KURCHATOV'S PIGEON: FIGURATIONS OF (POST)SOVIET NUCLEAR PEACEFULNESS

Authors

  • G. A. Orlova

Keywords:

peaceful atom, Cold War, propaganda, nuclear ethics, nuclear sublime, sociotechnical imaginary, discursive figure, figurations, fiction of authorship, USSR

Abstract

The article discusses the rhetorical, political and ethical entanglements of the atomic age, embodied into a new understanding of the world, as well as into new fragilities and responsibilities. The author notes the epistemological challenges of exploring the discursive production of the peace in the USSR, which is identified as one of the most indoctrinated practices of late socialism. Through the lens of a single slogan, the author analyzes the indirect transitions between ethics and propaganda. The statement “Let the atom be a worker, not a soldier”, which appeared on the banners of demonstrators in the late 1950s and early 1960s and was attributed to the atomic supervisor Igor Kurchatov, became a Soviet atomic imperative and a key figure in the discourse of (post)Soviet atomic peacefulness. The author describes the figuration of the slogan in the context of the confrontation between two systems, nuclear diplomacy and the establishment of a global agenda for the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. The USSR participated in this struggle by promoting the significance of the peaceful atom and defending its moral priority in the propaganda of this brand. The author focuses on the authorship of the statement and reveals its entanglement with the genealogy of morality and the development of an ethical position for a Soviet nuclear scientist between nuclear war and the peaceful atom. The article pays attention to the contribution of the science journalist Vladimir Gubarev to the retrospective restoration of the authorship of the Soviet atomic imperative. By creating this discursive fiction, one of the main chroniclers of the Sredmash project simultaneously engaged in both propaganda and ethical work.  

References

Гордеева И. Возникновение независимого мирного движения в СССР в 1980-е годы // Вестник РГГУ. Политология. История. Международные отношения. 2013. № 1. С. 214–224.

Калинин И., Никифорова Н., Орлова Г. Советское энергетическое воображение: электричество, атом, нефть. СПб.: Астерион, 2022. 317 с.

Мамедова А.О. Символы войны и мира в советском политическом плакате и карикатуре перио-да холодной войны // Вестник Моск. ун-та. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2013. № 1. С. 110–115.

Орлова Г. Трактор в поле дыр-дыр-дыр, / Все мы боремся за мир»: советское миролюбие в брежневскую эпоху // Неприкосновенный запас. 2007. № 4. С. 70‒88.

Рис Н. Русские разговоры. Культура и речевая повседневность эпохи перестройки / пер. с англ. Н. Кулаковой, В. Гулиды. М.: НЛО, 2005. 358 с.

Фролов Ю.В. История создания первой в мире АЭС: выбор проекта // Атомная энергия. 2020. № 1. С. 52‒57.

Холловэй Д. Сталин и бомба: Советский Союз и атомная энергия, 1939‒1956 / пер. с англ. Б.Б. Дьяков, В.Я. Френкель. Новосибирск: Сибирский хронограф, 1997.

Элиас Н. О процессе цивилизации: социогенетические и психогенетические исследования / пер. с нем. А.М. Руткевич. М.; СПб.: Университетская книга, 2001. Т. 1. 330 с.

Юрчак А. Это было навсегда, пока не кончилось. Последнее советское поколение. М.: НЛО, 2014. 61 с.

Agha A. Voice, Footing, Enregisterment // Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 2005. No. 15(1). P. 38–59.

Drogan M. The Nuclear Imperative: Atoms for Peace and the Development of US Policy on Exporting Nuclear Power, 1953‒1955 // Diplomatic History. 2015. No. 40(5). P. 948‒974.

Ferguson F. The Nuclear Sublime // Diacritics. 1994. No. 14(2). P. 4–10.

Guth S. One Future Only. The Soviet Union in the Age of the Scientific-Technical Revolution // Jour-nal of Modern European History. 2015. No. 13(3). P. 355–376.

Hamblin J. The Wretched Atom: America’s Global Gamble with Peaceful Nuclear Technology. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

Israel N. Serving Man: The United Nations Art Collection, Mid-century Modernisms, and the Appari-tion of Universality // Modernism / Modernity. 2020. No. 4(4).

Jasanoff Sh., Kim S. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea // Minerva. 2009. No. 47 (2). P. 119‒146.

Johnston T. Peace or Pacifism? The Soviet Struggle for Peace in All the World, 1948‒54 // Slavonic and East European Review. 2008. No. 86(2). P. 259‒282.

Josephson P. Atomic-Powered Communism: Nuclear Culture in the Postwar USSR // Slavic Review. 1996. No. 55(2). P. 297–324.

Josephson P. Red Atom: Russia’s Nuclear Power Program from Stalin to Today. University of Pitts-burgh Press, 2005.

