Life chances of youth in a russian megapolis
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-2-274-285Keywords:
life chances, life conditions, megapolis, megalopolis, heterotopia, social inequality, social structure, youth, life opportunities and deprivationsAbstract
Life chances represent a multifaceted phenomenon that encompasses a variable set of opportunities and deprivations, covering four main domains of public life, these determining an individual’s position within the social hierarchy. This article presents the results of theoretical and methodological reflections on studies of Russians’ life chances, highlighting the importance of applying specific approaches for correct interpretation of primary data obtained through surveys of Moscow residents on their subjective satisfaction with objective living conditions. The object of study is the youth of Big Moscow, the subject is the peculiarities of life chances that Muscovites have as inhabitants of a heterotopic megacity. The goal of the article is to identify the characteristics of living conditions and risks for young residents of Moscow as a modern heterotopia for subsequent collection of empirical data on the range of life opportunities and deprivations. Research findings: The data analyzed included both Russian and international scientific publications, as well as Russian studies of youth public opinion. Despite the inequality of opportunities between provinces and capitals, living conditions for Russians, regardless of where they reside, are gradually becoming more equalized. Megacities retain significant advantages, such as access to better educational and medical institutions, but are also a source of unique risks and deprivations, such as social alienation and environmental problems, which make living there less attractive. The uniqueness of Big Moscow as a heterotopic megalopolis, characterized by a high level of cultural and social diversity, complex connections, and technological advancement, underscores the importance of studying life chances within this special social environment. In this context, subjective assessments of satisfaction may diverge from objectively established opportunities and deprivations, and investigating this divergence will allow for a deeper understanding of urban processes and their impact on social inequality.References
Аникин В.А., Каравай А.В., Лежнина Ю.П., Мареева С.В., Слободенюк Е.Д., Тихонова Н.Е. Общество неравных возможностей: социальная структура современной России / под ред. Н.Е. Тихоновой. М.: Весь Мир, 2022. 424 с.
Большой толковый словарь русского языка / сост. и гл. ред. С.А. Кузнецов. СПб.: Норинт, 2000. 1536 с.
Вершинина И.А. Концепция мегалополиса Жана Готтмана // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2019. Т. 25, № 3. С. 36–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-36-48
Дияжев А.В. Жизненные шансы молодежи в условиях неопределенности // Государственная служба. 2024. Т. 26, № 3(149). С. 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-3-82-92
Ефимочкина Н.Б., Мамедов А.К. Эволюция цифровых полей социальных трансформаций мегаполиса // Экономика. Социология. Право. 2021. № 4(24). С. 73–85.
Ильин В.И. «Человеческий капитал» как категория качественной социологии // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 3. С. 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s013216250025139-5
Индекс цифровой грамотности – 2024: цифровая грамотность россиян не растет третий год подряд / Аналитический центр НАФИ. 2025. 29 янв. URL: https://nafi.ru/analytics/indeks-tsifrovoy-gramotnosti-2024-tsifrovaya-gramotnost-rossiyan-ne-rastet-tretiy-god-podryad-/ (дата обращения: 30.01.2025).
Климентьева Е.Н. Одиночество как социальная проблема современной России // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия: Регионоведение: философия, история, социология, юриспруденция, политология, культурология. 2009. № 3. С. 97–101.
Лазарев А.Д., Чирун С.Н. Социология молодежи: монография. Кемерово: Изд-во Кузбас. гос. техн. ун-та, 2006. 183 с.
Мареева С.В. Жизненные шансы жителей столиц и провинций в массовом сознании // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2018. № 6(148). С. 365–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.17
Маскаев А.И., Чикарова Г.И. Современный мегаполис и его влияние на адаптацию профессиональных акторов в России // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия: Регионоведение: философия, история, социология, юриспруденция, политология, культурология. 2017. № 1(194). С. 108–114.
Новые слова и значения: Словарь-справочник по материалам прессы и литературы 70-х годов / под ред. Н.3. Котеловой. М.: Русский язык, 1984. 810 с.
Романова А.П. Современный мегаполис как фронтирная гетеротопия // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета им. В.И. Вернадского. Философия. Политология. Культурология. 2016. Т. 2(68), № 3. С. 51–60.
Середина М.И. Современные мегаполисы мира и их социальные проблемы // Сервис plus. 2011. № 1. С. 23–27.
Стрельникова А.В., Веригина Т.Е. Город технологичный или город «удобный»: урбанистические тенденции и их воплощение (на примере Москвы) // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2023. Т. 32, № 3. С. 6–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038x-2023-32-3-6-27
Фуко М. Другие пространства // Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть: избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью: в 3 ч. Ч. 3 / пер. с фр. Б.М. Скуратова; под общ. ред. В.П. Большакова. М.: Праксис, 2006. С. 191–204.
Харман Г. Сети и ассамбляжи: возрождение вещей у Латура и Деланда / пер. с англ. А.А. Писарева // Логос. 2017. Т. 27, № 3. С. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-1-32
Численность и состав населения / Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781 (дата обращения: 30.01.2025).
