Critical thinking as an interdisciplinary scientific problem
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-2-182-195Keywords:
critical thinking, classical rationality, non-classical rationality, post-non-classical rationality, scientific approach, interdisciplinary researchAbstract
Critical thinking is one of the rapidly developing fields in practical pedagogy, state educational policy, personality psychology, and professional activities. However, research on critical thinking has not yet formed a system of scientific approaches, while existing solutions are limited to identifying the disciplines in which critical thinking is studied. Disciplinary division contributes to the accumulation of concepts but does not lead to scientific discussion, competition of theories, or historical change of ideas (i.e., to the emergence of scientific approaches). As an alternative, the paper proposes creation of an interdisciplinary foundation for critical thinking research. The study aims to identify contradictions in existing descriptions of critical thinking research as an interdisciplinary problem and to find a way to resolve these contradictions. Methodologically, the analysis is based on V.V. Matskevich’s concept of approach (strategies and programs in science, politics, or in the organization of life and activity of people through which paradigm structures and mechanisms in cognition and/or practice are expressed) and the system of historical types of scientific rationality proposed by V.S. Stepin (classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical). According to the classical approach, critical thinking is based on objective scientific standards independent of sociocultural context. Non-classical epistemology challenges the universality of these standards, emphasizing the influence of cultural and individual factors. The post-non-classical approach focuses on interdisciplinarity, pluralism, and the adaptability of critical thinking depending on sociocultural and professional contexts. Within these three types of scientific rationality, it becomes possible to identify truly competing approaches implicitly present in critical thinking research (universalism, contextualism, naturalism, constructivism, and others). As a result of the analysis, a three-level system of interdisciplinary critical thinking research is proposed, which allows for combining philosophical, psychological, pedagogical, and other studies to unite efforts in critical thinking research.References
Аршинов В.И. Междисциплинарность как проблема рефлексии современной нано-техно-научной практики // Междисциплинарность в науках и философии: колл. моногр. / отв. ред. И.Т. Касавин. М.: Ин-т философии РАН, 2010. С. 76–92.
Бажанов В.А. Как возможны псевдонауки? Еще раз о вечнозеленой философской проблеме // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2024. Т. 61, № 2. С. 6–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461218
Барбашина Э.В. Критическое мышление в системе высшего образования за рубежом // Идеи и идеалы. 2022. Т. 14, № 4, ч. 1. С. 120–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.1-120-136
Гиринский А.А., Лепетюхина А.О., Пащенко Т.В. Критическое мышление: от гумбольдтовской модели до ФГОС // Образовательная политика. 2022. № 1(89). С. 42–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838x-2022-1-42-52
Калашникова Н.А. Критическое мышление как когнитивная основа формирования социальной идентичности в условиях межкультурного диалога // Власть. 2013. № 11. С. 127–129.
Касавин И.Т. Социальная эпистемология. Фундаментальные и прикладные проблемы. М.: Альфа-М, 2013. 560 с.
Лебедев С.А. Три эпистемологических парадигмы: классическая, неклассическая и постнеклассическая // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки. 2019. № 2. С. 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2019-2-8-21
Лекторский В.А. Эпистемология классическая и неклассическая. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2001. 256 с.
Мацкевич В.В. Подход // Новейший философский словарь / сост. А.А. Грицанов. М.: Изд. В.М. Скакун, 1998. С. 526–527.
Никифоров А.Л. Что такое «постнеклассическая наука»? // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2013. Т. 36, № 2. С. 59–64.
Петракова И.Н. К вопросу о самодостаточности критического мышления // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2021. Вып. 2. С. 188–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6141-2021-2-188-197
Печенкин А.А. Критика понятия «постнеклассическая наука» // Наука как общественное благо: сб. науч. ст. Второго Междунар. Конгресса РОИФН (Санкт-Петербург, 27–29 ноября 2020 г.): в 7 т. М.: Изд-во РОИФН, 2020. Т. 1. С. 43–45.
Платонова С.И. Постнеклассическая эпистемология: основные особенности и перспективы развития // Вестник Ленинградского государственного университета им. А.С. Пушкина. 2012. Т. 2, № 1. С. 71–80.
Поздняков М.В. Критическое мышление: его сущность и присутствие в образовательных программах российских вузов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2023. № 492. С. 68–75.
Степин В.С. Классика, неклассика, постнеклассика: критерии различения // Постнеклассика: философия, наука, культура: колл. моногр. / отв. ред. Л.П. Киященко, В.С. Степин. СПб.: Мiръ, 2009. С. 249–295.
