The ideas of the person of work in classical sociology of organization management: Frederik Taylor and Elton Mayo
Sociology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-412-420Keywords:
sociology of the organization management, principles of management, image of the person of work, technocratic utopia, doctrine of the human relations, labor motivationAbstract
This paper purposes to generalize, systematize and clarify the basic concepts of sociology of the organization management representing an image of the person of work on the basis of the comparative analysis of two most famous scientists of the classical period of the theory of management — Frederik Winslow Taylor and George Elton Mayo. The axiological and methodological base of distinction of their theories are analyzed in the paper. Taylor describes the person of work as the one-dimensional object induced only by material benefit or fear of losing a job. It leads to the constant conflicts between workers and administration for settlement of which efforts of specially trained experts designed to develop and introduce rational methods of the scientific organization of work are necessary. Choosing priorities of production process Taylor gives strong preference to the technical equipment and technology, trying to adapt abilities and possibilities of the specific worker for them. It allows interpreting his theory as a technocratic utopia. Mayo represents the person of work as full partner of administration in achievement of common goals of the organization as the multidimensional personality induced to work by various motives of mainly social and psychological character. The main priority of administration in the theory of Mayo is the comprehensive development of social skills cooperation, as achievement of this purpose promotes not only success and prosperity of the organization, but also decrease in social tension in society in general. The comparative analysis, presented in the article, allows drawing a conclusion that both administrative doctrines are developed in the contemporary theory and practice of management in parallel. The sociology of the organization management is aimed at making and proving the choice of priorities between a technocratic utopia of Taylor and the humanistic doctrine of Mayo.References
Бакурадзе А.Б., Бондарева А.В. Аксиологические основания эволюции управления // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия: Философия. 2015. № 1. С. 26–38.
Ильиных С.А. Гендерная теория управления // Идеи и идеалы. 2012. № 2(12), т. 1. С. 115–126.
Ильиных С.А. Социология управления: роль зарубежных школ в становлении // Идеи и идеалы. 2015. № 2(24), т. 1. С. 94–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2015-2.1-94-106
Камышева О.В., Давлетова Э.Р. Классика науки об управлении на службе у современных менеджеров сервисных организаций // Science Time. 2015. № 2(14). С. 62–66.
Кочеткова А.И., Кочетков П.Н. Системные аспекты управления по ценностям // Перспективы науки. 2018. № 10(109). С. 164–169.
Панова А.С., Чижанькова И.В. Концепция «человеческих отношений» Элтона Мэйо // Материалы Ивановских чтений. 2017. № 4(1). С. 93–99.
Резанович Е.А. Влияние философских учений на формирование подходов к управлению // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2016. Т. 6, № 11А. С. 39–48.
Строкина В.Ю., Фокичева А.А. Применение классической теории менеджмента к управлению гидрометеорологическими рисками // Информационные технологии и системы: управление, экономика, транспорт, право. 2015. № 2(16). С. 63–67.
Тейлор Ф.У. Принципы научного менеджмента. М.: Контроллинг, 1991. 104 с.
Тейлор Ф.У. Научная организация труда // Файоль А., Эмерсон Г., Тейлор Ф., Форд Г. Управление — это наука и искусство. М.: Республика, 1992. С. 222–305.
Фрезе А.В. Концепции теории организации и управления // Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и управление. 2015. № 4(23). С. 86–89.
Червякова Е.В. Возможность использования классических теорий мотивации в управлении современными российскими организациями // Инновационные подходы к решению социально-экономических, правовых и педагогических проблем в условиях развития современного общества: материалы I Междунар. науч.-практ. конференции. Старый Оскол, 2015. С. 184–189.
Шухно Е.В. Организационная культура государственных научных учреждений и ее роль в карьере молодых ученых // Социология науки и технологий. 2018. Т. 9, № 2. С. 95–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2018-10007
Эмерсон Г. Двенадцать принципов производительности // Файоль А., Эмерсон Г., Тейлор Ф., Форд Г. Управление — это наука и искусство. М.: Республика, 1992. С. 87–221.
Arsenyev Yu., Minaev V., Leskovsky I., Konovalov A., Davydova T. Management of Investments in Human Capital in Situations of Uncertainty Based on Methods of Utility Theory // 3rd International Conference «Role of Nonmaterial Factors in Ensuring the Social and Psychological Condition of a Society». Sheffield, UK, 2015. P. 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15350/UK_5/3
Arpentieva M.R. Intersubjective Technology in Management Ontology // Science and Technology. 2017. No. 1, vol. 2. Р. 116–139.
Mayo E. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946. 194 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487273
Mayo E. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. N.Y.: Longmans, 1945. 453 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1335838
Sakhno E.Yu., Moroz N.V., Ponomarenko S.I. Use of the Urban Logic Theory with Development Projects Management // Науковiй вiсник Полiсся. 2018. № 3(15). P. 119–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2018-3(15)-119-126
Shevchuk V. O. Problems of management by balanced long-term economic development through physical economy // Облiк i фiнанси. 2016. № 4(74). P. 145–152.
