Making the Familiar Unknown ("image of the self" as a Subject of Research). Following the Theme of the 2016 Aseees-mag Convention

Authors

  • O. Bukhina International Association of Humanities
  • N.A. Mitsyuk Smolensk State Medical University
  • N. L. Pushkareva Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

Keywords:

image of the Self, image of Other, ethnic stereotypes, culture, gender, imagology

Abstract

In accordance with the theme of the ASEEES-MAG Convention of 2016, “Images of the Other”, Slavic and American researchers decided to give the title “Images of the Self” to the new summer congress of the International Association for the Humanities (IAC). More than 200 scholars and academics developed their discussions at Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv, Ukraine on 27-29 June 2018. Participants sought to examine how states, societies, interest groups and social movements, as well as individuals, represent themselves, to others as well (using a variety of means, including language, culture, literature, politics of history, and politics as such). As it became evident, images of the self can be found not only in scholarship but in popular writing, artistic expression, and public sphere as well. How does self-representation help to construct stereotypes and instrumentalized narratives? How do resources arise for toler-ance, mutual respect, and cooperation? These issues appear in headlines worldwide, but they seem especially salient in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. This was the goal of a huge international discussion. The participants of the conference discussed how nations could strengthen their ethnic identity, as well as build boundaries between citizens and immi-grants. Anthropologists have repeatedly stressed that ethnic identity is relational, and people define themselves through what sets them apart from other groups. At the conference, it was important to discuss what people thought about other nations, how it helped them shape what they thought of themselves, and how it helped to create a sense of unity that overcame earlier divisions. The Convention was supported by the Open Society Foundation, the New York Carnegie Corporation, the International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), the Association for the Study of Slavic, Eastern Europe-an and Eurasian Cultures (ASEEES), the Lviv City Council, and the Scientific Lviv program.doi 10.17072/2219-3111-2019-1-175-180

Author Biographies

O. Bukhina, International Association of Humanities

Translator, Essayist, Coordinator of the international programs of the American Council of Learned Societies in New York, member of the Executive Committee of the International Association for the Humanities (USA)

N.A. Mitsyuk, Smolensk State Medical University

Candidate of Science in History, Associate Professor, Department of Ancient and Modern Russian History, Perm State National Research University (Russia) 

N. L. Pushkareva, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

Doctor of Science in History, Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Head of the Sector of Ethno-Gender Studies, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia)

References

Библиографический список

Бугайчук Т.В., Доссэ Т.Г. Идентичность как объект исследования социальных наук // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2013. № 3. С. 212–217.

Гордон Л.А., Клопов Э.В. Человек после работы. М.: Б.и., 1972. С. 98.

Мицюк Н.А., Пушкарева Н.Л. Родовспоможение и культура деторождения в новейшей зарубежной историографии (1975–2015 гг. ) // Этнографическое обозрение. 2017. N 4. С.147–163.

Пушкарева Н.Л. Зачем он нужен, этот гендер? // Cоциальная история. 1998/1999: Ежегодник. М.: Б.и., 1999. С. 155–177.

Пушкарева Н.Л., Любичанковский С.В. Понимание «истории повседневности» в современном исто-рическом исследовании: от Школы Анналов к российской философской школе // Вестник Ленин-градского государственного областного университета. 2014. N 1. С. 7–22.

Сергейчик Е.М. Историческая идентичность: территория и карта // Вестник СПбГУ. 2016. Сер. 17, вып. 1. С.63–71.

Тишков В.А. Историческая культура и идентичность// Уральский исторический вестник. 2011. № 2. С. 4–16.

Pushkareva N., Zolotukhina M. Women's and Gender Studies of the Russian Past: two contemporary trends // Women's History Review. 2017. T. 27 (1). P. 71–87.

References

Bugaychuk, T.V. & T.G. Dosse [2013], “Identity as an object of study of social sciences”, Yaroslavskiy peda-gogicheskiy vestnik, № 3, pp. 212–217. Gordon, L.A. & E.V. Klopov [1972], Chelovek posle raboty [Man after work], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 268 p.

Mitsyuk, N.A. & N.L. Pushkareva [2017], “Childbirth and the culture of childbearing in the newest foreign his-toriography (1975–2015)”, Etnograficheskoye obozreniye, № 4. pp. 147-163.

Pushkareva, N. & M. Zolotukhina [2017], “Russian Women's Past: two contemporary trends”, Women's History Review, Vol. 27 (1), рр. 71–87. Pushkareva, N.L. [1999], “Why is it needed, this gender?”, in Sotsial'naya istoriya. 1998/1999: Yezhegodnik, ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, pp. 155–177.

Pushkareva, N.L. & S.V. Lyubichankovsky [2014], “Understanding the "history of everyday life" in modern historical research: from the Annals School to the Russian school of philosophy”, Vestnik Leningradskogo gosu-darstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta, №1, pp. 7–22. Sergeychik, E.M. [2016], “Historical Identity: Territory and Map”, Vestnik SPbGU, Ser. 17, № 1, pp. 63–71. Tishkov, V.A. [2011], “Historical culture and identity”, Ural'skiy istoricheskiy vestnik, № 2, pp. 4–16.

Published

2019-09-27

How to Cite

Bukhina, O., Mitsyuk, N., & Pushkareva, N. L. (2019). Making the Familiar Unknown ("image of the self" as a Subject of Research). Following the Theme of the 2016 Aseees-mag Convention. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 44(1), 175–180. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/2465