Transdisciplinary human study: pillars and collisions
Philosophy «Problematization of the human: an ongoing project» (special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-326-332Keywords:
discourse, history, metaphysics, paradox, problematization, self-organization, synthesis, sacred, transgression, transdisciplinarityAbstract
The transdisciplinary approach to studying the problem of human appears to be the most natural and productive starting point for the situation that modern philosophy finds itself in. In the paper, the problem of human is considered as a paradoxical weird problem directly related to the global problems of our time. In this case, what appears to be an alternative to problem-solving is problematization, which reveals hidden opportunities and existing relationships between different fields of meanings. The question of the method, foundations of integration was brewing over the «long 20th century» simultaneously with the proclamation of the end of fundamental pillars (God, science, history, man), which led to a situation of exhaustion of world outlooks and forced «preconceptionlessness». Overcoming this crisis, cognition is now moving into the trans- and meta- positions, where the opportunities for construction and new paths for syntheses open up. Not only the scientific and philosophical ethos, but the need to involve a wide range of people in the practice of study of human nature requires clarity: transdisciplinarity is not a mere popular intellectual trend (speculative program, discursive game), but an effective method that can work with radicalization, social restrictions, dead ends, etc. The search for ontological foundations and integration with various forms of cultural experience lead «trans-science» to metaphysical problems and the experience of the sacred, the recognition of the role of discourse as the creative being; then the testing of limits needs to be coupled with moderate epistemological conservatism. In its theoretical foundation, transdisciplinarity is based on the effects of self-organization, self-development, and self-learning, which requires the provision of conditions for the production of syntheses and competent trust in the process, which cannot be reduced to the expectation of a miraculous appearance of Deus ex machina. Exploring the paradoxical collisions of transdisciplinarity, it is proposed to consider its rootedness as a historical phenomenon.References
Ардашкин И.Б. «Проблема» и «проблематизация»: соотношение и интерпретация понятий в современной эпистемологии // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2004. Т.307, №4. С.147–150.
Бажанов В.А., Краева А.Г. Феномен трансдисциплинарной когнитивной революции // Российский гуманитарный журнал. 2016. Т. 5, №2. С.91–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2016.2.1
Богатая Л. Трансдисциплинарность: постнеклассический ракурс рецепции // Філософія освіти. 2015. № 1(16). С. 168–182.
Буданов В. Трансдисциплинарные дискурсы постнеклассики: познание, коммуникация, самоорганизация в антропосфере // Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке: подходы, проблемы, перспективы. М.: Изд. дом «Навигатор», 2015. С. 145–159.
Внутских А.Ю., Динабург С.Р. Трансдисциплинарные аспекты философской практики // Вестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2018. № 1. С. 33–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.1.33
Волков В.В., Хархордин О.В. Теория практик. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2008. 298 с.
Гумбрехт Х.У. Производство присутствия: Чего не может передать значение. M.: Новое лит. обозрение, 2006. 184 с.
Касавин И.Т. Социальная онтология и социальная эпистемология // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2014. Т. 40, № 2. С. 74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201440232
Кассирер Э. Опыт о человеке // Проблема человека в западной философии / общ. ред. Ю.Н. Попова. М.: Прогресс, 1988. C. 3–30.
Киященко Л.П. Культурный трансфер — тезаурус тематизации (проблематизация трансдисциплинарности) // Культура и искусство. 2020. № 12. С. 124–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2020.12.34760
Куликова Т.В. Феномен границы // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2010. № 6. С. 381–387.
Метцингер Т. Просвещение 2.0. Интервью с Томасом Метцингером // Философский журнал. 2020. Т. 13, № 2. С. 144–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2020-13-2-144-157
Николеску Б. Скрытое третье и многоликое великолепие бытия // Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке: подходы, проблемы, перспективы. М.: Изд. дом «Навигатор», 2015. С. 62–79.