Taylor F.W. The Principles of scientific management. N.Y.; London: Harper & Brothers, 1911. 152 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2221959
References
Arsen’ev, Yu., Minaev, V., Leskovskiy, I., Konovalov, A. and Davydova, T. (2015). Management of investments in human capital in situations of uncertainty based on methods of utility theory. 3rd International Conference «Role of Nonmaterial Factors in Ensuring the Social and Psychological Condition of a Society». Sheffield, pp. 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15350/UK_5/3
Arpentieva, M.R. (2017). Intersubjective technology in management ontology. Science and technology. No. 1, vol. 2, pp. 116–139.
Bakuradze, A.B. and Bondareva, A.V. (2015). Aksiologicheskie osnovaniya evolyutsii upravleniya [Axiological bases of evolution of steering]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Tver State University. Series: Philosophy]. No. 1, pp. 26–38.
Chervyakova, E.V. (2015). Vozmozhnost’ ispol’zovaniya klassicheskikh teoriy motivatsii v upravlenii sovremennymi rossiyskimi organizatsiyami [Possibility of use of classical theories of motivation in steering of the modern Russian organizations]. Innovatsionnye podkhody k resheniyu sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh, pravovykh i pedagogicheskikh problem v usloviyakh razvitiya sovremennogo obschestva: materialy I mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Innovative approaches to the solution of social and economic, legal and pedagogical problems in the conditions of development of modern society: proc. of the I International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Stary Oskol, pp. 184–189.
Emerson, G. (1992). Dvenadtsat’ printsipov proizvoditel’nosti [Twelve principles of productivity]. Fayolle A., Emerson G., Taylor F.W., Ford G. Upravleniye — eto nauka i iskusstvo [Fayolle A., Emerson G., Taylor F.W., Ford G. Management is science and art]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., pp. 87–221.
Freze, A.V. (2015). Kontseptsii teorii organizatsii i upravleniya [The concepts of theory of management]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Economics and Management]. No. 4(23), pp. 86–89.
Il’inykh, S.A. (2012). Gendernaya teoriya upravleniya [Gender theory of steering]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. No. 2(12), vol. 1, pp. 115–126.
Il’inykh, S.A. (2015). Sotsiologiya upravleniya: rol’ zarubezhnykh shkol v stanovlenii [Sociology of management: the role of foreign schools in its developing]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. No. 2(24), vol. 1, pp. 94–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2015-2.1-94-106
Kamysheva, O.V. and Davletova, E.R. (2015). Klassika nauki ob upravlenii na sluzhbe u sovremennykh menedzherov servisnykh organizatsiy [Classics of science about steering on service of modern managers of the service organizations]. Science Time. No. 2(14), pp. 62–66.
Kochetkova, A.I. and Kochetkov, P.N. (2018). Sistemnye aspekty upravleniya po tsennostyam [System aspects of value management]. Perspektivy nauki [Science Prospects]. No. 10(109), pp. 164–169.
Mayo, E. (1946). The human problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Harvard University Press, 194 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487273
Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Longmans, 453 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1335838
Panova, A.S. and Chizhan’kova, I.V. (2017). Kontseptsiya «chelovecheskikh otnosheniy» Eltona Mayo [The concept of «human relations» Elton Mayo]. Materialy Ivanovskikh chteniy [Proceedings of the conference Ivanovo reading]. No. 4(1), pp. 93–99.
Rezanovich, E.A. (2016). Vliyanie filosofskikh ucheniy na formirovanie podkhodov k upravleniyu [Philosophy’s influence on the management approaches]. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow]. Vol. 6, no. 11A, pp. 39–48.
Sakhno, E.Yu., Moroz, N.V. and Ponomarenko, S.I. (2018). Use of the urban logic theory with development projects management. Naukoviy visnyk Polissya [Scientific Bulletin of Polissia]. No. 3(15), pp. 119–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2018-3(15)-119-126
Shevchuk, V.O. (2016). Problems of management by balanced long-term economic development through physical economy. Oblik i finansy [Accounting and Finance]. No. 4(74), pp. 145–152.
Shukhno, E.V. (2018). Organizatsionnaya kul’tura gosudarstvennykh nauchnykh uchrezhdeniy i ee rol’ v kar’ere molodykh uchenykh [Organizational culture of the state scientific institutions and its role in career of young scientists]. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy [Sociology of Science and Technology]. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 95–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2018-10007
Strokina, V.Yu. and Fokicheva, A.A. (2015). Primenenie klassicheskoy teorii menedzhmenta k upravleniyu gidrometeorologicheskimi riskami [Application of the classical theory of management to steering of hydrometeorological risks]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i sistemy: upravlenie, e’konomika, transport, pravo [Information Technologies and Systems: Management, Economy, Transport, Law]. No. 2(16), pp. 63–67.
Taylor, F.W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, London: Harper & Brothers Publ., 152 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2221959
Taylor, F.W. (1991). Printsipy nauchnogo menedzhmenta [The principles of scientific management]. Moscow: Controlling Publ., 104 p.
Taylor, F.W. (1992). Nauchnaya organizatsiya truda [The scientific organization of work]. Fayolle A., Emerson G., Taylor F.W., Ford G. Upravleniye — eto nauka i iskusstvo [Fayolle A., Emerson G., Taylor F.W., Ford G. Management is science and art]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., pp. 222–305.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
