The subjective feeling of loneliness as a factor of change of sexual partners

Psychology

Authors

  • Alexandra Alexandrovna Gaivoronskaya Smolensk State Medical University, 28, Krupskaya str., Smolensk, 214019, Russia;
  • Irina Mikhailovna Osipenko Smolensk State Medical University, 28, Krupskaya str., Smolensk, 214019, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-1-71-77

Keywords:

loneliness, change of sexual partners, emotional immaturity, free relationship, hypersexuality, suspiciousness, proneness to conflict, dissociated loneliness, alienating loneliness, diffuse loneliness

Abstract

The article examines how the levels of perceived loneliness become a factor of changing sexual partners. The techniques of detecting the levels of subjective feelings of loneliness of D. Russell and M. Ferguson (adaptation D.I. Raigorodskii) and a questionnaire to determine the kind of loneliness S.G. Korchagina have been used. Also to identify significant themes in the feeling of loneliness and sexual relationships, subjects were asked to describe theirideas about loneliness, relationships with the opposite sex, using specific examples from personal experience in the form of free short stories (mini method works — method of Volovikova, N.L. Smirnova). Group of subjects with frequent change of partners showed a high level of subjective feelings of loneliness, while group with traditional sexual behavior didn’t show the high level of subjective feelings of loneliness. Leading themes/descriptions of subjective feelings of loneliness correlative of living space, especially sexual relations, express the search of identification, proneness to conflict, fears/phobias, manifestation of psychological trauma. The authors believe that the present research will help with the thorough study of the traumatic conditions caused by the subjective feeling of lonelinessin the sexual sphere. The subjective feeling of loneliness is closely related to communicative activities, communication styles, ways of overcoming critical life situations, peculiarities of personal characteristics. The scope of application of obtained results are Sexual Medicine (sexology) and Gender Psychology. The prospects for further research are the creation of mental health programs aimed at creating a positive self-image, the correction of stressful situations and the formation of positive interpersonal relationships in the sexual sphere. 

Author Biographies

Alexandra Alexandrovna Gaivoronskaya , Smolensk State Medical University, 28, Krupskaya str., Smolensk, 214019, Russia;

Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professorof the Department of Clinical Psychology

Irina Mikhailovna Osipenko , Smolensk State Medical University, 28, Krupskaya str., Smolensk, 214019, Russia

Ph.D. in Psychology, Lecturer of the Departmentof Clinical Psychology

References

Морозикова И.В. К проблеме о воспитательной деятельности учреждений профессионального образования в современных условиях (ментальный аспект) // Социально-психологические проблемы ментальности/менталитета: матер. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Смоленск: Изд-во Смолен. гос. ун-та, 2010. С. 391–394.

Сен А. Развитие как свобода. М.: Новое издательство, 2004. 432 с.

Левин К. Теория поля в социальных науках. СПб.: Речь, 2000. 368 с.

Панов В.И. Экопсихологические взаимодействия: виды и типология // Социальная психология и общество. 2013. № 3. С. 13–27.

Холод А.М. Норма и девиация в сексологии: определение диапазона понятия // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2000. № 2(18). С. 35–43.

Чернышев А.С., Орешина И.А. Роль малой группы в духовно-нравственном опосредовании социальных представлений современной учащейся молодежи о межполовых отношениях // Ученые записки. Электронный научный журнал Курского государственного университета. 2014. № 3(31). С. 212–223.

Шагивалеева Г.Р.Одиночество и особенности его переживания студентами: монография. Елабуга: Алмедиа, 2007. 157 с.

Фрейд З. Психология бессознательного. М., 1989. 384 с.

Перлман Д., Пепло Л.Э. Теоретические подходы к одиночеству // Лабиринты одиночества. М.: Прогресс, 1989. С. 152–168.

Фромм Э. Бегство от свободы. М.: Джайдест, 2014. 288 с.

Джонг-Гирвельд Дж.де, Раадшелдерс Д. Типы одиночества // Лабиринты одиночества. М.: Прогресс, 1989. С. 301–319.

Корчагина С.Г. Психология одиночества: учебное пособие. М.: Моск. психол.-социал. ин-т, 2008. 228 с.

Райгородский Д.Я. Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты: учеб. пособие. Самара: БАХРАХ-М, 2002. 672 с.

Воловикова М.И.Представления русских о нравственном идеале. М.: ИП РАН, 2005. 376 с.

Гайворонская А.А., Осипенко И.М. Влияние уровня одиночества на смену половых партнеров (на примере студенческой молодежи) // Социально-психологические проблемы ментальности / менталитета: матер. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Смоленск: Изд-во Смолен. гос. ун-та, 2010. С. 152–154.

References

Morozikova I.V. [To the problem of educative activity of Colleges of Professional Education in modern conditions (the mental aspect)]. Sotsialnopsikhologicheskie problemy mental’nosti/mentaliteta [Socio-psychological problems of mentality]. Smolensk, Smolensk University Publ., 2010, pp. 391–394. (In Russian).

Sen A. Razvitie kak svoboda [Development as freedom]. Moscow, Novoe Izdatelstvo Publ., 2004, 432 p. (In Russian).

Lewin K. Teoriya polya v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Field theory in social science]. Saint Petersburg, Speech Publ., 2000, 368 p. (In Russian).

Panov V.I. [Ecopsychological Interactions: Types and Typology]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. 2013, no. 3, pp. 13– 27. (In Russian).

Kholod A.M. [Norm and deviation in sexology: determining the range of the concept]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Review. Series Humanities]. 2000, no. 2(18), pp. 35–43. (In Russian).

Chernyshev A.S., Oreshina I.A. [The role of small group in spiritual and moral mediating of the social representations of modern students about sexual relationships]. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronniy nauchniy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific Notes: The online academic journal of Kursk State University]. 2014. no. 3(31), pp. 212–223. (In Russian).

Shagivaleeva G.R. Odinochestvo i osobennosti ego perezhivaniya studentami [Loneliness and students experience of it]. Elabuga, Almedia Publ., 2007, 157 p. (In Russian).

Freud S. Psikhologiya bessoznatel’nogo [Psychology of the unconscious]. Moscow, 1989, AST Publ., 384 p. (In Russian).

Perlman D., Peplau L. A. [Theoretical approaches to loneliness]. Labirinty odinochestva [Labyrinths of loneliness]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 152– 168. (In Russian).

Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom], Moscow, Digest Publ., 2014, 288 p. (In Russian).

Jong-Gierveld J. de, Raadschelders J. [Types of loneliness]. Labirinty odinochestva [Labyrinths of loneliness]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 301–319. (In Russian).

Korchagina S.G. Psikhologiya odinochestva [Psychology of loneliness]. Moscow, Psycho-social Institute Publ., 2008, 228 p. (In Russian).

Raygorodskiy D.Ya. Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy [Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests]. Samara, Bakhrakh-M Publ., 2002, 672 p. (In Russian).

Volovikova M.I. Predstavleniya russkikh o nravstvennom ideale [Representations of Russians about the moral ideal]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ, 2005, 376 p. (In Russian).

Gayvoronskaya A.A., Osipenko I.M. [Solitude level Influence on sexual partner change (for the sample of students)]. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy mentalnosti [Socio-psychological problems of mentality]. Smolensk, Smolensk University Publ., 2010, pp. 152–154. (In Russian).

Published

2017-03-30

Issue

Section

Статьи