Степин В.С. Типы научной рациональности и синергетическая парадигма // Сложность. Разум. Постнеклассика. 2013. № 4. С. 45–59.
Тарасова К.В., Орел Е.А. Измерение критического мышления студентов в открытой онлайн-среде: методология, концептуальная рамка и типология заданий // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 3. С. 187–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212
An indigenous knowledge mobilization packsack: Utilizing indigenous learning outcomes to promote and assess critical thinking and global citizenship / Negahneewin Research Centre. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2020. 25 p.
Arisoy B., Aybek B. The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues // Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2021. Vol. 92. P. 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
Arum R., Roksa J. Limited learning on college campuses // Society. 2011. Vol. 48, iss. 3. P. 203–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9417-8
Bailin Sh., Siegel H. Critical thinking // The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education / ed. by N. Blake et al. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003. P. 181–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996294.ch11
Barnett R. A curriculum for critical being // The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education / ed. by M. Davies, R. Barnett. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. P. 63–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_4
Chirgwin Sh.K., Huijser H. Cultural variance, critical thinking, and indigenous knowledges: Exploring a both-ways approach // The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education / ed. by M. Davies, R. Barnett. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. P. 335–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_21
Christie M., Asmar Ch. Indigenous knowers and knowledge in university teaching // University teaching in focus / ed. by L. Hunt, D. Chalmers. N.Y.: Routledge, 2021. P. 260–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008330-15
Correa Muñoz M.E., Saldarriaga Grisales D.C. El epistemicidio indígena latinoamericano. algunas reflexiones desde el pensamiento crítico decolonial // Revista CES Derecho. 2014. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 154–164.
Dumitru D. Critical thinking and integrated programs. The problem of transferability // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 33. P. 143–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.100
Ennis R. Critical thinking: a streamlined conception // Teaching Philosophy. 1991. Vol. 14, iss. 1. P. 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19911412
Ennis R. Critical thinking: reflection and perspective (Part I) // Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 2011. Vol. 26, iss. 1. P. 4–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20112613
Facione P.A. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi report). Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 1990. 19 p.
Firt E., Hemmo M., Shenker O. Hempel’s Dilemma: Not only for physicalism // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2021. Vol. 34, iss. 2. P. 101–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2041969
Follman J. Teaching of critical thinking / Thinking–Promises! Promises! // Informal Logic. 1987. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 131–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v9i2.2669
García Franco A., Ferrara Reyes L., Gómez Galindo A.A. Culturally relevant science education and critical thinking in indigenous people: bridging the gap between community and school science // Critical thinking in biology and environmental education: Facing challenges in a post-truth world / ed. by B. Puig, M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. Cham, CH: Springer, 2022. P. 55–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92006-7_4
Halpern D.F. Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring // American Psychologist. 1998. Vol. 53, iss. 4. P. 449–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.53.4.449
Halpern D.F., Sternberg R.J. An introduction to critical thinking: Maybe it will change your life // Critical thinking in psychology / ed. by R.J. Sternberg, D.F. Halpern. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020. P. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.002
Heard J., Scoular C., Duckworth D., Ramalingam D., Teo I. Critical thinking: Definition and structure / Australian council for educational research. 2020. 9 p. URL: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=ar_misc (accessed: 25.02.2025).
Hitchcock D. Critical Thinking // The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy / ed. by E.N. Zalta, U. Nodelman. 2018. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/critical-thinking (accessed: 25.02.2025).
Inoue Y. Critical thinking and diversity experiences: a connection / American educational research association. 2005. 13 p. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490360.pdf (accessed: 25.02.2025).
Informal logic: the first international symposium / ed. by J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson. Inverness, CA: Edgepress, 1980. 172 p.
Johnson R.H. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. 406 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606174
Lipman M. Thinking in education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 318 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840272
McGuirk J. Embedded rationality and the contextualisation of critical thinking // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2021. Vol. 55, iss. 4–5. P. 606–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12563
McPeck J.E. Critical thinking and education. N.Y.: St. Martin’s Press, 1981. 170 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463698
McPeck J.E. Critical thinking and subject specificity: A reply to Ennis // Educational Researcher. 1990. Vol. 19, no. 4. P. 10–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x019004010
Noone Ch., Bunting B., Hogan M.J. Does mindfulness enhance critical thinking? Evidence for the mediating effects of executive functioning in the relationship between mindfulness and critical thinking // Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. Vol. 6. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043/pdf (accessed: 25.02.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043
Nyeu M.T. From indigenous elders’ stories to a critical thinking curriculum: a discussion-based literacy intervention using indigenous students’ cultural narratives: doctoral dissertation / Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard, 2020. 216 p.
