On relations of objects in Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-5-13Keywords:
ontology, metaphysics, Graham Harman, object-oriented ontology, correlationism, speculative realism, nonduality, object, deconstruction, method, Jacques Derrida, philosophy, epistemology, relationsAbstract
The article aims to analyze the relations between objects in the object-oriented ontology of Graham Harman. The authors consider Harman’s concept to be one of the main achievements of modern philosophy. This concept makes it possible to overcome the problem of objectivity as such and to gain access to the object uncorrelated by the subject of knowledge. Using the presented scheme of the object, the authors postulate the absence of the subject and subject-object relations based on correlations. Thus, the problem of objectivity is solved in a radical way. However, Harman’s object-oriented ontology does not explain how the relations between uncorrelated objects occur. It is essential to find the way to describe the mechanism of interaction between objects in which the object remains real, i.e. uncorrelated, and at the same time sensual, accessible for perception and interaction. That is why the authors turn to Jacques Derrida’s concept of deconstruction. Its application to the analysis of relations between objects in Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology allows the authors to deabsolutize correlationism as the only possible way of relations between objects, and at the same time to preserve it as a way of interaction between objects. The nature of the relations between objects can be logically explained by the philosophy of Albert Camus, through combining his method of cognition with the principle of deconstruction. Using this method, the authors come to a conclusion that correlations necessarily arise when objects interact, which allows them to manifest themselves as accessible. However, the existence of objects by themselves takes place without correlations. They are a condition for the appearance of a sensory object, but they are not possible with the existence of real objects on their own. The method proposed shows that the relations of objects represent an inextricable duality of the sensual and the real object, which is manifested in their knowable-unknowable nature. Studying the nature of interaction between objects in Graham Harman’s object-oriented ontology with the help of this method allows better understanding of the problem of objectivity as such. This issue requires further, more extensive, study and discussion.References
Брайант Л.Р. На пути к окончательному освобождению объекта от субъекта // Логос. 2014. № 4(100). С. 275–292.
Вяткин Д. «Плазма в себе»: между онтологией и эпистемологией // Логос. 2017. Т. 27, № 3(118). С. 57–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-57-80
Деррида Ж. Голос и феномен и другие работы по теории знака Гуссерля / пер. с фр. С.Г. Кашиной, Н.В. Суслова. СПб.: Алетейя, 1999. 208 с.
Деррида Ж. О грамматологии / пер. с фр., вст. ст. Н.С. Автономовой. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 с.
Кралечкин Д. О сургуче и капусте // Логос. 2014. № 4(100). С. 293–318.
Камю А. Миф о Сизифе / пер. с фр. В. Великовского // Камю А. Творчество и свобода: сб. М.: Радуга, 1990. С. 29–109.
Мейясу К. Время без становления // Гефтер. 2013. 14 фев. URL: http://gefter.ru/archive/7657 (дата обращения: 10.10.2019).
Харман Г. О замещающей причинности // Новое литературное обозрение. 2012. № 2(114). С. 75–90.
Харман Г. Сети и ассамбляжи: Возрождение вещей y Латура и Деланда // Логос. 2017. Т. 27, № 3(118). С. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-1-32
Харман Г. Четвероякий объект. Метафизика вещей после Хайдеггера. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2015. 152 с.
Шавиро С. Вселенная вещей // Логос. 2017. Т. 27, № 3(118). С. 127–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-127-150
Harman G. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Peru, IL: Open Court, 2005. 283 p.
Harman G. I Am Also of the Opinion That Materialism Must Be Destroyed // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010. Vol. 28, iss. 5. P. 772–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d5210
Harman G. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press, 2009. 248 p.
Harman G. Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011. 256 p.
Harman G. Speculative Realism: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018. 190 p.
Meillassoux Q. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. L., UK: Continuum, 2009. 148 p.
Wolfendale P. Object-Oriented Philosophy: The Noumen’s New Clothes. Falmouth, UK: Urbanomic, 2014. 458 p.
References
Bryant L. (2014). Na puti k okonchatel’nomu osvobozhdeniyu ob’ekta ot sub’ekta [Towards a finally subjectless object]. Logos. No. 4(100), pp. 275–292.
Camus, A. (1990). Mif o Sizife [The myth of Sisyphus]. Tvorchestvo i svoboda, per. s fr. [On Creativity and Liberalism. Trans. from French]. Moscow: Raduga Publ., pp. 29–109.
Derrida, J. (1999). Golos i fenomen i drugie raboti po teorii znaka Gusserlya [Speech and phenomena: and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs, or voice and phenomenon]. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 208 p.
Derrida, J. (2000). O grammatologii. [Of grammatology]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 512 p.
Harman, G. (2015). Chetveroyakiy ob’ekt. Metafizika veschey posle Heideggera. [The quadruple object. The metaphysics of the objects after Heidegger]. Perm: HylePress Publ., 152 p.
Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Peru, IL: Open Court Publ., 283 p.
Harman, G. (2010). I am also of the opinion that materialism must be destroyed. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 28, iss. 5, pp. 772–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d5210
Harman, G. (2012). O zameschauschey prichinnosti [On vicarious causation]. Novoye literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer]. No. 2(114), pp. 75–90.
Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press Publ., 248 p.
Harman, G. (2011). Quentin Meillassoux: philosophy in the making. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 256 p.
Harman, G. (2017). Seti i assamblyazhy: vozrozhdenie veschey u Latura i Delanda [Networks and assemblages: the rebirth of things in Latour and DeLanda]. Logos. Vol. 27, no. 3(118), pp. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-1-32
Harman, G. (2018). Speculative realism: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 190 p.
Kralechkin, D. (2014). O surguche i kapuste [Of sealing wax and cabbage]. Logos. No. 4(100), pp. 293–318.
Meillassoux, Q. (2009). After finitude: an essay on the necessity of contingency. London: Continuum Publ., 148 p.
Meillassoux, Q. (2013). Vremya bez stanovleniya [Time without becoming]. Gefter. Feb. 14. Available at: http://gefter.ru/archive/7657 (accessed 10.10.2019).
Shaviro, S. (2017). Vselennaya veschey [Universe of the objects]. Logos. Vol. 27, no. 3(118), pp. 127–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-127-150
Viatkin, D. (2017). Plazma v sebe: mezhdu ontologiey i epistemologiey [Plasma in itself. Between ontology and epistemology]. Logos. Vol. 27, no. 3(118), pp. 57–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-57-80
Wolfendale, P. (2014). Object-oriented philosophy: the noumen’s new clothes. Falmouth, UK: Urbanomic Publ., 458 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
