Об измерении черт личности посредством времени реакции (Часть 1: Постановка проблемы)
Психология
Ключевые слова:
большая пятёрка, время реакции, имплицитный ассоциативный тест, социальное познание, черты личностиАннотация
Рассматриваются методы исследования имплицитного социального познания. Демонстрируется концептуальная неоднородность подходов к эмпирической разработке проблемы. Формулируется гипотеза о совместном вкладе имплицитных и эксплицитных черт личности в дисперсию показателей наблюдаемого поведения. Обозначаются современные тесты измерения имплицитных черт личности и их связь с эксплицитными параметрами. Конкретизируется проблема имплицитных-эксплицитных измерений личности и предлагается ряд гипотез для последующей эмпирической проверки.Библиографические ссылки
(1). Айзенк Г.Ю. Структура личности. СПб.: Ювента; М.: КСП+, 1999. 464 с.
(2). Голдберг Э. Управляющий мозг: лобные доли, лидерство и цивилизация. М.: Смысл, 2003. 335 с.
(3). Мерлин B.C. Очерк интегрального исследования индивидуальности. М.: Педагогика, 1986.
(4). Первин Л., Джон О. Психология личности: Теория и исследования. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2001. 607 с.
(5). Чалдини Р., Кенрик Д., Нейберг С. Социальная психология. Пойми себя, чтобы понять других! СПб.: Прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2002. Т. 1. 336 с.
(6). Allport G.W. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt., 1937.
(7). Anderson R.D. The Implicit Association Test for conscientiousness: An indirect method of measuring personality. Unpublished manuscript for the degree of Master of Arts. 2009.
(8). Asendorpf J.B., Banse R., & Mucke D. Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. № 83. Р. 380–393.
(9). Back M.D., Schmuckle S.C., & Egloff B. Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit selfconcept of personality // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. № 97. Р. 533–548.
(10). Banaji M.R. Implicit attitudes can be measured. In: H.L. Roediger, J.S. Nairne (Eds.) // The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington; DC: APA., 2001. Р. 117–150.
(11). Bessenoff G.R., & Sherman J.W. Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation // Social Cognition. 2000. № 18. Р. 329–353.
(12). Blair I.V. Implicit stereotypes and prejudice // Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
(13). Brendl C.M., Markman A.B., & Messner, C. Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2005. № 41. Р. 346–368.
(14). Cattell R.B. The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1943. № 38. Р. 476–506.
(15). Crosby E., Bromle S., & Saxe L. Recent unobtrusive studies of Black-and-White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review // Psychological Bulletin. 1980. № 87. Р. 546–563.
(16). De Houwer J. The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task // Experimental Psychology. 2003. № 50. Р. 77–85.
(17). Digman J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. № 73. Р. 1246–1256.
(18). Dovidio J.F., Kawakami K., Johnson C., & Johnson B. On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1997. № 33. Р. 510–540.
(19). Eagly A.H., & Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich., 1993.
(20). Egloff B., & Schmukle S.C. Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. № 83. Р. 1441–1455.
(21). Fazio R.H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA // Academic Press. 1990. Vol. 23. Р. 75–109.
(22). Fazio R.H., Jackson J.R., Dunton B.C., & Williams C.J. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. № 69. Р. 1013–1027.
(23). Fazio R.H., & Olson M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and use // Annual Review of Psychology. 2003. № 54. Р. 297–327.
(24). Fazio R.H., & Towles-Schwenn T. The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1999. Р. 97–116.
(25). Fleeson W., & Gallagher P. The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. № 97. Р. 1097–1114.
(26). Greenwald A.G., & Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes // Psychological Review. 1995. № 102. Р. 4–27.
(27). Greenwald A.G., & Farnham S.D. Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. № 79. Р. 1022–1038.
(28). Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., & Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. № 74. Р. 1464–1480.
(29). Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E.L., & Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. № 97. Р. 17–41.
(30). Grucza R.A., & Goldberg L.R. The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: Predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators // Journal of Personality Assessment. 2009. № 89. Р. 167–187.
(31). Hofmann W., Friese M., & Strack F. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2009. № 4. Р. 162–176.
(32). Hofmann W., Gawronski B., Gschwendner T., Le H., & Schmitt M. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005. № 31. Р. 1369–1385.
(33). Hofmann W., Gschwendner T., Nosek B.A., & Schmitt M. What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? // European Review of Social Psychology. 2005. № 16. Р. 335–390.
(34). Hong R.Y., Paunonen S.V., & Slade H.P. Big Five personality factors and the prediction of behavior: A multitrait-multimethod approach // Personality and Individual Differences. 2008. № 45. Р. 160–166.
(35). Jordan C.H., Spencer S.J., & Zanna M.P. I love me... I love me not: Implicit self-esteem, explicit self-esteem, and defensiveness. In: S.J. Spencer S. Fein M.P. Zanna J.M. Olson (Eds.). Motivated Social Perception: The Ninth Ontario Symposium. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002. Р. 117–145.
(36). Karpinski A. Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The role of the other // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004. № 30. Р. 22–34.
(37). Kruglanski A.W., & Thompson E.P. Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel // Psychological Inquiry. 1999. № 10. Р. 83–109.
(38). Lowery B.S., Hardin C.D., & Sinclair S. Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. № 81. Р. 842–855.
(39). Lucas R.E., & Baird B.M. Global self-assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006. Р. 29–42.
(40). Mischel W. Personality and assessment. N.Y.: Wiley, 1968.
(41). Nosek B.A., & Banaji M.R. The Go/No-go Association Task // Social Cognition. 2001. № 19. Р. 625–666.
(42). Petty R.E., & Cacioppo J.T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
(43). Schmukle S.C., Back M.D., & Egloff B. Validity of the Five factor Model for the implicit self-concept of personality // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2008. № 24. Р. 263–272.
(44). Schnabel K., Banse R., & Asendorpf J. Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The Implicit Association Procedure (IAP) // Experimental Psychology. 2006а. № 53. Р. 69–76.
(45). Schnabel K., Banse R., & Asendorpf J.B. Assessment of implicit personality self-concept using the implicit association test (IAT): Concurrent assessment of anxiousness and angriness // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2006b. № 45. Р. 373–396.
(46). Schwarz N., & Clore G.L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983. № 45. Р. 513–523.
(47). Schwarz N., Strack E, & Mai H.P. Assimilation and contrast effects in part/whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1991. № 55. Р. 3–23.
(48). Steffens M.C., & Schulze-Konig S. Predicting spontaneous Big Five behavior with Implicit Association Tests // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2006. № 22. Р. 13–20.
(49). Strack F., & Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004. № 8. Р. 220–247.
(50). Teige S., Schnabel K., Banse R., & Asendorpf J.B. Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) // European Journal of Personality. 2005. № 18. Р. 495–520.
(51). Von Hippel W., Sekaquaptewa D., & Vargas P. The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1997. № 33. Р. 490–509.
(52). Wilson T., Lindsey S., & Schooler T.Y. A model of dual attitudes // Psychological Review. 2000. № 107. Р. 101–126.
(53). Wittenbrink B., Judd C.M., & Park B. Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. № 72. Р. 262–274.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2022 Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