Paul R., Elder L. The thinker’s guide to intellectual standards: The words that name them and the criteria that define them. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. 74 p.
Siegel H. Critical thinking as an educational ideal // The Educational Forum. 1980. Vol. 45, no. 1. P. 7–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728009336046
Siegel H. Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education. N.Y.: Routledge, 1988. 192 p.
Sockbeson R. Indigenous research methodology: Gluskabe’s encounters with epistemicide // Postcolonial Directions in Education. 2017. Vol. 6, iss. 1. P. 1–27.
Steger M.B. Reflections on «critical thinking» in global studies // ProtoSociology. 2016. Vol. 33. P. 19–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology2016332
References
Arisoy, B. and Aybek, B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 92, pp. 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
Arshinov, V.I. (2010). [Interdisciplinarity as a problem of reflection of modern nano-techno-scientific practice]. Mezhdistsiplinarnost’ v naukakh i filosofii, otv. red. I.T. Kasavin [I.T. Kasavin (ed.) Interdisciplinarity in sciences and philosophy]. Moscow: IPh RAS Publ., pp. 76–92.
Arum, R. and Roksa, J. (2011). Limited learning on college campuses. Society. Vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 203–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9417-8
Bailin, Sh. and Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. N. Blake et al. (eds.) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ., pp. 181–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996294.ch11
Barbashina, E.V. (2022). [Critical thinking system of higher education abroad]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. Vol. 14, no. 4, part 1, pp. 120–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.1-120-136
Barnett, R. (2015). A curriculum for critical being. M. Davies, R. Barnett (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., pp. 63–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_4
Bazhanov, V.A. (2024). [How are pseudosciences possible? Once again about the evergreen philosophical problem]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 6–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461218
Blair, J.A. and Johnson, R.H. (eds.) (1980). Informal logic: The first international symposium. Inverness: Edgepress Publ., 172 p.
Chirgwin, Sh.K. and Huijser, H. (2015). Cultural variance, critical thinking, and indigenous knowledges: Exploring a both-ways approach. M. Davies, R. Barnett (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., pp. 335–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_21
Christie, M. and Asmar, Ch. (2021). Indigenous knowers and knowledge in university teaching. L. Hunt, D. Chalmers (eds.) University teaching in focus. New York: Routledge Publ., pp. 260–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008330-15
Correa Muñoz, M.E. and Saldarriaga Grisales, D.C. (2014). [The Latin American Indian epistemicide: Some thoughts from decolonial critical thinking]. Revista CES Derecho. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 154–164.
Dumitru, D. (2012). Critical thinking and integrated programs. The problem of transferability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 33, pp. 143–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.100
Ennis, R. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy. Vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil19911412
Ennis, R. (2011). Critical thinking: reflection and perspective (Part I). Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. Vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 4–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20112613
Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi report). Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 19 p.
Firt, E., Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O. (2021). Hempel’s dilemma: Not only for physicalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 34, iss. 2, pp. 101–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2041969
Follman, J. (1987). Teaching of critical thinking / Thinking–Promises! Promises! Informal Logic. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v9i2.2669
García Franco, A., Ferrara Reyes, L. and Gómez Galindo, A.A. (2022). Culturally relevant science education and critical thinking in indigenous people: Bridging the gap between community and school science. B. Puig, M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (eds.) Critical thinking in biology and environmental education: Facing challenges in a post-truth world. Cham, CH: Springer Publ., pp. 55–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92006-7_4
Girinskiy, A.A., Lepetyukhina, A.O. and Paschenko, T.V. (2022). [Critical thinking: from the Humboldt model to the FGOS]. Obrazovatel’naya politika [Educational Policy]. No. 1(89), pp. 42–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838x-2022-1-42-52
Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist. Vol. 53, iss. 4, pp. 449–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.53.4.449
Halpern, D.F. and Sternberg, R.J. (2020). An introduction to critical thinking: Maybe it will change your life. R.J. Sternberg, D.F. Halpern (eds.) Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.002
Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D. and Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Definition and structure. Australian council for educational research. 9 p. Available at: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=ar_misc (accessed 25.02.2025).
Hitchcock, D. (2018). Critical thinking. E.N. Zalta, U. Nodelman (eds.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/critical-thinking (accessed 25.02.2025).
