Basic ideas and concepts of feminist social epistemology

Philosophy

Authors

  • Olga Alexandrovna Voronina Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya str. Moscow, 109240, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-2-141-151

Keywords:

feminism, epistemology, women’s experience, gender, power, postmodernism, decolonialism

Abstract

Feminist epistemology focuses on the study of how the gender system affects the concept of knowledge,the knowing subject and practices of research. Feminist philosophers identify ways in which the dominant conceptions and practices of knowledge attribution, acquisition, and justification systematically disadvantage women and other subordinated groups. Feminist epistemology argues that dominant knowledge practices are based on denying women’s epistemic authority, on the denigration of «feminine» cognitive styles and ways of knowing; on the creation of social theories that ignore the experiences of women and their interests, or doing gender power relations invisible. Moreover, such practices frequently produce knowledge that is not good for people in a subordinate position or even reinforce gender and other social hierarchies. Feminist epistemology challenges the effectiveness of many a priori accepted theses of classical science, e.g. objectivity, needed for social and emotional detachment of the knowing subject from the object etc. The central thesis of feminist epistemology is that the subject of cognition is always situated in a specific socio-cultural and personal situation, which inevitably leads to the temporality of cognition. That is why feminist philosophers have focused ondetermining the role of social and political values in research; evaluating ideals of objectivity and rationality; the recognition of epistemic values, ways of knowing, referred to as symbolically feminine; the necessity of reforming structures of epistemic authority. The author analyzes how these ideas have been explicated in different schools of feminist epistemology — feminist position epistemology, empiricism, postmodern and decolonialist directions. The author believes that despite the debatable nature of problems and methods discussed in feminist epistemology, it is necessary to recognize the importance of its heuristic and social potential. 

Author Biography

Olga Alexandrovna Voronina, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya str. Moscow, 109240, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy,Leading Researcher (Professor) of the Departmentof Philosophy of Culture

References

Мотрошилова Н.В. «Социальная эпистемология»: новые проблемы, дискуссии и дихотомии // Ценности и смыслы. 2011. № 5. С. 5−31.

Социальная эпистемология: идеи, методы, программы / под ред. И.Т. Касавина. М.: Канон+, 2010. 712 с.

Деблассио А. Новые тенденции в альтернативных эпистемологиях // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. Т.23, №. 160−

Potter E. Feminism and Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. L.; N.Y.: Routledge: Taylor & Fransis Group, 2006. 206 p.

Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge / ed. by G. McCanney. N.Y.:New York University Press, 1988. 200 p.

Keller E.F. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985. 193 p.

Feminist Approaches to Science / ed. by R. Bleier. N.Y.: Pergamon Press, 1986. 212 p.

Феминизм: перспективы социального знания / под ред. О.А. Ворониной. М.: ИФ РАН-ИНИОН РАН, 1992.242 с.

Haslanger S. Ontology and Social Construction // Philosophical Topics. 1995. Vol. 23. P. 95–125. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics19952324.

Haraway D.Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Priviledge of Partial Perspective // Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. N.Y.: Routledge, 1991. P.183−203.

Bordo S. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987. 160 p.

ВоронинаО.А. Оппозиция материи и духа: гендерный аспект // Вопросы философии. 2007. №56−66.

Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science / ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 332 p.

Harding S. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: «What is “Strong Objectivity?”» // Feminist Epistemologies / eds. L. Alcoff, E. Potter. N.Y.: Routledge, 1993. P. 49–82.

Longino H. Subjects, Power and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science // Feminist Epistemology / eP. 101–120.

ЛешкевичТ.Г. Философия науки: традиции и новации. В чем специфика эпистемологии, гносеологии, методологии и философии науки? Эпистемология как «департамент мысли» / Библиотека «Полка букиниста». URL: http://society.polbu.ru/leshkevich_sciencephilo/ch02_i.html (дата обращения: 26.02.2017).

Anderson E. Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce // Hypatia. 2004. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 1–24.DOI:

Belenky M.F., Clinchy B.M., Goldberger N.R., Mattuck T.Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. L.: Basic Books Inc., 1986. 256 p.