Свирский Я. Трансдисциплинарность: на распутье между трансцендентным и имманентным // Трансдисциплинарность в философии и науке: подходы, проблемы, перспективы. М.: Изд. дом «Навигатор», 2015. С. 236–251.
Столярова О.Е. Подразумевает ли историческая эпистемология историческую онтологию? // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2018. Т. 34, вып. 3. С. 369–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.305
Фаритов В.Т. Трансгрессия и трансценденция как онтологические перспективы дискурса: дис. … д-ра филос. наук. Ульяновск, 2016. 318 с.
Чеклецов В.В. Диалоги гибридного мира // Философские проблемы информационных технологий и киберпространства. 2021. №1(19). С.99–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philit.2021.1.6
References
Ardashkin, I.B. (2004). [«Problem» and «problematization»: correlation and interpretation of concepts in modern epistemology]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University]. Vol. 307, no. 4, pp. 147–150.
Bazhanov, V.A. and Kraeva, A.G. (2016). [The phenomenon of transdisciplinary cognitive revolution]. Rossiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal [The Liberal Arts in Russia]. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2016.2.1
Bogataya, L. (2015). [Transdisciplinarity: post-non-classical point of view]. Fіlosofіya osvіti [Philosophy of Education]. No. 1(16), pp. 168–182.
Budanov, V. (2015). [Transdisciplinary discourses of a postnonсlassical science: knowledge, communication, selforganization of the anthroposphere]. Transdistsiplinarnost’ v filosofii i nauke: podkhody, problemy, perspektivy [Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects]. Moscow: Navigator Publ., pp. 145–159.
Cassirer, E. (1988). [The experience of man]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoj filosofii [The problem of man in Western philosophy]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 3–30.
Chekletsov, V.V. (2021). [Dialogs of a hybrid world]. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical Problems of Information Technology and Cyberspace]. No. 1(19), pp. 99–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philit.2021.1.6
Faritov, V.T. (2016) Transgressiya i transtsendentsiya kak ontologicheskie perspektivy diskursa: dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Transgression and transcendence as ontological perspectives of discourse: dissertation]. Ulyanovsk, 318 p.
Gumbrecht, H.U. (2006). Proizvodstvo prisutstviya: chego ne mozhet peredat’ znachenie [Production of presence: what meaning cannot convey]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 184 p.
Kasavin, I.T. (2014). [Social ontology and social epistemology]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science]. Vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201440232
Kiyaschenko, L.P. (2020). [Cultural transfer — thesaurus of thematization (problematization of transdisciplinarity)]. Kul’tura i iskusstvo [Culture and Art]. No. 12, pp. 124–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2020.12.34760
Kulikova, T.V. (2010). [The phenomenon of the border]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod]. No. 6, pp. 381–387.
Metzinger, T. (2020). [Enlightenment 2.0. An interview with Thomas Metzinger]. Filosofskij zhurnal [The Philosophy Journal]. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 144–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2020-13-2-144-157
Nikolesсu, B. (2015). [The hidden third and the multiple splendor of being]. Transdistsiplinarnost’ v filosofii i nauke: podkhody, problemy, perspektivy [Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects]. Moscow: Navigator Publ., pp. 62–79.
Stolyarova, O.E. (2018). [Does historical epistemology imply historical ontology?]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosoiya i konfliktologiya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies]. Vol. 34, iss. 3, pp. 369–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.305
Svirskiy, Y. (2015). [Transdisciplinarity: at the crossroads between transcendental and immanental]. Transdistsiplinarnost’ v filosofii i nauke: podkhody, problemy, perspektivy [Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects]. Moscow: Navigator Publ., pp. 236–251.
Vnutskikh, A.Yu. and Dinaburg, S.R. (2018). [Transdisciplinary aspects of philosophical practice]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki [Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Science]. No. 1, pp. 33–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.1.33
Volkov, V.V. and Kharkhordin, O.V. (2008). Teoriya praktik [The theory of practices]. St. Petersburg: European University Publ., 298 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