Bourdieu P. Condition de classe et position de classe // Archives Européennes de sociologie. 1966. Vol. 7, no. 2. P. 201–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600001417
Gottmann J. Megalopolis: the urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1964. 810 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4537.001.0001
Mayer S.E. What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997. 256 p.
Since Megalopolis. The urban writings of Jean Gottmann / ed. by J. Gottmann, R.A. Harper. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989. 304 p.
The reshaping of America: Social consequences of the changing economy / ed. by D.S. Eitzen, M.B. Zinn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989. 445 p.
Waldfogel J. Social mobility, life chances, and the early years / London School of Economics. CASEpaper 088. 2004. 32 p.
Weber M. Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective / ed. by D.B. Grusky. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994. 768 p.
References
Anikin, V.A., Karavay, A.V., Lezhnina, Yu.P., Mareeva, S.V., Slobodenyuk, E.D. and Tikhonova, N.E. (2022). Obschestvo neravnykh vozmozhnostey: sotsial’naya struktura sovremennoy Rossii [Society of unequal opportunities: the social structure of modern Russia]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ., 424 p.
Bourdieu, P. (1966). [Class condition and class position]. Archives Européennes de sociologie [European Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 201–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600001417
Chislennost’ i sostav naseleniya [Population size and composition]. Federal State Statistics Service. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781 (accessed 30.01.2025).
Diyazhev, A.V. (2024). [Life chances of youth under conditions of uncertainty]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration]. Vol. 26, no. 3(149), pp. 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2024-26-3-82-92
Efimochkina, N.B. and Mamedov, A.K. (2021). [The evolution of the digital fields of social transformations of the megalopolis]. Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Pravo [Economics. Sociology. Law]. No. 4(24), pp. 73–85.
Eitzen, D.S. and Zinn, M.B. (eds.) (1989). The reshaping of America: Social consequences of the changing economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Publ., 445 p.
Foucault, M. (2006). [Of other spaces: utopias and heterotopias]. Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu: v 3 ch. Chast’ 3 [Intellectuals and power: Selected political articles, speeches and interviews: in 3 parts. Part 3]. Moscow: Praksis Publ., pp. 191–204.
Gottmann, J. (1964). Megalopolis: the urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 810 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4537.001.0001
Gottmann, J. and Harper, R.A. (eds.) (1989). Since megalopolis. The urban writings of Jean Gottmann. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 304 p.
Harman, G. (2017). [Networks and assemblages: the rebirth of things in Latour and Delanda]. Logos. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-1-32
Il’in, V.I. (2023). [«Human resources» as a category of qualitative sociology]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3, pp. 32–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s013216250025139-5
Kliment’eva, E.N. (2009). [Loneliness as a social problem of modern Russia]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya [The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series: Region Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Sciences and Culturology]. No. 3, pp. 99–101.
Kotelovaya, N.Z. (ed.) (1984). Novye slova i znacheniya: Slovar’-spravochnik po materialam pressy i literatury 70-kh godov [New words and meanings: A reference dictionary based on the materials of the press and literature of the 70s]. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk Publ., 810 p.
Kuznetsov, S.A. (ed.) (2000). Bol’shoy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [The large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg: Norint Publ., 1536 p.
Lazarev, A.D. and Chirun, S.N. (2006). Sotsiologiya molodezhi [Sociology of youth]. Kemerovo: KuzSTU Publ., 183 p.
Mareeva, S.V. (2018). [Life chances of population in capitals and provinces in mass consciousness]. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 6(148), pp. 365–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.17
Maskaev, A.I. and Chikarova, G.I. (2017). [Modern megalopolis and its influence on adaptation of professional actors in Russia]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya [The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series: Region Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Sciences and Culturology]. No. 1(194), pp. 108–114.
Mayer, S.E. (1997). What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard: Harvard University Press, 256 p.
Indeks tsifrovoy gramotnosti – 2024: tsifrovaya gramotnost’ rossiyan ne rastet tretiy god podryad [Digital literacy index 2024: Russians’ digital literacy has not growed for the third year in a row]. NAFI Research Center. 2025, Jan. 29. Available at: https://nafi.ru/analytics/indeks-tsifrovoy-gramotnosti-2024-tsifrovaya-gramotnost-rossiyan-ne-rastet-tretiy-god-podryad-/ (accessed 30.01.2025).
Romanova, A.P. (2016). [Modern megapolis as a frontier heterotopia]. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiya. Politologiya. Kul’turologiya [Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Cultural Studies]. Vol. 2(68), no. 3, pp. 51–60.
Seredina, M.I. (2011). [Modern megacities of the world and their social problems]. Servis plus [Service Plus]. No. 1, pp. 23–27.
Strel’nikova, A.V. and Verigina, T.E. (2023). [Technological city or livable city: Urban trends and their implementation in Moscow]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 6–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038x-2023-32-3-6-27
Vershinina, I.A. (2019). [Jan Gottman’s concept of megalopolis]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 36–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-36-48
Waldfogel, J. (2004). Social mobility, life chances, and the early years. London School of Economics, CASEpaper 088. 32 p.
Weber, M. (1994). Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 768 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