Kinsella W., Collins A., Endres D. Communicating Nuclear Power: A Programmatic Review // Annals of the International Communication Association. 2005. No. 39(1). P. 277–309.

Krige J. Techno-Utopian Dreams, Techno-Political Realities: The Education of Desire for the Peaceful Atom // Utopia / Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility / eds. by M. Gordin, H. Tilley, G. Pra-kash. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. P. 15–75.

Nye D. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.

Schmid S. Producing Power: The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.

Spiering M. Atoms for Europe // Spiering M., Wintle M. European Identity and the Second World War. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. P. 171–185.

References

Agha, A. (2005), “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment”, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, № 15(1), pp. 38–59.

Drogan, M. (2015), “The Nuclear imperative: Atoms for Peace and the development of US policy on exporting nuclear power, 1953-1955”, Diplomatic History, № 40(5), pp. 948–974.

Elias, N. (2001), O protsesse civilizacii: Sociogeneticheskie i psihogeneticheskie issledovaniya [The civilizing process], vol. 1, Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow; St. Petersburg, Russia, 330 p.

Ferguson, F. (1994), “The Nuclear Sublime”, Diacritics, № 14(2), pp. 4–10.

Frolov, Yu. V. (2020), “History of the creation of the World's first nuclear power plant: choosing a project”, Atomnaya energiya, № 1, pp. 52–57.

Gordeeva, I. A. (2013), “The emergence of the independent peace movement”, Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 1, pp. 214–224.

Guth, S. (2015), “One future only. The Soviet Union in the age of the scientific-technical revolution”, Journal of Modern European History, № 13(3), pp. 355–376.

Hamblin, J. (2021), The Wretched Atom: America’s global gamble with peaceful nuclear technology, Oxford University Press, Nуw York, USA, 336 p.

Israel, N. (2020), “Serving Man: The United Nations Art Collection, Mid-century Modernisms, and the Apparition of Universality”, Modernism / modernity, № 4(4), available at: https://doi.org/10.26597/mod.0139 (accessed: 01.08.2024).

Jasanoff, Sh. & S. Kim (2009), “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea”, Minerva, № 47 (2), pp. 119–146.

Johnston, T. (2008), “Peace or Pacifism? The Soviet «Struggle for Peace in All the World», 1948-54”, Slavonic and East European Review, № 86(2), pp. 259–282.

Josephson, P. (1996), “Atomic-powered communism: nuclear culture in the postwar USSR”, Slavic Review, № 55(2), pp. 297–324.

Josephson, P. (2005), Red Atom: Russia’s Nuclear Power Program from Stalin to Today, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, USA, 352 p.

Kalinin, I., Nikiforova, N. & G. Orlova (2022), Sovetskoe energeticheskoe voobrazhenie: elektrichestvo, atom, neft [Soviet energetic imaginaries; electricity, atom, oil'], Asterion, St. Petersburg, Russia, 317 p.

Kinsella, W., Collins, A. & D. Endres (2005), “Communicating Nuclear Power: A Programmatic Review”, Annals of the International Communication Association, № 39(1), pp. 277–309.

Krige, J. (2010), “Techno-utopian dreams, techno-political realities: The education of desire for the peaceful atom”, in Gordin M., Tilley H. & G. Prakash (eds.), Utopia / dystopia: conditions of historical possibility, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, pp. 15–75.

Mamedova, A.O. (2013), “Symbols of War and Peace in Soviet Political Posters and Cartoons of the Cold War Period”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya, № 1, pp. 110–115.

Nye, D. (1994), American Technological Sublime, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994, 362 p.

Orlova, G. (2007), “«Tractor in a field of holes-holes-holes, We are all fighting for peace»: Soviet peacefulness in the Brezhnev era”, Neprikosnovennyj zapas, № 4, pp.70–88.

Ris, N. (2005), Russkie razgovory. Kul'tura i rechevaya povsednevnost' epohi perestrojki [Russian talk: Culture and conversation during perestroika], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 358 p.

Ryzhov, Yu.A. & M.A. Lebedev (2005), “Scientists of the Academy of Sciences in the Pugwash Movement”, Vestnik RAN, № 6, pp. 491–497.

Schmid, S. (2015), Producing Power: The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 362 p.

Spiering, M. (2011), “Atoms for Europe”, in Spiering M. & M. Wintle, European Identity and the Second World War, Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, pp. 171–185.

Yurchak, A. (2014), Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos'. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [Everything was forever, until it was no more: The last Soviet generation], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 615 p.

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

Orlova Г. А. . (2024). KURCHATOV’S PIGEON: FIGURATIONS OF (POST)SOVIET NUCLEAR PEACEFULNESS . PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 66(3), 197–213. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/9571

Most read articles by the same author(s)