Correlation between the nervous system properties and defense mechanism

Psychology

Authors

  • Elena R. Pilyugina Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, 42, Moscowskaya st., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420111, Russia
  • Ramil F. Suleimanov Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, 42, Moscowskaya st., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420111, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2023-2-241-250

Keywords:

defense mechanisms, psychological defense, properties of the nervous system, psychophysiology, personality traits

Abstract

The study reveals the relationship between different levels of personal properties — psychophysiological (properties of the nervous system) and behavioral (defense mechanisms). The study was conducted on the basis of the socio-psychological center «Opora» in Kazan and Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov. The study sample consisted of 76 subjects, including 52 women and 24 men aged 16 to 75. The subjects underwent examination of psychophysiological parameters on the AK-9 «Activatiometer» device and were tested according to the Method for measuring the psychological defense. The results were processed using the SPSS Statistic 23 software; Spearman’s test was used to identify correlations. We have revealed correlations as follows: between a strong nervous system and isolation, projection, omnipotent control; between a weak nervous system and the defense mechanisms of the psychotic group — dissociation, repression, hypochondria as well as passive aggression and altruism; between a balanced nervous system and the defense mechanisms of the adaptive group — suppression and sublimation; between the predominance of excitability and projection as well as omnipotent control; between the predominance of inhibition and isolation, rationalization, avoidance, anticipation; high lability of a nervous system is associated with the defense mechanisms of the adaptive group — sublimation and humor as well as dissociation and denial; low lability of a nervous system is related to projection and omnipotent control. It is advisable to use the identified relationships in the work of psychologists, teachers, and other workers in helping professions in order to simplify the identification of personality traits; knowing the traits, it is possible to predict the use of defense mechanisms based on the psychophysiological parameters of the personality, as well as to get a more holistic view of the personality.

Author Biographies

Elena R. Pilyugina , Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, 42, Moscowskaya st., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420111, Russia

Lecturer in the Department of General Psychology

Ramil F. Suleimanov , Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, 42, Moscowskaya st., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420111, Russia

Doctor of Psychology, Docent, Head of the Department of General Psychology

References

Анохин П.К. Биология и нейрофизиология условного рефлекса. М.: Медицина, 1968. 547 с.

Борисова М.Н. Определение порогов различения и выработка тонких сенсорных дифференцировок как путь к изучению концентрированности процесса возбуждения // Типологические особенности высшей нервной деятельности человека / под ред. Б.М. Теплова. М.: Психологический ин-т РАО, 1959. Т. 2. С. 199–219.

Дроздовский А.К. Современные возможности и перспективы дифференциальной психофизиологии профессиональной деятельности // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Организационная психология и психология труда. 2018. Т. 3, № 3. С. 132–175.

Ильин Е.П. Дифференциальная психология профессиональной деятельности. СПб.: Питер, 2021. 432 с.

Кондратьева О.Г., Башкатов С.А. Влияние свойств нервной системы на функционирование механизмов психологической защиты (на примере педагогов общеобразовательных школ) // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Психология. 2016. Т. 9, № 3. С. 24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/psy160303

Мерлин В.С. Психология индивидуальности. М.: Изд-во Моск. психолого-социального ин-та, 2009. 542 с.

Мерлин В.С. Темперамент как фактор трудовой деятельности // Очерк теории темперамента / под ред. проф. В.С. Мерлина. Пермь: Перм. кн. изд-во, 1973. С. 148–167.

Небылицын В.Д. Психофизиологические исследования индивидуальных различий. М.: Наука, 1976. 336 с.

Павлов И.П. Полн. собр. соч.: в 6 т. T. 6: Статьи по различным вопросам физиологии, выступления на диспутах и в прениях, речи и предисловия. Автобиографические материалы / ред. К.М. Быков, Е.Ш. Арапетьянц. 2-e изд., доп. M.: АН СССР, 1952. 463 с. Пилюгина Е.Р. Двухмерная классификация механизмов психологической защиты // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2020. Вып. 2. С. 270–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-270-280

Пилюгина Е.Р., Сулейманов Р.Ф. Методика измерения психологической защиты // Экспериментальная психология. 2020. Т. 13, № 2. С. 194– 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ exppsy.2020130213

Русалов В.М. Темперамент в структуре индивидуальности человека: Дифференциальнопсихофизиологические и психологические исследования. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2012. 528 с.

Цагарелли Ю.А. Системная аппаратурная психодиагностика и коррекция как универсальный психологический инструмент // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. 2014. № 1(6). С. 71–76.

Цагарелли Ю.А. Системная диагностика человека и развитие психических функций. Казань: Познание, 2009. 492 с.

Цагарелли Ю.А. Труды Е.П. Ильина как энциклопедия современной психологии // Психология человека в образовании. 2019. Т. 1, № 4. С. 330–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33910/26869527-2019-1-4-330-340 Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience. Vol. 1: Theories of emotion / ed. by R. Plutchik, Н. Kellerman. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1980. 399 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-11313-x Freud A. The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Routledge, 2018. 320 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429481550 Freud S. The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. N.Y.: Modern library, 1995. 992 р.