ПеченкинА.А. От Куайна к феминистскому эмпиризму: кризис эпистемологии в современной философии науки // Философские искания: Московско-Петербургский сборник. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та,С. 193–214.

Rose H. Hand, Brain and Heart: a Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences // Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1983. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 73–90. DOI:

Hartsock N.C.M. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and other Essays. N.Y.: Westview Press, 1998. 272 p.

Flax J. Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious // Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science / ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. Vol. 161. P. 245–281.DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48017-4_14.

Smith D. The Conceptual Practice of Power: a Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: North Eastern University Press, 1990. 235 p.

Lugones M., Spelman E. Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for «The Woman’s Voice»// Women’s Studies International Forum. 1983. Vol. 6, iss. 6. P. 573–581. DOI:

Клингер К. Позиции и проблемы теории познания // Пол, гендер, культура / под ред. Э. Шоре, К. Хайдер. М.: РГГУ, 2000. Вып.118−127.

Harding S. The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory // Sex and Scientific Inquiry / ed. by S. Harding, J. O’Barr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. P. 283–302.

Braidotti R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. N.Y.: Routledge, 1991. 336 p.

Feminism/Postmodernism /

Hekman S. Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited // Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1997. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 341–365.DOI: 10.1086/495159.

Fraser N. False Antitheses // Feminist Contentions / ed. by S. Benhabib, J. Butler, C. Drucilla, N. Fraser. N.Y.: Routledge, 1995. P. 59–74.

ТлостановаМ.В. Деколониальные гендерные эпистемологии. М.: ООО ИПЦ «Маска», 2009. 386с.

Lugones M. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system // Hypatia. 2007. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 186−209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x.

Mohanty Ch.T. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses // Feminist Theory: A Reader / ed. by W. Kolmar, F. Bartkowski. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 2000. P. 344–351.

Namaste V. Undoing Theory: The «Transgender Question» and the Epistemic Violence of Anglo-American Feminist Theory // Hypatia. 2009. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 11–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01043.x.

Narayan U. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism. N.Y.: Routledge, 1997. 240 p.

References

Motroshilova N.V. «Sotsial’naya epistemologiya»: novye problemy, diskussii i dikhotomii. [Social Epistemology: New Problems, Discussions and Dichotomies]. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and Meanings]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 5−31. (In Russian).

Sotsial’naya epistemologiya: idei, metody, programmy / pod red. I.T. Kasavina [Social Epistemology: Ideas, Methods, Programs. Ed. by I.T. Kasavin]. Moscow, Kanon Plus Publ., 2010, 712 p. (In Russian).

DeBlasio A. Novye tendentsii v al’ternativnykh epistemologiyakh [New Trends in Alternative Epistemology]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science]. 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 160−172. DOI: 10.5840/eps201023117. (In Russian).

Potter E. Feminism and Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. New York, Routledge, Taylor & Fransis Group Publ., 2006, 206 p. (In English).

Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge. Ed. by G. McCanney. New York, New York University Press, 1988, 200 p. (In English).

Keller E.F. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1985, 193 p. (In English).

Feminist Approaches to Science. Ed. by R. Bleier. New York, Pergamon Press, 1986, 212 p. (In English).

Feminizm: perspektivy sotsial’nogo znaniya / pod red. O.A. Voroninoy [Feminism: Perspectives of Social Knowledge. Ed. by O.A. Voronina]. Moscow, IF RAS-INION RAS Publ., 1992, 242 p. (In Russian).

Haslanger S. Ontology and Social Construction. Philosophical Topics. 1995, vol. 23, pp. 95–125. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics19952324. (In English).

Haraway D. Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, Routledge Publ., 1991, pp. 183−203. (In English).

Bordo S. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany, State University of New York Press, 1987, 160 p. (In English).

Voronina O.A. Oppozitsiya materii i dukha: gendernyy aspekt [Spirit and Matter Opposition: Gender Aspect]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. 2007, no. 2, pp. 56−66. (In Russian).

Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Reidel Publ., 1983, 332 p. (In English).