Inoue, Y. (2005). Critical thinking and diversity experiences: a connection. American educational research association. 13 p. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490360.pdf (accessed 25.02.2025).
Johnson, R.H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ., 406 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606174
Kalashnikova, N.A. (2013). [Critical thinking as a cognitive basis for the formation of social identity in the context of intercultural dialogue]. Vlast’ [The Authority]. No. 11, pp. 127–129.
Kasavin, I.T. (2013). Sotsial’naya epistemologiya. Fundamental’nyye i prikladnyye problemy [Social epistemology. Fundamental and applied problems]. Moscow: Alfa-M Publ., 560 p.
Lebedev, S.A. (2019). [Three epistemological paradigms: classical, non-classical, and post-nonclassical]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophy]. No. 2, pp. 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2019-2-8-21
Lektorsky, V.A. (2001). Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya [Classical and non-classical epistemology]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 256 p.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 318 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840272
Matskevich, V.V. (1998). [Approach]. Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar’, pod red. A.A. Gritsanova [A.A. Gritsanov (ed.) The latest philosophical dictionary]. Moscow: V.M. Skakun Publ., pp. 526–527.
McGuirk, J. (2021). Embedded rationality and the contextualisation of critical thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 55, iss. 4–5, pp. 606–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12563
McPeck, J.E. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 170 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463698
McPeck, J.E. (1990). Critical thinking and subject specificity: A reply to Ennis. Educational Researcher. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 10–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x019004010
Negahneewin Research Centre (2020). An indigenous knowledge mobilization packsack: Utilizing indigenous learning outcomes to promote and assess critical thinking and global citizenship. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario Publ., 25 p.
Nikiforov, A.L. (2013). [What is «post-nonclassical science»?]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 59–64.
Noone, Ch., Bunting, B. and Hogan, M.J. (2016). Does mindfulness enhance critical thinking? Evidence for the mediating effects of executive functioning in the relationship between mindfulness and critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 6. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043/pdf (accessed 25.02.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043
Nyeu, M.T. (2020). From indigenous elders’ stories to a critical thinking curriculum: a discussion-based literacy intervention using indigenous students’ cultural narratives: doctoral dissertation. Harvard, Harvard Graduate School of Education, 216 p.
Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2008). The thinker’s guide to intellectual standards: the words that name them and the criteria that define them. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publ., 74 p.
Pechenkin, A.A. (2020). [Criticism of the conception of post nonclassical science]. Nauka kak obschestvennoe blago: sbornik nauchnykh statey Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa ROIFN (Sankt-Peterburg, 27–29 noyabrya 2020 g.): v 7 t. [Science as a public good: collection of scientific articles of the Second International Congress of RSHPS (St. Petersburg, November 27–29, 2020): in 7 vols]. М.: RSHPS Publ., vol. 1, pp. 43–45.
Petrakova, I.N. (2021). [To the question of self-sufficiency critical thinking]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Tula State University. Film Humanities]. Iss. 2, pp. 188–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6141-2021-2-188-197
Platonova, S.I. (2012). [Post-nonclassical epistemology: key features and development prospects]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina [Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal]. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–80.
Pozdnyakov, M.V. (2023). [Critical thinking: its essence and presence in the educational programs of Russian universities]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. No. 492, pp. 68–75.
Siegel, H. (1980). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. The Educational Forum. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 7–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728009336046
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge Publ., 192 p.
Sockbeson, R. (2017). Indigenous research methodology: Gluskabe’s encounters with epistemicide. Postcolonial Directions in Education. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 1–27.
Steger, M.B. (2016). Reflections on «critical thinking» in global studies. ProtoSociology. Vol. 33, pp. 19–40. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology2016332
Stepin, V.S. (2009). [Classics, non-classics, post-nonclassics: criteria of distinction]. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura, otv. red. L.P. Kiyashchenko, V.S. Stepin [L.P. Kiyashchenko, V.S. Stepin (eds.) Post-nonclassics: Philosophy, science, culture]. St. Petersburg: Mir Publ., pp. 249–295.
Stepin, V.S. (2013). [Types of scientific rationality and synergetic paradigm]. Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika [Complexity. Mind. Post-nonclassics]. No. 4, pp. 45–59.
Tarasova, K.V. and Orel, E.A. (2022). [Measuring students’ critical thinking in online environment: methodology, conceptual framework, and tasks typology]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies. Moscow]. No. 3, pp. 187–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
