Global catastrophic risks in the light of unified objectively determined universal process concept. Part 2

Philosophy

Authors

  • Alexander Yur’evich Vnutskih Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-4-528-536

Keywords:

global catastroрhic risks, unified objectively determined universal process, cognitive biases, observation selection effects

Abstract

The article deals with the comparison of ontological and epistemological principles of the global catastrophic risks concept and the concept of unified objectively determined universal process. The author suggests that the concept of global catastrophic risks is an important contemporary trans-disciplinary concept, which has a significant influence both in the expert community and in the mass consciousness. Three ontological andthree epistemological principles of the concept have been reconstructed in the article. Ontological principles are focused on the idea of casual and unpredictable character of any processes in the world, including processes leading to global catastrophes. It follows from equal probability of these processes and the «equality» of all possibilities. Epistemological principles are focused on the idea of autonomy of the subjective side in cognition and its limitations. These limitations are interpreted as results of finiteness of the human experience’s sphere, due to cognitive biases and observation selection effects. However, the system of sciences and humanities facts, which can be interpreted in the light of the concept of unified objectively determined universal process, evidences that the philosophical principles (first of all, ontological ones) of the concept of global catastrophicrisks are insufficiently substantiated. The author believes, that the idea of a hierarchy of possibilities and «quantum entanglement’s» phenomenon in the light of the concept unified objectively determined universal process suffer to combine the idea of determined integral progress with the idea of casual processes (including the chances of global catastrophes). Also, the link between the world’s infinity and human experience’s spherein the light of the un-chaotic world’s concept allows to speak about the representative character of our experience with respect to the world as a whole. 

Author Biography

Alexander Yur’evich Vnutskih , Perm State University, 15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy,  Docent Professor of the Department of Philosophy

References

Внутских А.Ю. Глобальные катастрофические риски в свете концепции единого закономерного мирового процесса. Часть первая // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2017. № 3. С. 328–334. DOI:17072/2078-7898/2017-3-328-334.

Орлов В.В. История человеческого интеллекта. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. ун-та, 1999. Ч. 3. 184 с.

Барг О.А. Живое в едином мировом процессе. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. ун-та, 1993. 227 с.

Барашенков В. Эффект телепортации // Знание— сила. 2004. № 1. С. 33–41.

Стерледев Р.К., Стерледева Т.Д. Синхронистичность как предмет повышенной опасности // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. Вып. 3, ч. 2. С. 171–174.

Soja R. Dynamics of the Solar System Meteoroid Population. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at the University of Canterbury. 2010. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Canterbury. URL: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/4305/thesis_fulltext.pdf;jsessionid=FF1B3ADC1EA5E27541720CA6DB52A510?sequence=1 (accessed: 30.07.2017).

Adams F. Long-term astrophysical processes // Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. P. 33–47.

Виленкин А. Мир многих миров: физики в поисках иных вселенных. М.: Астрель, 2009. 303 с.

Yudkowsky E. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks // Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. P. 91–119.

Бэкон Ф. Новый Органон. URL: http://www.lib.ru/FILOSOF/BEKON/nauka2.txt_with-big-pictures.html#2 (дата обращения: 30.07.2017).

Фоллмер Г. Эволюционная теория познания: врожденные структуры познания в контексте биологии, психологии, лингвистики, философии и теории науки. М.: Русский Двор, 1998. 256 с.

References

Vnutskikh A.Yu. Global’nye katastroficheskie riski v svete kontseptsii edinogo zakonomernogo mirovogo protsessa. Chast’ pervaya [Global Cata strophic Risks in the light of Unified Objectively Determined Universal Process Concept. Part 1]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. 2017, iss. 3, pp. 328–334. DOI: 10.17072/2078- 7898/2017-3-328-334. (In Russian).

Orlov V.V. Istoriya chelovecheskogo intellekta [The history of human intellect]. Perm, PSU Publ., 1999, part 3, 184 p. (In Russian).

Barg O.A. Zhivoe v edinom mirovom protsesse [Living in United World Process]. Perm, PSU Publ., 1993, 227 p. (In Russian).

Barashenkov V. Effekt teleportatsii [Effect of Teleportation]. Znanie — sila [Knowledge is Power]. 2004, no. 1, pp. 33–41. (In Russian).

Sterledev R.K., Sterledeva T.D. Sinkhronistichnost’ kak predmet povyshennoy opasnosti [Synchronicity as a subject of increased danger]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskustvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice]. 2017, iss. 3, part 2, pp. 171–174. (In Russian).

Soja R. Dynamics of the Solar System Meteoroid Population. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at the University of Canterbury. 2010. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Canterbury. Available at: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/4 305/thesis_fulltext.pdf;jsessionid=FF1B3ADC1EA 5E27541720CA6DB52A510?sequence=1 (accessed 30.07.2017). (In English).

Adams F. Long-term astrophysical processes. Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 33–47. (In English).

Vilenkin A. Mir mnogih mirov: fiziki v poiskah inyh vselennyh [Many Worlds in One: The Search for Other Universes]. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., 2009, 303 p. (In Russian).

Yudkowsky E. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks. Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 91–119. (In English).

Bekon F. Noviy Organon [New Method]. Available at: http://www.lib.ru/FILOSOF/BEKON/ nauka2.txt_with-big-pictures.html#2 (accessed 30.07.2017). (In Russian).

Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki [Evolutionary epistemology]. Moscow, Russkiy Dvor Publ., 1998, 256 p. (In Russian).

Published

2017-12-30

Issue

Section

Статьи