man, ensuring the continuity of all his historical forms. In contrast to the interpretation of the concept of human nature as opposed to the social essence (as a base physical, material, biological, vital part of human being), it is heuristically significant to elevate it to a socially significant axiological principle, filling it with value content by raising the status of the human nature. This is especially important due to the fact that this concept is substantively included in ethical, social and humanitarian expertise of biotechnological projects. Without the axiological development of this concept, bioethical and ecological discourses will lose strength and persuasiveness. A person is always incomplete, multidimensional, multifaceted, therefore there cannot be a single essential idea of a person capable of becoming the cementing foundation of anthropological knowledge, as the first generation of «philosophical anthropology» representatives hoped for. Still, man is one anthropological type with a single nature. As a result of the study, a hypothesis has been put forward that it is the reanimation of the concept of «human nature» that will give unity to anthropological knowledge and become its «ideological core».References
Аванесов С.С. Антропология сегодня: коррекция базовых ориентиров // Человек. 2017. № 3. С. 5–32.
Бердяев Н.А. О назначении человека. М.: Республика, 1993. 384с.
Блюменберг Х. Антропологическое приближение к актуальности риторики // Это человек: антология. М.: Высш. шк., 1995. С. 101–124.
Воронин А.А. Совершенствование человека // Человек. 2015. № 3. С. 164–169.
Денежкин А.В. От составителя // Шелер М. Избр. произв.: пер. с нем. М.: Гнозис, 1994. С. VII–XII.
Доброхотов А.Л. Телеология культуры. М: Прогресс-Традиция, 2016. 527 с.
Ивин А.А. Аксиология. М.: Высш. шк., 2006. 390 с.
Кассирер Э. Опыт о человеке: Введение в философию человеческой культуры // Проблема человека в западной философии: переводы. М.: Прогресс, 1988. С. 3–30.
Малков С.М., Михайлов И.Ф., Юдин Б.Г., Ярославцева Е.И. Природа человека — история самосозидания: материалы круглого стола // Человек. 2015. № 1. С. 32–44.
Мюрберг И., Киселева М.С., Гусейнов А.А., Смит Р. Природа человека — история самосозидания: материалы круглого стола // Человек. 2014. № 6. С. 5–19.
Руссо Ж.-Ж. Эмиль, или О воспитании // Руссо Ж.-Ж. Педагогические сочинения: в 2 т. / под. ред. Г.Н. Джибладзе; сост. А.Н. Джуринский. М.: Педагогика, 1981. Т. 1. С. 19–592.
Фукуяма Ф. Наше постчеловеческое будущее: Последствия биотехнологической революции. М.: АСТ, 2008. 349 с.
Хабермас Ю. Будущее человеческой природы. М.: Весь Мир, 2002. 144 с.
Хайдеггер М. О существе и понятии φύσις // Васильева Т.В. Семь встреч с М. Хайдеггером. М.: Изд-ль Савин С.А., 2004. С. 119–182.
Хёйзинга Й. Гл.IV. Основные условия культуры // ХёйзингаЙ. Homo Ludens. В тени завтрашнего дня. М.: Прогресс–Академия, 1992. С. 257–265.
Шелер М. Философское мировоззрение // Шелер М. Избр. произв.: пер. с нем. М.: Гнозис, 1994. С. 1–128.
Ясперс К. Смысл и назначение истории: пер. с нем. М.: Политиздат, 1991. 527 с.
Bertram G.W. Two Conceptions of Second Nature // Open Philosophy. 2020. Vol. 3, iss. 1. P. 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0005
Madarasz N.R., Santos D.P. The concept of human nature in Noam Chomsky // Veritas (Porto Alegre). 2018. Vol. 63, no. 3. P. 1092–1126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2018.3.32564
Mali M. 15 Years Later, Why Do We Still Believe in the Blank Slate? 2017. URL: https://malharmali.com/2017/08/02/15-years-later-why-do-we-still-believe-in-the-blank-slate/ (accessed: 11.07.2021).
Shulavikova B. The Ideal of a «Good Life» Seen from a Personal Perspective // Filozofia. 2006. Vol. 61, no 4. P. 295–308. URL: http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/node/823 (accessed: 11.07.2021).
Smith R. Being Human: Historical Knowledge and the Creation of Human Nature. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 2007. 256 p.
References
Avanesov, S.S. (2017). [Nowadays anthropology: How to correct basic guidelines]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 3, рр. 5–32.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1998). O naznachenii cheloveka [On the appointment of a person]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 384 p.
Bertram, G.W. (2020). Two conceptions of second nature. Open Philosophy. Vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0005
Blumenberg, H. (1995). [Anthropological approach to the relevance of rhetoric]. Eto chelovek: Antologiya [This is a man: Anthology]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., pp. 101–124.
Cassirer, E. (1998). [An essay on man. An introduction to a philosophy of human culture]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 3–30.
Denezhkin, A.V. (1994). [From the compiler]. M. Sheler. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: [Scheler M. Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ., pp. VII–XII.
Dobrokhotov, A.L. (2016). Teleologiya kul’tury [Teleology of culture]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 527 p.
Fukuyama, F. (2008). Nashe postchelovecheskoe buduschee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii [Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnological revolution]. Moscow: AST Publ., 349 p.
Habermas, J. (2002). Buduschee chelovecheskoy prirody [The future of human nature]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ., 144 p.
Heidegger, M. (2004). [On the essence and concept of φύσις]. Vasil’eva T.V. Sem’ vstrech s M. Khaydeggerom [Vasileva T.V. Seven meetings with M. Heidegger]. Moscow: Savin S.A. Publ., pp. 119–182.
Huizinga, J. (1992). [Ch. IV. Basic conditions of culture]. Homo Ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnya [Homo Ludens. In the shadow of tomorrow]. Moscow: Progress–Akademiya Publ., pp. 257–265.
Ivin, A.A. (2006). Aksiologiya [Axiology]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 390 p.
Jaspers, K. (1991). Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The origin and goal of history]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 527 p.
Madarasz, N.R. and Santos, D.P. (2018). The concept of human nature in Noam Chomsky. Veritas (Porto Alegre). Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1092–1126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2018.3.32564
Mali, M. (2018). 15 years later, why do we still believe in the blank slate? Available at: https://malharmali.com/2017/08/02/15-years-later-why-do-we-still-believe-in-the-blank-slate/ (accessed 11.07.2021).
Malkov, S.M., Mikhaylov, I.F., Yudin, B.G. and Yaroslavtseva, E.I. (2015). [Human nature: The history of self-building. The roundtable]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 1, pp. 32–44.
Myurberg, I., Kiseleva, M.S., Guseynov, A.A. and Smit, R. (2014). [Human nature: The history of self-building. The roundtable]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 6, pp. 5–19.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1981). [Emil, or an education]. Pedagogicheskiye sochineniya: v 2 t. [Pedagogical works: in 2 vols]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., vol. 1, pp. 19–592.
Scheler, M. (1994). [Philosophical worldview]. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ., pp. 1–128.
Šulavíková, B. (2006). The ideal of a «Good Life» seen from a personal perspective Filozofia. Vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 295–308. Available at: http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/filozofia/?q=en/node/823 (accessed 11.07. 2021).
Smith, R. (2007). Being human: historical knowledge and the creation of human nature. New York: Columbia University Press, 256 p.
Voronin, A.A. (2015). [Perfection of the Human being]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 3, pp. 164–169.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
