Satisfaction with studies and the semantic sphere of personality of students in middle/late adolescence

PSYCHOLOGY

Authors

  • Alexander O. Ryazhkin Chelyabinsk State University, 129, Kashirin brothers st., Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-2-296-304

Keywords:

middle adolescence, late adolescence, semantic sphere of personality, university education, satisfaction with studies, locus of control, students

Abstract

The article studies the correlation between the level of satisfaction with studies and the semantic sphere of personality of students in middle/late adolescence. The changes occurring in the period of adolescence affect all spheres of human psyche and lead to a significant restructuring of the personality. The semantic sphere of personality is an important element of this process. The main purpose of this period is acquisition by a person of a new social role, associated with more independence and autonomy. Mastering a new profession, provided by a university, is of great importance during this process. According to the research hypothesis of this study, there is a correlation between students’ satisfaction with studies and the semantic sphere of personality. Our empirical research aims to identify and study the correlations between the indicators of the semantic sphere and the components of satisfaction with studies of students middle/late adolescence. The sample included 76 students of the first and second years of study aged 17 to 18 years. Correlation analysis showed statistically significant relationships between all indicators, which confirms the hypothesis of the research. An in-depth study of these correlations allows us to conclude that indicators of the semantic sphere of personality that reflect the level of the subjects’ purposefulness, their focus on the future are related to the level of satisfaction with the chosen profession to the greatest extent of all. The indicators reflecting the meaningfulness of the past and present most closely correlate with the components that reflect satisfaction with the upbringing, relationships with fellow students, and living conditions. The level of satisfaction with studies significantly correlates with the indicators of the meaningfulness of the past, present and future in the lives of the respondents, which makes it of central importance. The indicators of semantic sphere showing a person’s control of their own live have the highest correlation with the level of satisfaction with living conditions. The results may be used for optimization of education process in the first years of study at university.

Author Biography

Alexander O. Ryazhkin, Chelyabinsk State University, 129, Kashirin brothers st., Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia

Candidate of Psychology,Senior Lecturer of the Department of Psychology

References

Григоренко Е.Ю. Психологическое благополучие студентов и определяющие его факторы // Экономические и социальные перемены в регионе: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2009. Вып. 2(48). С. 98–105.

Деева Н.А. Рефлексивные механизмы переживания кризиса и изменение ценностно-смысловой сферы: дис. ... канд. психол. наук. Пермь, 2005. 187 с.

Донцов Д.А., Донцова М.В. Психологические особенности юношеского (студенческого) возраста // Образовательные технологии. 2013. № 2. С. 34–42.

Зинченко В.П. Миры сознания и структура сознания // Вопросы психологии. 1991. № 2. С. 15–36.

Каплан Е.А., Ерицян К.Ю. Работа и учеба у студентов вузов: конфликт или фасилитация? // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 4. С. 395–423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.928

Кулагина И.Ю., Апасова Е.В. Развитие личности при обучении в вузе (сравнительное исследование) // Культурно-историческая психология. 2018. Т. 14, № 2. С. 12–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140202

Куриленко Ю.А. Смысловая сфера как структурный элемент личности // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2014. № 2(57). С. 20–23.

Леонтьев А.Н. Избранные психологические произведения: в 2 т. М.: Педагогика, 1983. Т. 1. 320 с.

Леонтьев Д.А. Психология смысла: природа, строение и динамика смысловой реальности. М.: Смысл, 2019. 584 c.

Леонтьев Д.А. Тест cмысложизненных ориентаций (СЖО). М.: Смысл, 2000. 18 c.

Мандель Б.Р. Возрастная психология: учеб. пособие. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2021. 350 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/1065840

Мищенко Л.В. К проблеме диагностики отношения студентов к учебной деятельности // Вестник практической психологии образования. 2007. № 3. С. 122–128.

Мороз В.А., Антюшина Т.Ю. Межличностные отношения студентов, влияющие на процесс становления личности // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016. № 11(4). С. 735–739.

Середа Е.И., Рябова К.С. Удовлетворенность профессиональным обучением как компонент субъективного благополучия студентов вуза // Вестник Псковского государственного университета. Серия: Социально-гуманитарные науки и психолого-педагогические науки. 2013. № 3. С. 171–176.

Тимошкина М.В., Наумова М.В. Мотивы выбора вуза и профессии современной молодежью (на примере первокурсников ЮГУ) // Вестник Югорского государственного университета. 2016. № 1(40). С. 152–157.

Шарок В.В. Эмоционально-мотивационные факторы удовлетворенности обучением в вузе // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2018. № 69. С. 33–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/2

References

Deeva, N.A. (2005). Refleksivnye mekhanizmy perezhivaniya krizisa i izmenenie tsennostno-smyslovoy sfery: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Reflexive mechanisms of experiencing a crisis and value-semantic sphere changing: dissertation]. Perm, 187 p.

Dontsov, D.A. and Dontsova, M.V. (2013). [Psychological features of youthful (student) age]. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii[Educational Technologies]. No. 2, pp. 34–42.

Grigorenko, E.Yu. (2009). [Students psychological well-being and its determinants]. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny v regione: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. Iss. 2(48), pp. 98–105.

Kaplan, E.A. and Eritsyan, K.Yu. (2020). [The job and learning of university students: conflict or facilitation?]. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal]. No. 4, pp. 395–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.928

Kulagina, I.Yu. and Apasova, E.V. (2018). [Personality development in the context of university training: a comparative study]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 12–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140202

Kurilenko, Yu.A. (2014). [Semantic sphere as a personality structure element]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel’nykh organakh [Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement]. No. 2(57), pp. 20–23.

Leont’ev, A.N. (1983). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya: v 2 t. [Selected psychological works: in 2 vols]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., vol. 1, 320 p.

Leont’ev, D.A. (2019). Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy real’nosti [Psychology of sense: nature, structure and dynamics of meaning reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 584 p.

Leont’ev, D.A. (2000). Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsiy (SZhO) [Test of meaningful life orientations]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 18 p.

Mandel’, B.R. (2021). Vozrastnaya psikhologiya [Developmental psychology]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 350 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/1065840

Mischenko, L.V. (2007). [To the problem of diagnosing the students attitude to educational activities]. Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya [Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education]. No. 3, pp. 122–128.

Moroz, V.A. and Antyushina, T.Yu. (2016). [Students interpersonal relationships that influencing to the personal development process]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy [International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research]. No. 11(4), pp. 735–739.

Sereda, E.I. and Ryabova, K.S. (2013). [Satisfaction of professional education as a component of the university students subjective well-being]. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyye nauki i psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of the Pskov State University. Series: Social and Humanitarian Sciences and Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences]. No. 3, pp. 171–176.

Sharok, V.V. (2018). [Emotional and motivational factors of satisfaction with university education]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Psychology]. No. 69, pp. 33–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/69/2

Timoshkina, M.V. and Naumova, M.V. (2016). [Motives of choice of high school and the profession of modern youth (on the example of Ugra State University’s freshmen)]. Vestnik Yugorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Yugra State University]. No. 1(40), pp. 152–157.

Zinchenko, V.P. (1991). [The worlds of сonsciousness and the structure of consciousness]. Voprosy psikhologii. No. 2, pp. 15–36.

Published

2022-06-29

Issue

Section

Статьи