Production of Elements of Belt Sets in the Middle Ages (Based on the 2018 Excavation Materials from the Rodanovo Settlement)

Authors

  • N.B. Krylasova Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Yu. A. Podosenova Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
  • A.N. Sarapulov Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University

Keywords:

belt set, production technology, Rodanovo settlement, the Middle Ages, bronze-casting workshop

Abstract

The foundry of the first half of the 11th century discovered in the Rodanovo settlement which was used for the production of parts of belt sets is among the significant discoveries of the field archaeological season of 2018. Belt sets with metal buckles, boom sheets and belt tips were very popular among the inhabitants of the medieval Perm cis-Urals, both men and women. Undoubtedly, there was production of belt sets in the region with a rich copper stock and developed foundry practice which is confirmed, in particular, by the presence of unique local types of boom sheets and buckles. However, direct evidence of the production of those decorations in local workshops was not found. A representative range of defective, unfinished and finished goods, half-finished blanks of separate structural parts of belt sets (castings for pegs) was found in the workshop of the Rodanovo settlement. On the one hand, this collection helped to reconstruct the production technology of various elements of belt sets and the sequence of tech-nological operations from the selection of models for the production to the final rework of goods and their release into use. On the other hand, it was possible to identify some features of the workshop functioning. All technological operations related to founding of belt sets were aimed at obtaining large range of decorations. There was one techno-logical style of the master in the products of the workshop. The style is not only in the same sequence of operations for producing various elements of a belt set and using one instrument but also in using a certain «habitual» for the master metal alloy. The workshop made products based on copying local and imported decorations.doi 10.17072/2219-3111-2019-1-56-72

Author Biographies

N.B. Krylasova, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Science in History, Senior Research Fellow, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia)

Yu. A. Podosenova, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Science in History, Senior Research Fellow, Department of History, Archaeology and Ethnography, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural branch, Russian Acade- my of Sciences (Russia)

A.N. Sarapulov, Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University

Candidate of Science in History, Associate Professor, Acting Head of the Department of National and World History, Archaeology, Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University (Russia)

References

Библиографический список

Белавин А. М., Крыласова Н. Б. Древняя Афкула: археологический комплекс у с. Рождественск. Пермь: Б.и., 2008. 603 с.

Белавин А. М., Крыласова Н. Б. Огурдинский могильник. Пермь: Б.и., 2012. 259 с.

Данич А.В. Поясные накладки Питерского (Степаново плотбище) могильника // Поволжская археология. 2013. №1. С.181–196.

Казаков Е.П. Булгарское село X–XIII веков низовий Камы. Казань: Б.и., 1991. 176 с.

Король Г.Г. «Хойцегорский портрет» рубежа I–II тыс. н.э. и манихейство в Центральной Азии // Мировоззрение населения Южной Сибири и Центральной Азии в исторической ретроспекти-ве. Барнаул: Б.и., 2007. Вып. I. С. 81–99.

Крыласова Н.Б. Хронологические особенности материальной культуры X–XI вв. (по материа-лам Рождественского могильника в Пермском крае) // Вестник Пермского университета. Исто-рия. 2013. №1(21). С. 104–115

Талицкий М.В. Верхнее Прикамье в X–XIV вв. // МИА. 1951.№ 22. С. 33–96.

The Ansient Hungarians. Budapest, 1996. 480 р.

References

Belavin, A.M., Krylasova, N.B. (2008), Drevnaya Afkula: arkheologicheskiy complex u s. Rozhdestvensk [An-cient Afkula: the archeological complex of Rozhdestvenskoye settlement], PSHPU, Perm, Russia, 603 p.

Belavin, A.M., Krylasova, N.B. (2012), Ogurdinskiy mogilnik [Ogurdinskiy burial]. PSHPU, Perm, Russia, 259 p.

Danich, A.V. (2013) "Boom sheets of St. Petersburg (Stepanovo Plotbishche) burial ground", Povolzhskaya ar-cheologiya, №1, pp. 181-196.

Kazakov, E.P. (1991), Bulgarskoe selo X-XIII vekov nizoviy Kamy [The Bulgarian village of the X-XIII centuries in lower reaches of the Kama River]. ILLH KRC AS USSR, Kazan, Russia, 176 p.

Korol’, G.G. (2007), "«Khoitsegorsk portrait» of the turn of the first and second millennium AD and Manichae-ism in Central Asia", in Dashkovskiy P.K. (ed.), Mirovozzrenie naseleniya Yuzhnoy Sibirui i Tsentralnoy Azii v istoricheskoy retrospektive [Worldview of the population of Southern Siberia and Central Asia in a historical retrospective]. Issue I. Barnaul, Russia, pp. 81-99.

Krylasova, N.B. (2013), "Chronological features of material culture of the X-XI centuries (based on materials of Rozhdestvensky burial ground in Perm region)" Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, №1(21). pp. 104-115.

Talitsky, M.V. (1951), "The Upper Kama Region in the X-XIV centuries", in Materialy i issledovaniya po ar-cheologii Urala i Priural´ya. T.3 [Materials and research on the archaeology of the Urals and Cis-Urals, Vol.3], AS USSR, Moscow, Russia, pp. 33-96.

The Ansient Hungarians (1996), Hungarian National Museum, Budapest, Hungary, 480 р.

Published

2019-09-27

How to Cite

Krylasova, N., Podosenova, Y. A., & Sarapulov, A. (2019). Production of Elements of Belt Sets in the Middle Ages (Based on the 2018 Excavation Materials from the Rodanovo Settlement). PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 44(1), 56–72. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/2451