Horney K. Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. N.Y.: Routledge, 1951. 392 р. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315010526

McWilliams N., Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2011. 426 р. Perry J.C., M. Henry. Studying defense mechanisms in psychotherapy using the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales // Defense mechanisms: Theoretical, research and clinical perspectives / ed. by U. Hentschel, G. Smith, J.G. Draguns, W. Ehlers.

Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier, 2004. P. 165–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(04)80034-7

Vaillant G.E. Ego mechanisms of defense: a guide for clinicans and researchers. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1992. 306 р.

References

Anokhin, P.K. (1968). Biologiya i neyrofiziologiya uslovnogo refleksa [Biology and neurophysiology of the conditioned reflex]. Moscow: Meditsina Publ.. 547 р.

Borisova, M.N. (1959). [Determination of discrimination thresholds and development of subtle sensory differentiations as a way to study the concentration of the excitation process.]. Tipologicheskie osobennosti vyshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti cheloveka, pod red. B.M. Teplova [B.M. Teplov (ed.) Typological features of human higher nervous activity]. Moscow: PI RAO Publ., vol. 2, рр. 199–219. Drozdovskiy, A.К. (2018). [Modern opportunities and prospects of professional activity differential psychophysiology]. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya i psikhologiya truda [Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational Psychology and Labor Psychology]. Vol. 3, no. 3, pр. 132–175.

Freud, A. (2018). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Routledge Publ., 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429481550 Freud, S. (1995). The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library Publ., 992 p. Horney, K. (1951). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York: Routledge Publ., 392 p. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315010526

Il’in, E.P. (2021). Differentsial’naya psikhologiya professional’noy deyatel’nosti [Differential psychology of professional activity]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 432 p.

Kondrat’eva, O.G. and Bashkatov, S.A. (2016). [Features of psychological protection psychophysiological mechanisms of different level complexity at teachers]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series «Psychology»]. Vol. 9, no. 3, pр. 24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/psy160303

McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York: Guilford Press, 426 p.

Merlin, V.S. (1973). [Temperament as a factor of labor activity]. Ocherk teorii temperamenta, pod red.

prof. V.S. Merlina [V.S. Merlin (ed.) Essay on the theory of temperament]. Perm: Perm book Publ., рр. 148–167.

Merlin, V.S. (2009). Psikhologiya individual’nosti [Psychology of individuality]. Moscow: MSPU Publ., 542 p.

Nebylitsyn, V.D. (1976). Psikhofiziologicheskie issledovaniya individual’nykh razlichiy [Psychophysiological studies of individual differences]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 336 р.

Pavlov, I.P. (1952). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. T. 6: Stat’i po razlichnym voprosam fiziologii, vystupleniya na disputakh i v preniyakh, rechi i predisloviya. Avtobiograficheskie materialy [Complete works: in 6 vols. Vol. 6: Articles on various questions of physiology, speeches at disputes and debates, speeches and prefaces. Autobiographical materials]. Moscow: AN USSR Publ., 463 p. Perry, J.C. and Henry, М. (2004). Studying defense mechanisms in psychotherapy using the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales. U. Hentschel et al. (eds.) Defense Mechanisms: Theoretical, Research and Clinical Perspectives. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier, pр. 165–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s01664115(04)80034-7

Pilyugina, E.R. (2020). [Two-dimensional classification of psychological defense mechanisms]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology]. Iss. 2, pр. 270–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-270-280

Pilyugina, E.R. and Suleymanov, R.F. (2020). [Method of measuring psychological defense]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. Vol. 13, no. 2, pр. 194–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213

Plutchik, R. and Kellerman, N. (eds.) (1980). Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience. Vol. 1: Theories of emotion. New York: Academic Press, 399 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-11313-x

Rusalov, V.M. (2022). Temperament v strukture individual’nosti cheloveka. Differentsial’nopsikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Temperament in the structure of human individuality. Differential-psychophysiological and psychological research]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 528 р.

Tsagarelli, Yu.A. (2009). Sistemnaya diagnostika cheloveka i razvitie psikhicheskikh funktsiy [System diagnostics of a person and the development of mental functions]. Kazan: Poznanie Publ., 492 р.

Tsagarelli, Yu.A. (2014). [Systemic instrumental psychodiagnostics and correction as a universal psychological tool]. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal [Baltic Humanitarian Journal]. No. 1(6), pр. 71–76.

Tsagarelli, Yu.A. (2019). [The works of E.P. Ilyin as an encyclopaedia of modern psychology]. Psikhologiya cheloveka v obrazovanii [Psychology in Education]. Vol. 1, no. 4, pр. 330–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2019-1-4-330-340

Vaillant, G.E. (1992). Ego mechanisms of defense: a guide for clinicans and researchers. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 306 p.

Published

2023-10-17

Issue

Section

Статьи