Психометрика русской версии шкалы потребности в познании: Психология

Сергей Александрович Щебетенко

Авторы

Сергей Александрович Щебетенко Пермский государственный университет, 614990, Пермь, ул. Букирева, 15

Ключевые слова:

потребность в познании, когнитивные чувства, метакогниции, свойства личности, психометрика

Аннотация

Рассматриваются история 30-летнего использования Шкалы потребности в познании (The Need for Cognition Scale; NCS) и измеряемая с ее помощью потребность в познании. Поднимается вопрос о необходимости разработки русскоязычной версии NCS. На выборке в 482 человека русская версия NCS обнаружила оптимальные значения внутренней согласованности, а также однофакторную модель при некотором занижении собственного значения выделенного фактора и индексов пригодности в конфирматорном факторном анализе. В плане конкурентной валидности потребность в познании положительно коррелировала с открытостью опыту и отрицательно — с правым авторитаризмом. В части инкрементной валидности потребность в познании опосредовала связь открытости опыту с правым авторитаризмом. Обсуждаются полученные результаты и перспективы дальнейших исследований.

Биография автора

Сергей Александрович Щебетенко, Пермский государственный университет, 614990, Пермь, ул. Букирева, 15

кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры общей и клинической психологии

Библиографические ссылки

(1). Altemeyer B. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: JosseyBass, 1988.

(2). Altemeyer B. The authoritarians, 2006. URL: http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/ (date of access: 08.06.11).

(3). Arthur W., Jr. & Day D.V. Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1994. Vol. 54, Р. 394–403.

(4). Axsom D., Yates S.M., & Chaiken S. Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 53. Р. 30–40.

(5). Bakker A.B. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: Need for cognition determinates the impact of message format // AIDS Education and Prevention. 1999. Vol. 11. Р. 150–162.

(6). Barden J., & Petty R.E. The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008. Vol. 95. Р. 489–509.

(7). Baron R.M. & Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 51. Р. 1173–1182.

(8). Blagrove M. & Hartnell S.J. Lucid dreaming: Associations with internal locus of control, need for cognition and creativity // Personality and Individual Differences. 2000. Vol. 28. Р. 41–47.

(9). Bors D.A., Vigneau F., & Lalande F. Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality, and the relation with ability // Personality and Individual Differences. 2006. Vol. 40. Р. 819–828.

(10). Briñol P., Petty R.E., & Barden J. Happiness versus sadness as determinants of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 93. Р. 711–727.

(11). Cacioppo J.T. & Petty R.E. The need for cognition // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982. Vol. 42. Р. 116–131.

(12). Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., & Jarvis W.B.G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition // Psychological Bulletin. 1996. Vol. 119. Р. 197–253.

(13). Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., & Kao C.F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1984. Vol. 48. Р. 306–307.

(14). Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., & Morris K. Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, argument recall, and persuasion // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983. Vol. 45. P. 805–818.

(15). Carter J.D., Hall J.A., Carney D.R., & Rosip J.C. Individual differences in the acceptance of stereotyping // Journal of Research in Personality. 2006. Vol. 40. Р. 1103–1118.

(16). Chang C. Diagnostic advertising content and individual differences // Journal of Advertising. 2007. Vol. 36. Р. 75–84.

(17). Cohen A.R., Stotland E., & Wolfe D.M. An experimental investigation of need for cognition // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1955. Vol. 51. Р. 291–294.

(18). Costa P.T., & McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEOFFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.

(19). Epstein S., & Pacini R. Some basic issues regarding the dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 462–482). New York: Guilford Press, 1999.

(20). Evans L., & Petty R.E. Self-guide framing and persuasion: Responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29. Р. 313–324.

(21). Fleischhauer M., Enge S., Brocke B., Ullrich J., Strobel Al., & Strobel An. Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010. Vol. 36. Р. 82–96.

(22). Graham L.M. Need for cognition and false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm // Personality and Individual Differences, 2007. Vol. 42. P. 409–418.

(23). Haugtvedt C.P., & Petty R.E. Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 63. Р. 308–319.

(24). Haugtvedt C.P., Petty R.E., & Cacioppo J.T. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior // Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1992. Vol. 1. Р. 239–260.

(25). Henningsen D.D. & Henningsen M.L.M. The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups // Human Communication Research. 2004. Vol. 30. Р. 540–555.

(26). Hittner J.B. Alcohol use among American college students in relation to need for cognition and expectations of alcohol’s effects on cognition // Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social. 2004. Vol. 23. Р. 173–187.

(27). John O.P., Donahue E.M., & Kentle R.L. The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 5. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.

(28). John O.P., Naumann L.P., & Soto C.J. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. // O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2008.

(29). Leippe M.R., Eisenstadt D., Rauch S.M., & Seib H.M. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors’ need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004. Vol. 89. Р. 524–541.

(30). Levin I.P., Huneke M.E., & Jasper J.D. Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion-exclusion effects // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000. Vol. 82. Р. 171–193.