Harding S. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: «What is “Strong Objectivity?”». Feminist Epistemologies. Ed. by L. Alcoff, E. Potter. New York, Routledge Publ., 1993, pp. 49–82. (In English).

Longino H. Science, Power, Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophy of Science. Feminist Epistemologies. Ed. by L. Alcoff, E. Potter. New York, Routledge Publ., 1993, pp. 101–120. (In English).

Leshkevich T.G. Filosofiya nauki: traditsii i novatsii. V chem spetsifika epistemologii, gnoseologii, metodologii i filosofii nauki? Epistemologiya kak «departament mysli»[Philosophy of Science: Traditions and Innovations. What is the Specificity of Epistemology, Gnosis, Methodology and Philosophy of Science? Epistemology as a «Department of Thought»]. «Bouquiniste’s bookshelf» Library. Available at: http://society.polbu.ru/leshkevich_ sciencephilo/ch02_i.html (accessed: 26.02.2017). (In Russian).

Anderson E. Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia, 2004, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x. (In English).

Belenky M.F., Clinchy B.M., Goldberger N.R., Tarulet J.M. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York, Basic Books Inc. Publ., 1986, 256 p. (In English).

Pechenkin A.A. Ot Kuayna k feministskomu empirizmu: krizis epistemologii v sovremennoy filosofii nauki [From Quine to Feminist Empiricism: the Crisis of Epistemology in the Modern Philosophy of Science]. Filosofskie iskaniya: MoskovskoPeterburgskiy sbornik [Philosophical Searches: Moscow-Petersburg Collection]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2011, vol. 2, pp. 193–214. (In Russian).

Rose H. Hand, Brain and Heart: a Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1983, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 73–90. DOI: 10.1086/494025. (In English).

Hartsock N.C.M. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and other Essays. New York, Westview Press, 1998, 272 p. (In English).

Flax J. Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Reidel Publ., 1983, vol. 161, pp. 245– 281. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48017-4_14. (In English).

Smith D. The Conceptual Practice of Power: a Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, North Eastern University Press, 1990, 235 p. (In English).

Lugones M., Spelman E. Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for «The Woman’s Voice». Women’s Studies International Forum. 1983, vol. 6, iss. 6, pp. 573–581. DOI: 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90019-5. (In English).

Klinger C. Pozitsii i problemy teorii poznaniya [Positions and Problems of Theory of Cognition]. Pol, gender, kultura / pod red. E. Shore, K. Khayder [Sex, Gender, Culture. Ed. by E. Cheaure, C. Heyder]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2000, iss. 2, pp. 118−127. (In Russian).

Harding S. The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory. Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Ed. by S. Harding, J. O’Barr. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1987, pp. 283–302. (In English).

Braidotti R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. New York, Routledge Publ., 1991, 336 p. (In English).

Feminism/Postmodernism. Ed. by L. Nicholson. New York, Routledge Publ., 1990, 360 p. (In English).

Hekman S. Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. Signs. 1997, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 341–365. DOI: 10.1086/495159. (In English).

Fraser N. False Antitheses. Feminist Contentions. Ed. by S. Benhabib, J. Butler, C. Drucilla, N. Fraser. New York, Routledge Publ., 1995, pp. 59–74. (In English).

Tlostanova M.V. Dekolonialnye gendernye epistemologii [De-Colonial Gender Epistemologies]. Moscow, Maska Publ., 2009, 386 p. (In Russian).

Lugones M. Heterosexualism and the ColonialModern Gender System. Hypatia. 2007, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 186−209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527- 2001.2007.tb01156.x. (In English).

Mohanty Ch.T. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Theory: A Reader. Ed. by W. Kolmar, F. Bartkowski. Mountain View, Mayfield Publ., 2000, pp. 344–351. (In English).

Namaste V. Undoing Theory: The «Transgender Question» and the Epistemic Violence of AngloAmerican Feminist Theory. Hypatia. 2009, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 11–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527- 2001.2009.01043.x. (In English).

Narayan U. Dislocating Cultures. Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism. New York, Routledge Publ., 2007, 240 p. (In English).

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

Статьи