(31). Loevinger J. The attenuation paradox in test theory // Psychological Bulletin. 1954. Vol. 51. Р. 493–504.

(32). Maio G.R. & Esses V.M. The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions // Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol. 69. Р. 583–615.

(33). Miniard P., Bhatla S., Lord K.R., Dickson P.R., & Unnava H.R. Picture-based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement // Journal of Consumer Research. 1991. Vol. 18. Р. 92–107.

(34). Olson K.R., Camp C.J., & Fuller D. Curiosity and need for cognition // Psychological Reports. 1984. Vol. 54. Р. 71–74.

(35). Osberg T.M. The convergent and discriminant validity of the Need for Cognition Scale // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1987. Vol. 51. Р. 441–450.

(36). Patrick A. & Durndell A. Lucid dreaming and personality: A replication // Dreaming. 2004. Vol. 14. Р. 234–239.

(37). Petty R.E., Briñol P., Loersch C., & McCaslin M.J. The need for cognition // M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 2009. Р. 318–329.

(38). Petty R.E., Briñol P., Tormala Z.L., & Wegener D.T. The role of metacognition in social judgment // A.W. Kruglianski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2007. Р. 254–284.

(39). Petty R.E. & Jarvis B.G. An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes // N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996. Р. 221–257.

(40). Petty R.E., Schumann D.W., Richman S.A., & Strathman A.J. Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and lowelaboration conditions // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993. Vol. 64. Р. 5–20.

(41). Petty R.E., Tormala Z.L., & Rucker D.D. Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective // J.T. Jost, M.R. Banaji, & D.A. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 2004. Р. 37–51.

(42). Priester J.R. & Petty R.E. Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. Vol. 21. Р. 637–654.

(43). Rucker D.D. & Petty R.E. When resistance is futile: Consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 86. Р. 219–235.

(44). Rucker D.D., Petty R.E., & Briñol P. What’s in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of oneversus two-sided message framing // Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2008. Vol. 18. Р. 137–149.

(45). Ruiter R.A.C., Verplanken B., De Cremer D., & Kok G. Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals : The role of need for cognition // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 26. Р. 13–24.

(46). Sadowski C.J. An examination of the short need for cognition scale // The Journal of Psychology. 1993. Vol. 127. Р. 451–454.

(47). Sadowski C.J. & Cogburn H. E. Need for cognition in the big-five factor structure // The Journal of Psychology. 1997. Vol. 131. Р. 307–312.

(48). Sadowski C. J. & Gulgoz S. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Need for Cognition Scale // Perception and Motor Skills. 1992. Vol. 74. Р. 610.

(49). Sargent M. Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004. Vol. 30. Р. 1485–1493.

(50). Shestowsky D. & Horowitz L.M. How the Need for Cognition Scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations // Law and Human Behavior. 2004. Vol. 28. Р. 305–337.

(51). Smith B.N., Kerr N.A., Markus M.J., & Stasson M.F. Individual differences in social loafing: Need for cognition as a motivator in collective performance // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2001. Vol. 5. Р. 150–158.

(52). Streiner D.L. Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency // Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003. Vol. 80. Р. 99–103.

(53). Stephan J. & Brockner J. Spaced out in cyberspace? Evaluations of computer-based information // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 37. Р. 210–226.

(54). Tidwell P.S., Sadowski C.J. & Pate L.M. Relationships between need for cognition, knowledge, and verbal ability // Journal of Personality. 2000. Vol. 134. Р. 634–644.

(55). Tormala Z.L. & DeSensi V.L. The perceived informational basis of attitudes: Implications for subjective ambivalence // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008. Vol. 34. Р. 275–287.

(56). Tormala Z.L. & Petty R.E. Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: The moderating role of elaboration // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004. Vol. 30. Р. 1446–1457.

(57). Tuten T.L. & Bosnjak M. Understanding differences in Web usage: The role of the need for cognition and the five factor model of personality // Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2001. Vol. 29. Р. 391–398.

(58). Venkatraman M.P. & Price L.L. Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications // Journal of Business Research. 1990. Vol. 20. Р. 293–315.

(59). Virdine J.I., Simmons V.N., & Brandon T.H. Construction of smoking-relevant risk perception among college students: The influence of need for cognition and message content // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 37. Р. 91–114.

(60). Vogel T. & Kutzner F. Finding the susceptible interaction partner: A dyadic perspective on attractiveness advantages. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 2009.

(61). Vogel T., Kutzner F., Fiedler K., & Freytag P. Exploiting attractiveness in persuasion: Senders’ implicit theories about receivers’ processing motivation // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010. Vol. 36. Р. 830–842.

(62). Webster D.M. & Kruglanski A.W. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. Vol. 67. Р. 1049–1062.

(63). Yang Y. & Lee H.J. The effect of response mode, prior knowledge, and need for cognition on consumers’ information acquisition process // Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1998. Vol. 11. Р. 85–103.

(64). Ziegler R., Diehl M., & Ruther A. Multiple source characteristics and persuasion: Source inconsistency as a determinant of message scrutiny // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002. Vol. 28. Р. 496–508.